Breaking: Internet Explorer 8.1 Eagle Eyes Leaked

Advertisement

Smashing Magazine tries to be at the forefront of new and exciting developments in the wide world of the web. You might have heard that we met with the IE 8 Chief Strategist in the past, so it should come as no surprise that we like to keep up with the latest events in the web browser industry.

Even with the successful recent release of Internet Explorer 8, in some underground circles there is already talk going around about the next version of Internet Explorer: IE 8.1, codenamed Eagle Eyes. Loaded with exclusive features such as a new JavaScript engine, support of WebSlices and full web standards support (CSS 3), IE 8.1 is speculated to debut in this summer.

In this article, we take a closer look at the new features of Internet Explorer 8.1, compare it with other browsers and share with you our first-hand experience with the browser. Overall the browser is faster, more flexible, more stable and also more secure and performs already much better than a recently released IE 8. One word sums up our experience with IE 8.1: Eagle Eyes is the browser that Internet Explorer should have brought on the market a long time ago – and now it’s finally here.

New Features and Notable Improvements

User Interface

The user interface of IE 8.1 didn’t change much; just some minor tweaks to make the web browser more in tune with the Microsoft Windows 7 OS theme.

Screenshot of IE 8.1

Improved Security and Web Slices

One of the promising features of IE 8.1 is improvements in security measures and their revolutionary feature: Web Slices. The SmartScreen Filter and Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Filter now catches 96% of known Malware and Phishing sites as opposed to the 75% success rate in the current version of IE 8. Web Slices, the IE 8 feature that lets you keep track of changes to sites that you frequent, is noticeably quicker in letting you know that an update is made.

Web Slices.

Firefox Extensions Support

Eagle Eyes’s most exciting (and highly anticipated by developers) feature is its wide support of Mozilla-based add-ons. Though IE 8.1 duly notes that not all plugins will work perfectly, we have tested four popular Firefox plugins (Firebug, Web Developer, Tab Mix Plus, and No-Script) and they worked flawlessly (some of the developers even claim that – in terms of performance – they work much better under IE 8.1 versus Firefox 3).

Firefox Plugin Support

IE 8.1 performs better against the Acid 3 test

Our test with IE 8.1 shows that it performs very well against the Acid3 Test, a test that checks how well a web browser follows web standards. Simply put – in relative terms to other modern “web standards” browsers such as Firefox 3 and Safari – IE 8.1 kicks major butt in the Acid3 Test scoring 71 out of 100, passing with flying colors.

Screenshot of how IE 8.1 beat the Acid3 test.

Sure, the Acid3 Test is a big deal. Microsoft is pulling out all the stops with IE 8.1. In our exploration, these are just some of the notable features of Eagle Eyes.

Fast JavaScript Engine

Internet Explorer has always been the leader of executing client-side scripts, but that didn’t stop Microsoft from continuing its thirst for excellence by including a completely new JavaScript engine called JSE, which stands for JavaScript Speedy Engine.

Do not ask about what units or methodology was used. Just trust me.

Microsoft’s Internet Explorer Development Team has teamed up with the Google Chrome Development Team to create JSE in a seemingly grand plan combat Mozilla Firefox’s growing market share. The result: a JavaScript engine that outperforms all modern browsers currently available on the market.

Overall, Internet Explorer 8.1 performs much faster, is more stable and offers users a better user experience. Dramatic speed improvements of the Javascript engine are visible and clearly outperforms other browsers.

Multiple Browser Rendering Engine Options

Apparently, the IE development Team recognized the strengths of the Gecko Layout Engine (used in Firefox) and the WebKit rendering engine. Because of their GNU LPL licensed code base, Microsoft was able to legally incorporate a variety of rendering engines for users (and web-developers) to select from.

Browser rendering options.

In our exclusive interview with Mike Chelly, one of the senior developers of the IE development Team, we found out that Internet Explorer’s main priority during the development of the new browser was to make it much easier for developers to code and debug their sites:

Mike Chelly:
One of our primary goals is to give developers an easier way to test and debug how their sites and web apps work in different browsers, from within one browser. [Pauses to answer a call from his iPhone] We know in the past that we’ve gotten a bad rap for IE’s layout engine so we’re making up for this by not only releasing a web browser that outperforms every browser currently out there in terms of web standards support, but also gives you the chance to use another open source browser rendering engine in case you find ours isn’t good enough or if you want to make testing convenient and do it all from within the Eagle Eyes.

