Top 10 Usability Highs Of Mac OS

Advertisement

Although I’ve been a Windows power user for years, the transition to Mac couldn’t have been easier and more pleasant. I don’t want to turn this article into some endless rambling about how great Mac is, but as the user of both systems I can speak from my own experience quite objectively. Let’s take a look at some of the spots where Apple really has done it better in terms of user interface and usability.

1. Consistency
The whole OS and almost every application looks and feels the same, as if a single team developed the whole thing, thanks to Apple HI Guidelines. Official guidelines for user interface design made it possible for users to actually use most Mac-applications in a very same way, creating a seamless and comfortable experience in the end. Users are able to anticipate how system behaves and what to expect from its applications. In fact, consistency dramatically improves learnability and usability of interacting with the system.

2. Intuitiveness
Installing and uninstalling applications is simply drag-and-drop. It can’t get much simpler and more intuitive than that. In fact, it’s hard to make any errors here, e.g. selecting some wrong option in a drop-down menu or clicking occasionally on the cancel-button. Quick and simple.

3. Effective and appropriate metaphors
Mac effectively uses the power of unambiguous metaphors. The different overviews in the OS just work. Exposé does the right thing, Time Machine uses a 3D view where appropriate (none of that 3D-flip ‘just for the sake of it’-nonsense of Vista). Depth in Time Machine represents the location in time and therefore uses a neat metaphor helping the user, and browsing your albums with Cover Flow in iTunes (and Finder) feels almost like the real thing.

4. Informative error reporting on-demand
Contrary to other user interfaces, Mac-applicatinos display user notifications only when something goes wrong, not permanent baloons when some process is being started or finished. Think of it, do we really need someone to tell us when something goes the way it should?

5. Hiding the technical details
Manually having to defragment a hard drive? Hmm, not here. On Mac users use technical tools by communicating with simple and memorable metaphors. Most users are not savvy and they have no clue how to take care of technical details so why should a user interface prompt them to do this?

6. Fitts’ Law
Essentially, the famous Fitts’ Law says that users are more productive with the mouse when they have less distance to travel and a larger target to click on to do their tasks. Mac’s design engineers have incorporated this rule in their design: almost all application menus are attached to the top of the screen, rather than to the applications’ windows. It improves the usability and reduces screen clutter. Compared to other user interfaces, regarding Fitts’ Law Mac performs better.


Source (mock up)

7. User input feedback
Mac applications have no useless “OK” and “Apply”-buttons and changes are applied immediately and on the fly. Thus the system seems to be more responsive and requires less input from the users, making user feedback as effective as possible.


Clicking the checkbox here makes the tab bar show up in the browser window instantly. (Firefox)

8. User support and navigation
Remember Clippy? Mac has its own (OS wide) version as well, called Spotlight. The only difference is that it’s actually a lot more helpful and versatile. And damn speedy too! Really, navigating an OS hasn’t ever been that straightforward. It does calculations as well and launching applications is as easy as typing in its name and hitting Enter (see screenshot below).

9. Workflow
Mac doesn’t force you to focus on a single window, but keeps them all visible in the background ensuring a more efficient workflow. However this might be a thing of taste and getting used to.

10. Even kernel panic looks nice!
A funny but still nice example of Apple’s attention to detail. On the rare occasions when Mac crashes, it still does so in a respectable manner. Usability-wise it’s not perfect, since it doesn’t let the user know what went wrong and only asks the user to reboot the system. Still, beautiful and elegant.


Image source

I’m not saying Mac’s user interface is perfect. There is probably no perfect solution which would satisfy everyone. Yet Mac has done it right a lot of times, at least from the usability perspective. What do you think? Do you have examples when Mac fails from the usability point of view? And how exactly is Mac’s user interface better than other interfaces?

Editor’s note

This post is one of the finalists of our guest author contest. Over three weeks selected top-10-lists and discussion articles will be published. To rate the articles we’ll analyze their popularity, users activity, quality of backlinks, traffic and further data.


Juul Coolen is a web-designer living in The Netherlands. Apart from some freelance work he is still studying computer science at the university. His dream is one day to have a first-class design and development agency called Imaginized.

  1. 101

    Re point 5 “Hiding the technical details” I would agree that “Most users are not savvy and they have no clue how to take care of technical details”.

    So how can the UI icon be intuitive to most users when it shows a physical hard disk drive (which non-tech people are unlikely to recognise) labelled “Macintosh HD” (similarly, many non-tech people could interpret this as meaning “Macintosh High Definition”)

    0
  2. 102

    Thanks for all the nice and constructive replies.

    First of all I’m sorry for any spelling or grammatical mistakes. English isn’t my first language, but I try my best to act like it is :)

    I’m sure some of you people might be ‘offended’ by how Apple and Mac-focused this article is. Really my intention wasn’t to be biased, to bring other OS’s down (I’ve used Windows myself since my childhood). But I tried to write it in a somewhat informal and loose manner and just pointing on the usability highs of the particular operating system. Number 10 is basically a joke.

    Someone mentioned this hasn’t anything to do with design? Well it does, usability design is also design.

    0
  3. 103

    nice article, i’m Leopard user when i was a designer, but however i still cant living the MS Windows OS for college needs. its about software compatibility

    0
  4. 104

    I agree with all of you that is doesn’t matter really what tools you use, but it matters what you get out of them. I really don’t believe using Mac makes you a better designer slash developer. However I appreciate the little things about it, some of them which I pointed out in the article.

    Again, this is about usability and how we might learn of it. Also when there was more space I could’ve added a top 10 of lows of usability design of the Mac OS as well. I think most of the 10 topics are valid and of course there are others as well.

    0
  5. 105

    Sorry for double posting, but after reading back the article, I noticed some of my original contents to have been altered. I’m not sure all of it was for the good. And one or two spelling mistakes aren’t my fault :)

    0
  6. 106

    Great usability article… !
    and the people here who think that this is a Apple VS M$oft, well it’s funny to see how Apple is becoming more and more popular because of MacOS X quality!
    I knew an OS that was very popular because it was preinstalled on 99% of the world PC’s, cheap and full of bugs! If you want to discuss about differences, you can start here… :)

    0
  7. 107

    A big problem i have is with Number 9, it isnt a feature, its a real pain in the ass:

    “Mac doesn’t force you to focus on a single window”

    Sure, it doesn’t force you, but it doesn’t even allow you. I like to focus on what I am doing and nothing else. Why on earth do you need to see a whole bunch of toolbars and statusbars in the background, and no useful information?

    0
  8. 108

    I am a recent Mac User & I believe it is all about habits. As expected first 1 month was a torture & then all seemed to fall in place.
    Things that rock – Color Coding Folders / Dashboard / Interface Simplicity / Pure Joy when you see your mac start & all the wonderful display
    Things that suck – Finder Finder Finder! (I am using OSX) (Check this Link – he has some ideas on how finder should be)

    0
  9. 109

    I recently switched from Windows Vista to a Mac at work.

    There are some things in OSX that are downright crap.

    Maybe it’s because of working with XP and Vista for such a long time, but installing an app with the big icon drag and drop? Downright confusing.

    I don’t like the way windows of different programs lay on top of each other. It’s way too easy to accidentally click on a totally different program’s window.

    Getting to the desktop? I had to enable the active screen corners in Exposé, because for some reason alt-cmd-h (Hide all windows except this one) doesn’t work.

    The Function keys don’t work in Flash, which is a pain in the productivity. (They do now, since I turned off the Volume control etc.)

    Missing keys on the Keyboard that came with the iMac. (Where the hell are my curly and square brackets? I haven’t done any CSS coding yet, but that’s a big issue.)

    No “Home” and “End” button.

    Deleting files. Either you drag & drop to the Trash, or you have to use cmd-Backspace. Backspace only: Does Nothing. Delete: Does Nothing. cmd-Delete: Nothing.

