Smashing Magazine - we smash you with the information that will make your life easier. really.

I saw them all over the net. Some of them are really nice.

I think technology enables to do a lot of cool things; whether the things technology can do is useful or not depends on the application–and that is what it depends on totally; these examples although intriguing seem a bit distracting and not to the point. I think Flash is a cool technology, I think is has some applications it excels at over static content, however, I see Flash as mostly “a cool technology”, now the one thing Flash does have over many technology’s is that a large percentage of people have it installed on machines, if Flash were a “browser” if you will, and you could build a website with it that was searchable and accessible then we might have something, I don’t follow Flash that much so I don’t know if this is in the pipelines, all that I know is that people like there information fast and efficient and to the point–a least from a capitalist perspective–and maybe that is changing with my “oh that looks cool generation” but as for me despite my generation I’m in the party where I think content matters more then flashy presentation, there are a lot of arguments in between that statement, but for the most part in a business minded world where globalization is nothing but inevitable, I still firmly believe that people value content more then flashiness if you will. Take books for instance, all books are inbetween these cardboard covers some of them we consider brilliant books some of them we consider crap, but notice the presentation for the most part of books is the same hardback or paper back or perhaps spiral. So in the end while these sites are “hey look at me” I think for the most part people at this point in time still value the traditional web layout, I don’t think this has been fully realized yet however, as we are just entering a period of time where standards are starting to “be important” again I think this is just an example of business taking precidence overall over flashy presentation.

Leo Burnett’s web site is very awesome indeed. It has been around since i discovered flash

I don’t understand these disparaging comments toward sites that push the boundaries of imagination in web design. You would choose an advertising designer that uses 2 and 3 column CSS’s with staid color and font selection for his site over one who completely breaks the rules and develops something that hasn’t been seen before? You need to embrace your inner adventurer.

part of being a creative web designer is thinking creatively about development, and usability. Leo Burnett’s site is entertaining, but not very smart. Unless you are searching specifically for their site, it is virtually invisible to most internet searches. The intro design is the most interesting part of the entire site.

my finger and my mouse always fight when we are played this thing..but the usability will be low :D

Hmmm… Do these things make a site more user-friendly? Look nicer? Function better? Sell more?

I have to disagree with this article.

Oh.. Cursor Mania!

Go —> http://www.dontclick.it/

:)

It appears that (from this agency’s history and work) that they are always trying to “make a connection with the viewer”, this must be the reason behind their overly elaborate design; to make the site more interactive. However, the connection they are making with me through the site is frustrating and inconvenient. What does this say about their company?

I must agree as well, the navigation’s usability is quite poor. When attempting to watch videos on their SEVEN+ page, the screen keeps zooming in and out as videos start and end, then the color bars, change color so the one you had your eye on looks different requiring you to hunt for it again. This is highly frustrating. Also their history navigation I found aggravating I have to wait a long time to get to the 2000’s and then I have to keep hunting for the next tiny dot to hover my mouse over, but if I am off by just a little the dot moves away.

It’s clear though why they are successful. They give the customers what they want, and that is overly eccentric, super flashed out website, that “looks different” or “cool”. I see this all the time as a web developer myself. A concrete company will come to me and ask for a site like this. But why? This site is only useful in the right context, obviously this site is geared toward people who don’t understand much about Advertising, hence looking for an ad agency. They are then drawn in, with the crazy elaborate design that “wows them”. 99 times out of a hundred this is a site you would not want to build for a customer, however it works for an ad agency. It’s a cool idea but usability needs to be improved significantly.