Smashing Magazine - we smash you with the information that will make your life easier. really.

Five Reasons Why Designers Developers are Switching to Mac

Advertisement

Designers and developers have many choices to make when it comes to getting work done, from what frameworks, languages, and image editing software to use, to what platform to run. The latter is an oft debated and controversial topic and the mere mention of it risks setting off flame wars of epic proportions, so in the interest of sanity, we’ll try to avoid any direct comparisons to other operating systems.

It’s no secret that there has been a growing trend in recent years toward developers, especially of the web variety, choosing a Mac as their main dev machine. In this two-part series, we will examine some of the reasons behind this trend, look at some of the pitfalls of switching to the Mac, and go over the must-have software and configurations every switcher should be aware of.

[By the way, did you know we have a brand new free Smashing Email Newsletter? Subscribe now and get fresh short tips and tricks on Tuesdays!]

First Reason for Switching: Mac OS X

You may have noticed the rise in the number of colleagues and fellow developers who are choosing a Mac as their next computer. If you haven’t, you’re probably either working for Microsoft or you have an MBA. So why is it so compelling?

If you were to ask a die-hard Windows user why he or she thinks people like Macs, they would almost invariably say the reasons are purely about aesthetics. If you were to ask most web developers why they have switched to a mac, however, the refrain would be loud and unanimous: OSX. To be fair to Windows, in terms of raw capability the two offerings differ very little; with enough elbow grease, both systems can be configured in pretty much any way its users wish.

Mac in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

When pressured to explain why they prefer OSX, Mac users often rest on qualifiable and subjective arguments such as “it feels intuitive” or “I enjoy using it more” or even “I can’t explain why I like it better, I just do.” The Windows user, when presented with these arguments, usually rolls his or her eyes and continues on their way. It isn’t until someone truly makes up their own mind to give OSX an honest chance that they can understand what all the fuss is about.

A Few Quantifiable Benefits of OS X include:

1. Open Source Friendly

As a web developer, if there’s one skill you invariably have to develop, it’s the use of a *NIX terminal. Luckily, because OSX is built on top of UNIX, the terminal is ready and waiting. Every Apple ships with a wide variety of open source programming tools and frameworks built in such as PHP, Apache, and Ruby on Rails. Linux users who have grown tired of dealing with hardware issues, especially on laptops, often choose a Mac as their portable solution because it is UNIX based.

It means that the entire world of open source software out there is pretty much guaranteed to run without much hassle. In a world where open source software is a way of life, web developers need a friendly environment to operate in.

2. Quartz Extreme

Spaces in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

Quartz is the OpenGL powered windowing system used by OSX. Quartz extreme utilizes the graphics card exclusively, which means no processor cycles are taxed. This allows for a variety of useful features such as Exposé, which dynamically resizes every window on the screen giving you a bird’s eye view of your entire workspace.

Spaces, a feature introduced in OSX 10.5 (Leopard) takes the bird’s eye view a step further by providing a view of multiple desktops. To further illustrate the point, you can activate Exposé inside Spaces and drag these windows from desktop to desktop – any videos that are playing will continue to play and the windows will dynamically resize to accommodate the extra window. Once you get used to this sort of thing, you wonder how you ever lived without it.

3. Core Animation

Core in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

Core animation provides a way for developers to produce animated user interfaces via an implicit animation model as well as an ‘explicit’ model. In other words, it means some very flashy and useful features are going to start showing up in OS X applications much like the animated menu help system shown in the graphic above. Prodiving developers with a toolset to implement these types of animated effects means software will become more intuitive.

4. Built-in Tools

Tools in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

There are so many useful tools that are built in to the Mac that come in handy for designers and developers that it’s easy to see OSX was built with developers and creative professionals in mind. Take the built-in screen capturing utility “Grab” for OSX, which has a wide variety of options, from selecting down to the pixel the area you want to screenshot, to providing window captures complete with the window frame, to outputting directly to the desktop as a .PNG file.