    The Dock. I like the dock. It’s fantastic. It also gets in the way when I try to scroll horizontally in Photoshop or Firefox. (Same for the active screen corners)

    Oh and the last pet peeve: When a dialog box asks me if I really want to delete something? (This only happens when you use the cmd-Backspace keyboard shortcuts to delete a file) I have to use the tab key to move to the OK button, but then I have to hit the space bar to “click” it. The Enter-key? Does NOTHING.

    Good things: I haven’t crashed this computer yet. iTunes is faster on here. The screen is lovely (iMac). And a colleague installed Quicksilver for me.

    0
  10. 110

    Ugh: The Link refers to “Quicksilver”

    0
  11. 111

    To answer a few people who asked about breadcrumbs: you can get a full path in Finder by opening terminal and typing:

    defaults write com.apple.finder _FXShowPosixPathInTitle -bool YES

    Then type:

    killall Finder

    You will now have full paths viewable in the Finder title bar.

    —-

    Okay, and how is the workflow different from other operating systems? Being able to see windows in the background is a question of resolution, not operating system. The workflow is better, but it’s because you have things like expose, minimize/hide window options, one icon representing multiple windows, etc.

    0
  12. 112

    I think the mac is elegant. I’ve used windows since 3.1 until vista and while vista is an improvement in design and ui from its predecessors its still not as tight in the design front and the functionality front.

    I’ve also used linux and there are certain features of it that i love, certainly not the ui but i’m very comfortable on a terminal so its not a problem for me.

    I feel like the mac is this royal princess who can perform impeccably but can also be bad and dirty if she has to hence have resigned to own one as soon as i can.

    0
  13. 113

    I really like the point about kernel panics. In windows you get a blue screen with some memory pointers to help diagnose the issues, however with the Mac OS you are told to restart. When you next log into your account after you start the machine it presents and error report which you can read at use to fix the problem at your leisure.

    0
  14. 114

    No.6 “I actually have real issues with the fact that menus are always at the top of the screen. I don’t want to choose my windows and THEN go to the menu bar. I like the fact that I can click the Edit (or whichever) menu of the window next to mine without needing to change to that window first.”
    Try this (DejaMenu):
    http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/21184
    and it’s free. Get your menus from any position on the page in any app.

    0
  15. 115

    @Mitch: very valid point. I think it’s useful when doing some multi-tasking, however I agree for example with applications like Photoshop you don’t want everything else to remain visible in the back. I remember it to be distracting, especially in the beginning, but you get used to it. I think both Windows and Mac aren’t perfect on this matter.

    A lot of points have pro’s and con’s to it, and some are also a case of getting accustomed to.

    0
  16. 116

    Harv, just what is a UI with class? Oh you want more error codes and confusing messages about filetypes you need to be a programmer to understand? Or if you’re a Linux user, you like having a useless UI since you primarily run everything through terminal anyway? Is that classy? I’ve tried all three top oses and frankly, I see more intelligent design on the mac than anywhere else. The only thing second is the amazing implementation of the design. Judging from your opinion, you either don’t know how to use a mac, or you just simply spent about a day or two with one and didn’t really use it. I mean really, of all the things you could say in favor of windows, interface is hardly one of them.

    0
  17. 117

    “coomunicating”?

    A nice typo!

    :)

    0
  18. 118

    I’m sorry Tao, but I’m sure I didn’t misspell it myself. Some parts were edited by SM and thus out of my control unfortunately.

    0
  19. 119

    Intuitiveness is a very hard concept. When I tried to install Skype on a mac, I didn’t manage even after 15 minutes. I just looked at the picture with skype on one side, an arrow and some sort of folder on the right side. Then I tried to find this folder in the finder and tried to move the downloaded file into there. I tried things like this for 15 minutes until I called for help.

    I didn’t find the UI for installing intuitive at all. It is intuitive if you know what it means, but it really is very ambigous.Personally I think they could have put just a little text there to instruct me what to do. But even more intuitive would be if they asked you “Do you want to install Skype?” and presented “Yes” and “No” buttons.

    0
  20. 120

    “I don’t want to turn this article into some endless rambling about how great Mac is, but as the user of both systems I can speak from my own experience quite objectively.”

    I guess you didn’t totally contradict yourself with that statement, it did eventually end. Whew.

    0
  21. 121

    I enjoyed this article , because unlike most windows users. I can embrace change and currently use a mac and a pc regulary. I use windows xp for coding , since visual studio is unparralleled and OSX for music production and regular internet use and occasionally the odd linux based work i need to do.

    I find it hillarious that most of the comments here are complaining about an article on useability on OSX when lets face it. Apple got it a lot more right with leopard than microsoft have with vista.
    But it seems most computer users are so stuck in there old ways that they can’t appreciate any other way of doing things which makes me sad.

    0
  22. 122

    Q5 Grafisch Webdesign

    August 13th, 2008 5:40 am

    Ofcourse everyone has it’s favorite. I still prefer Microsoft, but that’s probely because i work wit them for over 15 years now….

    0
  23. 123

    Love my Mac, although have a PC at work. Nonetheless, I would like to point to some flaws in the Mac, particularly blatant to those that tend to use keyboard shortcuts (I suffered from a painful tendinitis and now try to avoid using the mouse as much as possible).
    Very often, the ESC button does not work
    Shame the Apple menu cannot be activated from the keyword, in the same way as the START menu in Windows
    You cannot move from one e-mail message to next/prior from within a message.
    To delete files, most often you have to drag them with your mouse and drop them in the Trash
    etc. etc.
    Some of these cases may have a solution if you install some plug-in (e.g., to flip from one file to another within the same application “à la ALT+TAB in windows), but generally speaking, I find it very irritating this whole Mac’s over-reliance on the mouse
    Besides that, I do love my Mac :-)

    0
  24. 124

    While some are valid, these complaints are short-sighted and a lot of times wrong (or because no one took any time to learn about it in the first place – or such a preconceived notion on how it should work because they’ve used Windows for so long). Do you expect to know everything about the Mac in 10 minutes of use?

    Example:

    “To delete files, most often you have to drag them with your mouse and drop them in the Trash”

    Move file to trash: Command-Delete
    Empty trash: Command-Shift-Delete?

    And this false statement from Grimmygrim:

    6. There is no built-in support for Mac’s favorite compression, StuffIt, whereas Windows and Linux has built-in support for zip (and in Linux’s case gzip).

    The Mac’s favorite compression is Stuffit? Back in the 90′s it was. Zip is built in on the Mac as well. Right-click (or Control-click) on a file/folder and choose “Create Archive of {file/folder}” (This is in Tiger, the menu name changed slightly in Leopard) And then there’s the terminal where you can use any number of compression commands.

    Installing an app non-intuitive? Do it once. Now you know how to do it again.

    Need to go to the start or end of a line?
    Start of line: Command-left arrow (or Command – up arrow)
    End of line: Command-right arrow (or Command – down arrow)

    And on and on…

    0
  25. 125

    regarding point# 6, Fitts’ Law doesn’t make sense here. On OS X, for every window you have to go all the way to the top of the screen (=more distance travelled), so i don’t know what you’re trying to say here. As an example, the quicktime player window has all the playback buttons but for the menu you have to go all the way to the top of the screen.

    As for point# 9, I totally agree with you it’s about taste. That’s why in windows i have the option of doing what i want. Personally i’ve never maximized a window on my 2560×1600 dell monitor, i can see edges of inactive windows (I always have multiple windows open and i always see my gadgets on the google desktop sidebar). Talking about choice, maximizing windows on OSX sucks balls.

    Anyways i don’t want this to sound like a windows fanboy rant, it’s just that the rest of the article is well written and these two points sound like they were added for the heck of it (probably because a top 10 list sounds better than a top 8 list).

    0
  26. 126

    As an interface designer, I have a few comments:
    I use both windows and macs, and I can agree with some of the comments, but then again, there is no perfect interface, as everybody thinks and works differently.
    Obviously the “techies” prefer windows as they like tinkering with the software and hardware, plus they are used to the operating system and feel is the right way to do things.
    On my personal experience, I have three windows computers at home (one is a laptop) and one macbook pro. My wife and kids prefer the mac, even when the other computers are similar or even more powerful. They don’t mind waiting for me to finish using it, when the pc laptop is available. “It just works” says my wife, Even my old father just purchased a mac after 20 years of windows usage, is a matter of “being able to do the work” instead of constantly having to adjust the settings or system. That’s the beauty of usability, and the mac does it best.
    When windows PC can be used by a 8 year old kid after 2 minutes of learning about it, will attain the mac’s usability.

