Smashing Magazine - we smash you with the information that will make your life easier. really.
Google PageRank: What Do We Know About It?
Everybody is using it, but (almost) nobody really knows how it works. Google PageRank is probably one of the most important algorithms ever developed for the Web. With billions of existing pages and millions of pages generated every day, the search issue in the Web is more complex than you probably think it is. PageRank, only one of hundreds of factors used by Google to determine best search results, helps to keep our search clean and efficient. But how is it actually done? How does Google PageRank work, which factors do have an impact on it and which don’t? And what do we really know about PageRank?
In this article we put the facts straight.
Over the last weeks we’ve done an extensive research and selected dozens of facts and suggestions about PageRank, which seem to be true in practice. Besides, we’ve collected academic papers related to the issue – such as scientific proposals for better search results (such as Topic-Sensitive PageRank); you’ll also find references to mathematical background of PageRank as well as 16 useful PageRank tools you can use to analyze und track the ranking of your web-projects.
Update: we’d like to apologize for some misleading facts we’ve initially included in this article. We’ve re-checked the sources and inaccurate or incomplete data. The .pdf-file won’t contain any mistakes. Thanks to all the readers who’ve pointed us to the mistakes (particularly Dan Grossman and Reuben Yau).
- Update: We are going to publish the .pdf-version of this post soon, so subscribe to our RSS-feed to keep track on our next posts.
- You don’t have to read the whole article. Most important facts are selected in the beginning of the post as a brief summary.
- You might be interested in reading our article Google AdSense: Facts, FAQs and Tools, which should provide you with the most important facts, tools and resources about Google AdSense.
- Update (28.07.2007): Spanish version of this article is available (thanks, Juan Manuel Lemus).

[Offtopic: by the way, did you already get your copy of the brand new Smashing Book?]
Summary: How Does PageRank Work?
- PageRank is only one of numerous methods Google uses to determine a page’s relevance or importance.
- Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B. Google looks not only at the sheer volume of votes; among 100 other aspects it also analyzes the page that casts the vote. However, these aspects don’t count, when PageRank is calculated.
- PageRank is based on incoming links, but not just on the number of them – relevance and quality are important (in terms of the PageRank of sites, which link to a given site).
- PR(A) = (1-d) + d(PR(t1)/C(t1) + … + PR(tn)/C(tn)). That’s the equation that calculates a page’s PageRank.
- Not all links weight the same when it comes to PR.
- If you had a web page with a PR8 and had 1 link on it, the site linked to would get a fair amount of PR value. But, if you had 100 links on that page, each individual link would only get a fraction of the value.
- Bad incoming links don’t have impact on Page Rank.
- Ranking popularity considers site age, backlink relevancy and backlink duration. PageRank doesn’t.
- Content is not taken into account when PageRank is calculated.
- PageRank does not rank web sites as a whole, but is determined for each page individually.
- Each inbound link is important to the overall total. Except banned sites, which don’t count.
- PageRank values don’t range from 0 to 10. PageRank is a floating-point number.
- Each Page Rank level is progressively harder to reach. PageRank is believed to be calculated on a logarithmic scale.
- Google calculates pages PRs permanently, but we see the update once every few months (Google Toolbar).
Summary: Impact on Google PageRank
- Frequent content updates don’t improve Page Rank automatically. Content is not part of the PR calculation.
- High Page Rank doesn’t mean high search ranking.
- DMOZ and Yahoo! Listings don’t improve Page Rank automatically.
- .edu and .gov-sites don’t improve Page Rank automatically.
- Sub-directories don’t necessarily have a lower Page Rank than root-directories.
- Wikipedia links don’t improve PageRank automatically (update: but pages which extract information from Wikipedia might improve PageRank).
- Links marked with nofollow-attribute don’t contribute to Google PageRank.
- Efficient internal onsite linking has an impact on PageRank.
- Related high ranked web-sites count stronger. But: “a page with high PageRank may actually pass you less if it has more links, because it’s spread too thin.” [RY]
- Links from and to high quality related sites have an impact on Page Rank.
- Multiple votes to one link from the same page cost as much as a single vote.
1.1. What is PageRank?
- “PageRank is [only] one of the methods Google uses to determine a page’s relevance or importance.” [PageRank Explained Correctly]
- “Google uses many factors in ranking. Of these, the PageRank algorithm might be the best known. PageRank evaluates two things: how many links there are to a web page from other pages, and the quality of the linking sites. With PageRank, five or six high-quality links from websites such as www.cnn.com and www.nytimes.com would be valued much more highly than twice as many links from less reputable or established sites.” [Google Librarian Central]
- “PageRank has only ever been an approximation of the quality of a web page and has never had anything to do with the measuring of the topical relevance of a web page. Topical relevance is measured with link context and on-page factors such as keyword density, title tag, and everything else.” [PageRank: An Essay]
1.2. How Does PageRank work?
- No one really knows.“No one knows for sure how PageRank is currently calculated by Google.” [Google PageRank Explained]
- PR(A) = (1-d) + d(PR(t1)/C(t1) + … + PR(tn)/C(tn)). “That’s the equation that calculates a page’s PageRank. In the equation ‘t1 – tn’ are pages linking to page A, ‘C’ is the number of outbound links that a page has and ‘d’ is a damping factor, usually set to 0.85.”
- We can think of it in a simpler way: a page’s PageRank = 0.15 + 0.85 * (a “share” of the PageRank of every page that links to it). “share” = the linking page’s PageRank divided by the number of outbound links on the page. A page “votes” an amount of PageRank onto each page that it links to. The amount of PageRank that it has to vote with is a little less than its own PageRank value (its own value * 0.85). This value is shared equally between all the pages that it links to.” [Google's Page Rank]
- “The core Google PageRank algorithm “distributes” it’s established PR across all of the outbound links. Put differently, if you had a web page with a PR8 and had 1 link on it, the site linked to would get a fair amount of PR value. But, if you had 100 links on that page, each individual link would only get a fraction of the value.” [The Importance of PageRank]
- “From this, we could conclude that a link from a page with PR4 and 5 outbound links is worth more than a link from a page with PR8 and 100 outbound links. The PageRank of a page that links to yours is important but the number of links on that page is also important. The more links there are on a page, the less PageRank value your page will receive from it.” [Google's Page Rank]
- “PageRank [..] uses the link structure as an indicator of an individual page’s value. Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B. Google looks at considerably more than the sheer volume of votes, or links a page receives; e.g. it also analyzes the page that casts the vote. Votes cast by pages that are themselves “important” weigh more heavily and help to make other pages “important.” [Google: Technology]
- “Not all links weight the same when it comes to PR. So an ‘important’ page linking to you gives you more PR than a ‘less important’ one. [...] A factor in PR propagation is the number of out-links the ‘voting’ page have. So a PR4 page with only one out-link on it might give you more weight than a PR5 page with 100 out-links on it. A typical example here would be the famous milliondollarhomepage. This page is PR7 page with hunderds of out-links therefore its weight is would contribute very little to your page PR.” [Google PageRank Explained]
- Each Page Rank level is progressively harder to reach. “PageRank is logarithmic in its calculation. In the same way that the earthquake Richter scale is exponential in calculation, so too is the mathematics behind Google PageRank. It takes one step to move from a PR0 to a PR1, it takes a few more steps to PR3, it takes even more steps to PR4, and many more steps again to PR5, and so one.” [Google Page Rank FAQ]

[via einfach-persoehnlich]
- “PageRank does not rank web sites as a whole, but is determined for each page individually. Further, the PageRank of page A is recursively defined by the PageRanks of those pages which link to page A.” [The Page Rank algorithm]
- “Google combines PageRank with sophisticated text-matching techniques to find pages that are both important and relevant to user’s search. Google examines all aspects of the page’s content (and the content of the pages linking to it) to determine if it’s a good match for user’s queries.” [What Is Google PageRank?]