In fact, some tools were created specifically for designers because Apple has long catered to the creative professional market (indeed, it sustained Apple during their darkest times). More built in tools include:

  • The Digital Color Meter – a tool that allows you to grab the color value of any pixel on your screen.
  • Console – Useful for viewing very large log files
  • Terminal – Mentioned above, complete with many OSS tools like VIM
  • XCode Tools – The Apple development IDE
  • Zoom – easy-as-pie down-to-the-pixel zooming
  • Safari Debug Mode – Similar to Firebug for Firefox
  • Time Machine – dead simple automated backups

5. Unified User Interface

As any student of design knows, consistency is one of the most important principles to adhere to, and it is clear the OSX UI was designed with this in mind. Because of the strict user interface guidelines provided by the Apple software development tools, applications and utilities on a Mac feel like they are all part of the same system.

Unified in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

The menu bar, which for some switchers can be a difficult feature to get used to, adheres to this unification by standardizing the location and layout of the menu options. Drag-and-drop functionality is ubiquitous. Being able to do things like drag an image off your web browser directly into your Photoshop project are a boon to productivity. If it feels as though you should be able to drag-and-drop something, you probably can.

6. Security

Now before you crack your knuckles and start composing your diatribe about why Macs aren’t any more secure than PCs, let me point out a trite but undebatable fact: there’s simply less malware out there for Macs than PCs – a LOT less (partly because Unix is inherently more secure than Windows and partly because Windows is just more wide-spread and Mac users aren’t targeted that often – read more in the article Is The Mac Really More Secure Than Windows?). If you are on a Mac, at least for the next few more years, you can pretty much rest assured your days of worrying about virus and spyware scans are a thing of the past.

7. Textmate, Growl, Quicksilver, and more

There is no shortage of text editors available to developers, but one that seems to keep coming up in recommendation after recommendation is Textmate, the lightweight GUI text editor for OSX. The project management drawer makes it easy to keep track of folders, which for monolithic MVC frameworks like Ruby on Rails and CakePHP is a godsend.

Apps in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

Nested scopes allow users to create their own syntax highlighting which is important in the ever changing world of web development. To speed up the development process, one can utilize “snippets” or pieces of reusable code that can be inserted with a few key strokes. While there aren’t any features that are revolutionary, they are combined in a way that makes for a very unobtrusive coding experience that seems very in tune with the overall feel of a Mac.

In addition to Textmate, there is a whole host of other beloved applications that seem to have been created by people who truly understand and want to emulate the Mac experience, like the quick-launch solution Quicksilver, the system notifications app Growl, and the chat client Adium. These are pieces of software of a caliber that is sometimes difficult to find on Windows. It seems that quality, not quantity, is the best way to describe the Mac software library.

8. Quick Look

Quicklook in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

OS X not only has icons that display an actual miniature version of the file they are representing, but it’s possible to view the contents of the file in their full glory without having to launch the program they are associated with simply by hitting the space bar. Furthermore, if a group of icons are highlighted, they can be expanded into a gallery view.

9. Virtualization

OSX is the only OS you can get that can virtualize all three major operating systems out of the box. This is a must have for checking browser compatibility. To make life even easier, you can do it right from within OSX using programs like Parallels, Virtualbox, and VMWare Fusion. And if you think web browsers render websites exactly the same regardless of the operating system they’re running on you are sorely mistaken.

Second Reason for Switching: Intel Inside

Intel in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

When Apple made the switch to Intel chips, it upset a lot of Mac fans out there who liked the fact that Apple wasn’t the same as any other X86 box on the market. With the rise in mobile computing, however, Apple was forced to face the fact that the PowerPC wasn’t offering as good a solution as Intel.

They also knew that by offering a system that could run Windows in addition to OS X they would put to rest any compatibility arguments. It turned out to be a good strategical move, and droves of would-be switchers were finally able to take the plunge without being forced to give up their entire libraries of Windows-based software.

OSX can virtualize all three major operating systems out of the box. This is a must have for checking browser compatibility. To make life even easier, you can do it right from within OSX using programs like Parallels, Virtualbox, and VMWare Fusion. And if you think web browsers render websites exactly the same regardless of the operating system they’re running on you are sorely mistaken.