    0
  27. 127

    Check item 6 on the list. How exactly does the mouse travel LESS when the menus are FURTHER from the application window.

    Here are the reasons why I cannot switch to OSX (from Windows) despite the desire to have a more attractive computer setup:

    1. No richt click. I would need to change the mouse to get right click and change the keyboard to get something that actually lets your hands rest while typing. I execute probably 80% of all system functions that I need from context menus using the right-click. How can anybody claim that moving a mouse an inch onscreen is better than dragging icons to far-away droppoints?

    2. OSX does not communicate when something is happening. You click and icon and, well, wait. Then something opens or doesn’t. The cursor does not react to clickable areas.

    3. With windows the functions you need are always there where you need them. As a graphic designer I love clean design and understand the OSX design principles, but it just makes things faster to have functions repeated in different contexts in the system.

    4. The application menu is always far away from the application window itself. How does this make anything useable? Apple applications look nice in screenshots since they are missing the whole menu which is severed from the window. Insane.

    5. Font rendering. Fonts look messy in OSX. Microsoft has really taken onscreen typography to the level where it should be using subpixel rendering.

    6. The Dock. This is just ridiculous. I can’t find anything in the dock with all icons looking just as candy as the next. The Windows taskbar is just miles ahead in terms of usability.

    7. Browsing for files is a pain in the ass on OSX. With Windows there are dozens of different views and contexts where you can access files either using links, directory trees or other file-windows. You can type a path if you happen to remember it or even type FTP/HTTP addresses to access servers. With OSX what you have is a weird and unintuitive multi-column show with clipped filenames showing little or no useful file information.

    8. Programs do crash on OSX. And when they do, they just stop working. Or disappear. Atleast in Windows a crashing situation become obvious without having to search for a application gone missing of wondering why buttons have stopped responding.

    9. I use my computer to do work the way I think is best. So I want to tune by OS to work best with my style of working. I want certain directories to appear one way and others another way. I want to know what the computer is doing. I want to feel the machine working. I want to know what it is doing and when its done with it. I want to know when something has gone wrong. With OSX I am being treated like an idiot. The OSX understimates me as a computer-literate user. OSX is great for that low-maintenance toy in the kids room, not for work.

    10. Overall responsiveness. Windows is snappy, it responds fast to commands and operations. All extra animations can be removed to get that no-delay experience. Every time on OSX I get the feeling that I am not able to do things as fast as I could.

    0
  28. 128

    quite interesting to see how stressful the debate is.
    Being a 1 week switcher to MacBook (15years of Windows+Linux), I can only say I’m very impressed with the overall system performance and layout.
    My principal needs are Firefox and any Multimedia player (VLC…), therefore any system embedding it that in a neat and tidy way will do it.
    Apple / Mac machines fill theses need hands down, and are actually just “enjoyable” to use, which is massive purchase argument, all in all

    0
  29. 129

    i was just like you awhile ago. what i did was went out and bought one and forget about all the upcoming stuff. apple is lame with announcing new macbooks. if you’re going to keep waiting, you’ll never get one because of all the rumors.

    0
  30. 130

    linux is going to be the best in the coming years… :)

    0
  31. 131

    ahh, feel the love from all the Mac-haters out there! NO computer system or OS is perfect or ever will be, assuming the obvious fact that people have different taste in workflow. i don’t feel like this was an anti-Windows attack, but i believe it would have been more aptly advertised as a comparison of the two OS’ with a glowing review of the Mac platform.

    it seems this is a debate that will flame on forever. if you even mention that a feature is better in one OS or the other, proponents of the opposite OS will fire back with a (most times) angry retort!

    let me pose this question though…why does Microsoft have to trick people into finding the good points of Vista by nicknaming it “Mojave?” really, a taste test? is this Microsoft, or Carls Jr!

    0
  32. 132

    @Mikael: I think those are all good points and I mostly agree. Obviously all operating systems have their highs and lows.

    Apparently, I (Vitaly Friedman) have misunderstood author’s ideas in some parts of the post. I am really sorry for that. (edited by the Editor)

    0
  33. 133

    Uninstalling by drag and drop? What about all the preferences and shared resources in the /Library and /user/Library folder?

    You seemed to have not had to re-install Adobe Creatives Suite multiple times and run bash scripts in order to remove the left-over preferences.

    0
  34. 134

    h-a-r-v –

    If it’s nice, fancy, and clear, how does it lack class? I would say those things together would pretty much exude class in a consumer product…certainly in an operating system.

    0
  35. 135

    @Mikael You’d think with all the power user / programmers on Macs now they’d document this, but you can do command line Finder window by hitting “/” in the Finder window.

    0
  36. 136

    Here we go again.

    @Mikael:

    1. No richt click. I would need to change the mouse to get right click and change the keyboard to get something that actually lets your hands rest while typing. I execute probably 80% of all system functions that I need from context menus using the right-click. How can anybody claim that moving a mouse an inch onscreen is better than dragging icons to far-away droppoints?

    Duh. Get a two button mouse. Or use the one you already have.

    3. With windows the functions you need are always there where you need them. As a graphic designer I love clean design and understand the OSX design principles, but it just makes things faster to have functions repeated in different contexts in the system.

    What you are describing is exactly the purpose of Apple’s HI Guidelines. Are you sure you don’t have this the other way around? Please describe.

    5. Font rendering. Fonts look messy in OSX. Microsoft has really taken onscreen typography to the level where it should be using subpixel rendering.

    This is obviously personal preference. I would argue the other way.

    6. The Dock. This is just ridiculous. I can’t find anything in the dock with all icons looking just as candy as the next. The Windows taskbar is just miles ahead in terms of usability.

    Oops. In point # 3 you said you were a graphic designer. Or do you prefer design that is not about candy? Maybe you could just replace your icons then? Check out CandyBar by Panic.

    8. Programs do crash on OSX. And when they do, they just stop working. Or disappear. Atleast in Windows a crashing situation become obvious without having to search for a application gone missing of wondering why buttons have stopped responding.

    Yes, programs do crash. Yes, they stop working. You mean they crash on Windows and still work? Isn’t that more confusing?

    Applications gone missing? Maybe you should check your system for ghosts.

    4. The application menu is always far away from the application window itself. How does this make anything useable? Apple applications look nice in screenshots since they are missing the whole menu which is severed from the window. Insane.

    Which application window? The first instance of Firefox you have running or the second instance or the third? ;)

    0
  37. 137

    Lol. Did you ever attempt pushing the F9 (or Exposé button in leopard)??? F10 and F11 are quite useful as well.

    0
  38. 138

    So many people in these comments just show over and over again, that they haven’t even bothered to try to use a Mac for more than 2 minutes. They just continue to believe pre-conceived ideas and don’t realise the so-called ‘missing feature’ is there all along, it’s just in a slightly different place.

    Most Windows to Mac switchers look for the hard ways to do a task. When I show them how its really done, they can’t believe how simple it was and completely overlooked the obvious.

    The Mac has supported 2 button mice for about 10 years, and been sold with them for the last few. Right-click contextual menus have been in the Mac OS since Mac OS 9 at least.

    For the people who are still living in the mid-90′s and believe that Mac’s are over-priced read this:
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/apple-mac-leopard-windows-vista,1985.html

    0
  39. 139

    RE: 2. Intuitiveness (Application Install)

    What is the point of having a sweet drag and drop app install interface if there are dramatically less apps to install? You use Wine but its not the same as running natively.

    For every glossy Mac app there are dozens of Windows apps that have the same functionality if not more. Without a huge range of apps what use is an OS? Along with the apps there’s no games either, you say there no demand but every time one gets promised Mac fans go wild, even if it’s some made for Wine abortion.

