Design Patterns: Badges, Tag Clouds, Huge Fonts
Web 2.0 dominates. Everywhere and all the time. The new design trends are there, in front of you and me, on the blog you’ve come from and on the blog you are going to visit next. Every now and again we find new design elements which somehow manage to become essential for every hip, trendy, glossy, stylish web-site which will be developed in the era of its majesty Web 2.0.
Remember those web-sites with old gray Javascript buttons, huge Comic Sans headers and visible eXtreme counters we used to visit few years ago? Looking at them, and looking at recent developments, one realizes how much actually has changed. But what has changed really – ok, we don’t see those buttons, those headers and those counters. In fact, we see something else.
With this article we start a series of articles about the latest design trends and patterns a web-developer should keep in mind, designing his new web-site.
1,2,3… Start!
Presenting services and end-products to potential customers, web-designers tend to stick to simplicity. The information provided by clients has to be explained in an understandable way. A web-developers should make sure the user understands instantly, what the company is offering, what are users’ adventages and what is actually required for using the service.
What is interesting is the fact that one can see the same familiar form of process visualization over and over again. You don’t see a huge list with requirements (in fact, usually you’ll find them on the bottom of the page, written in font size 7px or even smaller) or detailed .pdf-manuals on a front page. What you usually see are three-steps- and easy-to-go-badges in the center of the pages – they describe exactly what has to be done to use the service in few clicks. The use of graphics is essential and obligatory. Also Flash is often used to attract the attention of the users.
Examples:

friendster.com

fon.com

communitywalk.com

blish.com

dpolls.com
Badges and Flowers
Probably one of the most popular trends in the era of Web 2.0 are “Badges” with various round and square corners and modified flowers, we used to find on milk packages in the 90s.
Examples:

sixapart.com/comet

goowy.com

ajaxload.info

haveamint.com

conversate.org

sidejobtrack.com

zerohex.org

secondsite.biz
Beta
Have you tried to find at least one released Web 2.0 service? Browsing through the swarm of Web 2.0-sites you are more likely to find a beta-version than a released one. Ironically, just like few years ago, new ideas are born every day. But today they are realized instantly – and presented to the public as a beta-version.
Of course, “Beta”-stage delivers many advantages for developers. Being “Beta” means being incomplete and therefore – being allowed to offer the functionality which will – and probably – should be improved in the near future – just the way user would like it to be. In this way it is easier to prevent complaints, gain the attention of curious users and win some time for further development.
The label “Beta” has become some kind of trademark for something new and exciting. Over the last year it has almost become a standard for new projects and is often presented in bright and eye-catching colours together with the logotype of the site – intentionally, of course.
Examples:

clickcaster.com

bubbleshare.com

shozu.com

riya.com

picpix.com

redtoucan.com

mabber.com
Tag Clouds
Tag Clouds can simplify the navigation or confuse the visitors. Used effectively, they can provide help and emphasize the main topics and themes being tackled in a blog. However, sometimes they simply don’t fit and make both readability and usability more difficult: mainly, if web-typography isn’t used properly or basic rules are breached (i.e. line-height hasn’t been defined in em’s, but in px’s).
Examples:

shadows.com

connotea.org

blogmarks.net

imeem.com

browsr.com
Large Input Fields
Not a single web-developer would dare to do it few years ago, especially because not every browser would present input fields properly. In the meanwhile, it isn’t a problem any more and web-developers make use of it. Web forms are changing, legends and fieldsets become more and more popular, and large input fields appear like mushrooms after a rainy day – here some examples of them.
Examples:

Quite unusual design decision. Actually, it is an input field of a search engine seekum.com.

podbop.org

feedpile.com
Huge Fonts
The presentation of headers has become an important style element of every web-page. Image headers tend to be replaced by text-based headers – CSS does its work perfectly. The time of mini-headers is over, the opposite becomes more and more apparent – and sometimes extremely exaggerated. Enormous fonts can be found not only in headers, but also in navigation menus and brief texts.
Examples:

krugle.com

clearleft.com

blog.qype.com

rrove.com
Rounded Corners
Actually, there is a reason why we love rounded corners. This elements simplifies the readability and makes the understanding of presented information easier. In fact, rounded corners are used by emerging web-sites and young projects. All page elements become more round – navigation menus, buttons, input fields, tables and text columns.

Typical examples are web-sites like Ioutliner, Netsquared and Springdoo, which use rounded corners to its fullest effect.