Third Reason for Switching: Less Hassle

Opinionated Software

Some people like hassle. In fact, developers typically love getting their hands dirty customizing, maintaining, and tweaking their operating systems. If you fall under this category, Linux is probably your best fit, followed by Windows. OS X is more opinionated than other platforms. It’s more difficult to customize its look and feel, there’s no easy way to get it to run on anything but Apple hardware, and OS X can be very particular about the way certain things are done.

Opionated software, however, can have its benefits. While it may be more difficult to customize and hack every last aspect of your OS, sometimes it can be nice to have a system where a good many of these choices have already been made for you. Because Apple provides a complete solution, from the operating system to the hardware to a lot of the software that’s bundled in, they have an easier go of making sure the experience is seemless and well tested. Opinionated software can be a very polarizing concept, however.

Take Ruby on Rails for instance, a web development framework where many decisions are made for the developer based on the core contributors’ opinions about best practices. Rails has a preferred javascript framework, database ORM, templating system, and more. You can choose other configurations if you want to, but it shines brightest when you do things the “Rails Way.”

You spend less time customizing and more time actually developing. This hands-off approach can be a major turn off for some developers, but for others it removes a lot of the hassle and reinventing of the wheel. The high rate of Mac ownership among Rails developers could be directly attributed to the analogous nature of Apple and Rails. The analogy is made more apt by any number of PHP vs Ruby on Rails flame wars you can find out there.

Support

Genius in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

Because Apple provides the whole solution, they are obligated to provide support for the whole solution as well. Most developers are perfectly willing to trouble shoot their own computers, but when deadlines need to be met it can be nice knowing that you can offload some of that hassle to people who already know the system inside and out.

Apple has impressive customer service specifically because they support the entire system, rather than just one aspect of the system. It’s also handy to be able to take your machine into an actual brick-and-mortar store rather than deal with outsourced phone support.

Let’s face it, when it comes to a non-technical spouse or family member, we can expect to do a lot of troubleshooting. Just like its nice not to have to worry about troubleshooting your own computer, it’s even nicer not to have to worry as much about other people’s computers. It is reasonable to assume that because Macs typically have less security issues (at least for now), there’s less time spent trying to explain how to avoid malware and actually removing it.

Fourth Reason for Switching: Microsoft

If you like it or not: a big reason why developers have been flocking to Apple is in part due to the fact that it isn’t the big M. When personal computing was still in its infancy, the reverse was true. Microsoft understood that it was the developers (developers developers) that would make their OS successful while Apple’s closed model ended up being a huge mistake.

Once Microsoft started dominating the marketplace, however, the pungent stench of monopoly sparked the open source movement, and more and more developers were starting to wonder if there were better options out there.

Linux is of course the golden child of the open source movement, but despite the efforts of Ubuntu it is still a ways off in terms of being a turnkey solution for most people. Enter Apple: a Unix based system that despite being every bit as closed as Microsoft, is in large part the antithesis of Microsoft.

Roladex in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

Microsoft software has the unfortunate feeling of having been designed by committee. Features are packed in with little regard to their usefulness, and aesthetics are seemingly an afterthought. When Vista first launched, the Aero user interface was so flashy it required higher end machines to even run it, somewhat defeating the argument Microsoft was making about the affordability of PCs. OSX was designed to run as well on the most expensive Mac Pro as it would an eight year old Powerbook because they control the solution from hardware to software.

Vistas in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

Unfortunately, Windows doesn’t come bundled with PHP, Rails, or any other open-source web development frameworks or languages any time soon. More and more of what we do is in the cloud these days anyways and it is almost starting to feel quaint when you come across new software that runs solely as a desktop client. Microsoft has painted themselves into a corner – they rely on closed formats and standards in a world where open source software, open formats, and open standards are king.