    The reason for this is however much you think Mac is taking over there are so many more Windows users still, over 90% of the market. They are writing apps and buying software and until Apple can change this I can’t see things changing any time soon.

    For example they cater entirely for the well off, they don’t even have a proper budget range. In the developing world people will be buying a pc for the first time. With sub $200 PCs with Linux or Windows expensive propriety hardware/software like Apple Macs don’t stand a chance.

    Macs will continue to be a toy for the well off, ‘in crowd’ and computer illiterate.

    0
  40. 140

    Why did someone have to write another Mac article that opened the whole Win fanboy vs Mac fanboy debate?

    @ubuntu user –

    RE: your inane rambling.

    dude… its a computer, not a religion, take it easy hater. Sounds like you dont like macs because you feel like you cant afford one or its for some elite class. I think you should direct your hate to all those LCD and Plasma TV makers that dont make cheap versions for the developing world…. what a bunch of jerks! Yeah! then go after Mercedez Benz… those dregs dont make a low end car for people of lesser means… HOW DARE THEY!

    :P

    0
  41. 141

    I disagree with point number 6.
    I find that I have more space to travel when I have to go back to the menu bar at the top of the screen, ESPECIALLY in a multi-monitor environment.

    0
  42. 142

    For Exposé in Windows, you could use a program called Desposé. It’s basically the same thing. I like Mac, but it’s just too expensive for me. I tried it once with a kalaway install but didn’t exactly like it. It’s got an okay UI and all but it feels like an OS made so computer illiterate people wouldn’t be able to break it. Besides, Windows gets way more free and open source apps than Macintosh.

    0
  43. 143

    Hah, you just said ‘Windoz’ so ner

    0
  44. 144

    Yes! Most of the people complaining that the Mac OS cannot do this or that simply have not learned how to do it on the Mac OS.

    Actually complaining about the non-intuitiveness of dropping an app. icon that is sitting next to huge text that says “DROP THIS IN YOUR APPLICATIONS FOLDER” and simply dropping the icon into one’s Applications folder that (if you were a more savvy Mac OS user) is sitting right there in your doc. It must simply be too easy for your Microsoft-conditined ways…

    Hello!, that Mac mouse has 4 (four) available buttons on it for customization. Just because you cannot “see” the left and right mouse button does not mean they are not both there. 3rd button is pushing down the scroll wheel itself and 4th button are the two on the left/right sides that one squeezes. All four buttons are customizable. If you need to actually see visible lines that differentiate the left and right buttons, I guess one could spend $15 and buy a different mouse.

    I have one machine that I can easily load os X, Windows (Vista or XP), or Ubuntu (Linux) and switch very quickly to any of them.

    I am sick of the analogy that because your Windows OS is more complicated to use, that it is more adult-like and that the simplicity of the Mac OS is equated to child-like. That analogy, in general, is child-like.

    Fonts look VASTLY better on Mac os. In fact the font actually looks like the font would look on the printed page with the Mac OS. All you Windows folks have been living with those jaggy, non-fonts for so long you cannot even remember what real fonts look like. I think this is one of the biggest/most fundamental issues with Mac vs Windows arguments. Fonts look like pure garbage on a Windows box. Whenever I need to load up Windows on my Intel Mac to test how changes to my website render in IE (another huge piece of garbage), I am forced to see how ugly fonts render in Windows. It is 2008, what is up with this! The only response I seem to get is: 1) Windows users are used to fonts looking like 1993 windows 3.1……or 2.) Windows clear type anti-aliasing techniques actually make fonts more readable that Mac OS, at the expense of the on-screen rendering actually looking like the font it is supposed to be representing. The answer to both has to be a resounding no-way!

    0
  45. 145

    I became a fan of this magazine a few weeks back because of some sensible articles on web techniques. This article, however, is not sensible at all, and I advise some research should be done before spouting terms like Fitt’s Law. While the menu bar at the top of the screen makes an infinite target space, how often do you actually use it? And it’s much more demanding to use than a Windows machine if you happen to own one of those gigantic 30″ displays that only Apple popularises..

    Anyhow, I can’t say I’m a fan of the technical side of Mac OS X’s usability – it’s not consistent (can you say Brushed Metal?), keyboard shortcuts are numerous but often cranky (Adobe apps break HIDE!!), and the lack of true MDI interfaces is more annoying to my workflow than not. I hate being able to see crap on my desktop while I’m trying to click a button!

    I love OSX and use it daily, but in terms of pure usability I think it’s a dead heat between OSX and Windows.

    0
  46. 146

    Sebhelyesfarku

    August 14th, 2008 3:41 am

    Mactards drink too much Kool-Aid. Apple is an overhyped p.o.s.

    -1
  47. 147

    As a very long-time Mac User, I would disagree with the application uninstall argument under point 2. While many applications are that way, a number of applications (particularly those ported from Windows) do not use the app bundle intelligently, or don’t put their files in the right places (I’m looking at you, ~/Documents/Microsoft User Data/). Games are often the worst, because of their placement of media files.

    That said, even the worst-case apps are still just a matter of deleting a folder or three, if you can find them; it’s very rare that they’ll dump stuff on your Desktop, in the Dock, as a Startup Item, etc.

    0
  48. 148

    I think there should be a Mac versus Windows version of “Godwin’s Law”. Instead of the losing side being the first side that mentions the Nazis, it should be the first side that mentions Fitt’s Law :-)

    0
  49. 149

    Thank you…exactly right. The mouse must travel more on the Mac, a decided disadvantage than having the menus on the windows.

    0
  50. 150

    The main problem I have with OS X is the inability to set a minimum font size for all applications – and the whole interface. Font sizes are all over the place. Especially in pro-apps. It kills my eyes. I have a 30″ LCD and would prefer a minimum font size of 18 point everywhere. And resolution independence wont help as it scales everything up including the graphic elements. Really!

    0
  51. 151

    Apologies for bringing grammar into this discussion but I do believe it is relevant as more and more journalists write about Apple and the Mac. Does anyone else think that the use of the singular term “Mac” to start a sentence or in certain references sound incorrect without an article such as “The” or “A” preceding it? Despite Apple’s advertising, Mac is not a person and even Justin Long says he’s “a” Mac. My friends who own a Mac often say that it is a dead giveaway that writers using phrases like “I love Mac but my problem is…” don’t actually own one. Anyway, what do you guys think?

    0
  52. 152

    The only thing I don’t like on a Mac is that you have to right click to delete files. On a PC you can just select and hit the delete button.

    0
  53. 153

    @E.G.

    Isn’t “a Mac” referring to a machine that has the Mac operating system running on it and simply “Mac” refers to the operating system itself? I’m not sure there’s a clear distinction, but that’s about how I use it.

    “I love Mac” is then grammatically equal to saying “I love Windows”.

    0
  54. 154

    Nice article, but there are two things that I’d like to comment on:

    The first is item number 6, Fitts’ Law. The example stated is in my opinion a prime example of disobeying Fitts’ Law, since the menus are always at the top it means that the user will have to move the mouse a potentially long distance (if the window of the application is in the lower right corner) to a relatively small (in proportion to the resolution of modern displays) piece of text. Not good!

    My other comment is about item number 9, Workflow. It might be that I missed something but have not (nearly) all window managers since the the GUI was invented at Xerox PARC allowed this kind of workflow?

    0
  55. 155

    Nice recap article for me.

    I’ve been using Mac OS X for 3 years now, and prior Windows for the rest of my life, and in all honesty I’ve had less problems with my Mac than any PC I’ve had. I love the little things that Apple does, I love the UI design, and overall stability of OS X.

    However, I’ve also worked in Apple Tech Support I know that they have problems as well, just a hell of a lot less than Windows!

    0
  56. 156

    One big, irritating inconsistency to me is that some apps go away when you close their last window and some don’t. Close iPhoto and it is gone. Close iTunes, terminal or Address Book and they continue to remain actively loaded. I’m not how that fits in Apple’s guidelines, but it is definitely inconsistent.

