Design and Independence

Advertisement

Nic Pretorius

Designers are independent. In work, mindset and lifestyle. Yet in this Web age aren’t we losing independence? For most designers the first tool to start designing from is the Adobe suite, a quite impressive set of tools that help us to make our work easier. But don’t we rely too much on Adobe? For years people have been watching how Microsoft dominated the market. We lament that its applications are bloated and criticize its efforts to wipe away competitors. But instead of taking a stand, we continue to buy its products and we continue to moan.

We always have options. And in the design process we have them too. At the moment we don’t really know to what level open source applications can compete with Adobe. But with support, with independent minds and strong community involvement, the open source movement can grow. Competition is a part of the progress and so is the choice. We need to maintain a competitive arena in design. And we need good open source alternatives for the tools we use. Independent start-ups are the lifeblood of the industry and the breath of fresh air we all need.

But apart from Microsoft, Adobe and the latest computer system to run these applications, you may have problems setting up a professional open source environment which would perfectly meet your needs. We need better open source applications for designers. And we need to work together to produce them and then use them. Just think for a second: how many young designers can afford Adobe anyway? Do we not need a platform that supports us while we support it? Doesn’t open source represent the true spirit of design?

About the author

Nic Pretorius is a web wanderer.

Editor’s note

This post is one of the finalists of our guest author contest1. Over three weeks selected top-10-lists and discussion articles will be published. To rate the articles we’ll analyze their popularity, users activity, quality of backlinks, traffic and further data.


Footnotes

  1. 1 http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/07/17/write-a-guest-post-and-win-apple-macbook-air/

↑ Back to topShare on Twitter

Some contributors with just a single posting. To learn more look at our ebook.

Advertising
  1. 1

    What the hell is this?

    0
  2. 2

    Mmm… Is that it?

    0
  3. 3

    Confused by this article. This article does not meet the quality I have come to expect from SM.

    0
  4. 4

    CREATESOMFINGdotCOM

    August 11, 2008 6:17 am

    im a little bit confused .. :S

    0
  5. 5

    Interesting point of view, but I wonder how realistic it is. Apps like Photoshop and illustrator are rock solid at what they do. New apps usually lack features that your daily workflow needs and take time to learn. Open source is great, WordPress is the ultimate example of that, but how realistic are the chances of open source beating Adobe at image editing or vector editing? I’m skeptical to be honest.

    0
  6. 6

    The problem with this post is that it doesn’t tell us why we should use open source. OK, I know why. I wrote my entire dissertation on it, but this just says, “Use it because you should.”

    Bonus points for not actually telling us the open source alternatives to Adobe Creative Suite and Microsoft Office. I know the ones for office (though I use iWorks) but I don’t know any good ones for Adobe.

    0
  7. 7

    Some people don’t use Adobe for whatever reason, but most people that do use Adobe don’t complain about it. It would have to take some exceptional new software for me to throw away all my adobe experience for something different.

    0
  8. 8

    Vitaly Friedman & Sven Lennartz

    August 11, 2008 6:23 am

    @all: yes, this is it. Please read about our guest author contest here: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/07/17/write-a-guest-post-and-win-apple-macbook-air/.

    0
  9. 9

    In principle, open source is the way to go. In practice however, designers are left with few options but to toe the line. Open source applications are still some way away (years?) before they become viable alternatives. Until the open source community comes up with applications that can match or better proprietary ones, it would only be wishful thinking to ask professionals to forgo tools that work in favor of tools that merely represent an ethic.

    0
  10. 10

    I am not get you, exactly …..

    0
  11. 11

    This is a very interesting perspective.

    Open source applications bring with them a level of evolution, where the application flourishes as new people and ideas are brought into the mix and share what they have created. Apps like WordPress, Processing etc. would not be where they are today if it wasn’t for independent creators adding innovation to the versatile foundation provided.

    An open-source Photoshop or Illustrator would be astounding as new ideas are applied by the global design and tech circuit. In theory, it would make both applications without limits.

    0
  12. 12

    Aren’t we forgetting a big difference between MS and adobe.