Fifth Reason For Switching: Design and Minimalism

Macbook in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

Good design gets out of the way. It doesn’t demand to be seen or appreciated. Most of all, good design is something you don’t even notice at first. Bang & Olufsen understands this, and Apple understands this. As of this writing, there are only two styles of Apple notebook: silver and white, and white is only available in the cheapest configuration. Apple notebooks are free of stickers, screws, vents, buttons, switches, and graphics.

What this leaves is a system with little to look at other than the screen in front of you, which is as it should be. The benefit of the entire product development cycle being done under one house is that Apple creates a system that truly feels as though it was created by one person.

Google Yahoo in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

At the heart of Apple’s design philosophy is the concept of minimalism. It is a concept that has worked well for companies such as Google. We all remember the gratuitous placement of links and ads on most search engines before Google came around with its simple search bar. After all, it was the search that was the important part, not the content the provider was hoping we would want. Apple figures if not including a feature angers 1% of their consumer base but makes things easier for the other 99% it’s probably worth doing.

Take, for instance, the lack of a second mouse buttom. It may seem like a glaring omission on Apple’s part, but it has had some unintended consequences: because developers can’t simple throw commands into a bloated right-click menu they are forced to think more about the one-click usability of their applications.

Minimalist design has its downsides too, however. Macs lack card readers, often have 2-3 less USB ports than even low end machines, and are typically difficult to customize. For those of you who value a product that gives you many choices, Apple is going to fall short. It is often pointed out that upgrading a Mac is easy: “Just throw it away and buy a new one.”

Humor aside, this isn’t too far from the truth but the good news is that Macs hold their value better than any computer on the market. Instead of throwing it away, sell it on Ebay for healthy head-start on a new machine.

Mac’s Pitfalls

It’s not all sunshine and rainbows for everyone who switches to a Mac. There are the inevitable bumps in the road that everyone experiences when making a major platform change, and for some people these bumps are outright road blocks. Here’s what to be aware of:

1. Control is now Command

Breaking the habit of using control as the main modifier key on your system can take a bit of time and some people never quite get the hang of it. Old habits die hard and muscle memory dies harder. This is a problem that can be solved by re-mapping command to the control key, but when you are using a system that assumes a certain configuration you may run into confusion later on.

2. No Second Mouse Button

Trackpad in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac

Unless you use an external mouse with your Apple laptop you will have to get used to the lack of a second mouse button. The truth is there is no optimal number of mouse buttons. Luckily, you can enable right-clicking in a number of ways on a mac, such as tapping the track pad with two fingers simultaneously or holding ctrl when clicking.

3. No Maximizing of Windows

This is actually starting to become less true as time goes on as ex-Windows users who develop software for the Mac include the feature (for instance, maximize on firefox for the Mac works as expected). But the typical maximize you are used to in Windows cannot be found on the Mac, and for some this can be extremely frustrating. In fact, the whole “stop-light” window controls can at times feel stale and unintuitive.

4. Lack of an “affordable” Mac

Perhaps the most popular sticking point of non-Mac users, price is always at the heart of the debate. Under $1200 or so, there is no question that byte for byte, ghz for ghz, you can get a better raw value by avoiding Apple. Apple has chosen not to enter the sub $1000 PC not because it doesn’t want to grow sales, but because it wants to avoid the dogfight that Sony, HP, and other brands are in for the lower end market.

Profit margins are razor thin in that range, after all. Apple is certainly catering to the botique style consumer. If you are pinching pennies these days the price issue may just be the one pitfall you can’t bring yourself to overcome.

5. Much Smaller Software Library

While this is somewhat mediated by the fact that you can virtualize Windows on a Mac, it is a far cry from being able to run your favorite programs natively on your system. If you are using software on a regular basis that only runs in the Windows environment, you may want to think hard about whether moving to a Mac is worth the trouble.

6. You Can’t Build a Mac (Easily)

Part of the success of Windows was the fact that they licensed it to run on any PC, anywhere. Apple has been closed since the word go, save a brief period where they allowed Mac clones to exist in what turned out to be a devastatingly bad idea. If you’re the type who loves building your own PC from scratch, a Mac is not going to offer much for you.