    0
  57. 157

    half of the Windows users who posted a comment here are complaining that you have to use the mouse more, and have less keyboard shortcuts when using a Mac. The other half are complaining that you cannot click the big X with one’s mouse to quit a program on the Mac OS…!?

    (hint: command+Q)

    0
  58. 158

    Good points in your piece, though much more can be said about OS X’s virtues vs. Windows.

    I think what attracts me to Mac as a former Windows user (no experience with Vista, just 3.1 through XP) is the ease with which many tasks are accomplished, from connecting a printer to setting up a network to burning a disk. Simply connect a digital camera to a mac, iPhoto opens, photos are uploaded with a click. Drag a jpg and drop it on the iPhoto icon in the dock, it opens and the photo is added to the photo library. no opening of windows, no finding the right folder, no double clicking. Do the same with an mp3 and iTunes or a PDF and Preview’s icon, it opens. Drop any readable file on the MS Word dock icon, and even it will do the same. This is universal with all files and applications on the Mac, a huge time saver.

    The search function spotlight offers is so immensely superior and easier in comparison to Windows search as to be unfair to even compare them. You can actually find things and open them effortlessly.

    Reliability is also much higher. Far fewer crashes, glitches and shutdowns, which were a regular experience with my Windows machines. Installing applications and updates rarely requires restart on a Mac (the kludgy installer used by MS applications like Office being one of the few exceptions). Such little things add up quickly to a more user friendly and productive experience.

    Two points were made in comments I’d like to address.

    One commenter mentioned the mouse issue. It is absolutely true that the best mouse I’ve ever used on a Mac is the Microsoft wireless Intellimouse. I went through two of the Apple Mighty Mouse models, both failed after a few months — the little trackball gets gummed up and is impossible to clean. Never again. MS makes a great mouse.

    Another commenter mentioned that upgrading Macs is a nightmare, and this is absolutely false. I have been upgrading Macs for years. The older G4 and G5 towers are models of usability and upgradability. I’ve upgraded every component in them, including CPUs, and have replaced the ROMs on Windows Radeon 9800 Pro graphics cards for use in Mac. Nothing nightmarish about it. Most recently I’ve upgraded CPU, hard drive and optical drive in a Mac Mini, converting a weak 1.5 intel core solo mac mini into a 2 ghz core2 duo with superdrive and bigger faster hard drive. From start to finish, the upgrades took me 20 minutes to install. The Mac Mini’s are marvelously engineered and easy to work on.

    0
  59. 159

    Bruce Klutchko

    August 14th, 2008 1:56 pm

    I fully understand. From the opposite point of view, I just experienced the switch to Vista on my work laptop. It is nauseating (boot screen looks like a curtain with algae dripping down from the top), dizzying (the translucency feature actually blurs the underlying window), and infuriating (space is used up unnecessarily, it is inconsistent, beloved easy-top-use features have been removed — anybody know why the easy to use “X” to delete a file in XP has been replaced by a drop-down and a contextual menu?) — and so much more. Closing the cover on the laptop usually does not result in sleep but in a dead battery the next morning. Oh, and shutting down, the obvious alternative, takes sooo much longer.

    My 4 year old home iMac, ancient by corporate standards, is a joy to use.

    0
  60. 160

    I’m glad to see other folks who have issues with the “mile high menu” on Macs.

    I use both PCs and Macs equally and now that monitors have gotten larger than the old 15 inchers, Fitt’s law is obsolete.

    Add a second monitor to the mix and it’s downright horrible. Make those monitors 30 inchers and I want to tear my hair out. I have to pick my hand and mouse up and move it back two or three times just to get the mouse back over to the FILE menu.

    The fact that you can actually click between two selected items in Finder and it deselects everything is a real mystery to me. This is NOT user friendly in any way. Do the designers of software actually USE their software? Often it seems not.

    Both these particular issues are productivity killers for sure. I hope that more people complain about this so Apple finally sees the light.

    0
  61. 161

    I have used both OS’ and I used to own a Mac…used to. People diss Vista, personally I find Vista to be an extremely fast to boot and fast to re-act OS. I do have my system maxed for Vista, which is something that WE Windows users can do easily. We do not Steve’s permission to make changes to our computers.

    X is pretty to look at, stable. Will never take that away from it. But after upgrading to Leopard, I felt let down. The OS sucked on my iBook, unable to click on my Desktop (Finder) until I closed the app that I was currently working on, what BS. It did not just happened on my iBook also on my Powerbook and also on my mini, again BS.

    I am using the same XP machine now upgraded to Vista and simply love it. “MSFT stole from X” yeah, you know what, they all steal from each other. Take the Dashboard do you guys remember Konfobulator ? Now owned by Yahoo. Uhm yeah, real original right?
    And why does it have to remain hidden? I like my widgets where I can use them not hidden below. BTW they are memory hog, no matter which OS you prefer.

    In the end I GAVE away my copy of Leopard because frankly it was a joke, did not feel that it was worth selling the copy since it was lousy and I would not wish that upon anyone. I may eventually switch back to X, but with the idea that Apple now and their precious iPhone has a kill switch, makes me wonder, do I really need or want anyone to be protecting me? No, I can handle things on my own. Mr Jobs needs to get off his horse and let people do their own thinking….wasn’t that at one time one of their Ads, Think…? Funny, how he doesn’t want you to think. Control PHREAK. My HTC Touch is frigging awesome and on Sprint it blows the socks of any of my friends on their 3G. Blah.

    Mac was nice, it’s starting to suck still overrated and overpriced. I went back to MSFT, it allows me to do things my way, not the way some ____ wants me to do things. After all it is mine.

    In this article 10 great things….where are they? Get real, get a clue.

    0
  62. 162

    Duh! It’s called productivity. Every test done has clearly shown that people learn apps faster on a Mac and are more productive doing the same task on a Mac. Maybe because using a Mac is actually fun! using a Mac like working in a person-friendly office as opposed to an endless warehouse.

    0
  63. 163

    @20.daniel: You’re actually giving apple a point. Think in the dock. The icons get larger as soon as you get close to them…
    Although the authors of the article could have pointed that. Instead, they preferred the stupid bar. You can even say ” you don’t need to click start -> all programs” . Since i suppose your favorite apps are in the dock.

    0
  64. 164

    Willi E. Johnson

    August 14th, 2008 5:03 pm

    YOU ARE AWESOME. You are the first website that gives the most comprehensive factorial reasons why Mac OS is great!

    0
  65. 165

    i’m a mac user for a long time, but this article is no good at all. to get to the point:

    1) yeah, right. the ‘maximize’ button has his own function everytime in every application. no consistency there. also apps for leo and tiger are kinda different, so lack of consistency here

    2) intuitivnes? not much more than on XP. ok, you install just by draging, but its the same as installing on win machines. you still have to doubbleclick the package (install file in XP), drag it (or click 3 times next in XP) and eject it (click finis in XP). many programs prompt you after the install with the EULA, so no big difference.
    and uninstall? no way. you may think, that by moving it to trash youre finished – try AppZapper and youll see how much stuff the apps install into the library etc. nice thing in windows – the uninstaller.

    3) what effective about those metaphores?! linux and windows have the same amount of brilliant/crap metaphores, so???

    4) oh, error reporting! sadly – no. windows handles this way much better – bubbles on the taskbar. they may be annoying (and surely they are), but inform you about everything. instead the mac informs me about… well… mouse connection and… anything else? yeah, great.

    5) true, but wrong. its nice not to see much stuff, but without X knowledge you wont do ANYTHING in the whole system. atleast windows lets you to do (almost) everything in a GUI….

    6) yeah, great… if youre working on a 19″ or less monitor. but try 2×30″ (or even 24″) – youll find the bar reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaally far far away. and with the crappy style macOS handles mice… baaaaaaaaad (thank god for USB overdrive!)

    7) ever changed something and wanted to click cancel, cuz it was a bad idea? now you CANT. back to the “consistency” – some apps/settings have the “ok/cancel/apply”, some dont… wtf?!

