Breaking: Internet Explorer 8.1 Eagle Eyes Leaked

Advertisement

Smashing Magazine tries to be at the forefront of new and exciting developments in the wide world of the web. You might have heard that we met with the IE 8 Chief Strategist in the past, so it should come as no surprise that we like to keep up with the latest events in the web browser industry.

Even with the successful recent release of Internet Explorer 8, in some underground circles there is already talk going around about the next version of Internet Explorer: IE 8.1, codenamed Eagle Eyes. Loaded with exclusive features such as a new JavaScript engine, support of WebSlices and full web standards support (CSS 3), IE 8.1 is speculated to debut in this summer.

In this article, we take a closer look at the new features of Internet Explorer 8.1, compare it with other browsers and share with you our first-hand experience with the browser. Overall the browser is faster, more flexible, more stable and also more secure and performs already much better than a recently released IE 8. One word sums up our experience with IE 8.1: Eagle Eyes is the browser that Internet Explorer should have brought on the market a long time ago – and now it’s finally here.

New Features and Notable Improvements

User Interface

The user interface of IE 8.1 didn’t change much; just some minor tweaks to make the web browser more in tune with the Microsoft Windows 7 OS theme.

Screenshot of IE 8.1

Improved Security and Web Slices

One of the promising features of IE 8.1 is improvements in security measures and their revolutionary feature: Web Slices. The SmartScreen Filter and Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Filter now catches 96% of known Malware and Phishing sites as opposed to the 75% success rate in the current version of IE 8. Web Slices, the IE 8 feature that lets you keep track of changes to sites that you frequent, is noticeably quicker in letting you know that an update is made.

Web Slices.

Firefox Extensions Support

Eagle Eyes’s most exciting (and highly anticipated by developers) feature is its wide support of Mozilla-based add-ons. Though IE 8.1 duly notes that not all plugins will work perfectly, we have tested four popular Firefox plugins (Firebug, Web Developer, Tab Mix Plus, and No-Script) and they worked flawlessly (some of the developers even claim that – in terms of performance – they work much better under IE 8.1 versus Firefox 3).

Firefox Plugin Support

IE 8.1 performs better against the Acid 3 test

Our test with IE 8.1 shows that it performs very well against the Acid3 Test, a test that checks how well a web browser follows web standards. Simply put – in relative terms to other modern “web standards” browsers such as Firefox 3 and Safari – IE 8.1 kicks major butt in the Acid3 Test scoring 71 out of 100, passing with flying colors.

Screenshot of how IE 8.1 beat the Acid3 test.

Sure, the Acid3 Test is a big deal. Microsoft is pulling out all the stops with IE 8.1. In our exploration, these are just some of the notable features of Eagle Eyes.

Fast JavaScript Engine

Internet Explorer has always been the leader of executing client-side scripts, but that didn’t stop Microsoft from continuing its thirst for excellence by including a completely new JavaScript engine called JSE, which stands for JavaScript Speedy Engine.

Do not ask about what units or methodology was used. Just trust me.

Microsoft’s Internet Explorer Development Team has teamed up with the Google Chrome Development Team to create JSE in a seemingly grand plan combat Mozilla Firefox’s growing market share. The result: a JavaScript engine that outperforms all modern browsers currently available on the market.

Overall, Internet Explorer 8.1 performs much faster, is more stable and offers users a better user experience. Dramatic speed improvements of the Javascript engine are visible and clearly outperforms other browsers.

Multiple Browser Rendering Engine Options

Apparently, the IE development Team recognized the strengths of the Gecko Layout Engine (used in Firefox) and the WebKit rendering engine. Because of their GNU LPL licensed code base, Microsoft was able to legally incorporate a variety of rendering engines for users (and web-developers) to select from.

Browser rendering options.

