Five Reasons Why Designers Developers are Switching to Mac
Designers and developers have many choices to make when it comes to getting work done, from what frameworks, languages, and image editing software to use, to what platform to run. The latter is an oft debated and controversial topic and the mere mention of it risks setting off flame wars of epic proportions, so in the interest of sanity, we’ll try to avoid any direct comparisons to other operating systems.
It’s no secret that there has been a growing trend in recent years toward developers, especially of the web variety, choosing a Mac as their main dev machine. In this two-part series, we will examine some of the reasons behind this trend, look at some of the pitfalls of switching to the Mac, and go over the must-have software and configurations every switcher should be aware of.
First Reason for Switching: Mac OS X
You may have noticed the rise in the number of colleagues and fellow developers who are choosing a Mac as their next computer. If you haven’t, you’re probably either working for Microsoft or you have an MBA. So why is it so compelling?
If you were to ask a die-hard Windows user why he or she thinks people like Macs, they would almost invariably say the reasons are purely about aesthetics. If you were to ask most web developers why they have switched to a mac, however, the refrain would be loud and unanimous: OSX. To be fair to Windows, in terms of raw capability the two offerings differ very little; with enough elbow grease, both systems can be configured in pretty much any way its users wish.

When pressured to explain why they prefer OSX, Mac users often rest on qualifiable and subjective arguments such as “it feels intuitive” or “I enjoy using it more” or even “I can’t explain why I like it better, I just do.” The Windows user, when presented with these arguments, usually rolls his or her eyes and continues on their way. It isn’t until someone truly makes up their own mind to give OSX an honest chance that they can understand what all the fuss is about.
A Few Quantifiable Benefits of OS X include:
1. Open Source Friendly
As a web developer, if there’s one skill you invariably have to develop, it’s the use of a *NIX terminal. Luckily, because OSX is built on top of UNIX, the terminal is ready and waiting. Every Apple ships with a wide variety of open source programming tools and frameworks built in such as PHP, Apache, and Ruby on Rails. Linux users who have grown tired of dealing with hardware issues, especially on laptops, often choose a Mac as their portable solution because it is UNIX based.
It means that the entire world of open source software out there is pretty much guaranteed to run without much hassle. In a world where open source software is a way of life, web developers need a friendly environment to operate in.
2. Quartz Extreme

Quartz is the OpenGL powered windowing system used by OSX. Quartz extreme utilizes the graphics card exclusively, which means no processor cycles are taxed. This allows for a variety of useful features such as Exposé, which dynamically resizes every window on the screen giving you a bird’s eye view of your entire workspace.
Spaces, a feature introduced in OSX 10.5 (Leopard) takes the bird’s eye view a step further by providing a view of multiple desktops. To further illustrate the point, you can activate Exposé inside Spaces and drag these windows from desktop to desktop – any videos that are playing will continue to play and the windows will dynamically resize to accommodate the extra window. Once you get used to this sort of thing, you wonder how you ever lived without it.
3. Core Animation

Core animation provides a way for developers to produce animated user interfaces via an implicit animation model as well as an ‘explicit’ model. In other words, it means some very flashy and useful features are going to start showing up in OS X applications much like the animated menu help system shown in the graphic above. Prodiving developers with a toolset to implement these types of animated effects means software will become more intuitive.
4. Built-in Tools

There are so many useful tools that are built in to the Mac that come in handy for designers and developers that it’s easy to see OSX was built with developers and creative professionals in mind. Take the built-in screen capturing utility “Grab” for OSX, which has a wide variety of options, from selecting down to the pixel the area you want to screenshot, to providing window captures complete with the window frame, to outputting directly to the desktop as a .PNG file.
In fact, some tools were created specifically for designers because Apple has long catered to the creative professional market (indeed, it sustained Apple during their darkest times). More built in tools include:
- The Digital Color Meter – a tool that allows you to grab the color value of any pixel on your screen.
- Console – Useful for viewing very large log files
- Terminal – Mentioned above, complete with many OSS tools like VIM
- XCode Tools – The Apple development IDE
- Zoom – easy-as-pie down-to-the-pixel zooming
- Safari Debug Mode – Similar to Firebug for Firefox
- Time Machine – dead simple automated backups
5. Unified User Interface
As any student of design knows, consistency is one of the most important principles to adhere to, and it is clear the OSX UI was designed with this in mind. Because of the strict user interface guidelines provided by the Apple software development tools, applications and utilities on a Mac feel like they are all part of the same system.

The menu bar, which for some switchers can be a difficult feature to get used to, adheres to this unification by standardizing the location and layout of the menu options. Drag-and-drop functionality is ubiquitous. Being able to do things like drag an image off your web browser directly into your Photoshop project are a boon to productivity. If it feels as though you should be able to drag-and-drop something, you probably can.
6. Security
Now before you crack your knuckles and start composing your diatribe about why Macs aren’t any more secure than PCs, let me point out a trite but undebatable fact: there’s simply less malware out there for Macs than PCs – a LOT less (partly because Unix is inherently more secure than Windows and partly because Windows is just more wide-spread and Mac users aren’t targeted that often – read more in the article Is The Mac Really More Secure Than Windows?). If you are on a Mac, at least for the next few more years, you can pretty much rest assured your days of worrying about virus and spyware scans are a thing of the past.
7. Textmate, Growl, Quicksilver, and more
There is no shortage of text editors available to developers, but one that seems to keep coming up in recommendation after recommendation is Textmate, the lightweight GUI text editor for OSX. The project management drawer makes it easy to keep track of folders, which for monolithic MVC frameworks like Ruby on Rails and CakePHP is a godsend.

Nested scopes allow users to create their own syntax highlighting which is important in the ever changing world of web development. To speed up the development process, one can utilize “snippets” or pieces of reusable code that can be inserted with a few key strokes. While there aren’t any features that are revolutionary, they are combined in a way that makes for a very unobtrusive coding experience that seems very in tune with the overall feel of a Mac.
In addition to Textmate, there is a whole host of other beloved applications that seem to have been created by people who truly understand and want to emulate the Mac experience, like the quick-launch solution Quicksilver, the system notifications app Growl, and the chat client Adium. These are pieces of software of a caliber that is sometimes difficult to find on Windows. It seems that quality, not quantity, is the best way to describe the Mac software library.
8. Quick Look

OS X not only has icons that display an actual miniature version of the file they are representing, but it’s possible to view the contents of the file in their full glory without having to launch the program they are associated with simply by hitting the space bar. Furthermore, if a group of icons are highlighted, they can be expanded into a gallery view.
9. Virtualization
OSX is the only OS you can get that can virtualize all three major operating systems out of the box. This is a must have for checking browser compatibility. To make life even easier, you can do it right from within OSX using programs like Parallels, Virtualbox, and VMWare Fusion. And if you think web browsers render websites exactly the same regardless of the operating system they’re running on you are sorely mistaken.
Second Reason for Switching: Intel Inside