- “Google calculates pages PRs once every few months (PR update). After a PR update is done, all pages are assigned a new PR by Google and you will have this PR until a new PR update is done. New sites that were just launched will have a PR of 0 until an update is done by Google so that they are assigned an appropriate PR.” [Google PageRank Explained]
- “Google PageRank is calculated all the time, but what we see in the Google Toolbar (or other online PR tools) is a snapshot in time which is updated every 3 months or so.” [Reuben Yau]
- PageRank values don’t range from 0 to 10. PageRank is a floating-point number. “It’s more accurate to think of it as a floating-point number. Certainly our internal PageRank computations have many more degrees of resolution than the 0-10 values shown in the toolbar.” [Matt Cutts]
- “We’re sure that their curve is similar to an exponential curve with each new “plateau” being harder to reach than the last. I have personally done some research into this, and so far the results point to an exponential base of 4. So a PR of 6 is 4 times as difficult to attain as a PR of 5. [..] The difference between a high PR of 6, and a low PR of 6, could be hundreds or thousands of links.” [Top 10 Google Myths Revealed]
- “PageRank is believed to be calculated on a logarithmic scale. What this roughly means is that the difference between PR4 and PR5 is likely 5-10 times than the difference between PR3 and PR4. So, there are likely over a 100 times as many web pages with a PageRank of 2 than there are with a PageRank of 4. This means that if you get to a PageRank of 6 or so, you’re likely well into the top 0.1% of all websites out there. If most of your peer group is straggling around with a PR2 or PR3, you’re way ahead of the game.” [Importance of Google PageRank]
- “The fact is that PageRank is based on incoming links, but not just on the number of them. Instead PageRank is based on the value of your incoming links. To find the value of an incoming link look at the PR of the source page, and divide it by the number of links on that page. It’s very possible to get a PR of 6 or 7 from only a handful of incoming links if your links are “weighty” enough.” [Top 10 Google Myths Revealed]
- “Google tries to find pages that are both reputable and relevant. If two pages appear to have roughly the same amount of information matching a given query, we’ll usually try to pick the page that more trusted websites have chosen to link to. Still, we’ll often elevate a page with fewer links or lower PageRank if other signals suggest that the page is more relevant. For example, a web page dedicated entirely to the civil war is often more useful than an article that mentions the civil war in passing, even if the article is part of a reputable site such as Time.com.” [Google Librarian Central]
- Links don’t give PR away, they are votes. “When a page votes its PageRank value to other pages, its own PageRank is not reduced by the value that it is voting. The page doing the voting doesn’t give away its PageRank and end up with nothing. It isn’t a transfer of PageRank. It is simply a vote according to the page’s PageRank value.” [Page Rank Explained]
- “We know from the paper “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine” (Paper) that the PageRank of a Web page is a number calculated using a recursive algorithm in which the page receives a share of the PageRank of each page that links to it.” [Google PageRank]
- Crawlers don’t analyze web-sites permanently. “It often takes two full monthly updates for all of your incoming links to be discovered, counted, calculated and displayed as backlinks.” [Google FAQ]
1.3. Which factors do have an impact on PageRank?
- Each inbound link is important to the overall total. Except banned sites. “PageRank is a form of a voting system. A link to a page is a vote for that page. Higher PageRank pages are viewed by Google as more important. Their votes are given more value by Google — much more value, in some cases. In general, the more voting links, the stronger the PageRank.” [Google PageRank FAQ]
- Adding new pages can decrease Page Rank. “The effect is that, whilst the total PageRank in the site is increased, one or more of the existing pages will suffer a PageRank loss due to the new page making gains. Up to a point, the more new pages that are added, the greater is the loss to the existing pages. With large sites, this effect is unlikely to be noticed but, with smaller ones, it probably would.” [PageRank Explained]
- Page Rank can decrease. “You can lose some important links that are no longer linking to your site. PR loss can also occur if some of your linking partners also experience a drop in their own PR, possibly setting off a chain reaction of lower PageRank all through the immediate linking network.” [Google PageRank FAQ]
- Links from and to high quality related sites are important. “The more closely related the pages, the higher the PageRank amount transferred.” “Linking to high quality sites shows the search engines your site is very useful to your visitors. Unless your site has been around for years and is well established and trusted by Google, this factor will have an adverse effect on your site’s overall ranking. Linking only to high quality content sites will give your site an edge over your competition.” [Let Google's Algorithm Show You The Traffic, FAQ]
- Incoming Links from popular sites are important. If pages linking to you have a high PageRank then your page gains some part of their reputation.
- Site can be banned if it links to banned sites. “Be extremely careful of any out-going links from your site. Don’t link to bad neighborhoods (link farms, banned sites, etc.) Google will penalize you for bad links so always check the PageRank of the sites you’re linking to from your site.” [SiteProNews]
- Illegal activities will penalize your PageRank and possibly ban your site from Google. “Hidden text, deceptive redirects, cloaking, automated link exchanges, or anything else against Google’s quality guidelines” can ban your site from Google.
- Myth: the higher your google PageRank, the better the results. “While pages with a higher PageRank do tend to rank better, it is perfectly normal for a site to appear higher in the results listings even though it has a lower PageRank than competing pages. [..] Google examines the context of your incoming links, and only those links that relate to the specific keyword being searched on will help you achieve a higher ranking for that keyword.” [Top 10 Google Myths Revealed]
- Related high ranked web-sites count stronger (or don’t they?). “One-way inbound links from websites with topics that are related to your website’s topic will help you gain a higher Page Rank.” Other one-way inbound links from pages with high page rank but unrelated topics do help a little, but not nearly as much. [What Is Page Rank?]
- Different pages from a site can have different Page Rank. “Search engines crawl and index webpages not websites, that is why your page rank may vary from page to page within your website.” [What Is Page Rank?]
1.4. Which factors don’t have an impact on PageRank?
- Frequent content updates don’t improve PR automatically.” Although Google might send crawlers more frequently to analyze your site, what is more significant are links pointing to you.
- “Content is not taken into account when PageRank is calculated. Content is taken into account when you actually perform a search for specific search terms.” [Google PageRank]
- “High PageRank does NOT guarantee a high search ranking for any particular term. If it did, then PR10 sites like Adobe would always show up for any search you do. They don’t.” [What Is Google PageRank?
- Google considers site age, backlink relevancy and backlink duration. PageRank doesn't. If backlink isn't relevant, it won't weight much.
- Wikipedia Links don't improve Page Rank. "Wikipedia implemented a no-follow rule, indicating that outbound links should not be followed by search engine spiders." [A Survival Guide to SEO & Wikipedia]
- Listing in DMOZ and Yahoo! doesn’t give your site a special PR Bonus. “Google uses Open Directory Project (DMOZ.org), to power its directory. Coupling that fact with the observation that sites listed in DMOZ often get decent and inexplicable PageRank boosts, has lead many to conclude that Google gives a special bonus to sites listed in DMOZ. This is simply not true. The only bonus gained from being in DMOZ is the same bonus a site would achieve from being linked to by any other site.” However, DMOZ data is used by hundreds of sites.” [Top 10 Google Myths Revealed]
- Sub-directories don’t necessarily have a lower Page Rank than root-directories. Depending on the popularity of a web-site your subdirectories can have a higher PageRank than the root pages.