In our exclusive interview with Mike Chelly, one of the senior developers of the IE development Team, we found out that Internet Explorer’s main priority during the development of the new browser was to make it much easier for developers to code and debug their sites:

Mike Chelly:
One of our primary goals is to give developers an easier way to test and debug how their sites and web apps work in different browsers, from within one browser. [Pauses to answer a call from his iPhone] We know in the past that we’ve gotten a bad rap for IE’s layout engine so we’re making up for this by not only releasing a web browser that outperforms every browser currently out there in terms of web standards support, but also gives you the chance to use another open source browser rendering engine in case you find ours isn’t good enough or if you want to make testing convenient and do it all from within the Eagle Eyes.

Server-side code decompiler

If you’ve ever wished to know how sites and web applications work, Eagle Eyes (the name is fitting in this context) will let you view the server-side source code of a web page. We didn’t explore this feature much, but from basic tests, the server-side code decompiler was able to tell us how the Mixx promotional algorithm worked.

Screenshot of a social media site that isnt Digg so should I really bother writing an alt attribute?

Website Skins

IE 8.1 allows you to keep a list of websites that you’d like to re-skin into one of the (currently) ten website templates that IE 8.1 comes with. When you next visit the site, it renders it into a prettier version by switching its stylesheets. This will allow IE 8.1 users to replace the design of an unreadable website to a template that is more viewable. In our test case, we used the Six Revisions website.

In its current state, this is what the ordinary Six Revisions website looks like:

Six Revisions screen shot. Such a great site I wonder who runs it.

We selected the “Mozkine” theme and this was the result:

Hey this looks like the Mozilla.org theme!

Judging solely on this test case, it shows how useful this feature can be in making the web a prettier place.

Conclusion

Our test run of IE 8.1 shows that the developers of the Internet Explorer team have done a great job improving the browser’s rendering engine. IE 8.1 Eagle Eyes has a lot of potential to quickly become the browser of choice for many web-developers. We weren’t able to find out when exactly Microsoft is going to release the first public beta of the new browser, but some sources from the developer’s team claim that it will happen this summer.

It is safe to say that Internet Explorer 8.1. will be – based on our experience and superior expertise in this matter – dominating the browser market unless other browsers shape up and step up. We are hoping that IE 8.1 will be released soon, as we’ve been dreaming about it for a while now.


*Seriously Steve, was that restraining order necessary? I was only trying to give you a hug. In retrospect, I should’ve not done that naked.

Jacob Gube is the Founder and Chief Editor of Six Revisions, a web publication for web developers and designers, and the Deputy Editor of Design Instruct, a web magazine for designers and digital artists. He has over seven years of experience as professional web developer and web designer and has written a book on JavaScript.

  1. 101

    If only it was true :o(….. I am so very sad now, it all looked so promising… boohoo

    Tim

    0
  2. 102

    Aaron Blakeley

    March 31st, 2009 6:01 am

    Microsoft should take note and make these changes. Does anyone have a mailing list for Microsoft developers. I am sure most of the email addresses end in gmail.com.

    0
  3. 103

    @Creamy CSS: Thanks! :)

    0
  4. 104

    Website skins? Come on guys… That is more than lame. Based on how IE works I can imagine how using skins will ruin everything for you.

    0
  5. 105

    Dude, I was like “HOLY SHIT!”, and then I saw the server-side script deal, which is impossible – not that Microsoft making a good browser is possible either – and I was very disappointed :)

    0
  6. 106

    HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!! IE 8.1 FTW!!!! Nice one, Smashing!

    0
  7. 107

    It would have been worthy to talk about compatibility mode in this post. I think for most web developers making the transition to supporting IE8 this is required knowledge.

    0
  8. 108

    ha ha, thats excellent… almost had me until the part about plugins :)

    0
  9. 109

    Whahahahahaha, I can’t believe this is true story! if (this== true){ i am gonna eat IE6 raw }

    0
  10. 110

    Client-side server code decompiler… no shit ? it’s wild west on the web :) or is it like fifth dimension ?

    0
  11. 111

    Firefox addon support would be a killer feature really.

    0
  12. 112

    Dammit, got me. I thought I’d died and gone to heaven when I read Firebug would work on it.

    *Cue cartman voice*
    “I hate you guys!”