    8) yup, one of the greatest things in OSX. just damn that shortcuts and when you connect a new HFS harddrive full of stuff – forget for the moment, that you wanted to do something on the mac and get some coffee…

    9) effecient for who?! if you see 2091 windows on a screen – doesnt that make it a LITTLE bit chaotic?! surely it does (thank got for think!)

    10) uh…

    so please, think before you write something like this article…
    and dont get me wrong – i like OSX and i am really glad i dont have to use windows anymore, but the “facts” you published here are really pure blasphemy.
    9)

    0
  66. 166

    As an old time pc user and Microsoft fan (i’m a Microsoft fan just because i see everyone seems to hate it), I sometimes seriously consider switching to Mac. But just a search on the internet and browsing around blogs and forums on the internet is enough for me to forget the idea. It’s not the Mac that disappoints me, it’s the fan base. It’s the snobbishness among the Mac users, from Steve Jobs himself to the normal user, that disgusts me.
    The fact is, OSX it’s just an ordinary OS, like others, which is optimized for a very limited number of Machines. It would have the same problems as Windows if it was installed on unlimited number of machines with so many faulty drivers.
    And the illusion of its security. Mac’s being secure it’s like a man being immune from rubbery because of living alone in an island where there is no one else. You want an evidence: Read about the history of Quick time and Safari on Windows. Safari’s security holes started being discover after just hours of its release.
    Don’t get me wrong I really like Mac’s and I am still in thoughts of a switch(although i fear greatly of missing some Appz). But come one be more reasonable and admit that with Apple’s way, not everyone in the world can have a computer.
    But damn the Macbook Pro’s are beautiful.

    0
  67. 167

    Use Parallels or VMWare Fusion to run Linux or Windoze on your mac. Vista actually runs better on most Macs than on comparable PC boxes.

    0
  68. 168

    dude, for once…when you click on “edit” on a window…in Windows….you SELECT the window…therefore its the exact same thing…and since windows in Windows take up the whole screen, it’s more time consuming than in OS X.

    Also, the “maximize” button on OS X isnt a “maximize to screen” button…its a “maximize window to ITS specified size”….for example…if a webpage is 800 pixels in width…it makes the browser 800 pixels in width

    0
  69. 169

    At the end of the day a person happy with Mac will stick with mac, someone who likes Windows will stay with windows, and ditto for Linux. I think it is somewhat superficial to say ‘here’s 10 good reasons why xxx is better than yyy’. This is simply because, one can reverse the argument the other way and simply say, here’s 10 other features I like about Vista, or whatever.

    So just go away and find something more meaningful to write about, so we will have something more meaningful to ponder. I’ve already wasted time by responding here…

    0
  70. 170

    Apple products are like a girlfriend; you need one as long as you don’t have one, and when you do, you realize it’s really no big deal and go back to normal ways.

    0
  71. 171

    right on.
    that was the nicest comment I’ve ever read about Mac’s.

    0
  72. 172

    I’ve had my Mac now for about 3 years or so, and I use it almost every day. But, I still don’t understand why the GUI is held up as a shining example of good design. Here’s my list of why the Mac is pretty poor. Not all these are GUI issues, but many of them are.

    To pre-empt anyone pointing out that I am a MS Windows convert or some such, I would like to point out that I am not. I am not comparing my Mac to Windows. I am comparing my Mac to common sense and pretty much every other OS out there that has ever had a GUI (Windows, Linux, BSD, Amiga (!), etc etc).

    I present my “Top 10 Usability Lows Of Mac OS”…

    * In order to move focus to a window, you need to click on it, which always brings it to the front, and covers up the other window that you were looking at and need to refer to (aka standard MS Windows behaviour). Horribly annoying, and because of the way the Mac puts the menu at the top of the screen, there’s not much you can do about this; no chance of an X-Windows type “non-click” focus option

    * Only one “resize” point on a window; in the bottom right. Quite frustrating at times

    * Pop-up (or rather, “roll-down”) dialogue boxes that cover up the window that you are using; a classic example is the spell check box on several applications; it covers up the text you are trying to check, and so you loose the context

    * When I don’t have my wireless router switched on, my Mac INSISTS on asking me if I want to connect to next door’s (unprotected) router. This is despite clicking the “do not ask me this again” box

    * The standard mouse movement is AWFUL

    * My icon for my email client insists on bouncing up and dound when an email comes in. I don;t mind it doing it a couple of times to let me know I have an email, but why does it have to do it for ever, thus forcing me to break off from what I’m working on just to shut the thing up?

    * Customising the desktop is pretty much impossible. I don’t like a white background to everything; it gives me a headache. But I have no options to change this. Pretty basic stuff really

    * When I close an application with the little red button, it doesn’t actually close it. It removes it from the desktop, but the app is still running. Where is the logic in this behaviour? The app should be either running and usable or neither; not running and (effectively) out of control

    * My Mac insists on writing .Data and .Trash files (or whatever they are called) all over the place. Very very annoying with removable media that is swapped between different OS’s. And despite what many people say, these files DO cause problems. But you can’t stop it happening (at least not without spending cash on some tool to fix it, which should not be necessary)

    * The Mac OS is (by default) case-insensitive. While inconvenient, this is not a major problem. What IS a problem is that some of the “standard” unix command line tools get confused by this behaviour (it looks like Apple has modified some of the tools to work properly, but it has missed some bits), and so don’t always work correctly

    0
  73. 173

    linux is like being single – you have to do everything with your own hands.
    windows is like being married – you rather stick at work longer, just not to get home to your bitchy wife who just screams at you and doesnt do anything to please you.

    ;)

    0
  74. 174

    @Bob (August 12th, 2008, 3:59 pm)

    Nope, this isn’t fanboyism. You just didn’t understand Fitt’s Law.

    Fitt’s law states: “The time to acquire a target is a function of the distance to and size of the target.” (http://www.asktog.com/basics/firstPrinciples.html)

    By putting the menu bar at the top the screen, a menu item has an infinite height (you don’t have to slowdown your mouse pointer to get the y-position right). So, even if the distance to reach the click target may sometimes be longer, the size of the target matters more in most cases.

    There are empirical studies on this subject, which you may want to consult.

    I said “in most cases” deliberately, because the advantage ot the size target may become less relevant in certain instances:
    multiple monitor settings with only one monitor displaying the menu bar or really really large monitors (I have 1920x1200px on my Mac and it’s definitely not yet detrimental with regard to Fitt’s).

    0
  75. 175

    I’d love for Apple to make a merge option when copying folders to a location where one already exists by the same name. If you aren’t careful – you actually lose all content in the destination folder.

    The Finder got improved in Leopard, but Explorer on Windows is better at the job. Could not however live without Exposé and QuickLook, which I sorely miss on my work computer (that runs Windows).

    0
  76. 176

    If Fitts’ Law says that users are more productive with the mouse when they have less distance to travel and a larger target to click on to do their tasks….WHY the hell did Mac’s design engineers have all application menus attached to the top of the screen, rather than to the applications’ windows where it would have context and ACTUALLY be less of a mouse movement. I know why…because it looks a little better with multiple less-than-full-screen windows..form over function.

    Mac applications have no useless “OK” and “Apply”…but have a fair few other “confirm” type buttons.
    All windows visible in the background ensuring a LESS efficient workflow as you cant focus on what you are doing. Unfortunately this is encouraged by the lack of a good way to view all open windows.

    Even kernel panic looks nice!..well on my girlfriends macbook it looked rather sad…what is kernel panic BTW…sounds rather technical

    Oh and my favourite piece of usability..the tiny little bit of the bottom right corner of a window that you have to grab to resize a window.

    And last but certainly not least..the most funtional thing of all is the packaging…something that beautifull just HAS to work well…doesn’t it?

    0
  77. 177

    One of your top 10 is probably my biggest complaint about the Mac: “almost all application menus are attached to the top of the screen, rather than to the applications’ windows”, I find that this means it takes quite a bit of effort on my part to ensure that the menu I’m looking at is the one I want since all apps put their menu in the exact same place. I find the windows system, where the menu is on the app window, I never have this confusion.