When Apple made the switch to Intel chips, it upset a lot of Mac fans out there who liked the fact that Apple wasn’t the same as any other X86 box on the market. With the rise in mobile computing, however, Apple was forced to face the fact that the PowerPC wasn’t offering as good a solution as Intel.
They also knew that by offering a system that could run Windows in addition to OS X they would put to rest any compatibility arguments. It turned out to be a good strategical move, and droves of would-be switchers were finally able to take the plunge without being forced to give up their entire libraries of Windows-based software.
OSX can virtualize all three major operating systems out of the box. This is a must have for checking browser compatibility. To make life even easier, you can do it right from within OSX using programs like Parallels, Virtualbox, and VMWare Fusion. And if you think web browsers render websites exactly the same regardless of the operating system they’re running on you are sorely mistaken.
Third Reason for Switching: Less Hassle
Opinionated Software
Some people like hassle. In fact, developers typically love getting their hands dirty customizing, maintaining, and tweaking their operating systems. If you fall under this category, Linux is probably your best fit, followed by Windows. OS X is more opinionated than other platforms. It’s more difficult to customize its look and feel, there’s no easy way to get it to run on anything but Apple hardware, and OS X can be very particular about the way certain things are done.
Opionated software, however, can have its benefits. While it may be more difficult to customize and hack every last aspect of your OS, sometimes it can be nice to have a system where a good many of these choices have already been made for you. Because Apple provides a complete solution, from the operating system to the hardware to a lot of the software that’s bundled in, they have an easier go of making sure the experience is seemless and well tested. Opinionated software can be a very polarizing concept, however.
Take Ruby on Rails for instance, a web development framework where many decisions are made for the developer based on the core contributors’ opinions about best practices. Rails has a preferred javascript framework, database ORM, templating system, and more. You can choose other configurations if you want to, but it shines brightest when you do things the “Rails Way.”
You spend less time customizing and more time actually developing. This hands-off approach can be a major turn off for some developers, but for others it removes a lot of the hassle and reinventing of the wheel. The high rate of Mac ownership among Rails developers could be directly attributed to the analogous nature of Apple and Rails. The analogy is made more apt by any number of PHP vs Ruby on Rails flame wars you can find out there.
Support

Because Apple provides the whole solution, they are obligated to provide support for the whole solution as well. Most developers are perfectly willing to trouble shoot their own computers, but when deadlines need to be met it can be nice knowing that you can offload some of that hassle to people who already know the system inside and out.
Apple has impressive customer service specifically because they support the entire system, rather than just one aspect of the system. It’s also handy to be able to take your machine into an actual brick-and-mortar store rather than deal with outsourced phone support.
Let’s face it, when it comes to a non-technical spouse or family member, we can expect to do a lot of troubleshooting. Just like its nice not to have to worry about troubleshooting your own computer, it’s even nicer not to have to worry as much about other people’s computers. It is reasonable to assume that because Macs typically have less security issues (at least for now), there’s less time spent trying to explain how to avoid malware and actually removing it.
Fourth Reason for Switching: Microsoft
If you like it or not: a big reason why developers have been flocking to Apple is in part due to the fact that it isn’t the big M. When personal computing was still in its infancy, the reverse was true. Microsoft understood that it was the developers (developers developers) that would make their OS successful while Apple’s closed model ended up being a huge mistake.
Once Microsoft started dominating the marketplace, however, the pungent stench of monopoly sparked the open source movement, and more and more developers were starting to wonder if there were better options out there.
Linux is of course the golden child of the open source movement, but despite the efforts of Ubuntu it is still a ways off in terms of being a turnkey solution for most people. Enter Apple: a Unix based system that despite being every bit as closed as Microsoft, is in large part the antithesis of Microsoft.

Microsoft software has the unfortunate feeling of having been designed by committee. Features are packed in with little regard to their usefulness, and aesthetics are seemingly an afterthought. When Vista first launched, the Aero user interface was so flashy it required higher end machines to even run it, somewhat defeating the argument Microsoft was making about the affordability of PCs. OSX was designed to run as well on the most expensive Mac Pro as it would an eight year old Powerbook because they control the solution from hardware to software.

Unfortunately, Windows doesn’t come bundled with PHP, Rails, or any other open-source web development frameworks or languages any time soon. More and more of what we do is in the cloud these days anyways and it is almost starting to feel quaint when you come across new software that runs solely as a desktop client. Microsoft has painted themselves into a corner – they rely on closed formats and standards in a world where open source software, open formats, and open standards are king.
Fifth Reason For Switching: Design and Minimalism

Good design gets out of the way. It doesn’t demand to be seen or appreciated. Most of all, good design is something you don’t even notice at first. Bang & Olufsen understands this, and Apple understands this. As of this writing, there are only two styles of Apple notebook: silver and white, and white is only available in the cheapest configuration. Apple notebooks are free of stickers, screws, vents, buttons, switches, and graphics.
What this leaves is a system with little to look at other than the screen in front of you, which is as it should be. The benefit of the entire product development cycle being done under one house is that Apple creates a system that truly feels as though it was created by one person.

At the heart of Apple’s design philosophy is the concept of minimalism. It is a concept that has worked well for companies such as Google. We all remember the gratuitous placement of links and ads on most search engines before Google came around with its simple search bar. After all, it was the search that was the important part, not the content the provider was hoping we would want. Apple figures if not including a feature angers 1% of their consumer base but makes things easier for the other 99% it’s probably worth doing.
Take, for instance, the lack of a second mouse buttom. It may seem like a glaring omission on Apple’s part, but it has had some unintended consequences: because developers can’t simple throw commands into a bloated right-click menu they are forced to think more about the one-click usability of their applications.
Minimalist design has its downsides too, however. Macs lack card readers, often have 2-3 less USB ports than even low end machines, and are typically difficult to customize. For those of you who value a product that gives you many choices, Apple is going to fall short. It is often pointed out that upgrading a Mac is easy: “Just throw it away and buy a new one.”
Humor aside, this isn’t too far from the truth but the good news is that Macs hold their value better than any computer on the market. Instead of throwing it away, sell it on Ebay for healthy head-start on a new machine.
Mac’s Pitfalls
It’s not all sunshine and rainbows for everyone who switches to a Mac. There are the inevitable bumps in the road that everyone experiences when making a major platform change, and for some people these bumps are outright road blocks. Here’s what to be aware of:
1. Control is now Command
Breaking the habit of using control as the main modifier key on your system can take a bit of time and some people never quite get the hang of it. Old habits die hard and muscle memory dies harder. This is a problem that can be solved by re-mapping command to the control key, but when you are using a system that assumes a certain configuration you may run into confusion later on.
2. No Second Mouse Button

Unless you use an external mouse with your Apple laptop you will have to get used to the lack of a second mouse button. The truth is there is no optimal number of mouse buttons. Luckily, you can enable right-clicking in a number of ways on a mac, such as tapping the track pad with two fingers simultaneously or holding ctrl when clicking.
3. No Maximizing of Windows
This is actually starting to become less true as time goes on as ex-Windows users who develop software for the Mac include the feature (for instance, maximize on firefox for the Mac works as expected). But the typical maximize you are used to in Windows cannot be found on the Mac, and for some this can be extremely frustrating. In fact, the whole “stop-light” window controls can at times feel stale and unintuitive.
4. Lack of an “affordable” Mac
Perhaps the most popular sticking point of non-Mac users, price is always at the heart of the debate. Under $1200 or so, there is no question that byte for byte, ghz for ghz, you can get a better raw value by avoiding Apple. Apple has chosen not to enter the sub $1000 PC not because it doesn’t want to grow sales, but because it wants to avoid the dogfight that Sony, HP, and other brands are in for the lower end market.
Profit margins are razor thin in that range, after all. Apple is certainly catering to the botique style consumer. If you are pinching pennies these days the price issue may just be the one pitfall you can’t bring yourself to overcome.
5. Much Smaller Software Library
While this is somewhat mediated by the fact that you can virtualize Windows on a Mac, it is a far cry from being able to run your favorite programs natively on your system. If you are using software on a regular basis that only runs in the Windows environment, you may want to think hard about whether moving to a Mac is worth the trouble.
6. You Can’t Build a Mac (Easily)
Part of the success of Windows was the fact that they licensed it to run on any PC, anywhere. Apple has been closed since the word go, save a brief period where they allowed Mac clones to exist in what turned out to be a devastatingly bad idea. If you’re the type who loves building your own PC from scratch, a Mac is not going to offer much for you.
In general, even the most jaded Windows user is inevitably going to miss at least a few features or aspects of Windows during their switch to a Mac. The best policy to follow is to keep an open mind during the learning process. Try doing things “the Mac way” for a week and keep your skepticism to a minimum.
Above all, ask questions before you make assumptions. There’s a fervent Apple community out there (in case you haven’t noticed) that have solutions for every issue you find, thanks in part to the fact that most of them are switchers themselves. Remember, if you’re having the issue, chances are good some other switcher experienced it before you and created or found a solution.
Conclusion
While not the right solution for everyone, it’s clear that many people are switching to a Mac these days for a good many reasons. Nevertheless, Macs are expensive and require user’s patience and willingness to adapt his or her behavior to a compltely different interface. Mac is certainly not an option for every user, but it is definitely an option worth considering – particularly for designers or developers.
Join us in Part 2 of this series where we examine some of the must have software, configurations, and tricks that every new Mac user should know about. Please feel free to subscribe to our RSS-feed
and follow us on Twitter
.