    0
  13. 113

    Yeah you got me up to the firefox plugins :)

    I think that’s because i wanted good css support so badly …

    0
  14. 114

    Thanks for wasting my time reading the first half of this crap. Real professional, guys. This was not funny or even believable, since the second section was support for Firefox extensions — yeah, right.

    0
  15. 115

    Yorick Peterse

    March 31st, 2009 6:30 am

    Haha, great April Fools’ joke, also love it that the JS chart states “Graph created with Microsoft Excel to show it’s software greatness” :P

    0
  16. 116

    sounds interesting!

    0
  17. 117

    I love how people do not read the whole thing. You had me until the graph. Also, I have to say that the timing is actually brilliant, since it’s close enough to April 1st that it can be a joke without it actually being on April 1st and therefore obvious.

    Good job, Jacob.

    0
  18. 118

    I knew something was up when you said “full CSS3 support”. WAY too good to be true for IE.

    0
  19. 119

    you got me! =]

    0
  20. 120

    LOL LOL and LOL
    heyyyy how much are you paid for, smashing????
    by the time ie can do all these things listed, other browsers will be able to support 3D simulation browsing already…….. hahahahaha

    0
  21. 121
  22. 122

    lol nice. You actually had me for a while. I was even believing the FF addon support. But the “server-side code decompiler” is where I started lol’ing.

    0
  23. 123

    Michael Mogill

    March 31st, 2009 6:44 am

    Nice one guys.. the 8.1 on the Browser Version picture was a weak photoshop. ;)

    0
  24. 124

    Die IE! DIE!!! +)

    0
  25. 125

    @Nate

    Yeah, that’s the one that really convinced me as well.

    0
  26. 126

    Clicked as soon as I read ‘web standards support’ really ;)

    In reality, what I’d like from a non-aprils-fooled IE 8.1 would be for it not to be rubbish. However, recent history (4, 5, 5.5, 6, 7, 8.. uh… actually most all of ‘em) dictates that I will probably be disappointed. Are my standards too high, or IEs too low? :)

    0
  27. 127

    Cynthia Clinton

    March 31st, 2009 7:03 am

    You guys suck! I was all happy that IE was going to offer the skins and the firefox extension capability. lol

    0
  28. 128

    euhhhhhhh
    this post made me believe just for 2 minutes that the IE is still a … pretty good browser ;
    that was just before i realized that today is 31st march

    the IE sucks

    0
  29. 129

    I think the joke is on you SM for forgetting that there is 31 days in March.

    0
  30. 130

    Got me. I’m still shaking!

    0
  31. 131

    My favourite is the Windows 7 theme

    0
  32. 132

    Extraordinare

    March 31st, 2009 7:25 am

    Firefox rules..

    0
  33. 133

    MS making something useful? Hah! Nice Acid test, looks uncannily similar to my FireFox screenshot. The day IE becomes a useful browser will be the day the world comes to an end.

    0
  34. 134

    This news is FAKE because all these features are already present in IE8.0.

    0
  35. 135

    Ha ha! Good one. This fooled my boss, he actually believed it to be true!

    0
  36. 136

    The sad part of this joke is that we’re so used by now to MS releasing poorly designed software that we’d actually be surprised by a decent IE browser.

    0
  37. 137

    Got me too.

    The only thing that was weird is that it was not a new version. If it was IE 9.0, that would be even easier to believe.
    What I hope now is that MS developers will see this page and will question themselves about what everyone wants concerning a navigator. They should look at the poll too.

    0
  38. 138

    ROTFL!!! Too excellent! Congrats!

    0
  39. 139

    Server-side code decompiler? How should this work? Magic? :D
    Good one, but where do you live? New Zealand? The Blog’s date is still the 31st.

    0
  40. 140

    April’s fools people!!!! LOL

    sure i’ll absolutely going to download it!

    0
  41. 141

    Lol, I love the tiny text under the graph :)

    0
  42. 142

    You fooled me so badly lol…..

    Server-side decomplier :P

    0
  43. 143

    haha, nice. i like the Server-side code decompiler.

    0
  44. 144

    I got stuck on the server side de-compiling which would present HUGE risks for security reasons.