    Microsoft achieved market dominance through illegal corporate practices, Adobe achieved market dominance through making good products…

    0
  13. 13

    From a site defined by posts so long that you can barely process them all, this definitely feels very out of place.

    0
  14. 14

    Radomir Dopieralski

    August 11, 2008 6:47 am

    Have you ever really tried to use any of those open source applications? I’m using almost solely Gimp, Inkscape and Vim in my work, and they became very convenient after some time to familiarize myself with them. Sure, they are not all-singing, all-dancing automated web page manufacturing programs, with thousands of ready effects, templates and such, but my work has to be original anyways, and I like working close to the fabric. Obviously, for people who like more automation and hand-holding it’s still a long time until they are useful (I’d estimate about eterity minus one day), you know, you can get your tools for free nowadays (people who made them can still use them, even when they give them away), but nobody will just give you rough products for free (after they are used in enough places, they become worthless).

    So yes, Open Source is a great source of useful tools and gadgets that you can use to make your work easier. I doubt it will ever be a source of ready-made, half-chewed, automated solutions that Adobe and Corel sell.

    0
  15. 15

    Yes, @ 12. Adobe products are the best!

    And products like gimp are good for beginners but there will be the point where you will get the big wall and you have to get a better software for your work.

    0
  16. 16

    Open source sucks, the money spend on Adobe is the best u will ever spend. As designer u almost make instant profit by just buying it because u know it will improve your workflow.

    Gimp vs photoshop… Its like choosing to drink your own piss (gimp) or nice cold relaxing beer (photoshop)…

    0
  17. 17

    “how many young designers can afford Adobe anyway?” Come on… Your first decent project will cover all your software expenses… You’ve got to use the tools you prefer, not the cheapest one. We are talking about 2 000 EUR/USD softwares at most, not 20 000, and 2 000 is *nothing* for a professional designer.

    0
  18. 18

    @Thibaut: Totally agree!!!

    0
  19. 19

    “It¹s a poor workman who blames his tools.”
    Unknown

    0
  20. 20

    I’m a big fan of Open Source, my entire business is based around Joomla … but you will pry my Photoshop and Illustrator from my cold, dead hands. I’m fine with OpenOffice and of course I only open Internet Explorer to check pages for clients, but there is no substitute for Photoshop and Illustrator for a professional.

    When there is one, I’m there.

    0
  21. 21

    I too feel that Adobe is dominating the market.But we have to keep in mind how they came to this far.Corel,GIMP and say a dozens who came and gone.None lacked the interface usability of Adobe.i can say that.I think only corel photo paint survived to some extend.But cant be called a competitor at all.But whatever i think ADOBE is the best.They must lead the industry into creating a benchmark in R&D

    0
  22. 22

    “Come to think of it, how many young designers can afford Adobe anyway?”
    Good point, but I’d like to point out that Microsoft has provided us, students, with a set of web development and designer tools for free (Microsoft DreamSpark), maybe it’s time to move from Adobe & Flash and try out Microsoft & Silverlight?

    Althou’ GIMP is a good tool, as profesionals we need more, something like Photoshop/Illustrator…

    0
  23. 23

    This was an absolutely painful article to read. I love the idea of guest posts, but maybe Smashing Magazine should do a little proofreading and editing on the posts before publishing. The point of the article is completely destroyed and eclipsed by the amazing amount of grammatical errors and badly formatted sentences it contains.

    0
  24. 24

    Moderately written article with an excellent though behind it. There’s something to think about in the seemingly unsaid view of “all artists use Adobe” just like “you’re only a real artist if you use a Mac.” Indeed, both are generally excellent tools (I use both) but isn’t there something equally as attractive in using another “outsider” tool and knowing it so well that you can use it to all purposes? That step back and re-learn process is probably more than most people in the industry can afford (literally) to do, but is the thought itself that horrifying?

    0
  25. 25

    @16 (V1), Succinct and to the point :)

    0
  26. 26

    Jonathan, don’t you mean “…grammatical errors and *poorly* formatted sentences it contains?” If we’re to be picky about such things. ;)

    0
  27. 27

    It would be a win-win situation if there did exist some OS that could compete with Adobe. For some time now I’ve had the suspicion that with no real competitor they are resting on their laurels a bit.