- Meta-Tags don’t improve PageRank. “Google can sometimes use the meta description tag to create an abstract for your site, so it may be useful to you if your home page is primarily composed of graphics. However, do not expect it to increase your rank.” [10 Google Myths Revealed]
- .edu and .gov-sites do not provide higher PageRank (or do they?).“We don’t really have much in the way to say “Oh this is a link from the ODP, or .gov, or .edu, so give that some sort of special boost.” Its just those sites tend to have higher PageRank because-because more people link to them and reputable people link to them.” [A Google Myth Busted]
- Links marked with nofollow-attribute don’t contribute to Google PageRank. “Google implemented a new value, “nofollow”, for the rel attribute of HTML link and anchor elements, so that website builders and bloggers can make links that Google will not consider for the purposes of PageRank — they are links that no longer constitute a “vote” in the PageRank system.” [Wikipedia: PageRank]
- Multiple votes to one link from the same page cost as much as a single vote. “It is reasonable to assume that a page can cast only one vote for another page, and that additional votes for the same page are not counted.” [PageRank FAQ]
- Links from one page to itself don’t improve Page Rank. “It is reasonable to assume that a page can’t vote for itself, and that such links are not counted.” [PageRank Explained]
- Bad incoming links don’t have impact on Page Rank. “Where the links come from doesn’t matter. Sites are not penalized because of where the links come from.” [Google PageRank]
- Dangling links don’t have impact on Page Rank. “Dangling links are simply links that point to any page with no outgoing links. They affect the model because it is not clear where their weight should be distributed, and there are a large number of them. Because dangling links do not affect the ranking of any other page directly, we simply remove them from the system until all the PageRanks are calculated. After all the PageRanks are calculated they can be added back in without affecting things significantly.” [PageRank Paper]
1.5. Ranking Factors (related to PageRank)
- Efficient internal onsite linking is important. “Internal linking is important to your overall ranking. Make sure your linking structure is easy for the spiders to crawl. Most suggest a simple hierarchy with links no more than three clicks away from your home/index page. Creating traffic modes or clusters of related links within a section on your site has proven very effective.” [Let Google's Algorithm Show You The Traffic
- Anchor text is important. The more specific is the reference, the better Google can evaluate it and consider it in relates search queries.
- Google penalizes link farms. "Google is only concerned with pages of over 100 outgoing links. Google considers overly linked pages to be link farms, and they are penalized as such." [Google FAQ]
- Headers (h1, … ,h6), strong tags and semantic content are important. (Update: But it doesn’t improve PageRank.) “Place it in the description and meta tags, place it in bold/strong tags, but keep your content readable and useful. Be aware of the text surrounding your keywords, search engines will become more semantic in the coming years so context is important.” [Let Google's Algorithm Show You The Traffic
- "The anchor text of a link is often far more important than whether it's on a high PageRank page." [What Is Google PageRank?
- "If you really want to know what are the most important, relevant pages to get links from, forget PageRank. Think search rank. Search for the words you'd like to rank for. See what pages come up tops in Google. Those are the most important and relevant pages you want to seek links from. That's because Google is explicitly telling you that on the topic you searched for, these are the best." [What Is Google PageRank?]
2.1. Google PageRank: Theory & Scientific Background
- A Survey of Google’s PageRank
Calculation of Page Rank, Page Rank Implementation, Inbound Links, Outbound Links, Number of Pages, PageRank Distribution, Additional Factors and more. - The Lineal Algebra Behind Google
The $25,000,000,000 Eigenvector – The Linear Algebra Behind Google. Google’s success derives in large part from its PageRank algorithm, which ranks the importance of webpages according to an eigenvector of a weighted link matrix. Analysis of the PageRank formula provides a wonderful applied topic for a linear algebra course. - The Intelligent Surfer: Probabilistic Combination of Link and Content Information in PageRank
We propose to improve Page-Rank by using a more intelligent surfer, one that is guided by a probabilistic model of the relevance of a page to a query. Efficient execution of our algorithm at query time is made possible by precomputing at crawl time (and thus once for all queries) the necessary terms. - Topic-Sensitive PageRank
To yield more accurate search results, we propose computing a set of PageRank vectors, biased using a set of representative topics, to capture more accurately the notion of importance with respect to a particular topic. By using these (precomputed) biased PageRank vectors to generate query-specific importance scores for pages at query time, we show that we can generate more accurate rankings than with a single, generic PageRank vector. - Method for node ranking in a linked database
A method assigns importance ranks to nodes in a linked database, such as any database of documents containing citations, the world wide web or any other hypermedia database. The rank assigned to a document is calculated from the ranks of documents citing it. In addition, the rank of a document is calculated from a constant representing the probability that a browser through the database will randomly jump to the document. By Page and Lawrence. - How Google Finds Your Needle in the Web’s Haystack
Mathematical Background of Google PageRank. By David Austin, Grand Valley State University - A Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine
Original Slides, by Larry Page. - Wikipedia: PageRank
Mathematical Theory Behind Google PageRank
3.1. Google PageRank Tools & Services
- PageRank Search
Showing search results in order of PageRank. - Google PageRank Inspector.
Google PageRank inspector is PHP scripts that can seek all of your website, include out linked page or not, and display Pagerank value for each of your website pages. New pages linked by high pagerank pages can be indexed in google quickly and have higher keyword rank in google search. - Google’s PageRank – Calculator
The results produced by the calculator indicate each page’s PageRank share and are not equivalent to the values in the Google toolbar.
- Webmastereyes, Visual PageRank View
The results will show the page given along with the PageRank of each link on that page. You also have the option to show “nofollow” and external links. - Smart PageRank
Checks PageRank from multiple datacenters and sends emails automatically if PageRank is updated. - Google PageRank Notifier
“This script will send you an email whenever the PageRank of the given page changes. PageRank is taken from the Google Toolbar “API” and is updated once an hour.” - Google PageRank™ Checker (registration required)
You can monitor site’s PageRank via RSS and you can also be notified via e-mail when the PageRank has been changed.
- Dig PageRank
Checks the current Page Rank of a page in over 100 Google data centers. - Live PageRank Check
The Live PageRank value may be used as an indicator of what will show when Google decides to export the PageRank values to the Google Toolbar. The Live PageRank calculator gives you the current PageRank value in the Google index, not just the snapshot that is displayed in the toolbar. Google updates its internal PageRank value continuously as the web changes and their index is updated. Only once every third month or so this value is exported to be displayed in the Google Toolbar. - Page Rank Widget for Mac OS X.
Llittle Widget finds the Google Page Rank for any URL by calculating the checksum and requesting the PR from Google’s servers.