remoteartist
April 26th, 2009 2:20 pmYou know – if you are bogging down in your operating system – you aren’t ready for Photoshop.
I use both – and could care less really – just get me in my application, give me a good graphics tablet and monitor.
Been at this a long time – routinely do high-end design work, and find this minutia of which platform is better annoying. So a kid in Bangladesh is handicapped because he can only afford a PC – classic OS elitism.
Take that extra money you save by working in Linux and take a drawing class.
Jean-Baptiste Jung
April 26th, 2009 2:21 pmExcellent article! Microsoft is like McDonald’s: nasty for your health ;)
Nate
April 26th, 2009 2:21 pmMac looks fancy and all, but I’m a die hard Windows fan. I may get a Mac if I win the lottery.
Mihai Moscovici
April 26th, 2009 2:23 pmThanks for a balanced review!
Brian
April 26th, 2009 2:23 pmWhat designers AREN’T using Mac? I’m from a small city in Tennessee and I don’t know ANY designers that aren’t using Mac.
I understand that some must be using PCs but that headline just sounds funny to me.
cssah
April 26th, 2009 2:24 pmthanks so much i will get mac very soon
Karsten
April 26th, 2009 2:25 pmThank you for the first really BALANCED review – most similar articles are biased by Mac or Win-fans. THANKS.
Dieter Mueller
April 26th, 2009 2:30 pmHow lame.
I am a freelancer since 1989 – using both Macs & PC. Maybe five but certainly ten years ago there were REAL reasons to use a Mac: better fonts, better applications, better hardware (how that has changed – Macs are basically Intel clones today and Apple’s production standards have slipped in some products) more stable production environment. Today Photoshop is Photoshop (or any other important design tool) – no matter on which box you run it on.
A good designer delivers good work NO MATTER which tool he uses – even when it’s only pen and paper. Stop that techno & brand fetishism – do some good work instead.
Max.W
April 26th, 2009 2:33 pmForgot to mention that Mac’s are not for gamer’s either. I’m a designer AND a gamer too.
Hammad
April 26th, 2009 2:34 pmwe’d love to get macs for our studio, but its not the price, software or any geek loyalty that prevents us – it’s the internal technical skills. connecting the macs to the windows active directory, nas server etc isnt something we’ve never done – and help from google isn’t really the kind of reliability we can afford to risk. if something goes wrong – we can’t fix it at the speed and cost we can with a PC. however, we’re getting closer to making the jump!
Milos
April 26th, 2009 2:34 pmDieter Mueller, you make a good point. Good designers deliver good work no matter what tool they use, but some tools are more usable than others and some environments are better than the others. With the same logic, you could just use Notepad instead of PHP Eclipse for coding which is not right, isn’t it?
Karl
April 26th, 2009 2:35 pmPros and Cons to both sides of the argument. About personal preference in this day and age. Very nice little article though. Thanks alot.
Christopher Wagar
April 26th, 2009 2:37 pmI am SO impressed! I switched to a mac about 2 years ago, but it was all on a whim. Everyone I talked to was either heavily anti-mac, or a fanatic. I wanted a balanced idea of what I was getting myself into, but all I got was a look at the childish ego-war that exists between mac and pc fans. I wish there was an article like this back then! As it turns out, I do prefer mac, but I’m well-aware of it’s shortcomings. Thanks again!
Liberation
April 26th, 2009 2:39 pmWow. That’s so cool that you chose to insult your readers and make assumptions in your opening paragraph.
Gabriel
April 26th, 2009 2:40 pmI think there are plenty of reason that are really true (expose and spaces, quicklook, textmate, growl, security, stability…)
But some other like core animation… I dont really care if my app do little eye candy animations. I just care if they do the job the are supposed to do.
About the design of the computers… this is too something that it didnt make any diference to me…
So to me, the main mac features to switch are productivity ones, and no beacuse “mac is pretty”.
JimmyFingers
April 26th, 2009 2:43 pmThis is all a matter of preference. I prefer to design on a PC because my audience will view my work (most likely) on a PC. There is no end all tool out there that you can get for a Mac or a PC which makes either any better than the other.
In fact I would rather sand my hands off and try and win a push up contest than partake in an argument about why one is better than the other.
It is like Coke and Pepsi, they are both softdrinks, but which do you prefer.
Adam R Garcia
April 26th, 2009 2:44 pmI started designing audodidactically with a PC. I’d have to say that at the time, I had no idea how much better a Mac would be, but when I am forced to get back on them now for presentation purposes, I find basic navigation on a PC counter-intuitive. I think that’s my biggest beef with PCs. To each their own.
Dan
April 26th, 2009 2:44 pmAnyone not using Mac for design already doesn’t know that they don’t know yet.
al
April 26th, 2009 2:48 pmI use XP on the classic theme.
notepad++, dreamweaver, photoshop…all run nicely.
plus i enjoy playing games
Aaron
April 26th, 2009 2:51 pmWell said, but perhaps this article still comes off as needless Windows bashing. Windows is a viable option for people who need raw power at an inexpensive price. With talent – yes talent – you can achieve the same designs on OSX, Windows, and Linux machines.
That said, all three operating systems have their pros and cons. Try them all and use what you like. Personally, I’m happy doing the “psd shows as a preview” tweak in Windows 7 and calling it a day.
bob
April 26th, 2009 2:53 pm…this isn’t really about designers, per se, as much as a general “OSX is cool” article.
Arvin
April 26th, 2009 2:53 pmAs a mac user, I switched mainly because Final Cut was becoming the standard for video editing, and there was no elegant way of getting less-experienced editors my motion graphics work without it and its stable of codecs.
I love using the Mac.
However, there seems to be this constantly-supressed reality that people keep ignoring, which is that even with the latest versions of Adobe’s suite, Windows still runs Photoshop, Flash, and AfterEffects way faster than on OSX.
EVEN VISTA runs AfterEffects faster, and Photoshop and AfterEffects both take longer to start up on my 2008 iMac with 2.8 ghz and 4 gigs of ram than on my 4 year old PC running Windows XP home.
If you don’t notice this enough to put it as even a miniscule part of the reason why one wouldn’t use OSX, then I think I know which side of the form/function argument you fall under.
Ruth
April 26th, 2009 2:55 pmI started with windows and am yet to be convinced that Macs are better then my PC. Mac repairs are an issue and very expensive as technicians are hard to find in the rural landscape. I still need a debate that challengers my opinion. that Macs and Pcs are like cars. Mac’s are the sports car model (Designer ego) with PC’s being family cars that do the same job minus the ego.
Frats
April 26th, 2009 3:00 pmThe biggest problem for possible switchers is probably Apple’s relatively high prices. I’ve been there myself, after having been a hardcore Windows user for over ten years.
However, when I finally switched to a Mac, all of a sudden the extra euros I did pay we’re forgotten: this machine works so much better!
Best reasons: it doesn’t get slower, there is no blue screen, there are no viruses, malware et cetera and its beauty! Buy one!
qbix
April 26th, 2009 3:06 pmI’ve been a graphic designer, illustrator, and now flash developer for the past 10+ years all on the PC. I agree with Dieter that good designers will turn out good work regardless of platform. I think it has more to do with ease of use than anything that people in general, not just designers, are turning to the Mac. Sure, aesthetics play a big part and being a designer I applaud Apple for having a great sense of it when it comes to UI and industrial design, but that’s just the surface of an OS and a computer.
I feel like I have full control over the experience when it comes to PCs. I can tweak just about anything about it and if I need more flexibility, I just boot into a Linux partition. If the latest version of photoshop feels slow, I just go get more ram and a new videocard instead of a new system, and if I feel like pushing my CPU, I overclock it. Today if you want the best system money can buy for the job in the creative field, it would clearly be a PC with a 64 bit version of Windows, 8+ megs of RAM, a Quadro CX videocard, two solid state drives in RAID 0 and another 3 1.5TB drives in RAID 10. In other words, the myth that Macs are better for graphics is a lie but sadly some people still believe that.