    0
  78. 178

    Richard Nullent

    August 15th, 2008 6:31 am

    I agree with you. Its all pretty, I find OSX an Operating system with all the gloss but it feels like they treat users as being stupid when in some cases they are not.

    0
  79. 179

    Great article,
    it shows many ways in which the Mac OS is intuitive and easy to use. I use Macs at home and develop for Windows at work. I find it humorous when people get so offended by Mac lovers like its still 1990. Windows is for work, get over it. Computers are everywhere and there’s no reason to be stuck using Windows everywhere you go. It is well known that Microsoft constantly looks to the Mac OS for inspiration (they paid $100 million for the right to do so) and that’s a good thing. And Apple isn’t getting into the SQL Server/Exchange/Big Hardware business. Macs just look better in your living room. Sorry if you can’t afford one. I can’t afford a Porsche but I’m not going to tell you my Corolla is just as nice to drive. And if you’re upgrading a Mac’s hardware, you’re missing the whole point. Windows is designed for that stuff. Macs are information appliances and will run for decades if you need them to. I have a Mac SE from 1987 and it still runs fine.

    0
  80. 180

    Please, you’re making me vomit, that is so freaking biased, ooh, mac this, os x that, give me a break.

    0
  81. 181

    I read a lot of criticism regarding #6. I just want to say this one has been added to the article by SM, so those aren’t my words. Personally, I would indeed prefer Window’s use of taskbars. One advantage of the Mac way, is the consistency. The taskbar is always in the same spot and has a similar structure.

    0
  82. 182

    mac’s are only intuitive if you have been on them for quite some time.

    ex #1. when im at school and my thumb drive is full, i start deleting things to free up some space. I “delete the file”, try to move another file on, and weird, i still dont have space… how intuitive is not deleting the file till the trash is emptied?

    ex #2a. “users are more productive with the mouse when they have less distance to travel and a larger target to click on to do their tasks” how does this make sense? you have 2 screens, file open in screen 2, menu bar in screen 1?

    ex #2b. say you have your window not “almost maximized” as mac always does… and a window at 50% behind it, your menu bar is now much farther away than it would be in windows or linux… that is not intuitive at all… why would you want your operating systems menu bar to change at all.

    pretty weak article

    0
  83. 183

    Matt (August 12th, 2008, 7:31 am)

    Are you aware of Expose’ (system preferences)? I’ve had as many as 30 windows open. All I have to do is move my cursor to the upper right hand corner and all my screens become visible at once. Then I just click on the one I want to go to.

    Or am I missing something in the way you work?

    0
  84. 184

    Most of the times I’ve had a kernel panic (which have been I think twice in over a year, and it was with 10.5.0/.1) when I rebooted, the apple crash reporter was opened. You can get a basic idea of what happened if you look through the report.

    0
  85. 185

    I agree with #160, the menubar is a real productivity killer especially with multiple monitors. Hey Apple, give me an option to keep the menubar with the application window.

    Another productivity killer is that you can only resize a window from the bottom right corner and move a window from the top.

    Yet another productivity killer is the not so Mighty Mouse which fails to recognize button presses reliably. How many times do I have to click the gosh darn thing to get it to respond!?

    Doesn’t Apple eat their own dog food?

    0
  86. 186

    The problem is, my good man, it’s not a maximize button and never has been. The idea was to increase the size of the window as big as necessary to show all or as much as possible of the open document. It has ALWAYS been that way on a Mac. So saying the maximize button doesn’t work, only shows that you are a Windows user making uneducated remarks on the Mac OS interface.

    0
  87. 187

    Justin Vanden Bosch

    August 15th, 2008 2:32 pm

    One word for those who lose windows in mac and find it cluttered. Spaces.
    One of the greatest features built into OSX.
    I have used windows (since 3.1), Linux on the side for 3 years and recently OSX.
    OSX just works and its great. I’m currently dual booting my 24″ imac to OSX and Ubuntu. Allows me to use OSX most of the time and then whenever I need to use higher end professional engineering programs (unigraphics, hyperworks etc) I can just reboot into ubuntu.
    It’s great setup with rare crashes, unlike my lenovo T60 laptop with XP (I’m on my 3rd hard drive this year)

    0
  88. 188

    Hey guys
    I never used Mac OS, so i can’t tell how good/bad it is.
    But, if i understand it well, its like my father owning a Mini Cooper(the “new” Mini).
    Its a well designed product, extremely expensive and it has some annoying things (like the speed meter in the middle of the car, not in the driver’s side).
    But its like being in a special club or having an unique style. Its almost a way of living.
    And then theres the addons ( John Cooper Works kit ) that fortify that feeling.
    In seconds you just want everything Mini.
    That’s how i suppose that Mac’s are. Apple Version:
    Its a well designed product, extremely expensive and it has some annoying things (like the bar always at the top of the screen).
    But its like being in a special club or having an unique style. Its almost a way of living.
    And then theres the addons ( iPod, iPhone and those little services that Apple offers ) that fortify that feeling.
    In seconds you just want everything Apple/Mac.
    That’s what i think it is to have a Mac in these days. And yes, the Mini sometimes gives me some headaches, but i suppose its something special and unique. Like Apple stuff.

    0
  89. 189

    When will OS X stop violating Fitts’ Law and start putting the menu on the same monitor as the window? It is retarded that if I have four monitors and I am working in an app on the right most monitor and I need to do something that I haven’t memorized the key combo for I have to move my mouse left 2 monitors to get to the menu (I have the menu on the 2nd monitor from the left). Each monitor should have a menu that corresponds to the window on that monitor that most recently had focus or currently has focus.

    0
  90. 190

    ‘h-a-r-v’-

    I felt the same way you did/do back in the late 90′s, when dotcom, apple, starbucks were all the rage. Who do they think they are? Always happy, hip, cool dotcommers! Curse you!!! Me with my spanking new, overpriced Dell 333mhz with (wait for it: 6BG HDD/64MB RAM!!!) I’ll show ‘em, they are far too whimsical for us ‘Serious’ Windows users, with our visible screw-holes, illegible texted stickers and rear-loading(!) usb 1.0 ports.

    I have grown to be a MAC guy, yes and as a business owner in the Architecture/Construction sector, I find that the lack of seriousness (as you call it) mitigates those hellish Monday mornings and scary Friday deadlines, where by and large, we work at a good clip, communicating between our two offices here in Brooklyn and in Southern Ireland often without a hitch.

    I have come to equate the visual ‘seriousness’ of a product with that of unreliability, visually, the lack of confidence (not the a Mac actually has a stream of consciousness, although some may disagree) that PC designs project is undeniable. You know you’ll need to crack one open when you need it most.

    0
  91. 191

    I’m not sure if mac Finder is one of the usability highs. i use both windows and mac and i feel stupid using the mac’s finder. I don’t know why we can’t resize the columns in the column views without moving your mouse to the bottom of the window and drag that tiny icon. And why can’t the columns be resized to fit the names of the folders/files. this pisses me off everyday using it to the point that i just create as many shortcuts to the sidebar as i need to.

    0
  92. 192

    While installing / uninstalling might be intuitive, and i think thats great for usability, from a security POV its actually the worst behaviour. The way OSX facilitates this behaviour is by statically linking the applications and bundling all the libraries with the application. This means its very easy to add / remove applications but if a particular library (that is not part of the default install) has a vulnerability, then every single application that uses that library must also be upgraded. Since not every application has an upgrading mechanism, this means every user has to be aware of the status of ever application they have installed on their computer and upgrade them manually. Note that this isn’t an OSX specific problem, MS Windows also does the same thing.

    The traditional UNIX model of dynamically linking solves this problem but it is much harder to mimic the install behaviour. FreeBSD / Linux use the ports tree / apt/ yum etc… which is probably slightly more work , slightly less intuitive to actually install applications but makes it easier / more intuitive to stay secure.

    0
  93. 193

    I generally agree with the article, MACs are OK, but take a look at OpenSuse 11.0 – choose KDE 3.5.9 on installation and enjoy.

    0
  94. 194

    web design company

    August 19th, 2008 10:34 pm

    stop with mack loving. Windows is better anyway.