Server-side code decompiler

If you’ve ever wished to know how sites and web applications work, Eagle Eyes (the name is fitting in this context) will let you view the server-side source code of a web page. We didn’t explore this feature much, but from basic tests, the server-side code decompiler was able to tell us how the Mixx promotional algorithm worked.

Screenshot of a social media site that isnt Digg so should I really bother writing an alt attribute?

Website Skins

IE 8.1 allows you to keep a list of websites that you’d like to re-skin into one of the (currently) ten website templates that IE 8.1 comes with. When you next visit the site, it renders it into a prettier version by switching its stylesheets. This will allow IE 8.1 users to replace the design of an unreadable website to a template that is more viewable. In our test case, we used the Six Revisions website.

In its current state, this is what the ordinary Six Revisions website looks like:

Six Revisions screen shot. Such a great site I wonder who runs it.

We selected the “Mozkine” theme and this was the result:

Hey this looks like the Mozilla.org theme!

Judging solely on this test case, it shows how useful this feature can be in making the web a prettier place.

Conclusion

Our test run of IE 8.1 shows that the developers of the Internet Explorer team have done a great job improving the browser’s rendering engine. IE 8.1 Eagle Eyes has a lot of potential to quickly become the browser of choice for many web-developers. We weren’t able to find out when exactly Microsoft is going to release the first public beta of the new browser, but some sources from the developer’s team claim that it will happen this summer.

It is safe to say that Internet Explorer 8.1. will be – based on our experience and superior expertise in this matter – dominating the browser market unless other browsers shape up and step up. We are hoping that IE 8.1 will be released soon, as we’ve been dreaming about it for a while now.


*Seriously Steve, was that restraining order necessary? I was only trying to give you a hug. In retrospect, I should’ve not done that naked.

Jacob Gube is the Founder and Chief Editor of Six Revisions, a web publication for web developers and designers, and the Deputy Editor of Design Instruct, a web magazine for designers and digital artists. He has over seven years of experience as professional web developer and web designer and has written a book on JavaScript.

  1. 1

    It is tomorrow 1 april, not today…

    0
  2. 2

    is it a joke???

    0
  3. 3

    Breaking News: Smashing Magazine April Fools leaked in March

    0
  4. 4

    [...] Graph created with MS Excel to showcase Microsoft’s greatness in the software market [...]

    That made me laugh.

    0
  5. 5

    “Breaking News: Smashing Magazine April Fools leaked in March”

    LOL

    0
  6. 6

    Go for it! Where is the download button??
    I want that!

    But hey, wait. I can use my beloved IE6 till that date, cause it is faster in JS than all the others, right???

    :D

    0
  7. 7

    I can’t believe that they actually decided to support Firefox extensions in IE! Sounds… weird.

    0
  8. 8

    Peter Gasston

    March 31st, 2009 3:16 am

    A day early, guys.

    0
  9. 9

    Breaking News: Google’s V8 Javascript engine is slower than IE 6

    Also, the Acid 3 test is strikingly identical to the Firefox 3.0.x version

    0
  10. 10

    Gutted :( for a second the world seemed rosey again!

    0
  11. 11
  12. 12

    A day early!

    Also, you probably should’ve showed a “100/100″ screenshot instead of “71/100″ when you say it passes the Acid3 test :)

    0
  13. 13

    ….would be nice though

    0
  14. 14

    you got me !!
    I believed in 8.1, I believed in firefox extensions, but I couldn’t get the “browser javascript performance” graph. That was too much, too many mistakes. I started thinking that smashingmagazine sucks, and went down the page to see who did write that crap.

    at second reading… I start laughing out loud.
    My favourite the server side code decompiler ! (and of course the algorithm found).

    0
  15. 15

    Nice, will link it @ work :D

    0
  16. 16

    Smashing Editorial

    March 31st, 2009 3:23 am

    @Peter Gasston (#7), @Mike Rundle (#11):

    actually, it is April 1st in Kiribati already (see )Time zones) and since we have readers all across the globe, it sounds quite OK for us to publish the post now. We don’t have that many readers from Kiribati, but it would be unfair to publish it when it’s April 2nd there ;)

    0
  17. 17

    haha fucking awesome! :p

    0
  18. 18

    Tip: read alt and title attributes. :)

    0
  19. 19

    LOL!!
    That was funny :)

    0
  20. 20

    I still love my buggy IE 6 loaded with shit :D.