    0
  45. 145

    haha damn it, had me going there.

    0
  46. 146

    God I hate this website

    0
  47. 147

    Christopher Mena

    March 31st, 2009 8:07 am

    I freaked out at the style sheets option… GOOD ONE SMASHING! You guys rock.

    0
  48. 148

    if they copy soo much from firefox or google chrome maybe they should start using the actual code from chrome or firefox and contribute back to the community

    0
  49. 149

    the “Server-side code decompiler”, is not something like, wow, i can see the passwords to databases to many many sites of rookies developers who put them in php scripts?, it’s that a good idea?, i think it’s stupid, thank you microsoft for another one, and, if their os it’s bad fixed and too much expensive, how can i wait something good for this?

    0
  50. 150

    Haha you guys had me going for a minute, the Firefox extensions thing is impossible though, and the source code view thing gives it away.

    1) Firefox extensions are built on top of Firefox’s framework. Even just porting a Firefox extension to another XUL-based application is hard work. Making extensions work on IE would be impossible, especially something like Tab Mix Plus, which majorly changes how the Firefox tab bar works and is very dependent on… well, the underlying tab bar being the Firefox one. Even small changes to Firefox will break extensions that use the features that were changed (hence why addons are disabled when you upgrade until they are patched).

    2) There is no standard way to query a website for its PHP or ASP source code. The website must specifically choose to make a method available for download of its source, and for the most part many websites will not because they are “closed source” (Microsoft.com, for example, would never do it anymore than they would release the source for Windows).

    3) IE6 and 7 score very poorly on JavaScript benchmarks. Although it is believable MS would skew their own benchmarks. The tiny text is good and I completely missed it.

    4) IE would not let you use a competitor’s engine inside their own browser unless they completely switch to Webkit or whatever (I think there were legit rumors they planned to chuck Trident and do this in the future). There would also be licensing issues considering Gecko and Webkit are under some form of open source licences.

    5) Website skins would not work since every website author will code their site differently. With an ideal design where HTML is used to store content and CSS for styling, multiple styles can be provided BY THE WEBSITE. However styling can be embedded in pages as legacy HTML tags (IE font tags) and HTML tables can be heavily used/abused to fix layouts. These would be impossible to adjust with a universal restyling engine. Even with an ideal page such an engine would have to be able to dynamically figure out what on the page is a header, what is content, etc. Failure rates would be high.

    Right now Stylish is an extension for Firefox which can be used to change the look of webpages, but they are written to change INDIVIDUAL pages or sites, and are written for the specific page or site.

    Not to mention MS wouldn’t include a Mozilla styling. :P

    0
  51. 151

    @ Mark: lol, I didn’t even notice that the first time around.

    You had me jumping with glee, until I realized that a server-side code decompiler would reveal all my site’s secrets to hackers. Then wait… this is too good to be true.

    Although, it’s not April Fool’s….

    0
  52. 152

    Actually I still hate Microsoft for releasing IE6.
    But if they are able to take down IE6 to an acceptable limit (5% or less) I’m going to love them for their great newcome with IE8 and, of course, Windows 7.
    Of course I’ve several doubts about the security of IE8 but I hope Microsoft learned of its mistakes.

    0
  53. 153

    damn, got me hook line and sinker.

    0
  54. 154

    I think the comments from the people who thought this was serious are just an entertaining as the article itself.

    0
  55. 155

    We hate explorer…

    0
  56. 156

    You know, the start of it was actually looking promising, particularly as I use IE8 as my primary browser, and as part of web development. It really would have helped re-establish IE as a good browser.

    Very bad call >:(

    0
  57. 157

    Very good Jacob, Nice writing… Even for sometime i also think it all was real… but it isn’t… it’s so good to be true… anyway nice effort.

    DKumar M.

    0
  58. 158

    src=”http://media.smashingmagazine.com/images/ie8-eagle-eyes/graph_js_performance.jpg”
    alt=”Do not ask about what units or methodology was used. Just trust me.”

    src=”http://media.smashingmagazine.com/images/ie8-eagle-eyes/mixx.jpg”
    alt=”Screenshot of a social media site that isnt Digg so should I really bother writing an alt attribute?”