Most people just don’t want to have to think about hardware or configuring a firewall, therefore they just buy whatever is easiest so they can just get to work and not worry about these things. That’s why Macs are popular and the elitist and trendy Mac fans couldn’t be happier. I agree that MS has to play catch up, but I don’t think Windows is a bad OS for creative professionals. And for this opinion I will probably be called an MS fanboy, but I’m used to it.
C6FlyBy
April 26th, 2009 3:10 pmWow, I switched to a Mac but none of those reasons even matter. I actually prefer Windows in most ways BUT…I need quietness! I spent $4000 building a SOTA ‘silent’ PC but my new 3 Ghz 24″ iMac is virtually silent, and there’s no constant flow of warm air coming up from under my desk. Serenity at last.
brandon
April 26th, 2009 3:10 pmFYI, you forgot THE reason that designers use macs: color management. That is the main reason. Period. End of discussion. Nothing else you mentioned in the article couldn’t be done on a PC, except the physical Apple stores. Not a single thing.
PCs CAN virtualize OSX. PCs CAN run PHP, ruby, etc, with extra software (and no, I DON’T want it built in from the start). PCs CAN do all of the desktop eye-candy, which FYI when I use a mac I turn all of it off (though again the PC requires extra software).
No I am not a fanboy, I am a person who uses PC+Linux+OSX on a daily basis. They all have their uses, I just needed to correct some factual errors in the article.
Roland
April 26th, 2009 3:13 pmIs there really that much difference between Mac and Windows (Note that I don’t say Mac and PC, because Mac IS a PC). I use both myself and I really don’t feel one is better than the other.
Daniel M
April 26th, 2009 3:14 pmI switched to mac a few years ago and havn’t looked back since, in fact i bought my mum a pc with vista a short while back, hated it and gave it to me! although i use it as a back up, i really cant stand using it. Macs are simply a far better all round machine.
Kilian Güntner
April 26th, 2009 3:16 pmI prefer Windows XP still for web design/software devevelpoing – at least for a year or so, then I’ll probably switch to os x or vista (or perhaps something new). Currently i produce results a little bit faster with two mouse buttons by standard, actually and the mac book air processor in such a small package turns on the fan all the time Ive heard ;) //K
j.wonnell
April 26th, 2009 3:18 pmyes, the time has come for apple, especially the new macbooks with the multi-touch pad and leopard. i would never want to do design work on a windows pc again. of course, for play time I still use a windows pc. Gaming capabilities like my pc would cost waaaay too much in a macpro
James
April 26th, 2009 3:20 pmI read this article and thought that it would be a red rag to the die-hard Mac haters, of the kind that will call anyone who expresses a preference for the Mac a fanboy, but thus far the comments are remarkably restrained. Smashing Magazine clearly has a better and politer class of readers!
Good article, though the stuff about single button mice has been untrue since OSX became the default operating system. I will admit however that Apple has never made a good mouse, so you’d be best advised to get one from say Logitech or (horrors!) Microsoft. But they do for the most part work with OSX straight out of the box.
jobChaowadee
April 26th, 2009 3:22 pmIncorrect fact on “No Secondary Mouse Button”.
Seriously, all new unibody Mac laptops have the secondary button. It is up to you that you would like to activate it or not.
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1290/picture1y.png
Simona
April 26th, 2009 3:24 pmI just cannot help it, but Mac has brainwashed so many people it’s insane. The Mac is not only more expensive, it’s also a throwaway box after two years. Mac might have been more stable, but that time has long passed. The price is not justifiable anymore. So if you don’t use a Mac, you cannot call yourself designer, wooo. And if you are a developer and switching to MAC, you should be stripped off your title :). I gotta give Mac the thumbs up for marketing though. Make people believe that when they buy the product, they’ll belong to the elite….
connecticut websites
April 26th, 2009 3:25 pmThis article might have made sense 20 years ago, now it just reveals the ignorance of the author…the Mac vs PC argument died a long time ago, now it’s just an urban myth to make mac users feel better about how much money they spend compared to PC users.
Maybe Mark can also write an article about how crop circles are made by aliens, or how he saw Elvis last week working at Taco Bell.
Tracy
April 26th, 2009 3:27 pmMy entire design education was completed on OSX, even though I was a Win user. I got my assignments, worked on them in class (Mac), and then went home and worked on them some more on my PC. And I know I am in the minority when I say that I felt more comfortable working on in Win as opposed to the Mac. Up to this day I am still running a PC and loving it, but I am glad that I had the opportunity to learn the OSX environment. Maybe one day I will switch but for now I’m quite happy.
It is not the tools that make the designer, but how the designer uses their tools.
Philip K.
April 26th, 2009 3:29 pmGood article but needs some tuning. I got nothing to add but this picture.
Emil
April 26th, 2009 3:31 pmI use windows. I am not a FAN of it. It is just a computer used for running other software. If Photoshop did not run on Windows, i would have switched. All that matters to me is my own creativity (or lack of it).
mikemike
April 26th, 2009 3:34 pmNice try Vitalli, you troll. The first reason you gave is one of two reasons why people switch to Mac:
1) They don’t really do any work, but rather dream of whimsical fantatic “design careers” that entail using a beautiful Mac (which costs 2x as much as it’s Window counterpart and offers zero technical advantage now that Macs are PCs)
2) The only other reason why people switch to Mac is because Windows hasn’t come out with a compelling release for years. Once Windows 7 comes out Mac losers will stop creaming their pants over cool looking buttons, and clear backgrounds.
The thing to remember is: MACs ARE PCs!!!!. They are not Macs anymore. Apple simply manufacturers the same product as HP now, but somehow the ignorance of people denies this great fact in the name of aesthetics. I won’t deny that a MacBook looks great, but so does a golden sink. My sink is ceramic though because I won’t pay extra to be a pretentious poser.
One final note: Most successful developers/designers are Windows users, and the ones that use Mac, by their very nature will fail.
Anone
April 26th, 2009 3:35 pm“Linux is of course the golden child of the open source movement, but despite the efforts of Ubuntu it is still a ways off in terms of being a turnkey solution for most people.”
As an Ubuntu user I have to say that since Dapper Ubuntu has been an option for the average user–and just keeps getting better. I would never consider a mac.
Trav
April 26th, 2009 3:44 pmDamn….. I just started a new job as Senior Designer and the company I work for is all PC based. I’ve been using a Mac now for the past 6 years and having to use a crappy PC everyday is killing me.
Ted K
April 26th, 2009 3:45 pmRails, Textmate, CS4, and OS X == Pure Bliss.
After using a Mac for a year now, I couldn’t be happier. When I must use my Windows machine, which is quite often (All good architecture software is Windows-only), I feel alone and quite frustrated. But at the same time, I tweak, and customize, and tweak some more–and often enjoy it. When I get back to my Mac, I have nothing to tweak, nothing to customize. But I’ve learned to love opinionated software.
As for the price, Mac’s are definitely more expensive, but it’s worth it for me. It’s all just about priorities. I’m living on a grad school budget: Macbook Pro, IKEA bed, and some good food. I could easily get a more affordable laptop and have some extra spending money, but I wouldn’t dream of it.
Overall, nice article, and greetings from Minnesota.
Jason
April 26th, 2009 3:48 pmThis has been a paid advertisement by the cult of Apple. Jog on….
N'FOS
April 26th, 2009 3:51 pm2 words…
Appl€ Sucks! 8D
Helen
April 26th, 2009 3:52 pmNo, designers who need a very well equipped computer do not buy a Mac out of the same reason that only rich dentists buy a Leica M8 and professional photographers do not. My computer would cost 17000 Euro if it would be a Mac. The difference is 14000 Euro. A Mac is a good thing for a hotel lobby :)
Emil
April 26th, 2009 3:53 pmShow us your work, not your computer.
gus
April 26th, 2009 3:56 pmFALSE
PC is better
Hobartimus
April 26th, 2009 3:57 pmI’m not going to get into the Mac vs PC debate, but the nature of this article is just plain messed up.
When I got my first Mac in 1991, Apple owned something like 92% of the creative market. It was very normal for ad agencies to have Macs in the creative department and PCs for business.