- Google PageRank Prediction
The tool analyzes the popularity of a given web-site and tries to predict its future Google PageRank. More Page Rank Tools. - PageRank Checker
Shows PageRank of your backlinks. - PageRank Overlay (PR Mapper) (both currently offline)
Browse your competitors website and view the Google PR of all the links at once. Also available as Firefox Extension. - PageRank Decoder (Demo)
“This little tool is not too much different then a tool that tells you your PageRank, however it allows you to organize your sites (with PR information) in a visual network and then correspondingly connect them with arrows. You can move them around like cards, connect them or not, and even delete them by throwing them in a trash can.” [Search Engine Roundtable]
- Page Rank Export List History
This Page Rank Update/Export List History contains the dates that Google Toolbar Pagerank (PR) was exported. - Google Ranking Factors
Alleged positive and negative SEO Google Ranking Factors
3.2. Google Tools & Services
- Google Quality Guidelines
These quality guidelines cover the most common forms of deceptive or manipulative behavior, but Google may respond negatively to other misleading practices not listed here (e.g. tricking users by registering misspellings of well-known websites). - Check if your site is in Google database
- Reinclusion request form
Request reinclusion of a site that has violated the webmaster guidelines - Google Tools
A comprehensive overview on Dmoz.org.
Vitaly Friedman, editor-in-chief of Smashing Magazine (www.smashingmagazine.com), an online magazine dedicated to designers and developers.
- 213 Comments
- 1
- 2
June 5th, 2007 7:32 pmGreat article… I’d love to print this… Can you make this available as a PDF-file or some other printer-friendly format?
- 3
June 5th, 2007 7:43 pmAnother great article, guys! Thanks again.
- 4
June 5th, 2007 7:49 pmGreat article on PR, Everything explained neatly. Thanks for this wonderfull article.
- 5
June 5th, 2007 8:04 pmAgain a Great Article….
- 6
June 5th, 2007 8:07 pmAs usual, you guys rock with your informative articles
- 7
June 5th, 2007 8:44 pmWith all the Page Rank Hype going on, it’s so nice of you to put it all together for us to see. There’s so much disinformation out there about Page Rank, what it is and what effects it.
Thanks again, and keep up the good work! - 8
June 5th, 2007 8:44 pmGreat article, thank you!
- 9
June 5th, 2007 8:47 pmAwesome.
Checked every few months eh? That makes more sense. I wonder if other google features are also checked on that basis…
- 10
June 5th, 2007 9:01 pmagain i must tell you guys.. thanks for the info!!!
cheers!!! :-x - 11
June 5th, 2007 9:07 pmwhat does “not automatically” mean? :D
- 12
June 5th, 2007 9:16 pmWow, thats really impressive article about PageRank.
I wonder that “semantic content are important” for PageRank, thats a new information to me. - 13
June 5th, 2007 9:28 pmGreat article, I think you should clarify point 6 of the impact summary, Wikipedia links don’t improve Page Rank ( removing ‘automatically’).
- 14
June 5th, 2007 9:40 pmA thoroughly good read but still leaves everything a little vague, maybe send someone undercover at google? ;-)
My eyes hurt after reading all this.
Any chance of someone posting this as a PDF?
- 15
June 5th, 2007 9:58 pmThat’s a great compilation of articles…
- 16
June 5th, 2007 10:01 pmwow this kind of stuff is awesome. love smashingmag
- 17
June 5th, 2007 10:07 pmSome asking again for a PDF…
Why not implementing a @media print rule in css to support a more printer friendly output, or a automatic PDF-Generation?
- 18
June 5th, 2007 10:09 pmgreat article – again!
Can you give me a proof, that semantic markup (h1, p, etc.) is rated better than the same website built with layout-tables?!
Some asking again for a PDF…
Why not implementing a @media print rule in css to support a more printer friendly output, or a automatic PDF-Generation? - 20
June 5th, 2007 10:36 pmImpressive list as usual :-)
“Links from and to high quality related sites are important.”
Today, I post list of high PR blog that offer free backlinks after make review. Is it OK to do that way to increase PR? - 21
June 5th, 2007 10:39 pmIs there a way to find out whether or not a site you’re considering linking to has been banned?
- 23
June 5th, 2007 10:45 pmNice Write Up.
There are many useful for me to seo my website.
Thanks
- 24
June 5th, 2007 11:26 pmI love your article! Great use of headers, illustrations and very easy to read. Definitely a bookmark
- 25
June 5th, 2007 11:30 pmGreat article once again. It’ll take me a while to digest it all.
BTW Small typo in the first paragraph… “hunderds of factors”
- 26
June 5th, 2007 11:37 pmGreat article. Quick question. Does anyone know what is the best software optimize your site and for search engine optimization? I use Axandra IBP but I want to know if there is a better software for PC.
Keep up a good work. - 27
June 6th, 2007 12:02 amguau super bueno este post…
ABRAZO VIRTUAL - 28
June 6th, 2007 12:03 amVery good, thanks
- 29
June 6th, 2007 12:35 amPage Rank is only half the story when it comes to Google Search.
You should really read this.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/03/business/yourmoney/03google.html - 30
June 6th, 2007 1:09 amExcellent article. The explanation is good and de tools useful.
- 31
June 6th, 2007 1:10 amVery well researched article… However, I think I’ll just forget about PR as I have always done – and then be pleasantly surprised when sites I make get a good PR with no effort whatsoever.
If you game Google, you will be penalised. It’s as simple as that.
Besides, the second that anybody actually figures out how any Google algorithm actually works – they change it. It’s happened before, and it’ll happen again!
- 32
June 6th, 2007 1:34 amWow! You guys rock. I thank you all for such in depth info and it will help me to sharpen my blunt weapons and knowledge about page ranking. Once again thumb up.
ADITYA.
- 33
June 6th, 2007 2:06 amAnother brilliant article! Bravo!
- 34
June 6th, 2007 2:24 amExcellent article! Thanks
- 35
June 6th, 2007 3:27 amI’m reading things here everytime you get an article in delicious/popular and I must admit that this time you’ve impressed me :) Not just a collection of links but true research. Impressive article. Bookmarked.
- 36
June 6th, 2007 3:48 amDELICIOUS!
- 37
June 6th, 2007 4:59 amYou forgot to mention that PR means VERY LITTLE in terms of Google Rankings. Anyone who tells you different is relaying FUDD.
- 38
June 6th, 2007 5:22 amThanks this helped me a lot !!
- 39
June 6th, 2007 5:30 amThanks for the great insights and hints. But, I still have a question. Why is PageRank so important after all? To me, it seems that PR is a thing of the past to Google in determining the search results. Or did I miss a point?
- 40
June 6th, 2007 5:35 amWhile you do a good job dispelling a few big ones, this article is still filled with myths and mistakes. PageRank is not updated every few months; it’s updated continuously along with the index, while the snapshot pushed to the toolbar servers (on that logarithmic scale you mentioned) is only updated every few months.
- 41
June 6th, 2007 5:42 amLinking to high quality sites is important? No, no it’s not. Especially not to PageRank calculations, where what site you’re linking to is irrelevant, only the number of links matters when you’re talking about outbound.
Why is anchor text under “which factors do have an impact on PageRank”? Anchor text, while incredibly important to search result rankings, is absolutely irrelevant in PageRank calculations. It’s a pure numbers game. Stop talking about anything but number of links and PageRank of links, since that’s all that matters to the calculation.
The more I reread this, the more rubbish I find.
- 42
June 6th, 2007 6:06 amGreat article, love the links. Thanks
- 44
June 6th, 2007 6:44 amthanks a lot for this informations :)
- 45
June 6th, 2007 7:49 amVitaly: Have you read the whitepaper that actually details the pagerank algorithm? You won’t find anything there but numbers, since that’s all this is… an enormous set of linear equations that need to be solved. The sum of all weights of all URLs must add up to 1; assigning the proper values for the 6 billion variables to make that happen is the computational challenge. Nothing but number of links weighted by number of links.