    ROFLMAO!

    0
  59. 159

    April Mob… hehe

    0
  60. 160

    If it aint April 1, it’s not an april fools it’s just lame?

    0
  61. 161

    MICROSOFT IS DEAD TO ME! All their products are an absolute nightmare. One thing that makes me laugh, is that office 08 is actually so much easier to use on a MAC than on windows. How the hell did they screw that up!

    0
  62. 162

    “Fast JavaScript Engine” that title made me realize.

    what a joke, is smashing magazine an aussie website ? :p

    0
  63. 163

    Thomas Thomassen

    March 31st, 2009 9:03 am

    A bit quick on the posting trigger there aren’t we? 1st April isn’t here yet.

    0
  64. 164

    It took me an embarrassingly long time to catch on

    0
  65. 165

    I’m not sure how 71/100 on ACID3 “kicks major butt,” other than relative improvement to its own past versions. I’ve seen Safari 3.2.1 score 74/100 (with “LINKTEST FAILED”) and others mention 75/100. I’ve also seen Firefox 3.0.7 score 71/100 with no failure messages.

    0
  66. 166

    LOL! i really felt ashamed for being so behind with all this news :P although the poll made it seem like some sort of an unusual thing, I still fell for it.

    that was good.

    0
  67. 167

    I think the best part of this is all the people saying, “Hey, this isn’t April Fools yet!” just because it’s not April Fools where they are.

    Uh, Internet? Time zones? Global access?

    Narcissist, much?

    The timing made this whole thing especially brilliant….

    0
  68. 168

    Ha, Server-side code decompiler. Now that would be scary.

    0
  69. 169

    Mikhail Subach

    March 31st, 2009 10:17 am

    Good work, guys! :)))

    0
  70. 170

    @Israel you’re telling me!

    I didn’t realize till this was a fake till I read the ss decompiler lol. I thought it was strange IE6 outperformed chrome & safari with its javascript engine.

    good one Smashing.

    0
  71. 171

    Everything, from a technical point of view, is feasible, except Server Side Decompiler… It was a really good joke until that.

    0
  72. 172

    I need a copy now so I can make all the websites I visit prettier with the new Website Skins feature!

    0
  73. 173

    What about support for SVG and the Canvas tag? ;) April Fools!

    0
  74. 174

    Hollis Bartlett

    March 31st, 2009 11:02 am

    Man, that had me going too, especially when seeing the server-side decompiler… I had loud security alarm bells going off in my head… Then I began to wonder how that would even be possible… Then the website skins part…Then I started reconsidering my career choices… Then I looked at the calendar and saw the comments. Good one!

    0
  75. 175

    You don’t need Eagle Eyes to spot this is a wind-up. Good one though :-)

    0
  76. 176

    Server side decompiler… yeah right… I’d like one like the reflector so I can decompile it in ASP.NET (C#) and not PHP :))))))))

    0
  77. 177

    I’ll never download IE, so also not Eagel Eye.

    If IE becomes the only webbrowser in the world, I’ll cut my internet connection with a knife.

    0
  78. 178

    uh.. im not too sure all the info in this article is correct. Its almost the opposite of what i’ve read previously..

    0
  79. 179

    damn you guys, I was genuinely excited that IE might actually not suck. Alas, I was wrong.

    0
  80. 180

    OMG: it’s already available as the Ubuntu package ms-internet-explorer8!

    0
  81. 181

    Francois Botha

    March 31st, 2009 12:12 pm

    Hey dudes… Stop whining. It’s already April in some countries. Oh wait… you’re right. There’s absolutely nothing outside the States.

    0
  82. 182

    Haha, funny. What gave it away was the non-rounded corners for the navigation in the first smashingmagazine screenshot yet you went onto say it supported CSS3! Nearly had me!

    0
  83. 183

    Yeah, ok. I laughed out loud (briefly) and then was kinda angry and disappointed. I was (ignorance is bliss) getting seriously excited with the prospect of those (albeit impossible to implement) features.
    Seriously though, I would be almost as happy if I never had to think about, or deal with IE 6 ever, ever, ever again.