    0
  95. 195

    I do agree that I don’t care for Spotlight in 10.5, compared to 10.4. When you open the results window, everything used to be nicely categorized. Now it’s a big list (yes, you can sort by type…).

    One thing I noticed when setting up a new Mac for my parents, is that some things may be a little confusing for a new user. For example, stacks in the dock. The strange icons of a stack of documents really doesn’t relate well to the concept of a folder of documents. I changed them to the folder icon.

    As a long-time Mac user and a 5-year user (daily) of Windows, I think the consistent placement of the menu in Mac OS is definitely better than the placement of menus in Windows. For those of you arguing about Fitt’s law–isn’t there something about having menus placed in a predictable place? I don’t always have my windows maximized. Plus, that’s what keyboard shortcuts are for!

    Also, I still haven’t gotten used to Windows’ files and folders being sorted separately.
    When I am looking for something, I usually know it’s name, but sometimes I don’t know if it is a file or a folder.

    And Spotlight kick’s the behind of Windows’ slow search function.

    0
  96. 196

    Very nice article to summarize why I love the Mac and dislike Windows. I got my first Mac 2 years ago and since then it has been getting better and better. I finally wiped out my Windows systems.

    0
  97. 197

    @ Matt (August 12th, 2008, 7:31 am) :

    That’s why you have expose and spaces, to have an instant overview of what application windows you have open, and if you make good use of spaces you have even more “space” to open them and have them organized……

    0
  98. 198

    First, I have a Mac, and I like it better than Windows. I prefer Linux (Arch!), but I’m in school and waste too much time fiddling with bleeding-edge software on Linux. :)

    @#1, consistency is not as good as it’s fabled to be. Drag and drop?
    Finder > Sidebar = Add a shortcut
    Sidebar > Finder = *poof*
    Finder > Dock = Add a shortcut
    Dock > Finder = *poof*
    etc.

    @#5, defragmentation went the way of FAT32 filesystems (RIP, 2001). All modern file systems defragment as a matter of course, unless you go above 80% usage or so.

    @#6, my problem with the menu in the upper right-hand corner is that I have to bring a window to front before clicking the menu. Also, windows will lose focus, and I will end up clicking the window for another application accidentally. I prefer the menus beneath the title bar for each window. Fitt’s Law is more of a suggestion for Fitt’s family and friends.

    @#9, I don’t know what the hell you’re talking about. Window handling is almost identical in all major desktop environments. Expose is nice.

    To me, the strongest features of an OS X laptop are the warranty, the multitouch trackpad, spotlight (mmm, spotlight), and a fair deal of multimedia integration. Apple does the same sort of controlling-my-experience thing that Microsoft does, and I resent the hell out of that, though.

    Nonetheless, I tend heavily towards recommending Macs to people who ask, and only recommend Windows if their specific need requires it.

    0
  99. 199

    If I could choose between a 5 dollar graphics card and a 150 dollar graphics card – i would put my money on the 150 dollar one any day.
    This article sums up perfectly what Macs are about – UI – class – Style.

    And the comment about trying to do a major upgrade is not part of a mac users vocab – they simply buy a newer better one. It beats the hell out of fiddling with some appaling bad pile of 3rd party bits and bobs simply to alleviate the pcs original shortcomings.

    Who would ever want to sit in front of some machine that spouts endless drivel when trying to use a new usb device – just plug it and and get on with it – dont tell ask me if i want to search the world for the driver.

    PC’s are for messing with

    Macs are for using

    End

    0
  100. 200

    That’s not strictly true

    More Windows users are now migrating to Mac – I dont know any Mac users who want to migrate to PC. Further I now have clients who need to run windows and they claim that it runs better on a mac.

    0

  1. 1

    I actually have real issues with the fact that menus are always at the top of the screen. I don’t want to choose my windows and THEN go to the menu bar. I like the fact that I can click the Edit (or whichever) menu of the window next to mine without needing to change to that window first.

    And the Apple OS minimize/maximize/non-max size buttons? Drives me nuts. When I want a window maximized, it means I want it to take up my entire screen, not leave a smidge of pixels open here or there.

    I’ve used Windows and Macs for equal amount of time for school and work, and I can safely say that despite the many issues I also have with Windows, I will never buy a Mac. (Have you ever tried doing a serious hardware upgrade with a Mac machine? I’ve never experienced such a headache in my life.)

    +2
  2. 2

    Hmm. First of all, I don’t find it fair, that there was no limit for top-ten articles, ’cause this one is a good example of using it the other way around. It’s actually a discussion article just using the top-10 list form. And I didn’t know we discuss operating systems here (and hardware in case of the HD). I guess SOMEHOW we might consider it as description (not a top-10) of a tool for designers.

    I don’t like Macs and their “cool and colorful” design, however that’s only my personal taste. E.g. I prefer HTC Touch Flo 3D design to iPhone’s interface. Apple just doesn’t look serious to me, it’s rather lil’ infantile. It’s nice, it’s fancy, it’s clear, but it lacks class (imho). I also think all the stuff from #1 to #10 simply doesn’t matter at work, otherwise I’d have a Mac, I guess. So I don’t get the point of the article, unless we treat it as mentioned in the previous paragraph.

    +1
  3. 3

    I’m sorry but this is just a horrible article. Not only is much of it misleading but much of it is also just plain wrong. The inanity of some of the complaints and comparisons made me laugh out loud several times.

    By the way, “Ok”, “Apply” and “Cancel” buttons are there for a very good reason. When you make changes in a configuration dialog in OS X, you have no way of going back to the previous settings. Like you say, they are automatically applied. In complicated configuration dialogs, you might find that you didn’t want to make a change after all. In Windows, you just hit Cancel and you’re back to the original settings. If you like what you’ve done but want to try some more options, you can hit Apply. Otherwise, just press Ok and you’re done. I’ve found the lack of this obvious behavior in OS X irritating to say the least.

    “Mac doesn’t force you to focus on a single window, but keeps them all visible in the background ensuring a more efficient workflow. However this might be a thing of taste and getting used to.”

    What?!?!?! Have you not even used Windows? Why do you think that this behavior is somehow just an OS X feature when every other windowed operating system out there behaves like this?

    The single menu bar at the top of the screen is one of the most idiotic features of the Mac. At the very least, it should be optional. I pity people who work on multiple monitors with OS X. I’ve heard their complaints about this misfeature.

    If I didn’t have better things to do, I could lay waste to the rest of this ridiculous list.

    +1
  4. 4

    I use a PC at work and and an old Mac at home.
    I’ll list the problems that I have with both staring with PC…
    PC Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 1.86Ghz, 1GB ram, about 1 year old

    -Outlook stop receiving mail, requiring me to relaunch Outlook a number of times a day.
    -When I print to PDF, the pages get split down the middle on random occasions forcing me to use another PC to create the files.
    -Word randomly goes to default mode with default fonts, sizing and page views. I have to re-set these settings once every two months (approx).
    -Automatically changes default printer on some programs but not others. I don’t find out until I go to print.
    -MS Access sometimes forgets where the server is. I have to restart the computer just so Access can find the server again.
    -Inconsistent loading times. Some applications will load in next to no time, but sometimes the same application will take much more time to load if it loads at all.
    -Randomly reverts to MS Internet Explorer as default browser even though I’ve selected Firefox
    -Restarting takes an between 5 to 8 minutes until it’s ready to use again.

    Apple Macintosh G4 Power PC 800Mhz 2003 model
    -The DVD drive takes a while to kick in (30 seconds) if the computer has been sitting idle for longer than 5 minutes.
    -Restarting takes about 1 minute 30 seconds until the computer is ready to use again.

    One small problem that is predictable and consistent versus a number of problems that crops up randomly.
    It’s proof that no matter how crappy your product is, if you have the right marketing you can sell any old crap to people eh Microsoft?

    +1

Leave a Comment

Yay! You've decided to leave a comment. That's fantastic! Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and rel="nofollow" is in use. So, please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name, or it will be deleted. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for dropping by!

↑ Back to top