    Nice stuff for the 1st April, I must say :D

    0
  21. 21

    Wow. I really thought I was lacking behind when I saw the graphs.

    You’ve got me. :(

    0
  22. 22

    Ronald Lokers

    March 31st, 2009 3:32 am

    ROFL!!!

    The whole article tells what Microsoft should do but never will do ;) Good joke :)

    0
  23. 23

    You don’t pass an Acid test unless you perfect it. It’s not a case of doing at least half well.

    Still, I lol’d.

    0
  24. 24

    Would be nice if it were true, but alas ’tis the season for humour :)

    0
  25. 25

    Michael SteelWolf

    March 31st, 2009 3:38 am

    That was great!

    0
  26. 26

    you gave urself away when you said Microsoft collaborated with google for their new JS engine… lolz… ya, right…. lolz again

    0
  27. 27

    Darren Azzopardi

    March 31st, 2009 3:39 am

    Hook link and sinker…..if it weren’t for the end

    “Jacob Gube is a professional contemporary dancer for the New York City Dance Company.”

    Loved it..would be awesome if it happened :)

    0
  28. 28

    Y’all’re assholes. Ruined my day when I realized it was April 1st.

    Well, it was nice for a short few moments …

    0
  29. 29

    u just gave billgates a heart attack….

    0
  30. 30

    Shame it’s a day early… but very funny! I believed the first couple of bits and was getting quite excited until the Acid test bit…

    0
  31. 31

    Very funny! I love the server-side code decompiler! :D

    0
  32. 32

    fail :)

    0
  33. 33

    The server side code decompiler and algorithm for Mixx made me laugh… preg_match (‘/cats/’…)

    0
  34. 34

    Ahahaha!!! U ROCK!

    0
  35. 35

    damn, I read though half of it, still believing this is true. but the ‘skin option’ completely made me look at the calendar :D

    0
  36. 36

    Five Minute Argument

    March 31st, 2009 3:55 am

    You had me at “full web standards support (CSS 3)”. I’ll be amazed if IE (or any other browser, for that matter) *ever* has full CSS 3 support!

    0
  37. 37

    (mike chelly) – “pauses to answer a call on his iPhone”

    nice touch – if the graph had been as subtle we might have fallen for it

    0
  38. 38

    Adrian Giddings

    March 31st, 2009 3:56 am

    You utter bastards :)

    Worse than falling for Eric Spiekerman as the new head of Microsoft font development last year.

    ” [Pauses to answer a call from his iPhone]” was a beautiful touch and made me think for a minute.

    Keep up the great work.

    0
  39. 39

    Man, I know you love Microsoft’s IE :P

    Is Internet Explorer turning into a little IE Tester-like browser, now that it supports multiple rendering engines?

    God, what doesn’t Microsoft do to make you use their products.

    Since they’re not capable of creating a good browser (like Mozilla), they’re just implementing other’s engines, in case you like them more than IE’s engine…

    Lame Microsoft, not surprising at all…at least we’ll have a more standard compliant browser to replace IE6/7 in the years to come…

    Wait….now I have to test for Firefox, IE6, 7, 8 (soon 8.1 to add), and Safari? Jesus!
    This will screw my analytics too!!

    0
  40. 40

    You had me fooled until the Javascript performance graph :)

    0
  41. 41

    IE7 doesn’t work very well – but it works a lot better than IE8.0 (scores as low as 12 in Acid3)

    Who cares about “web slices” etc.?

    I wish they would focus on improving the core e.g. HTML and CSS rendering. Actually I wish Microsoft would give up and discontinue all Internet Explorer products!

    0
  42. 42

    ROTFL, I have to admit I read the entire article believing that was a serious one!
    The server side decompiler scared me! :D

    0
  43. 43

    That bar chart on JavaScript performance is completely incorrect… you actually expect us to believe that IE6 is faster at JavaScript than all the other browsers?!?