Site age, link text, *who* is being linked to… all irrelevant. Those things are part of the search ranking algorithm as a whole, but not the PageRank calculation. If you had titled this post something other than “Google PageRank: What Do We Know About It”, you’d be able to discuss all the other ranking factors you so want to discuss.
PageRank is a little more bland and technical for a blog like this — it’s academia.
- 46
June 6th, 2007 7:57 amVery clear explanation on Google Page Rank.
- 47
June 6th, 2007 8:48 am“Related high ranked web-sites count stronger (or don’t they?). “One-way inbound links from websites with topics that are related to your website’s topic will help you gain a higher Page Rank.” Other one-way inbound links from pages with high page rank but unrelated topics do help a little, but not nearly as much.”
Incorrect. If you’re talking ranking then you’re right, but talking PR, that’s simply not true.
- 48
June 6th, 2007 8:51 amDan glad to see you kicking some sense into proceedings. Although I can’t say I’m surprised that an SEO article that hits the digg frontpage is full of mistakes…
- 49
June 6th, 2007 10:43 amVery well explained! I haven’t seen more comprehensive, yet easy to understand explanation of PR. Great work!
- 50
June 6th, 2007 1:40 pmGreat work! Thank you very much!
- 51
June 6th, 2007 2:24 pmGood!very useful!thanks a lot!
- 52
June 6th, 2007 2:28 pmExcellent article, very thorough
- 53
June 6th, 2007 3:28 pmAm I the only person who gets the feeling that it is “pointless” even worrying about page rank? The page rank you see in G tool bar it seems is not up to date…..adding content does not immediately result in R change and the bombshell which many figured out months ago is that
“page rank does not guarantee ranking = traffic”
So Why bother?
Rob
- 54
June 6th, 2007 3:33 pmhmm, I think PR is already not important for most of developers, who are up to fresh market news.. Pagerank should be important only for google, now we should look at alexa ratings more, and to look for better keywords ant content, but pagerank isn’t giving big important for google search results..
- 55
June 6th, 2007 3:54 pmThank you, its a very impressive article. Fantastic work! I have been looking for an article like this.
- 56
June 6th, 2007 4:09 pmA really good guide to pagerank, good job!!!
- 57
June 6th, 2007 4:46 pmupdate for you wikipedia links are all rel nofollow as of a few months back.
- 58
June 6th, 2007 4:49 pmExcellent work! This article could easily worth hundreds of dollar.
- 59
June 6th, 2007 5:05 pmLovely collation of plagiarism that passes for an article on an attribute that’s so outdated as to be practically useless. Rather than read this stuff, go and get yourselves a professional SEO company people.
- 60
June 6th, 2007 6:08 pmWhat to say??? As always amazing article. I would like to know if important brands have a high PageRank for being important outside internet or for doing it the right way inside internet…
;-) - 61
June 6th, 2007 6:12 pmThis is pure :3 and >:3
It’s not like I really cared for pagerank, but now I do!
- 62
June 6th, 2007 7:32 pmVery nice post, thanks for the useful information!
- 63
June 6th, 2007 8:23 pmGreat article!!!
My blog have pr 3 i try to create another website without any link on the internet only one link on my front page, some time after the blank page have pr 2….
i already do this with 3 diferent sites and all the same one link on my blog front page during a while and the other site get pr 2…. - 64
June 6th, 2007 8:44 pmGreat! Is it possible to publish a german version on http://www.seo-scene.de? Or do Dr. Web this job?
- 65
June 6th, 2007 8:44 pmGreate article!
- 66
June 6th, 2007 10:54 pmNice article. Gave insight to PR.
- 67
June 6th, 2007 11:31 pmExcellent article. Thanks for this!
- 68
June 6th, 2007 11:49 pmYou guys always have such detailed and interesting articles. thumbs up
- 69
June 7th, 2007 1:51 amVery informative!
- 70
June 7th, 2007 3:56 amGreat article!
I would never like to know anything more than you have given here.
I had few doubts and now it seems this article has cleared my doubts.
keep up the great work guys! - 71
June 7th, 2007 5:32 amNice, really good… Thx.
- 72
June 7th, 2007 4:34 pmExcellent explanation of Google Pagerank.
Over 800 people have tagged this in del.icio.us as of June 7th only 2 days after this has been posted.
- 73
June 7th, 2007 4:57 pmThank you guys for the great article. I´m deeply impressed.
- 74
June 7th, 2007 9:10 pmGood articles:)
- 75
June 8th, 2007 2:28 amWonderful! Every article that gets published on your site is helping me improve in some or the other way. Thanks a lot for yet another useful article. Looking forward to the PDF version.
Cheers!! - 76
June 8th, 2007 9:35 amExcellent article! Thanks!!!
For a long time I have been using http://www.websitegrader.com to track my website’s marketing effectiveness and it has been really useful. This article gives me additional detail on the nuances of Page Rank. Thanks.
- 77
June 8th, 2007 11:23 amGreat article, never seen such explanation to pagerank.
btw digpagerank tool checks pr in 689 datacenters not 100. :-) - 78
June 8th, 2007 11:44 am“Links marked with nofollow-attribute don’t contribute to Google PageRank.”
I have very strong reasons to believe this is not true. Hate to say this(I am sure spammers will go mad), but 2 years ago I had small site hosted on free hosting and free subdomain. I never did some link building for it, but I left comment on one page that got pr8 on next update and my site got pr7 from that link only. It was Worpdress comment and it had nofollow like all other WP blogs.
So, I would say those links pass pr. - 79
June 8th, 2007 1:25 pmReally amazing!!! How do you guys know all these?? :D
- 80
June 8th, 2007 1:37 pmawesome blog post – i have learned so much about page rank here… more so than all of my other research.
- 81
June 8th, 2007 1:57 pmdizzy with all that info. Even if we only get half of that, it will be a better world :)
- 82
June 8th, 2007 4:54 pmGood extensive researched…
- 83
June 8th, 2007 8:17 pmGreat work !
I was searching for a while all that bunch of information.Many thanks for this useful job !
- 84
June 8th, 2007 10:13 pmGreat article, especially like the pagerank mountain diagram. Is this article available as a pdf?
- 85
June 9th, 2007 5:21 amThis is the most amazing compilation of knowledge that I’ve ever encountered on the topic of PageRank. Thanks for putting it together!
- 86
June 9th, 2007 6:02 amThanks for this great article…
Can I translate it? (Smashing Magazine will recive the credits of course) - 87
June 9th, 2007 11:38 pmWonderful resource. I thought it was too good not to be shared so I have translated it into French for us non English-speaking froggies (it means a lot of people, even in the IT world). If you have a problem with copyright or whatever, let me know I’ll remove it immediately.
- 88
June 10th, 2007 8:59 amI don’t doubt the importance of Google in general, but I have to pause to wonder if Google PageRant isn’t a little bit like Alexa ranking. That is, it seems like a self-propagating – almost viral – factor whose significance is largely predicated by the fact that bloggers & webmasters consider it to be significant.
Or in other words, the primary factor in making those “only available for a limited time” Nascar plates (with the 24-karat gold rim) on cheesy late-night informercials “collectable” is that someone declared them to be so.
Not bashing the Goog, just thinking out loud…
- 89
June 10th, 2007 2:50 pmThis blog entry contains some useful info on PR. Thanks. -Geoff
- 90
June 10th, 2007 4:22 pmit doesnt say anything about changing web hosts. Does changing web hosts affect PR or google searching?