In general, even the most jaded Windows user is inevitably going to miss at least a few features or aspects of Windows during their switch to a Mac. The best policy to follow is to keep an open mind during the learning process. Try doing things “the Mac way” for a week and keep your skepticism to a minimum.

Above all, ask questions before you make assumptions. There’s a fervent Apple community out there (in case you haven’t noticed) that have solutions for every issue you find, thanks in part to the fact that most of them are switchers themselves. Remember, if you’re having the issue, chances are good some other switcher experienced it before you and created or found a solution.

Conclusion

While not the right solution for everyone, it’s clear that many people are switching to a Mac these days for a good many reasons. Nevertheless, Macs are expensive and require user’s patience and willingness to adapt his or her behavior to a compltely different interface. Mac is certainly not an option for every user, but it is definitely an option worth considering – particularly for designers or developers.

Join us in Part 2 of this series where we examine some of the must have software, configurations, and tricks that every new Mac user should know about. Please feel free to subscribe to our RSS-feed Rss in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac and follow us on Twitter Twitter in Five Reasons Why <del>Designers</del> Developers are Switching to Mac.

Mark Nutter runs a web development shop in Minnesota. You can follow him on Twitter where he occasionally says something worthwhile.

    Post Rating
    1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
    Loading ... Loading ...

    Tags:

    Advertising
    1. 1
      remoteartist
      April 26th, 2009 2:20 pm

      You know – if you are bogging down in your operating system – you aren’t ready for Photoshop.

      I use both – and could care less really – just get me in my application, give me a good graphics tablet and monitor.

      Been at this a long time – routinely do high-end design work, and find this minutia of which platform is better annoying. So a kid in Bangladesh is handicapped because he can only afford a PC – classic OS elitism.

      Take that extra money you save by working in Linux and take a drawing class.

    2. 2
      Jean-Baptiste Jung
      April 26th, 2009 2:21 pm

      Excellent article! Microsoft is like McDonald’s: nasty for your health ;)

    3. 3
      Nate
      April 26th, 2009 2:21 pm

      Mac looks fancy and all, but I’m a die hard Windows fan. I may get a Mac if I win the lottery.

    4. 4
      Mihai Moscovici
      April 26th, 2009 2:23 pm

      Thanks for a balanced review!

    5. 5
      Brian
      April 26th, 2009 2:23 pm

      What designers AREN’T using Mac? I’m from a small city in Tennessee and I don’t know ANY designers that aren’t using Mac.

      I understand that some must be using PCs but that headline just sounds funny to me.

    6. 6
      cssah
      April 26th, 2009 2:24 pm

      thanks so much i will get mac very soon

    7. 7
      Karsten
      April 26th, 2009 2:25 pm

      Thank you for the first really BALANCED review – most similar articles are biased by Mac or Win-fans. THANKS.

    8. 8
      Dieter Mueller
      April 26th, 2009 2:30 pm

      How lame.

      I am a freelancer since 1989 – using both Macs & PC. Maybe five but certainly ten years ago there were REAL reasons to use a Mac: better fonts, better applications, better hardware (how that has changed – Macs are basically Intel clones today and Apple’s production standards have slipped in some products) more stable production environment. Today Photoshop is Photoshop (or any other important design tool) – no matter on which box you run it on.

      A good designer delivers good work NO MATTER which tool he uses – even when it’s only pen and paper. Stop that techno & brand fetishism – do some good work instead.

    9. 9
      Max.W
      April 26th, 2009 2:33 pm

      Forgot to mention that Mac’s are not for gamer’s either. I’m a designer AND a gamer too.

    10. 10
      Hammad
      April 26th, 2009 2:34 pm

      we’d love to get macs for our studio, but its not the price, software or any geek loyalty that prevents us – it’s the internal technical skills. connecting the macs to the windows active directory, nas server etc isnt something we’ve never done – and help from google isn’t really the kind of reliability we can afford to risk. if something goes wrong – we can’t fix it at the speed and cost we can with a PC. however, we’re getting closer to making the jump!