    0
  28. 28

    I think I see where you are coming from, but your point about us needing competitors for Adobe I think I disagree with. Because I think Adobe is a company which prides itself on pushing technologies and capabilities, and although yeah some competition is always good, I think that IF* we did take away all of Adobe’s competitors it would still strive to bring us something new and exciting.

    There is a reason that Adobe is top, and a reason that Microsoft is top, that’s because they are innovators, and I think that that innovation is in them, regardless of how their competitors are moving forward.

    0
  29. 29

    Vitaly Friedman & Sven Lennartz

    August 11, 2008 8:32 am

    @all: the article was edited. The next articles will be edited as well.

    0
  30. 30

    This looks like a keyword paragraph. However, software that is carefully crafted, with usability in mind rather than “features” will always be better. Some softwares like CinePaint, Gimp might be bloated with features but they don’t feature a fast workflow. Even this small software named Artweaver has usability in mind, although it’s lacking some features. Let’s not mention the integration between Photoshop, Illustrator, Flash, AfterEffects, etc I’d like to see if Gimp can embed Smart Clips from Inkscape, which is IMHO the better crafted OS software.

    0
  31. 31

    This article has a lot of potential to be something better than this. Something I would consider for another open source based article is to show exactly how an open source program (like the Gimp) can really benefit a graphics designer.

    Now I know the Gimp is powerful, but realistically its a tool rather than a solution for graphic designers. I use it for specific purposes that over time I’ve discovered by just having fun with it.

    You’re not going to sell someone on the idea of moving outside of their comfort zone until you begin to give them a reason to. Open source is fantastic, and deserves to be represented as such.

    0
  32. 32

    This article is NOT up to SM standards. There is better content in the comments on this article. The character limit for your competition was obviously too low.

    As for open source: Unfortunately the design world is still a bit of an elite world. I highly doubt you’d get hired as a designer if you list GIMP and Inkscape instead of Adobe CS2 or CS3. If you are a Freelancer, it might be worth it. (Although I would only use it to make money to buy CS3…) I have no idea if GIMP can even open .PSD files, or that Inkscape can open .AI files. I’m already running into trouble with designers sending me their work as Freehand files, which I cannot open.

    @D: Silverlight is no competition for Flash (yet). Penetration of the plug-in is low. The install percentage of Flash is around 98% (As claimed by Adobe).

    0
  33. 33

    opensource 4 openminded
    ———————————-
    some comments to this article are maybe typical from readers, who just come to read some news, steal some inspirations and download some sourcefiles for their datanirvana…

    it’s a shame to read such comments here on sm, like: “poor workman, who blames his tools…” sorry. can’t agree!

    i agree, that this article has not the quantity and quality of the known smashing magazine articles, but who cares. it is just one of hundred…

    But the tenor of this article is the ideology of the opensource community and we should all be pleased, that there are still “some/a lot” people outthere, who share their knowledge. our daily workflow, wouldn’t be such comfortable for us without them. we all should keep in mind, that we “all” are part of a progress, now.

    how would you feel, if there wouldn’t be free fonts, freeware, free scripts and sourcefiles on the net anymore…
    how would you do interaction things without opensource (e.g. processing, nodebox, pure data, draw bot, …)?!

    So, you have the choice to buy a commercial tool or you are lucky to find an opensource tool, with nearly the same functions for free.
    But that’s the fact, you have the option!

    Please, do not misunderstand me. In case of desktop publishing are the adobe tools any penny worth. (owner of the master collection) But not erverybody is able to pay round about 3.500€ for software.

    0
  34. 34

    Lame!, Borring!, where are those ALTERNATIVE Open Source Software?, put something really useful, not just ab “article-comment”

    Cheerz!,
    ¿SM, what is this?

    0
  35. 35

    @ Derek Mounce – I don’t claim to be a grammaticist, I’m just trying to make a point about proofreading and quality of writing playing a huge role in the reception and interpretation of any written publication.