- 91
June 10th, 2007 11:55 pmVery informative article, thank you..
- 92
June 11th, 2007 8:37 amHmmm pretty interesting. I think most of us bloggers have little hope of getting a high rank ever : )
- 93
June 11th, 2007 4:38 pmReally very powerfull and great article.
- 94
June 11th, 2007 9:18 pmInspiring and Impressive.
- 95
June 11th, 2007 10:59 pmUnfortunately this article just increases the myth that PageRank is the be all and end all of SEO. Its just one factor of many. Do the top 10 sites on any search term rank with the highest PR at the top descending?… Nope.
- 96
June 12th, 2007 1:00 amhej,
I really appreciate your work and your research seems to be well done but I am missing some links to SEO-pages in your compilation that IMHO should not be left out because of their valued content. most notably “Google Search Engine Ranking Factors” by SEOmoz.
and when it comes to pagerank calculation or to the number of inboud links necessary to gain a certain PR I do miss some tables like the one by Bob Wakfer”.
if I missed those articles being mentioned somewhere I apologize; i did not find them or something similar.
- 97
June 12th, 2007 3:16 pmExcellent work, very detailed. Thanks. Looking forward to PDF.
- 98
June 12th, 2007 7:28 pmA great article!! thank you
- 99
June 12th, 2007 11:43 pmPhew .. that’s an amazing article. Good work guys.
- 100
June 14th, 2007 5:23 pmGreat article thanks!
- 101
June 15th, 2007 9:23 pmGreat explanation, thanks for the effort.
- 102
June 15th, 2007 11:23 pmI’m not convinced everything present here is true, in fact some it seems to conflict (i.e. PR no impact on search, high PR pages tend to rank on search) but still a very powerful collection of information. Thanks for the good read!
- 103
June 18th, 2007 8:41 pmYou Can Do It!!!!!
so impressive!
thank you
- 104
June 19th, 2007 5:04 pmThis is cool collection about PR of Google.
I found this interesting to read,i am happy that what i have written in karthi’s Blog is correct after reading this. - 105
June 21st, 2007 3:52 amGreat article!
It’s very interesting and there is great stuff related.
I’ve translated it in italian on my blog rails on the roadThank you!
- 106
June 22nd, 2007 7:03 pmThe best article about PR i have found, thanks!
- 107
June 22nd, 2007 7:31 pmFabulous information! Came to know a lot of things abt pagerank. thanks!
- 108
June 24th, 2007 1:31 amI can’t understand the equation. What is “A” , “d” , “C” , “t1″ and “tn”???
- 109
June 25th, 2007 1:57 pmCan you please tell me how much time does it take for a site to get a Google Page Rank?
- 110
June 25th, 2007 5:22 pmNot a very good article at all.
The information is mis-leading and repetitive.
For example, we have thisOne-way inbound links from websites with topics that are related to your website’s topic will help you gain a higher Page Rank
and then a few line down there is this
Content is not taken into account when PageRank is calculated
So, how does Page rank take into account topic when it doesn’t take into account content?
It appears this article is nothing more than a mash up of various other articles written over the years of evolution of page rank.
There isn’t even the distinction between true page rank and tool bar page rank.
True page rank is is based on a mathematical formula this is unlikely to be the same formula cited above (Larry Page Rank) and is merely a statistical model to show the probability of a random surfer getting to your website by clicking randomly on links.
The “page rank explained correctly with examples” link is a good site, but out of date.
Toolbar page rank is unlikely to be linked to true page rank and is nothing more than a meaningless green bar to throw wannabe SEOs of the real trail.
What is unacceptable in a report/article like this is to state opinion as fact. There are very few facts on this page, merely speculation. true, some of it is tried and tested, but some of the opinions here have been tried and disputed as well.
- 111
June 27th, 2007 7:16 pmWow. An amazing article. As a newbie webmaster I still have no idea what to do. Whether I should care or not. And whether I can. I hope that behind all these trees there is some forest and that I can actually see it.
- 112
July 1st, 2007 7:59 pmGreat Job Man, Thanks a lot for valueable information
- 113
July 2nd, 2007 11:21 amHow often is PR updated?
- 114

- 115
July 4th, 2007 9:02 pmThis will be a useful information for my friend who is soon taking a job as SEO. He will be glad when I will forward this article to him.
- 116
July 13th, 2007 12:08 amVery well outlined. Thankfully I know all of it already or else I wouldn’t get my sites at the top of Google already ;)
- 117
July 13th, 2007 3:19 pmThanx for clearing my confusion on page rank. Great post with great details.
- 118
July 15th, 2007 1:23 amAwesome article. Thanks for the read. Now I know how to rank higher with my site. xD
- 119
July 19th, 2007 1:26 pmone of the great information for webmasters
- 120
July 21st, 2007 2:25 amAmazing Read! This is a very important document. You should print a book!
- 121
July 27th, 2007 6:25 amVery interesting document! I’ll check it again! ;-)
marco.
- 122
August 7th, 2007 4:21 amWell, it represents a lot of work but your article is pretty much a load of nonsense.
How can you say that PageRank is based in part on relevance (it’s not) and then point out that it has nothing to do with content?
Relevance does not equal importance.
Importance, as measured through PageRank, has nothing to do with relevance. It’s a crude valuation system that makes no allowances for disagreements, disparagements, or faux representations.
Relevance is determined by copy, either on-page or off-page. Relevance is quantified (scored) separate from PageRank and PageRank is used to weight or qualify the Relevance score.
- 123
August 11th, 2007 3:18 pmHey there great article, I always wondered what page rank was and how it worked.
I am glad that I have book marked this page, It holds a lot of info. One would need to make return visits just to digest all the info here.
I’m guessing the page rank goes from 0 to 10…correct me if I’m wrong….
I see some times my page rank is 0 and then it is at 3 ….any comment on how that is or why, for the sake of a couple hours.currently my blog has a page rank of 3 , is that good? What can I do to make that better. Any suggestions?
- 124
August 13th, 2007 6:17 pmHi,
I Like your article. What about database generated pages?
I have a lot of pages generated with a script.Magnar
- 125
August 17th, 2007 8:41 pmSeldom there is a research on Google Page rank so deep and compendious…..!!!!!
- 126
August 23rd, 2007 11:34 pmGreat, thanks for doing all the work for us, guys, you’re great!
- 127
August 23rd, 2007 11:39 pmFor donalyza: make sure you delete all your links from your old blog and add only one: the one to donalyza.com This will boost greatly your new site’s PR.
Well, OK, you can add mine too as a thank you :-) - 128
August 28th, 2007 8:44 pmit’s amazing
- 129
September 1st, 2007 8:49 pmThis is pure :3 and >:3
It’s not like I really cared for pagerank, but now I do! - 130
September 2nd, 2007 1:45 pmThanks for posting this great article. I’ve heard the debates about how secondary PR actually is. Now this is the clear explanation. Plus, you give alternate concepts to focus on.
I’ve been wondering what to do with my music site and it might turn out helpful. I’ll add a bookmark because it’s wonderfully detailed.
Thank you!
- 131
September 4th, 2007 11:25 amGreat Post – thx!
- 132
September 5th, 2007 6:27 amDear,
I’m a brazilian journalist, technology editor (licensed) of the site of the O Estado de São Paulo, one the most important newspapaper of the Latin American.