Today things are very different. If anything, Macs have gained more ground in the mainstream over the past 10-15 years, but PCs have grabbed a bigger chunk of the creative fields.
This article is bass-ackwards.
Ted K
April 26th, 2009 3:58 pmAnd as for the aesthetics arguments…
If you paint your Macbook blue. That is aesthetics.
If you sandbrush your HP. That is aesthetics.
If you put a sticker on your laptop. That is aesthetics.
Construction, materiality, hardware, size, weight, stability, durability, noise, temperature, etc… are most certainly not aesthetics. They are all components of design.
I can only imagine a true designer would want something he or she sees as well designed, whatever machine that might be.
Vladocar
April 26th, 2009 3:58 pmI hope NOT to see this kind of article ever more. What will be next if you don’t have iPhone you are loser or if you have iPod you are cool.
Helen
April 26th, 2009 3:59 pmBy the way: Glenn Gould exercised on a Yamaha or even on very cheap pianos. He didn’t use a Steinways. You can find Steinways in many houses of rich people in the middle of the living room.
Bob Nolin
April 26th, 2009 4:01 pmThe main reason I switched, two years ago, to Mac was I had finally had it with having to reinstall my machine every six months due to Windows crapping out. I swore that the next time I found my machine not able to restart due to some obscure blue-screened code, I would bite the bullet and get a Mac. I am so glad I did.
Now, whenever I have to play “help desk” for others in my family who are still saddled with Windows, I find my jaw dropping at how slow their systems are. No doubt I’ll be rebuilding them each soon (or getting them Macs!).
The best reason, and one you don’t mention (that I saw anyway) is: Windows is unreliable, breaks down constantly, and is maddening to use. I’ve become quite spoiled by my Mac Pro. But on the other hand, it does just what I expect it to: it works. Always.
HBSteve
April 26th, 2009 4:04 pmDesigners ALWAYS have used macs… macs were always a designers computer, while PC’s were business computers… while the apps have grown to be used on both – this greyed the usage of computers.. While today its a price difference, since many can design on either, even myself had to switch to a pc even though being a machead for many years before the new macs of mainly image… the apps simply ran faster on a cheaper machine… Its always the right computer for the right task… I still think mac has a long way to go and have yet to see a business be running a mac that isnt a design firm or some new foofoo type of business… sure I love them, sure I still want one, but like so many others, they simply are too expensive… when mac puts out a $399 computer (with monitor/keyboard/mouse etc) then pc markets will be in trouble… electronics now a day are cheaper than ever… 21+” monitors for around $100ish, 1TB hard drives for $100, awesome video cards for $100ish range, memory at rock bottom prices… now is the time apple needs to come out with a recession proof price tag.. Im sure they would get many new users soon as they do this… put the mac mini out for at most $299 THEN we can start seeing some great results… oh and ditch the Air laptop… what a waste – a computer that requires you to have another computer.. did I mention im still a total machead? haha So I hope the prices keep coming down
FrankG
April 26th, 2009 4:05 pmI work at an ad agency and we only hire creatives with heavy Mac experience. Any applicant that has mostly PC experience, is Mac hostile, or insists on PC/Windows is disqualified. We’ve been burned too many times from these sorts. They always fail and deliver sub par work.
Howard Z
April 26th, 2009 4:09 pmI made the switch 2 years ago, best move I ever made. More stable, no OS slowdown, no defragmentation, no spyware/viruses, no microsoft verification process for the bits of software. Most Mac haters have just refused to use a mac or are going off a 1 hr experience they had with a mac in 2000. Macs are dominant in professional fields for a reason, they are excellent to work on.
hybrid-kernel
April 26th, 2009 4:17 pmMost of the positives are present on linux. Of course 1 reason they will never be equivalent is the lack of popular multimedia software (All adobe’s stuff, final cut, etc). That is one reason I want a mac – a non-windows computer that can run photoshop naively. If only the mac mini cost <400, then I might buy one. Until then, I can only hope for second hand or a lottery/giveaway.
kiedis
April 26th, 2009 4:18 pmi used to be a die hard fan of PC, i had ms dos, windows (in all its versions) linux and i used to hate the mac until i got to college where i study design (i had never touched a mac before)
the whole lab had macs…and only one pc with ubuntu…
i had to learn to use them and then i realized they were not that bad…
most of the students have macs and when we share files like for example indesign files it was a mess with my old laptop. fonts were not the same, even if i had the same font installed in some cases it would not recognize it exactly as i wanted…
so i had to change manually everything each time and redo all the layout sometimes, i would waste lots of time.
my old laptop had lots of problems because fujitsu siemens give no support and release no drivers for this model since 2006 so..when i installed directx 10 everything started crashing and if i had directx 9 nothing would work fine…
everything was slow, and it was so hot and noisy my classmates would say “what’s that noise??” and i would be ashamed to say “its my laptop” in a room full of mac and the only noisy pc …
I would hesitate to take my computer with me because it was over 5 kilos and 1 kilo and half for the charger…plus all the books i need to carry and stuff…my back hurted…
so i finally got tired and got a 17 inch macbook pro and i’ve had it for a month and im not regretting it, it works nicely it dont make noise, easy to carry, don’t heat as much as my old laptop…and its fast :)
as for the software i used to wonder “what kind of software will i find? will it be difficult to find something to do what i do?”…most things worked out of the box…and the rest…open source software really help a lot…the only thing i miss are some games but i can install a windows emulator for that…so it’s not really a problem
one of the things i like the most is the magnetic power field, with my pc i was constantly nervous when it was plugged at school because i had to watch that noone passes by and get the cable in their feet and crashes my pc on the floor…
also, 8 hours of battery that is just great, i had only 1 hour and half and i could not even finish one class without being plugged
i guess that is why most designers change to a mac…
Floris Fiedeldij Dop
April 26th, 2009 4:18 pmWhen my PC broke down and I got a powerbook at the end of 2005 .. I realized after a few weeks I haven’t touched my PC at all .. The switch was completed. I turned my PC into a ubuntu server and got a mac pro 12 months later. And an iMac this year.
I am never switching, my computer frustrations dropped from 80% to 5% and my workflow went from 45% to 80% .. easily.
Snow Leopard, true native 64bit .. I can’t wait.
Agnes
April 26th, 2009 4:23 pmI am not a tech person so I cannot offer anything innovative to say about the tech side of macs vs pcs, but as a designer my work improved from the point of aesthetics after the purchase of my first macbook in September last year. The minimalism of the machine is non distracting, and as a matter of thought progress, the same became true for my web designs, which became much more space aware, cleaner, transparent, more efficient and more logical, whereas I’ve begun to abhor the screaming, color bursting, busy designs of so many websites, even some showcased here at SM.
So yes, the switch to a mac has made the difference and it’s quite apparent in my design process.
Bryan
April 26th, 2009 4:23 pm“Mac might have been more stable, but that time has long passed. The price is not justifiable anymore.” ?
I disagree with this one. I’ve seen more issues in 4 months with my wife’s Vista laptop than I’ve seen in 2+ years with a MacBook Pro.
Realistically I think PC is perfectly fine for any use, but you really can’t discount the great features inherent with the Mac and the lack of baggage by not using Windows. Bottom line is that if you care about gaming or want to save money, than a PC is for you. If you don’t care about those things as much then a Mac provides less danger of virus problems, a more stable environment (you can crash one program on a Mac and still save and shutdown others, not sure I’ve ever seen this as a possibility in a PC).
All that said, designers are “switching to a Mac?” Seems to me that most designers originated on the mac.
Gee
April 26th, 2009 4:23 pmI heard JJ Abrams loves Macs
Rob
April 26th, 2009 4:26 pmI use both Macs and PCs regularly, and I still can’t agree with most of your points besides perhaps the first one. Expose typically annoys the shit out of me (where windows will move unintentionally) but some of the productivity stuff can be useful. Enough to justify the price? Absolutely not.