    Also, if we are going to be picky about such things, check out the definition of “badly” or write a constructive comment that refutes my point.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/badly

    0
  36. 36

    realistically the killers of the design community are not and I repeat are not our tools ie our software costs, our computer costs, and our tools to cut things and take photos of things. Our costs are rising that is for sure. But do you know what is lowering? Our demand.

    Demand look at it like this some small company wants a logo in any city in america 20 years ago, they’d have to ask all of their friends for a designer… then if guy’s/gals work didn’t meet their expectations they’d look up books on designers, and or contact a talent scout or agency. Well Guess what people like that do today. They post up an ad on craigslist or something of the sort or try to get someone on a similar site to do it for 1/10th the rate someone should be doing the work for. And all the while we’re dealing with inflation. There is plenty of money for design here and elsewhere, it just isn’t being spent on it. Last week the head of aquent suggested that globalization is going to change design. Well I agree it’s going to lower is value. And it has. So unless the design community does something about that, than who cares how much adobe software costs I just wish it cost the same equivalent here as it does elsewhere.

    0
  37. 37

    design is MORE than just knowing how to use a piece of software.

    design is MORE than just USING a piece of software

    design is MORE than just a piece of software.

    a DESIGNER knows this.

    maybe that’s why we have a ‘web wanderer’ writing an article for SM. I can’t believe this is one of the finalists? Is this is really one of the best ‘articles’ sent?

    @joseph (36) is correct. free software does NOTHING for DESIGNERS, if anything it hurts us. With free software anyone can call itself “designer’ and start churning out posters, and copy/paste websites and Color 101 best of class flyers, etc.

    0
  38. 38

    so there were 200 entries and this was really one of the 10 best? uh oh…

    0
  39. 39

    Printed design is tied up in the huge costs of printing. One failed run can ruin a small design company. I was warned whilst studying design that most companies fail in the UK after 5 years.

    Are you going to risk your business on software in the case of GIMP which seem to be developed from the point of what widget is fun for the developer to make rather than making well designed usable software. To be honest it goes two ways the OS community need to start talking to designers much more than designers need to talk to them, as it is not just the design software that needs a designers eye.

    Adobe does need competition, Quark is an active example of what happens to a company when it has little competition. However on the web and the home Adobe has just that. I use Adobe software, I use OS software, I use shareware and other companies apps. Everyone I know has a different setup to creating HTML and CSS. They need more professional competition, but I can’t see it coming from OS.

    0
  40. 40

    Of all of this I would still have greatly preferred a list of comparable open source projects that could be used in lieu of a commercial application, specifically those sold by Adobe. In the case of Dreamweaver there are a number of free applications, though I prefer commercial alternatives such as a combination of MAMP Pro and Coda.

    One I would be most interested in finding an alternative for is Adobe’s Flash. Much of the application I do not use. I need only the ability to create basic symbols and use my scripts. Components and so forth are useless to me, as is the built-in documentation and HTML exporting abilities. Even the projector formats are of no use. No, a Flash alternative would be most welcome.

    @3lab: The quote mentioned about workmen and tools is actually a very famous quote and an extremely valid point. No matter what software a web designer uses if they have no skill the end result will still be poor. A skilled designer can make a good design in Paint and build it with Notepad, Photoshop simply makes the process easier.

    Also, only a few have actually damned open source. Those few are misguided, in my opinion. The net was founded on open source and it’s principles and it is from this that all the best things on the web spring forth into the world. If you re-read the comments you will see many are simply commenting on the quality of the writing, not on the content or root-message.

    @Jonathan: Your grammar was fine. People forget that the vast majority of grammar isn’t rules so much as vague guidelines. Most important is the improper use of words and tense, the rest is mostly subjective.

    0
  41. 41

    While I believe that in screen-based design open source software could be a great alternative, in the “offline” world it just doesn’t work that way. Maybe larger companies that can afford experimental projects could play around with these programs, however, most companies are not willing to loose more money through mistakes generated by software output than what they need to spend on reliable softwares.

    0
  42. 42

    I’m not sure I understand the vehemence against this article. Neither the writing quality nor the length were typical SM-caliber. But there seems to be a bit of a anti-open source backlash going on the same time.