    In reality, Chrome and Opera are by far the fastest. I’ve seen this from my own testing and I’ve even talked to Microsoft people who admit that IE 8.0′s JavaScript was 10x SLOWER than Chrome in their own tests.

    If you’re going to show charts like that, please state where you got your information. I think that any web developer would tell you that that chart is completely wrong.

    0
  44. 44

    Ha ha ha, this article really makes me laugh….. LOL

    0
  45. 45

    had me for a while. i started to wonder at the firefox extension implementation. buy i just thought it would be awesome. it was the server side script decompiler that made me realise. even microsoft aren’t that stupid?

    sad really, this is how microsoft should make it

    0
  46. 46

    That *might* happen….maybe 10 years later.

    0
  47. 47

    exactly what IE and other browsers needs to do lol

    0
  48. 48

    and how about the png problem ? are tested yet?

    0
  49. 49

    Also, I think Microsoft needs to take this article seriously. Otherwise, no joke, IE is doomed :)

    0
  50. 50

    Got me until the “server side code decompiler.” Suddenly, I realized…

    0
  51. 51

    Matthijn Dijkstra

    March 31st, 2009 4:15 am

    Well I wont put much value to those speed charts, it says that it is much faster than Safari, but which version? When you look further, they have the ‘multi-render’ feature so it can render as Firefox 3 and Safari 2! But… then again, we are at Safari 4 at the moment… which has allot of speed improvement.

    Now I have read further, and must say the Server Side decompiler is really awesome, allways wanted to know how SmashingMagazine works behind the scenes ;)

    0
  52. 52
  53. 53

    I love how people add comments thinking this is real. I was believing it even a few minutes after reading the article. I couldn’t wait to tell everyone… but then I realized, why does SmashingMagazine talks about this (SM is an awesome blog for all JS/PHP/CSS and coding stuff) when I think I never saw a post about some “leaked” software. Then I typed in Google “Internet Explorer 8.1″ and no relevant links were found except this one :P

    You got me :P

    0
  54. 54

    Man, you fooled me good. I was looking at the server side decompiler and asking myself: How the f%^& could they claim to do that? It has to be bogus.. Nice one, as always.

    0
  55. 55

    Johns Beharry

    March 31st, 2009 4:19 am

    Dam, you got me good I had eaten it all up then scrolled down and like… wat? April fools… :(

    Damm you.. ><

    0
  56. 56

    I can’t decide what makes me laugh more. The article or the comments of the people who actually believed this is true.

    @Dave: Yes, the bar chart on JavaScript performance is completely incorrect ;-)

    0
  57. 57

    IE & Improvement !!!!
    Impossible

    0
  58. 58

    You blew it at the “full web standards support (CSS 3)”. “Firefox extensions support” was just icing on the cake ;)

    0
  59. 59

    I always get a laugh how during April Fools day on the Internet, everyone seems to clamber over each other to be the first to post a comment showing that they were smart enough to tell it was a joke… :)

    0
  60. 60

    @Rob: Haha! You know, that’s actually funnier than the poor ignorant people who have no idea it’s a joke at all.

    0
  61. 61

    Looks very promising… you got me! …Egg and my face were in complete alignment

    0
  62. 62

    Roshan Bhattarai

    March 31st, 2009 4:25 am

    LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL……………I like the way you celebrated the april fool day…..but it’s just March 31st here dude…I was really shocked by the server side decompiling feature at first glance…

    0
  63. 63

    When your post date comes up as March 31st seems slightly stupid to argue Kiribati. If the date was April 1 then would be funnier.

    0
  64. 64

    Well let us see if these are all true…..
    and I’m in luv with firefox so don’t know whether I’ll dwnload IE 8.1 after its release.

    0
  65. 65

    Excellent post, had me interested until the code decompiler and I thought WTF! and then – bugger date check – thanks for that but really MS should take some of these as hints how to actually make a browser people do want….

    0
  66. 66

    Alexander Baldwin

    March 31st, 2009 4:42 am

    Okay okay. I was all for this, but CSS3 support?! Come on, we all know that’s never going to happen!

    0
  67. 67

    Wow, this seems to be the release where MS will FINALLY join the ranks…

    0
  68. 68

    You had me until the Acid test. Microsoft, actually supporting SVG? Never happen.

    Good one!

    0
  69. 69

    Nice, giggity :D

    0
  70. 70

    And i thought it was actually too good to be true!!!