PCs — and I think this is pretty fair — are a much greater value.
Dave
April 26th, 2009 4:33 pmI’ve never understood number 6 (less malware out there for the MAC). Why would anyone be stumped by the extra vulnerabilities of Microsoft Windows to the degree it would become a factor in deciding which platform to develop on? Any “webmaster” or web programmer will surely spend 5 minutes installing a virus scanner – on either platform – so how is this even a remotely viable concern?
I hear this “Microsoft is more secure because there is less Malware for it” argument all the time, in the general sphere of the OS debate. But I think it’s bogus that the higher level PC user would ever be worried about it. I give you, perhaps if it is a new webmaster and a new PC user all at once, maybe then. But otherwise, meh.
-D
Ian
April 26th, 2009 4:33 pmWow, I remember when this was a site about web design. Out of the many reasons given here, most have absolutely no application to design.
Also, I love how the article pushes open-source, despite the fact that Apple charges far more for their apps (which are just as closed and proprietary as any other vendor). When I was using Mac running OS 10.1, I was pretty pissed to find out that I need to upgrade my whole f’ing OS to update Safari and iPhoto.
Finally, how can the author praise the whole one vendor solution aspect in the same article that knocks MS for being too controlling.
Windows, OSX, Linux it doesn’t matter they’re all the same in many ways. Each has pros and cons. However, it’s nice to see irrelevant, opinion pieces instead of actual design content.
Emily
April 26th, 2009 4:36 pmI use all 3: XP on my home machine, Ubuntu on my laptop, an iMac at work.
I’m a developer and a gamer.
All 3 systems crash – and for the uses they crash under, they crash at about the same rate. (eg: my XP machine crashes while gaming only, the iMac crashes randomly and for oddball things not under heavy load, and the laptop/linux crashes generally when installing things)
All 3 systems have silly UI quirks, good bits, and neat things.
All 3 systems can be configured to act like the other, and all 3 can run vitual copies of the others. If you have to install software to virtualize, its not “out of the box”. if you’re talking about dual/tri-booting, this isn’t special.
I find the Textmate/Growl/Quicksilver reason to be rather weak – mostly for the Textmate part. 1) Its not bundled with the OS. 2) Its not free. 3) It doesn’t have features you won’t find in other programs. It IS however, hard to find a free text editor for OS X. I spent a week looking. I finally settled on Komodo Edit, because then I could have the same program on ALL 3 platforms that I use, and not have to relearn different editors each time. Quicksilver also has parallels on other OS’s, though they work different. Growl is neat, but, I don’t consider it’s functionality unique.
I don’t have some of those “built in tools” on my iMac? Since its from work I don’t know how old it is, but I am running 10.5/Leopard. Granted, there’s plenty of great widgets – but all 3 OSs do that too.
One good reason to switch, however, is Microsoft itself. I’ll agree with that reason, even though I’ll continue to have one and sometimes upgrade it for gaming.
I’ll also agree with the less hassle reason, if you’re comfortable with the sometimes necessary customer service calls that can entail – because you’d rather focus on using it, than fixing it.
If you like the looks of a Mac, that’s a fine reason to switch too.
Though the comments implying that every other product isn’t as minimal/well designed is sort of a strawman argument. Some do have such things, but plenty don’t. And for those of us who build our own systems, you get what you want.
Some of the pitfalls also don’t really exist – like others have mentioned.
I can use 2+ mouse buttons, I can maximize windows, moving Command to the Control location was easy. Though the rest of the 3 are true – price, software and building. I think, as a work-only machine in my case, its great. My software needs are well within the “Mac scope”. I wouldn’t be able to justfity to myself, purchasing a new mac. A refurb, probably. The lack of same-system upgradability however, is I think a major issue. I haven’t had to rebuild an entirely new machine since buying the first one. I’ve probably purchased in parts, over time, 1/2 the amount of ‘new machines’ I’ve had (eg: upgraded enough to reinstall the OS, but carry-over parts enough to halve the cost). Laptops are an exception to this rule, and Macs will always do well there.
Until they allow for more same-system upgradability, they’ll continue to essentially “hate” gamers and game-developing companies. For me, that’s the major difference. I can’t game on it – so I can’t have one for a home machine. If I were just a console gamer, perhaps, but I’m a computer and console gamer.
Windows has to be lauded for this, if nothing else, making heavy commitments to gaming – gaming has pushed the chip manufacturers further and further, and brought us high-end graphics and 3d rendering. The abiilty to replace discrete parts of a system, and to install it on nearly anything crazy you could build, allowed the graphics crazyness to exist and thrive. Its possible that they could have just swapped places, early on, and we’d all be talking about how switching to Windows and away from the Evil Apple Empire. Either way, if you’re going to compliment Apple on its less broad approach, you have to credit what the broad approach has given us.
Fabien
April 26th, 2009 4:40 pmmhhh.. ..and i thought smashing was about objectivity. no, just paid articles.
mave
April 26th, 2009 4:46 pmGawd is Smashing ever sucking these days. This article is a prime example of why. Mindless blathering with misinformed opinions that are completely irrelevant to design. Newsflash: a tool is just a tool, and focusing on the tool rather than the output of the designer makes you look like a total tool. That’s why Mac fanboy/girls are so hated these days.
I’ve been in design for nearly 20 years, and guess what? The reality is that designers are switching to PC. When I started out in design, everyone used Macs. Now, more and more designers I meet are PC users. My position? Whatever floats your boat, as long as you promise to just get to work and not evangelize about why your choice is so much better than someone else’s. It’s totally gauche and lame, and has no bearing on the quality of work one can do.
Amy
April 26th, 2009 4:51 pmNo offense, but…there are designers who don’t use Macs?
I’ve been in this business over 15 years and I’ve never met a single person or shop who counted on anything else. Shops will sometimes have a few Windows machines around for cross-platform issues or Windows-only solutions such as imposition software, but 99% of actual work is done on Macs.
Though I admit it’s not all that unusual to run across “designers” who use Publisher and then wonder why their pieces cost twice the amount to print.
David Walsh
April 26th, 2009 5:05 pmWe also need to be honest and cite clever advertising.
Adrian Harvey
April 26th, 2009 5:14 pmAnother pointless Mac vs. Windows Article – I’m disappointed, would have expected better from Smashing Magazine!
“Mark Nutter runs a web development shop in Minnesota. You can follow him on Twitter where he occasionally says something worthwhile.”
Pity he says nothing worthwhile in this article
Anrkist
April 26th, 2009 5:21 pmOpen Source Friendly
And yet the freeware offerings are slim pickings. How is that free FTP software working out for you? Ohhh Cyberduck… yeah, nice. It’s simple to say the least.
Built-in Tools
Windows has these in the form on non-built in tools that you download if you want them. Vista has them, but I don’t want them.
Unified User Interface
I work with people who can’t even copy and paste to the correct folder in OSX. They are smart people who have worked with the system for years and still have issues getting things in order. I can’t help but think it’s a OS issue.
Security
Just as vulnerable. The fact less people use the system is the reason why it has less attacks. Recent articles suggest OSX is becoming a target. Hooray for Mac users, you get your spotlight now.
No doubt, I bet I’m not the only one who touched on these subjects. It’s not a bad system but it has just as many faults as any other. Post was a little long and as always from a Mac user, self infatuating.
Agnes
April 26th, 2009 5:24 pmHere’s another point to make: if you are a true designer, and you cannot afford to buy or finance a mac, then you are not a designer.
SM may lose some readers, but the true designers are here to stay. ;)
adwin
April 26th, 2009 5:28 pmI am still playing with Windows right now and not switching to Max. If i need unix based, I will choose ubuntu or opensuse. But I admit, in Linux, there are lots of software but not as easy to use as in mac.