I’d like to translate the sumary of this post to portuguese and publish it into my blog reporternet.jor.br . If you agree with, let me know soon.
Thanks a lot
- 133
September 29th, 2007 7:30 pmVery informative article for optimising the website to enable a clean search.
- 134
October 4th, 2007 1:03 amAha… Really show what i want. Thanks a lot for the info. Lots of thing learned.
- 135
October 15th, 2007 4:17 amnice article, i read with great attencion, and learn great things, thnks
- 136

- 137
November 4th, 2007 5:19 pmhmm.. how can i get high page rank??? got alot of page that refer to my site or got a lot domain that refer to my site that have a page rank ??
- 138
November 7th, 2007 12:11 amaccording to my notion my pagerank is changed every 3 months and that is what I read most of the times on the internet
- 139
November 15th, 2007 12:11 pmWhat a wonderful article, the great and neat article on PR
- 140
November 15th, 2007 12:20 pmIt is the correct line, they want to say that the link from PR4 and PR5 with unique link is more beneficial than PR8 with 100 inbound links
- 141
December 13th, 2007 12:21 pmFantastic post I couldn’t agree more with what you said, and I like how you went into details about Google Pagerank it was very insightful keep up the good work.
- Dwayne Charrington
http://www.dwaynecharrington.com - 142
December 17th, 2007 6:27 amGreat article…makes a lot of sense.
- 143
December 29th, 2007 12:23 amYes, great post, very good for webmasters
- 144
January 3rd, 2008 6:37 amgood stuff
- 145
January 13th, 2008 1:31 pmi don’t think anybody can really explain how Google works because i have seen goolge drop a lot of sites with high page ranks for no obvious reason
- 146
January 20th, 2008 4:27 pmthanks…
- 147
January 21st, 2008 6:20 pmNice article, cleared up a few things about page rank for me. Thanks
- 148
January 23rd, 2008 5:28 amI am a BIG FAN of Smashing Magazine. Thanks for such a wonderful article on Google PR. Can anyone tell me where can i find more help on calculating google PR?
Thanks and advance.
Cheers! - 149
January 27th, 2008 11:11 pmit was real real good article
i like the part which said wikli pedia and .gov have nothing to do with pr - 150
February 3rd, 2008 4:36 amRelay good article.
- 151
February 4th, 2008 2:51 amSimply Brilliant… spectacular information about google PR
- 152
February 17th, 2008 4:56 amIts really nice of you to put up all the details in one article :D
I’m glad to find this place to learn more about Google’s algorithm and PR.
Thanks for putting up efforts.
- 153
February 18th, 2008 3:39 amGoogle’s algorithm and PR info has been really helpful
Thanks
Jamie
- 154
February 23rd, 2008 8:06 amsuperb articles!
- 155
March 9th, 2008 8:35 pmIs it help to have outgoing links to high pagerank sites?
- 156
March 18th, 2008 4:03 amVery interesting site.Very helpful.Thank you
- 157
April 2nd, 2008 7:45 amlol i am the newest comment the olny 1 for 2008
- 158
April 17th, 2008 4:51 pmThat is a lot of things!!! I don’t ge tthe equation at all
- 159
April 17th, 2008 9:59 pmThanks for the posting, now I know how to pursue high PR
- 160

- 161
April 18th, 2008 6:55 amAwesome post. It was very helpfull and can be perceived as a cornerstone on your website!
- 162
May 1st, 2008 4:16 pmVery useful information! I think this topic needs to be further discuessed.
Regards, - 163
May 5th, 2008 10:12 pmMy last comment was for some reason tagged as spam…
Anyway…@Fauzy – The script you are using to check the PR has encountered a failure. Thats why you recieve a PR -1.
I would post a link, but it will just be marked as span once again…
- 164
May 6th, 2008 1:02 amThis is obviously one great post. Thanks for the valuable information and insights you have so provided here. Keep it up!
- 165
May 6th, 2008 4:09 pmNice summary! I’m loving these SEO articles.
Smashing Magazine is such an incredible resource. I look forward to reading it every day.
- 166
May 22nd, 2008 10:26 pmWow the information about the Google Page rank that is provided here is awesome. And I really enjoyed the use of pictures to support the content.
A job very well done. I must go through other posts too to get more detailed information.
- 167
- 168
June 19th, 2008 1:43 amHi There!
Very new to the whole seo thing and we employed a company to take care of this for us. I have noticed in my monthly report that our site has ALOT of PR 0 sites linking to it. Should I be worried? They make up around 75% of our links.
- 169
June 26th, 2008 4:34 amPageRank is a link analysis algorithm that assigns a numerical weighting to each element of a hyperlinked set of documents, such as the World Wide Web, with the purpose of “measuring” its relative importance within the set. The algorithm may be applied to any collection of entities with reciprocal quotations and references. The numerical weight that it assigns to any given element E is also called the PageRank of E and denoted by PR(E).
- 170
July 12th, 2008 10:13 pmThis is a really great information! Thanks for sharing.
- 171
July 16th, 2008 7:08 pmwew..i got a great information…thanks its help me to build my blog…..
- 172
July 28th, 2008 5:13 amgreat article, google just gave me PR2 after two months. this article really explains it. keep up the good work.
- 173
July 31st, 2008 9:20 ammonster post, but awesome. Excellent work on covering all the bases, I’d even forgotten about some of these finer points, so thanks for the reminder.
- 174
September 14th, 2008 6:23 amStill don’t understand PR, hehehe.
- 175
September 17th, 2008 1:52 amExcellent article so good advice for everyone here. Not sure if I agree with the importance to linknig to external authority sites though
- 176
September 22nd, 2008 2:22 pmyokmu bu makaleyi türkçeye çevirebilecek babayiğit? (türkiye)
leanguage turkish?
ım sorry not speak english :-(
speak turkish :-) - 177
September 22nd, 2008 10:06 pmReally such a great information about Google page Rank i hope it is going to help in many ways..
Thank
- 178
October 1st, 2008 9:45 amThanks for the great article. Well worth the read.
- 179
October 2nd, 2008 11:30 pmThanx a lot for such a descriptive and informatic article…..
I was searching for a detailed PR description for PR and now i think that my search completed…
I m going through it and really i can say that its really really an excellent one!!!!! - 180
October 12th, 2008 2:17 amFantastic article. Never went thru such kinda detailed article on Page Rank. No matter how much well learned u think yourself to be, there is always something left to learn. Superb Stuff.
- 181
October 16th, 2008 9:32 amthanks a lot
- 182
October 17th, 2008 7:33 amwery nice and good post ! thanks
- 183
October 24th, 2008 8:59 pmThis is the most amazing compilation of knowledge that I’ve ever encountered on the topic of PageRank. Thanks for putting it together!
- 184
November 3rd, 2008 5:34 pmWhich one show the better indicator, alexa or pagerank? Anybody can help me to decide?
- 185
November 5th, 2008 5:48 amVery rich article , full of resources & information.
You will help a lot.
your effort is much appreciated
Regards - 186
November 6th, 2008 1:54 amNice article. Can I translate it to czech and publish it on my blog?