Rounded corners with sharp shadows: cluckoo.com

ning.com

Rounded corners everywhere: zimbra.com




Alexander Kinnunen
September 15th, 2006 12:50 amA really nice article, with great examples!
Deborah
October 10th, 2006 2:07 pmWhat a coincidence. We are both writing about web stuff and we have chosen the same theme. Good taste I guess. Your site is very informative. I found it whilst doing a Google search.
I see by your profile you are involved with the ‘Web Developer’s Handbook’, which is a site I used at one point for resources. Very extensive.
milo
October 22nd, 2006 4:32 pmPretty good article, all new stuff in one hand, thanks.
rajendran
January 17th, 2007 8:55 pmVery good article and a very useful one for designers like me as well. I have bookmarked your site so that I can learn more about the latest happenings. Thanks!
SvT
January 25th, 2007 5:53 pmgood article!) tnx..
Özcan
January 29th, 2007 12:16 amPretty good article, all new stuff in one hand, thanks.
Matt
January 31st, 2007 10:42 pmA good article but how long will it be before badges, huge input fields and tag coulds be a thing of the past? In other words another web “trend”.
Matt Davies
February 16th, 2007 9:07 pmBring on web 3.0! Great article. Cheers!
Piyal Kundu
March 6th, 2007 1:43 amVery nice article. Need more. Thanks
klein
March 14th, 2007 4:56 pmnice information,i will surely use this info in my site designersyard.com, i like this.
navi
March 22nd, 2007 6:53 amnice lists….
It gives me some inspiration,keep on moving forward!!
Güneş
April 13th, 2007 11:24 pmYour site is very informative. I found it whilst doing a Google search.
Harry
June 5th, 2007 5:28 amThese design trends have very little to do with Web 2.0 (other than tag clouds maybe). Mostly these trends have to do with recent “design” ideas that are popular. Everyone is getting on the bandwagon and copying everyone else. That’s not really new either. Rounded corners certainly aren’t new.
Randolph Valencia
June 6th, 2007 12:22 amVery informative post! Good job!
albert
June 20th, 2007 10:59 pmThanks for all inspirations, smashingmagazine is one of my favorite site…
greetings
Albert from cuba
arun bhatia
July 24th, 2007 7:01 amreally nice articles with example. I m realy impressed with the way it was explained.
NIshanthe
August 5th, 2007 1:02 pmGood list with nice examples.
-Nish
TN
August 16th, 2007 9:21 amI think Web 2.0 has a lot to do with web dev catching on to design, layout and information hierarchy – the theory has been around forever, and the things Web 2 is addressing is quite basic, but the basics are good and I can only say it’s about time.
The fact that everything is shinny, or has rounded corners means nothing. It’s like saying bell-bottoms on trousers are integral to the trousers – obviously they aren’t, it’s just a fad. And the same can be said about the current penchant for slick buttons, reflections etc. However the underlying theory behind making information easy to access and comprehend has started seriously on the web, which is good to see.
bincom
October 8th, 2007 9:55 pmHere is a lovely list. Our company website is currently being redesigned and this list is serving as inspiration. Cheers.
Ivy Clark
November 4th, 2007 11:14 amGreat observations! I’ll definitely check back for more. Thanks for sharing. Cheers!
John Smith
November 27th, 2007 11:15 pmwhy not go straight to web4.0
Rajiv
December 27th, 2007 3:08 pmHi this is cool Article. those who are learning Web 2.0 this is very best article to understand Web 2.0
thangaraj
January 11th, 2008 5:02 amI like to see all these good concepts.
john feller
January 18th, 2008 12:28 pmI was under the impression that web 2.0 was about functinality, not fancy-schmancy stripy glossy graphics. And what happened to vowels?!
Seriously, facebook is a good example of web 2.0 (apparently) – being able to rearrange items on the page at will makes the site (or any site that utilizes such a feature) engaging and feels more personal to the user. Modular…ness.
or am i thinking of Web 3.0?
waqas zahoor
January 25th, 2008 9:40 amNice, vary nice
Dean
February 15th, 2008 6:40 amGreat post.
Ive noticed an emerging trend not mentioned here, and one which i believe we will be seeing a lot of in ’08.
Pattern fills. Mostly subtle, ornamental florals, or sometime retro graphic, used in clean flat vector shapes in logos and other graphics.
I’m led to believe its crossed over from interior design and last years trend for using wallpaper as opposed to paint.
One to watch….
Adam
August 13th, 2009 5:01 amExcellent article. Thanks for taking the time to write this up.