    Can somebody explain this to me? Why are designers so emotionally tied to the Adobe suite and doesn’t anybody else see this monopolisitc structure being potentially very bad for (our) business?

    And why isn’t anybody responding to the article’s actual thesis, ie. that with community particpation and development the tools that can’t yet compete with Adobe can be brought up to snuff?

    0
  43. 43

    1. “What the hell is this?” – Shuuun

    Well, the article was intended to be a question to the design community. The competition asked for “discussion articles” and “original ideas”. Since the majority of designers use Adobe, I have long wondered if it would be feasible to run an open source business. I work with Adobe tools, but in the environment we are living in, the idea of independence has been running through my head a lot. I made no comments about the quality of Adobe products, since the quality is excellent. I also did not say that we must move away from Adobe, I am posing a question. My grouping of Adobe and Microsoft was based purely on the fact that they are dominant in their respective markets.

    The comment towards the end of the article about designers and being able to afford the product was based around the fact that plenty of young people that use Adobe have not bought it. I was not talking about “professional designers”.

    As for writing quality, constructive criticism can lead to improvement.

    Regarding comment 37, that open source does “NOTHING”. If you use Firefox or WordPress, then you will know the value of open source and what it can do. I would hope a “DESIGNER” would know that.

    Best regards

    nic

    0
  44. 44

    Maybe if the author could suggest some open software he uses, or make actual comparisons of other products that compete with adobe that could strengthen his appeal for designers to try them out. Not just say some whimsical ideal and expect it to be analyzed and taken on board.

    0
  45. 45

    I’m all for open source software, as long as it works well and has a similar interface. I have played with The Gimp(raster) and Inkscape(vector). They look like good programs. I just cannot justify learning how to do everything over again, when I have CS3 loaded already and am completely comfortable in the Adobe applications. I love the Adobe products. I only wish they didn’t cost as much.

    0
  46. 46

    Joseph Maguire reply hit the nail on the head. We need to act as a community and raise our standards, problem is people in india and the like will never follow suit.

    0
  47. 47

    well wat the use to move to open source application, does it reflect our creativity if we use or not use Adobe software. What is the use of this question man? we designer are using those software as a global connection. We have standardized the formats, thus we can exhange source files (a.i, PSD format). If everyone using its own different software, how will we be able to edit a work done by another designer on another software?

    0
  48. 48

    I am saying is that for years, without ever be considered a creative graphic. we talk about the need to have better applications, but … really know what already exist?
    these could not integrate the main applications? we call creative and we do not know out of the photoshop’s world, as designed, we go into crisis when we are placed in a different environment.

    0
  49. 49

    darkprint wrote:
    “well wat the use to move to open source application, does it reflect our creativity if we use or not use Adobe software. What is the use of this question man? we designer are using those software as a global connection. We have standardized the formats, thus we can exhange source files (a.i, PSD format). If everyone using its own different software, how will we be able to edit a work done by another designer on another software?”

    my answer is:
    then as worked as a designer? with copy paste on creations already made?

    0
  50. 50

    Dear Craig S., …then there is no independence if we are so limited. I like to use many programs that do the same thing in a different ways. I work with mac and recently I discovered pixelmator. it generates beautiful figures that reproduce with photoshop it takes time x4. then you can adjust to make them less artificial. but you designers (I do not know what species) love create a square that used dozens of rows of tutorials. but is not the result that counts? or an image is not trivial if you spent a day on it?
    not in all cases means.

    0
  51. 51

    Please, explained better Rakesh, and which is the style of MS?

    0
  52. 52

    Right Lilia, but one of the characteristics of the designer is not creativity, open-mindedness? then we should know to find ‘independently’, by itself, the instruments for his work? Gimp, bonomo, mutapic, etc., do not create different results in the hands of several supposed creators?

    0
  53. 53

    regarding msg 41: the great designers, designers professionals, did not pontificate on ‘research’, ‘testing’? and now the possible errors and delays programmes less famed damage nuisance? Boh.

    0
  54. 54

    I tried going down the open source route, I have installed Linux.

    Then went up and down the internet searching forums and open source websites for tools to replace my Mac at work or my PC at home, NO JOY!!!