- 187
December 1st, 2008 10:25 pmAre you idiots for real? This made about as much sense as reading the bible in Braille wearing mittens. Did any of this crap make any sense to any of you or are you pretending to understand so you wont look stupid. Well i must be stupid because I didnt understand a goddamned thing that was written about pagerank p(#$#)-^%$$=d(FG)*WEW+(pie)/a_horses_ass+d(/423)*infinite
Come on people get real for the love of god - 188
December 4th, 2008 11:04 amThere’s some good stuff here, but I agree with Happyfeet (not as strongly as him), it’s not as easy to interpret as everyone is making it out to be. Still, a nice, useful explanation of PR, despite some confusing portions (particularly in the equations).
And as for Carmen,
I don’t want to sound like I’m spamming or anything, but a really good tool to use to figure out what problems your site could have is http://spydermate.com
I believe they’re going through some changes right now in getting the final version up (it’s still in its Beta stage), because it looks different than it used to, but it still offers some good content about what’s wrong with your site.
Do a quick scan… looks like you have a ton of broken links, for starters…
- 189
January 26th, 2009 5:41 amReally a very good and detailed article about PR.. Thanks a lot
- 190
January 28th, 2009 7:39 pmGoogle PR..
So HOT
- 191
January 28th, 2009 8:41 pmA very informative article. I got a clear vision of PR.
- 192
February 1st, 2009 1:31 amI think this is a good bit of info on PageRank, I like it and it has helped me on my site.
I really do apreciate the time you put into writing these articles. They do take a long time to read, but they do help, so thanks.
Keep up the good work
Christopher - 193
February 16th, 2009 7:18 amCool stuff, great post.
- 194
February 27th, 2009 1:57 pmvery wonderfull article, thank you
- 195
February 28th, 2009 6:09 amgreat works,thanks
- 196
March 21st, 2009 8:08 amA really comprehensive article – but im not sure im anymore enlightened than i was before. Im trying to boost my page rank as an uninformed amatuer, maybe i should enlist the services of a SEO co. Anyone have any good ones they can recommend???
- 197
April 16th, 2009 2:39 amnice sharing thank you job
- 198
June 1st, 2009 10:06 amreally good writ-up!
- 199
June 2nd, 2009 6:38 pmreally really nice
- 200
June 8th, 2009 4:16 amsuch great article
thanks for this. - 201
June 16th, 2009 3:03 amVery informative article and contents are well organized.
As mentioned in the article ,PagRank does not rank the website as a whole.So it is doubtful that Page Rank can be a useful factor for estimating the reliability of an information on the internet.However,PageRank is a great and significant contribution to Search Engines. - 202
July 5th, 2009 7:39 pmLearn seo and learning to bring it to the blog traffik need perseverance, this may be, many questions: how do
How To Increase Traffic Blog / website, if you are a blogger or a website owner, you definitely want more traffic to your blog or website is. You may often seek out information on the internet about how I Increase Traffic To Your Blog / Website you. On this article I will spell out
3 How to Increase Traffik blog / your website. List is different from the others because the simple, original and unique ideas. If you want to search for people to see the website / blog you,2 How to Increase Traffic Blog / website I believe this can work well for the site / your blog. Here are 2 ways are:
1. Write contain more. If you want traffic, you must write contain. People do not akan charcoal-site you visit if you do not contain the good writing, interesting & quality, and new visitors will not return to your blog. So keep posting the interesting writing.
2. Design & layout is good. If your site design disorganized, difficult to navigate, or the color does not match the vision (glare), also full atao error, visitors certainly will not stand for long berlama-diblog you. - 203
July 6th, 2009 8:26 pm“Google PageRank is probably one of the most important algorithms ever developed for the Web”
there are many other algorithms that are more important than PageRank itself. too much importance on PR like this actually promote link farming, swap linking and others. PageRank is supposed to be a vote for site based on its popularity and should be treated like that. artificial linking shouldn’t be counted as PageRank at all. - 204
July 16th, 2009 1:44 amWill you be posting an update to this excellent post? Google has made some significant changes since 2007…
- 205
July 19th, 2009 1:12 amThis is as complete as it can get. An update will be very much appreciated. This is one of the best articles I’ve read with regards to Page Rank.
- 206
July 30th, 2009 9:55 amI m very much intrested in SEO tools developements.I really liked this stuff
- 207
August 14th, 2009 9:08 amVery good article, thnks for it! I was calculating using the equation that calculates a page’s PageRank and seems that is missing a number, the one that makes Page Rank level progressively harder to reach. What do you think about it?
- 208
September 13th, 2009 3:13 amthis is the single greatest piece of consolidated info on the sacred algorithm i have ever read…..and its free. bloody brilliant!!!!!
- 209
September 29th, 2009 7:36 pmI always like to say that SEO is not an exact science, but after reading this post I am thinking twice about that statement. I know no one can make a site magically appear at the top of the Google PageRank system, but these are some fantastic tips that will definitely help you there.
Thanks,
Carson - 210
October 7th, 2009 8:53 amAbsolutely amazing and lengthy article, almost all of which I believe is still relevant today. This should be referenced everywhere for the newbies that think that PR is everything, when really there are many other factors that determine search engine rankings.
Aaron
- 211
December 14th, 2009 12:02 amwaw.., n waw.. excellent
- 212
December 29th, 2009 8:15 pmThank you so much for the information. You changed my knowledge because I used to think that high page rank means high results listing in Google search.
I also learnt a lot from this post! Thanks for your wonderful content!Nguyen Hanh
- 213
January 18th, 2010 10:13 pmReally its very useful for me.. Thanks
- 00
There are no trackbacks at this time. If you are interested in leaving a trackback, please use this URL.
Leave a Comment
Make sure you enter the * required information where indicated. Please also rate the article as it will help us decide future content and posts. Comments are moderated – and rel="nofollow" is in use. Please no link dropping, no keywords or domains as names; do not spam, and do not advertise!
Interact
Popular
- 100 Wordpress Themes
- Photoshop Tutorials
- Fantastic Wallpapers
- 40+ Excellent Freefonts
- Dual-Screen Wallpapers
- Wordpress Themes for 2009
- Illustrator Tutorials
- Incredible Free Icon Sets
- High-Quality Free Fonts
- 30 Scripts For Galleries
- Photoshop Text Effects
- Useful Icon Sets
- Web Design Trends
- iPhone Wallpapers
- Before Launching a Website
- CSS Layouts And Templates
- Photoshop Actions
- Stunning Pictures and Photos
- Fantastic HDR Pictures
- Logo Design Tutorials
- Free Design Templates
- 10 Mistakes In Logo Design
- Photoshop Custom Shapes
- 40 Creative Design Layouts
- 8 Layout Solutions
- 53 CSS Techniques
- Photography Techniques
- Black & White Photography
- Styling Design Elements
- CSS-Based Forms
- 50 jQuery Techniques
- 50 Portfolio Websites
- 50 CSS Techniques
- Creative Logo Designs
- Desktop Wallpapers
- 25 Open Source Mac Apps
- 50 Free Icon Sets
- Learn Something Every Day: a nice little blog updated every day - http://bit.ly/rmcES
- We’re Ready for CSS3, but are we Ready for CSS3? - http://bit.ly/cKN7Bz
- lovely-css: a grid-based CSS framework - http://bit.ly/ayA0wb
- How The CSS Selector nth-child Works - http://bit.ly/cgPMqe
- 33 New High Quality Adobe Illustrator Tutorials - http://bit.ly/bTgFbu
- How to Drastically Improve Your Designs - http://bit.ly/a9L1sb
- A Quick Look at Mobile Web Designs - http://bit.ly/9TCWCG






(3 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)
Impressive