Mario
April 26th, 2009 5:34 pmNice Mac propaganda!
Joseph
April 26th, 2009 5:35 pmI recently switched to Mac and I love it – most of it. But two things itches me
- battery charger heats up so quickly and hence have to charge while shut down and have to work on battery. Not so good design
- To use function keys (on laptop), I need to press two keys (fn + function key). Again, not so good design for often used keys
Matt French
April 26th, 2009 5:39 pmMacs is better at graphics and they have lots more fonts so are better for designers.
Seriously, Macs have a nicer interface, but most of the “main player” apps are on both and run equally well on both (though PC’s seem to have a speed advantage on Adobe stuff). Frankly, if you have worked on any major production, debates about PC vs Mac are quite pointless. You use whatever runs the software you need to run. Unfortunately, in the high-end film graphics area, Apple has really dropped the ball. FCP is good enough for TV stuff I suppose, but the slow death of Shake was embarrasing and has cost Apple dearly in the high-end market. The majority of studios have shifted away from Apple hardware and software solutions.
However, it is obvious that Apple is not “about” computers anymore. Music players and phones are their core business now and it shows. The intel Macs are hardly impressive pieces of hardware.
Don’t get me wrong, I love my Macbook Pro, but I am not drinking the Apple kool-aid yet. It is just a computer and anyone who defines their lifestyle around a computer is more than a little sad.
Jim
April 26th, 2009 5:41 pmWow – Smashing Mag used to actually have useful, interesting posts about design stuff. But I can understand it’s a lot more profitable to simply run an Apple commercial instead.
If I want shallow, biased tech “reviews”, I’ll go to Engadget instead – thanks.
vrpj
April 26th, 2009 5:42 pmI’ve been designing on Macs and PCs since the beginning of computer based design. PCs lost this battle many many years ago. I know Nobody who designs on PCs. Designers don’t have the time to put up with the crapolla that comes along with a PC.
Anita
April 26th, 2009 5:48 pmThe Mac vs. Windows debate will wage eternal, and the comments to this article make some really good points for both sides of the argument. Better points than the actual article does, so I’m not sorry I took a look.
That said, the condescension and blatant hypocrisy in this article really rubbed me the wrong way.
The opening stated:
“…in the interest of sanity, we’ll try to avoid any direct comparisons to other operating systems.”
And yet, the body of the article is rife with such diplomatic gems as:
“If you were to ask a die-hard Windows user why he or she thinks people like Macs, they would almost invariably say the reasons are purely about aesthetics.”
“The Windows user, when presented with these arguments, usually rolls his or her eyes and continues on their way.”
So… apparently it’s not okay to directly compare the two systems — In the interest of sanity, you understand — but it IS okay to make broad-based, negative assumptions about the people who use Windows. I’m glad we cleared that up.
Argument of Mac vs. Windows aside, this is horrible, unprofessional journalism, and is the latest in a disturbing trend of the same at a site that I used to value for it’s smart and informative content. Fail, Smashing Magazine. Huge fail. What a disappointment you’re becoming.
Tami W
April 26th, 2009 5:49 pmExpose alone is worth the price of admission. I have typically used a pc at work and mac at home, and I am always amazed at how much smoother my work flow is on a mac. I think it is due largely to expose and the speed at which I can switch between programs/windows.
The KB shortcuts in adobe products also seem much more intuitive. Maybe I’m imagining it, but I doubt it, macs have been the choice of graphic designers for eons, so there has always been close ties between adobe products and mac.
I was a pc person, and then for a long time, I wanted to be a mac person but couldn’t justified the cost and the “apple tax”. However, I eventually got a used mac, and now couldn’t imagine going back.
That, and you can’t beat an os that allows you to upon a terminal and use vi on a default install.
Agnes
April 26th, 2009 5:54 pm@ Anita
Just because of one tiny post, now SM has become a disappointment? That’s funny. Just one blog post, and move on to next! That’s the way blogs are, as inconvenient truth that may be.
(now a mac user is rolling her eyes)
bob
April 26th, 2009 5:55 pmIn the time it takes to bitch about what brand of glowing box you use, you could have designed something. Seriously, use what you like and shut the hell up.
Rayan
April 26th, 2009 5:56 pmI felt this article was semi-decent.
NOTE TO THE EDITOR: I would love to see your sources for this article. Otherwise, this is a bad example of what a Smashing Magazine article should be. Please continue to read below.
There are so many false within this article onto what’s going on in the PC world. Bare in mind that I am a designer and web developer, with experience between Mac and PC. I love my MacBook Pro, and I will continue to use it proudly.
“Apple has chosen not to enter the sub $1000 PC not because it doesn’t want to grow sales, but because it wants to avoid the dogfight that Sony, HP, and other brands are in for the lower end market.”
An Apple Computer does not compare to a PC computer. Apple factors the cost on the laptop, OSX, support, and convenience, without the hassle. Due to recent stock reporting Q1 2009, Apple has reported an increase in revenue (mostly from their iPhone products); therefore, they have no reason to lower prices if consumers are willing to pay a hefty amount for their product. Also, If you notice the difference in prices between each Apple Laptop within the same series, you’ll see that they’re spaced out by roughly $300-500 (we’re talking about Apple stores, and their vendors such as Best Buy). This is done due to limiting selection, so choosing the Mac that’s right for you is easier. If they did introduce a laptop within that factor, there would be a decrease in sales of the higher-end laptops, and an increase in lower end.
“Unfortunately, Windows doesn’t come bundled with PHP, Rails, or any other open-source web development frameworks or languages any time soon. More and more of what we do is in the cloud these days anyways and it is almost starting to feel quaint when you come across new software that runs solely as a desktop client. Microsoft has painted themselves into a corner – they rely on closed formats and standards in a world where open source software, open formats, and open standards are king.”
If you’ve been following up with Smashing Magazine articles, you’ll find there are several websites that offer free development solutions to downloading onto a Windows PC. Not all solutions are available right out of the box, but I feel that would be OK. Microsoft has developed asp.NET, and allows you to download a free version of Visual Studios Express 2009 from their website. It’s not the essential choice for web development, but I wouldn’t go as far as lack of solutions available. In terms of your cloud computing statement, OSX includes development software out of the box. Wouldn’t that defeat the purpose of referencing cloud computing to begin with? Please, explain to your readers.
Your article does express valuable information for why designers switch to Macs. You’ve clearly outlined it, but few of your reasons are subtle without including several more sources to back up your statements. It’s a pretty big deal.
Matt Palmer
April 26th, 2009 5:57 pmI use both every day and both for graphic design.
Beasty PC = 2 grand, beasty MAC = 6 grand.
Nuff said.
Rayan
April 26th, 2009 5:59 pm@Anita
Thank you for pointing that out. I completely agree 100%. I expected something a little better from Smashing Magazine than to see this.
CoryMathews
April 26th, 2009 6:00 pmSmashingMagazine we are done. You have just lost another viewer. This article is just complete crap, I cannot say it any better then it was said above
“…this isn’t really about designers, per se, as much as a general “OSX is cool” article.”
Here is some of the bs you “claimed” in this article.
“It means that the entire world of open source software out there is pretty much guaranteed to run without much hassle. In a world where open source software is a way of life, web developers need a friendly environment to operate in.”
Uhmm what.. Yes it may have been based on unix when it was started but not any more… OSS is more widely available on PC then mac, and 100% on linux.
“…partly because Unix is inherently more secure than Windows…”
Wait which OS got hacked in under 5 seconds by a year old exploit? O yea… Mac. Which os did he state was hardest to hack? Windows, which browser? Chrome.. No safari, no OSX.