    0
  71. 71

    Praveen Vijayan

    March 31st, 2009 4:48 am

    WOW!! f***king awesome joke!!! a day early – wish a day ie will equipped with all this features ;)

    0
  72. 72

    Ha ha I thought it was real until I read the comments….you SM guys simply rock at everything you do.

    0
  73. 73

    The Monkey Pirate

    March 31st, 2009 4:53 am

    Happy April foo… wait. Not yet.

    0
  74. 74

    Firrst half of the post I was interested, second half of the post I felt DUMB due to the interest I had in the first part! LOL

    Funny

    0
  75. 75

    Firebug for IE?! Would be a dream!

    0
  76. 76

    Simao Belchior de Castro

    March 31st, 2009 5:02 am

    April fools day is tomorrow. Changing the day makes it just a plain lie.

    If you can’t fool people properly in the proper day, just don’t.

    0
  77. 77

    LOL, Thank you, you just made my morning.

    0
  78. 78

    You almost got me. Wondering what Microsoft thinks about this post.

    0
  79. 79

    Happy April Fools! :P

    0
  80. 80

    server side decompiler…. of course ;-)

    0
  81. 81

    It sounds to good to be true…oh wait…it is!

    Good one!

    0
  82. 82

    Even though it’s a day earlier, it’s still make a good jokes. IE could never archive any of those features :D.

    0
  83. 83

    Acanski Petar

    March 31st, 2009 5:13 am

    Wow! :D

    0
  84. 84

    one of the best joke about IE ;) great post! wonderful, Jacob!

    0
  85. 85

    probably it will be the best joke in the web this April,.. will see :)

    0
  86. 86

    at first i thought .. wtf? then i saw the acid3 test and .. noway :D heh

    0
  87. 87

    Santosh Puthran

    March 31st, 2009 5:22 am

    It looks like a April fool joke.

    0
  88. 88

    Maybe…just maybe this will happen. I will wait and see about that one. Who knows, Microsoft might have finally got their heads out of their rear-ends for a change. :)

    @kylereddoch

    0
  89. 89

    I was going to make some huffy, elitist remark and then I remembered what tomorrow (for me) is. Successful troll is successful. :D

    0
  90. 90

    i was kind of confused as i read the first 3-4 paragraphs and took a look at the date…. not april. 1st? .. wtf?

    0
  91. 91

    Chris Pollard

    March 31st, 2009 5:35 am

    Microsoft needs to hire you guys to head product development. If they ever built such a beast, I’d probably use it.

    Come to think of it, why the heck hasn’t Mozilla created an extension to allow you to swap WebKit for Gecko? Wouldn’t it be sweet to combine IETab with a “WebKitTab” and be able to test all rendering engines from one browser? Or did they make that and I just missed it?

    0
  92. 92

    You totally got me.

    I had completely forgot that we were so near the 1st April. :o

    Though, it would be awesome if there where any browser out there that would be a “Developers browser”.

    0
  93. 93

    Hans Rödtang

    March 31st, 2009 5:39 am

    The server-side decompiler blew it. Everybody knows that is impossible :P

    0
  94. 94

    I am bedazzled, just a bit more now and I am willing to convert from open source technologies to anything Microsoft throws at me.

    Unless of course (didn’t read the whole article) Microsoft is actually offering this as open source as well.

    Cheers for best tech April 1st in years..

    0
  95. 95

    It will let you view server side scripting… -> that was priceless. And I love how the code it was showing is PHP. I was saying to myself… “Oh $h!+ !!!” How can that be good!?

    0
  96. 96

    “Wikipedia entry on the layout engine that IE 8.1 pwns hardcore.”

    :D

    Great job!

    0
  97. 97

    GUYS
    I felt fluffy inside there for a minute :(
    you got me he he he :) Nice!

    0
  98. 98

    lol! this is definitely april fools post!!!!!!!
    good article though !! :-)

    0
  99. 99

    Nearly choked on my bread laughing… :D Nice one.

    0
  100. 100

    …UH!!…too nice to be real!!

    0

Leave a Comment

Yay! You've decided to leave a comment. That's fantastic! Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and rel="nofollow" is in use. So, please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name, or it will be deleted. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for dropping by!

↑ Back to top