    Never mind how awfull the fonts render on Linux, I think it has agreat potential, but it’s not reday yet.

    0
  55. 55

    Stick a newbie in front of Photoshop and watch their eyes light up as they use it for an hour. Stick a newbie in front of Gimp and watch them break down in tears after 10 minutes of swearing at the monitor. No contest whatsoever, I wouldn’t even call Gimp an option.

    0
  56. 56

    Honeslty.. this is confusing article

    0
  57. 57

    @Tephlon: True, my point was that even these “big bullies” like Microsoft are not so “anti-opensource”. Silverlights open-source version, Moonlight, developed by Mono and Microsoft has it’s fingers in it, supporting it and they also support SUSE.

    Silverlight is no competition to Flash yet, because it’s still in beta. Silverlight 1 is basicly dead and I believe it’s much better to use Silverlight 2, but as I said it’s still in beta. When you compare the age of Flash and Silverlight, well it’s no wonder Silverlight hasn’t catched up yet.

    It has much better support for multimedia thou’ and all-and-all it’s faster (check bubblemark). Microsofts smart advertising choices will make Silverlight popular http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/Features/2008/jul08/07-29qaolympics.mspx

    0
  58. 58

    Actually Inkscape is a pretty good replacement for Corel Draw, I always hated that program, I’ve only used it because of the easy-to-work-with nodes. The nodes are the first thing why I don’t use Adobe Illustrator, they’re so small I need to be an inch from the monitor to click on them, or you’ll mess up and move the entire object instead of one control point. I don’t wanna negate, Illustrator IS the markets BEST vector editing software, but for me – to hard to work in. Corel is much easier but as I mentioned it, I hold a personal grudge against it (Years of working with it in design school).

    Try Inkscape, it’s interesting and worth trying, it has one click line curving, better gradient tool that Illustrator and BIG nodes and control handles!. If people continue active development (v 0.46 now) the software will be mega successful. I know I will use it.

    But I will never renounce Photoshop :) I just know my way in it, since I started with version 5 7 years ago.

    0
  59. 59

    Great article, it makes a nice change from the usual SM articles :)

    0
  60. 60

    weird!
    I’m not used to read this kind of articles here. It could have been alright, if I read it somewhere else.
    It just does not fit to SM.

    0
  61. 61

    Totally agree with this opinion.
    Independence not dead.

    0
  62. 62

    ref61: can U explain your concept in more detail?

    0
  63. 63

    Could you explain more?

    0
  64. 64

    This would be good if it listed some open source alternatives. My guess is that there aren’t any open source design software good enough to use to a professional level.

    0
  65. 65

    I agree with the thought of the article that Adobe isn’t affordable while all the open-source alternatives suck, if you wanna make something real. That’s why torrents were invented, e.g.

    Still, in most countries you’re in fact completely untraceable if you’re using an illegal copy. You may use it to learn the art and then start your own business and get e.g. EU funds to pay for the original, or.. buy some old PC and old, used & cheap PS (like 5.0) as your company workstation and actually design with your power-notebook with illegal CS3 on board at home, as many do. Life is life.

    But that whole independence point is kinda naive. I mean.. We all have free will, that makes us human, no matter whether you’re a designer or not. I could point you lots of web-designers working in make-it-quick-make-a-lot companies (amount before quality), that don’t put a single thought to their projects, using some non-standard-compliant templates, praying to the clock on the office wall for the another shitty day at work to end. Slaves-like, just like other assembly-line-workers. They don’t even select what projects they’re about to do. It’s orders.

    Being a designer is just another way to express your freedom, but you gotta feel it first. it doesn’t work the other way. Others might be musicians, sportsman, other professionals and put the same speech you gave to what they do.

    0
  66. 66

    @Tephlon The Gimp does open PSD files, but unfortunately it doesn’t render Photoshop’s layer effects and type layers, so if another designer sends me a website design I will still have to use PS to open it.

    @Coningham

    While I believe that in screen-based design open source software could be a great alternative, in the “offline” world it just doesn’t work that way.