    0
  84. 184

    Heh, Over 100 comments since I saw this, Loved the bit with the decompiler, I think we probably all wanted this review to be kind of true considering the previous versions of IE have been somewhat lacking ;)

    0
  85. 185

    haha :D i beleved it at first but the “Server-side code decompiler”? lol!

    0
  86. 186

    Would’ve been more convincing if you hadn’t used MS Sans Serif for the fake text in your screenshots, when the other text is Tahoma.

    0
  87. 187

    @Daniel, the same here: It all seemed possible until the “server-side decompiler”. And the code decompiled is so lame, it gives all away :P

    0
  88. 188

    lol excellent

    0
  89. 189

    Hahah this was very funny indeed :)

    0
  90. 190

    LOL. You got me; up until the Javascript engine. Sounded too fake, numbers did not make sense.

    0
  91. 191

    damn, you had me going there lol good one!

    0
  92. 192

    I analyzed your Firefoxaddonsupportpicture with JPEGSnoop:
    *** Searching Compression Signatures ***

    Signature: 01C26040DB5181BA3B5CD7A813FAD209
    Signature (Rotated): 01C26040DB5181BA3B5CD7A813FAD209
    File Offset: 0 bytes
    Chroma subsampling: 1×1
    EXIF Make/Model: NONE
    EXIF Makernotes: NONE
    EXIF Software: NONE

    Searching Compression Signatures: (3327 built-in, 0 user(*) )

    EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match?
    ————————- ———————————– —————- ————–
    SW :[Adobe Photoshop ] [Save For Web 060]

    NOTE: Photoshop IRB detected
    Based on the analysis of compression characteristics and EXIF metadata:

    ASSESSMENT: Class 1 – Image is processed/edited

    ————————————————————————————
    Good Joke

    Andy

    0
  93. 193

    March Fools Day – for those who just can’t wait the extra 12 hours.

    0
  94. 194

    Hahaha, server side decompiler rofl

    0
  95. 195

    Thomas Thomassen

    March 31st, 2009 1:54 pm

    @Peter Gasston (#7), @Mike Rundle (#11):
    actually, it is April 1st in Kiribati already (see Link [is.gd]) and since we have readers all across the globe, it sounds quite OK for us to publish the post now. We don’t have that many readers from Kiribati, but it would be unfair to publish it when it’s April 2nd there ;)

    Still… the post date is 31. March.

    0
  96. 196

    And with this news, I’m blocking ALL IE users from my site. Why? Because Microsoft just doesn’t get it. You do NOT catch up by spitting out product after product of JUNK that serves no purpose but to rip off what other people have already perfected. They need to just give up on the browser wars. They’ve lost. It’s OVER. IE is a miserable failure, and always will be.

    0
  97. 197

    Server-side code decompiler is unnerving, our code is our IP will this work for localhost and remote sites? this could be a security nightmare.

    0
  98. 198

    I guess the most amusing thing about the article, is the Acid3 claim. Midori browser already gets 100 of 100 on the test. Though, it should be noted, the test is supposed to load and render SMOOTHLY. Midori and any other browser that has ever achieved 100 pauses momentarily before completing the test. Yeah, 100 of 100, but not perfectly smoothly. Oh well, nothing’s perfect. Midori is close enough, for the time being.

    0
  99. 199

    @Hackerandy: You had to do all of that to determine that this is a joke? :)

    0
  100. 200

    Hold on just a big fat minute.

    You compare a PRE-beta IE8.1 with the current version of Safari in the ACID3 test? Why not compare it to Safari 4, available to anyone & everyone at Apple’s web site? It scores a perfect 100 on ACID3.

    Also, Microsoft should be comparing its IE betas to Safari 4 in their speed tests. Safari 4 will blow it’s doors off.

    C’mon people, try to be fair.

    0

Leave a Comment

Yay! You've decided to leave a comment. That's fantastic! Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and rel="nofollow" is in use. So, please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name, or it will be deleted. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for dropping by!

↑ Back to top