OSX can virtualize all three major operating systems out of the box. This is a must have for checking browser compatibility. To make life even easier, you can do it right from within OSX using programs like Parallels, Virtualbox, and VMWare Fusion. And if you think web browsers render websites exactly the same regardless of the operating system they’re running on you are sorely mistaken.
Yes you said this twice, but all 3 OS’s can do this, just not right out of the box. Honestly how many people do this? Only a select few which is exactly why it should not be included in the OS by default. As you said Minimalism, but I say bloat.
Opinionated Software
This is a very bad thing, I have lost a lot of respect for you by saying this is a good thing. This gives apple complete and total control over everything. If apple wanted every window to have a big pink and purple button in the middle of the window, what could you do about it? Nothing
Most developers are perfectly willing to trouble shoot their own computers, but when deadlines need to be met it can be nice knowing that you can offload some of that hassle to people who already know the system inside and out.
Heres a true story for you.
Apple: We need you to send your computer in for us to check it. You should have it back in 2-4 weeks….
I never have a problem meeting deadlines when I don’t have a computer for 2-4 weeks. Great support my ass.
Unfortunately, Windows doesn’t come bundled with PHP, Rails, or any other open-source web development frameworks or languages any time soon.
Just as you said minimalistic. Why would anyone but web developers want php and rails running on their computers? Noone wants that crap on there except web developers and we make up a very small percent of computer users.
As I stated above you have lost another viewer. I hope you change and write quality articles again so you don’t lose more.
Kay
April 26th, 2009 6:05 pmThe reasons above are not the reasons for switching to a Mac at all.
I only agree with two statements above, the feature “Spaces”, it eases my workflow and saves me a lot of clutter than working on XP.
Second, the small amount of software available to Mac. While all Adobe products are available, Mac is certainly not for 3D designers.
Anita
April 26th, 2009 6:05 pm@Agnes
You might want to read the entire comment, as I said, “…is the latest in a disturbing trend of the same…” IE, a lot of the articles I’ve been reading here have been sub-par. I’ve been faithfully following and recommending SM for a couple of years now, and the recent content just doesn’t seem up to the quality I’ve come to expect.
You seem to be making the assumption that my criticism is to do with the Mac vs. Windows debate (As in, I’m a Windows user and I just want to complain about a Mac article), as you’ve mentioned being a Mac user. My complaint has nothing to do with Mac vs. Windows (I love Macs), it’s to do with crappy and biased journalism posted under the guise of objectivity.
joenutz
April 26th, 2009 6:05 pmI’ve got the best of both worlds. I was always a windows guy and plus, I never wanted to pay so much money for a mac when you can build a 10x faster PC for the same price. I recently discovered that you could install MAC on a custom PC. Sure it was a little tricky but it was THE BEST thing i have ever done. I now have a custom mac that i can upgrade just as easily as a PC. And its hella fast.
I have dual booted Leopard and Vista on my custom built PC, so when uni work comes I boot into Leopard, and its great because I cant get distracted by any games(since they are all on windows). If at any time i need to do anything on windows, i restart and select windows. Voila.
If you’re interested I’m sure a search engine should give you all the information you need.
Just make sure you own a copy of OSX to make sure you’re not doing anything illegal.
JasonG01
April 26th, 2009 6:11 pmI don’t really care about the whole Mac/Win debate. From a productivity perspective, Adobe runs good on both, and there is plenty of webdev software on every platform.
Now, what would be useful is an article on how to do cross browser testing for free on any given platform. Safari on Windows is easy, but what about IE6 7 and 8 simultaneously on both Mac and Windows?
Dominic Whittle
April 26th, 2009 6:14 pmHow about that CS4 on mac runs like a dog compared to CS4 on windows?
Yeah, so if you’re a designer and you don’t mind your productivity slowed…. get a mac.
(I have a brand new top-spec 15″ unibody MacBook Pro)
“Unified User Interface” — Macs are let down by a total lack of consistent keyboard shortcuts. And don’t pretend people don’t use keyboard shortcuts. MY TIME IS IMPORTANT.
Joe Brightwell
April 26th, 2009 6:16 pmWhile the cost of a Mac might be more competitive with the PC-equivalent in North America or Europe, down under the cost of a Mac with the same specifications as a PC is nearly double.
For example, last year I would’ve bought a MacBook Pro but the cost was too much – $3000 NZD MacBook Pro vs a $1300 NZD Dell Vostro. I then used the remaining money to go on a holiday and to buy/update Adobe software.
For me, cost is the only factor in the PC vs Mac war. If cost weren’t an issue, I’d definitely have both. PC desktop machine for home, MacBook Pro for a laptop.
In regards to employers hiring Mac-only staff, I think that’s silly but as designers we should be more prepared and skilled with multiple operating systems.
A good chunk of design companies down under use Macs but most use PCs, while a lot of the general public are brand-whores and spend their cash on Macs just to be cool.
Oh and if your PC has got spyware or viruses, then stop looking at stupid email forwards, porn or warez websites. I haven’t had trouble with those things for years with WinXP for both work and home (and I’m still using it!). I haven’t even bothered with Vista yet…
The Poker Jerk
April 26th, 2009 6:19 pmI have the real reasons:
1) Because they are hipsters
1) Because it’s trendy
1) Because they think they’re “supposed to” since they are designers
1) They think it will make them look cool
1) They really think it’s better, since they never used a PC before
anne_nime
April 26th, 2009 6:23 pmIts true that the tool is important in design, but this article is a shameless plugging of MAC… not that I am a die-hard PC user, nor a MAC pisser. C’mon, arent these up in the Mac site already? Why must we post a remake in SM?
Design, regardless of machine… is nothing without the persistence, creativity, inspiration… and the latest Adobe.
charlie
April 26th, 2009 6:25 pmI’m a Mac whore and simply hate PC because of Microsoft and Windows. Exactly as SM pointed out.
We all know PC is a powerful tool. But you people pointing out price and power are totally missing the point of this article.
Intuitiveness people……intuitiveness………..
Jody
April 26th, 2009 6:29 pmI’m not switching to any company that nicknames their new Operating System version “Snow Leopard”.
Agnes
April 26th, 2009 6:37 pm@ Anita
This is a blog. Not journalism. A blog is an opinion driven content since its inception.
I am not a part of SM staff, I just think your comment isn’t just, quite on the contrary- I find the content very useful. You can’t find it anywhere else, if you do, give me a link or two.
You always have the option not to visit this or any other particular blog, so the complaining is useless, a waste of your and our time.
benz
April 26th, 2009 6:39 pmeither, it’s just a matter of getting used to it…and the budget of course. ;)
Keir Douglas
April 26th, 2009 6:44 pmNow that Apple is taking sooooo much business away from Micrososft, I no longer feel moved to evangelise to avoid being absorbed by the “Borg.” I’m just happy knowing I’m no longer on the endangered species list. There are some rational reasons I prefer MacOS: I spend “zero” time running my computer and 100% of my time being productive; I don’t have to worry about criminals who live only to destroy my peace of mind – I have been connected to the internet since the early 1990s / have never run anti-virus software / have never run a firewall / have never caught so much as a sniffle; my computers cost more – but they come with a basic suite of “bugless” interoperable applications I would pay a lot to install on an IBMpc clone.
To each their own – the article is factual and not overly opinionated in my opinion.
Jeff
April 26th, 2009 6:44 pmThe real reasons people switch to mac.
#1 they look hip when they work in a coffee shop
#2 apple spends millions making commercials paying off bloggers like you to promote their product, and microsoft spends nothing comparatively on marketing.
This article is a piece of shit. Completely unbiased. Right. I like the negatives for macs… no right click button and control is command… Oh shit..
Oh, I can drag and drop images from my browser into photoshop too…
I think they both have their benefits, and I like working with macs, But come on, this reads like an apple advert. You are all sheep.