    Or vice versa: There’s a marvellous cross platform open source alternative to InDesign and Quark, called Scribus, that works really well in a print workflow. But you cannot save your Scribus documents as accessible PDFs, which renders your documents unusable for accessible websites.

    The big advantage with OSS is that you can talk to the developers at any time and suggest the features you’re missing. Chances are they will implement them in one of the next releases. That rarely works with MS or Adobe software roadmaps.

    0
  67. 67

    The big advantage with OSS is that you can talk to the developers at any time and suggest the features you’re missing.

    I forgot to say, “or add the missing features yourself, if you can”. ;)

    0
  68. 68

    This post was terrible. I come to smashing for thoughtful and helpful posts not some to read som “what if” rant with no solid suggestions of alternatives. So Adobe software is expensive… but can anybody on this page say they haven’t used the software to at least earn their money back x 10.

    0
  69. 69

    Good idea, bad execution. It’s true, this article lacks quantity, and it’s a shame really. Could’ve been so much better.

    And please, stop flaming “open source sucks”.

    0
  70. 70

    I read the article again, but I do not understand yet what the problem until we analyse the reasons for which was written and not go to analyse the players involved. you need open source high level to have a free tool similar to photoshop or whatever? well, when developers and programmers are put under the directives of photographers, designers, sound designers, musicians, etc., will go ahead with the debate.

    0
  71. 71

    ERRATA CORRIGE: … until we don’t analyse the reasons…

    0
  72. 72

    I Think with this article can be “THE 10 OPEN-SOURCE DESIGN TOOLS ALTERNATIVE TO ADOBE APPS”, because how was writed, its like “A ARTICLE TO ADOBE GIVE ME A FREE ADOBE PACK LICENSE TO WRITE A COOL REVIEW”, not really a standard SM article… :(

    0
  73. 73

    I agree with the writer that there should be better alternatives to Adobe, but Joseph has a great point too.
    Most design students should just buy Paintshop Pro (7, 8, or 9, before it changed in v.10)
    but most design students just get Photoshop through other
    ways.

    Here are free Photoshop alternatives:http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/11-free-alternatives-softwares-to-adobe-photoshop/

    @Doug S
    Here’s a list of them at Osalt.

    0
  74. 74

    Ok…so here’s my opinion about this article.

    This was considered one of the best articles because it accomplishes what smashing mag wanted, it’s generated discussion. It’s a valid argument, and as a 16 year old student, whose 30 trial has just run out on the last computer in my household, I can understand first hand the argument for students who can’t afford the software. There are academic discounts, I plan to use them, and while $600USD is still a lot for a student working part time, it’s better than $2000USD.

    I’ve gone the open source route, and actually started with GIMP. Once I started seeing others use Photoshop, and looked into all the resources available when learning Photoshop, I was intrigued. Once I used Photoshop, I could appreciate why this was *THE* professional app when it comes to graphic designers, web designers, video professionals, basically EVERYONE!

    I think the author of this article is also using sneaking and under handed tactics to generate the discussion he now has. He purposely is linking M$ with Adobe, to clearly different companies. Everyone knows that the design community favors Macs, and he’s just asking for trouble by joining a Machead’s favourite app company with their least favourite. That’s just dirty play.

    If you ask me, Timespeak said it best:

    “It¹s a poor workman who blames his tools.”
    Unknown

    Nuff said.

    0
  75. 75

    I rated it bad

    0
  76. 76

    I wonder why anyone didn’t at least mention Paint .NET….

    http://www.getpaint.net/

    I also would like to recommend Inkscape…its pretty cool for a open source vector graphics program

    0
  77. 77

    I’m too late for this… anyway

    Just because most web designers know how to code doesn’t mean ALL designers can code, and code Adobe-like applications at that! FYI Adobe DOES condone the spirit of ‘sharing’ within the design community — there are communities which thrive well through artists sharing free color palettes, brushes, vectors, and other plugins/presets that you can use with Adobe products.

    If Adobe wanted big-bad-brainwashing-level-dominance, they wouldn’t have allowed this sharing or user contribution. They would have just restricted (ie) brush making to themselves and sold each brush set for $20 each. — but then again if they were like that, their following would disappear quickly.

    0

↑ Back to top