    11. 11
      Milos
      April 26th, 2009 2:34 pm

      Dieter Mueller, you make a good point. Good designers deliver good work no matter what tool they use, but some tools are more usable than others and some environments are better than the others. With the same logic, you could just use Notepad instead of PHP Eclipse for coding which is not right, isn’t it?

    12. 12
      Karl
      April 26th, 2009 2:35 pm

      Pros and Cons to both sides of the argument. About personal preference in this day and age. Very nice little article though. Thanks alot.

    13. 13
      Christopher Wagar
      April 26th, 2009 2:37 pm

      I am SO impressed! I switched to a mac about 2 years ago, but it was all on a whim. Everyone I talked to was either heavily anti-mac, or a fanatic. I wanted a balanced idea of what I was getting myself into, but all I got was a look at the childish ego-war that exists between mac and pc fans. I wish there was an article like this back then! As it turns out, I do prefer mac, but I’m well-aware of it’s shortcomings. Thanks again!

    14. 14
      Liberation
      April 26th, 2009 2:39 pm

      Wow. That’s so cool that you chose to insult your readers and make assumptions in your opening paragraph.

    15. 15
      Gabriel
      April 26th, 2009 2:40 pm

      I think there are plenty of reason that are really true (expose and spaces, quicklook, textmate, growl, security, stability…)
      But some other like core animation… I dont really care if my app do little eye candy animations. I just care if they do the job the are supposed to do.
      About the design of the computers… this is too something that it didnt make any diference to me…
      So to me, the main mac features to switch are productivity ones, and no beacuse “mac is pretty”.

    16. 16
      JimmyFingers
      April 26th, 2009 2:43 pm

      This is all a matter of preference. I prefer to design on a PC because my audience will view my work (most likely) on a PC. There is no end all tool out there that you can get for a Mac or a PC which makes either any better than the other.

      In fact I would rather sand my hands off and try and win a push up contest than partake in an argument about why one is better than the other.

      It is like Coke and Pepsi, they are both softdrinks, but which do you prefer.

    17. 17
      Adam R Garcia
      April 26th, 2009 2:44 pm

      I started designing audodidactically with a PC. I’d have to say that at the time, I had no idea how much better a Mac would be, but when I am forced to get back on them now for presentation purposes, I find basic navigation on a PC counter-intuitive. I think that’s my biggest beef with PCs. To each their own.

    18. 18
      Dan
      April 26th, 2009 2:44 pm

      Anyone not using Mac for design already doesn’t know that they don’t know yet.

    19. 19
      al
      April 26th, 2009 2:48 pm

      I use XP on the classic theme.

      notepad++, dreamweaver, photoshop…all run nicely.

      plus i enjoy playing games

    20. 20
      Aaron
      April 26th, 2009 2:51 pm

      Well said, but perhaps this article still comes off as needless Windows bashing. Windows is a viable option for people who need raw power at an inexpensive price. With talent – yes talent – you can achieve the same designs on OSX, Windows, and Linux machines.

      That said, all three operating systems have their pros and cons. Try them all and use what you like. Personally, I’m happy doing the “psd shows as a preview” tweak in Windows 7 and calling it a day.

    21. 21
      bob
      April 26th, 2009 2:53 pm

      …this isn’t really about designers, per se, as much as a general “OSX is cool” article.

    22. 22
      Arvin
      April 26th, 2009 2:53 pm

      As a mac user, I switched mainly because Final Cut was becoming the standard for video editing, and there was no elegant way of getting less-experienced editors my motion graphics work without it and its stable of codecs.

      I love using the Mac.

      However, there seems to be this constantly-supressed reality that people keep ignoring, which is that even with the latest versions of Adobe’s suite, Windows still runs Photoshop, Flash, and AfterEffects way faster than on OSX.

      EVEN VISTA runs AfterEffects faster, and Photoshop and AfterEffects both take longer to start up on my 2008 iMac with 2.8 ghz and 4 gigs of ram than on my 4 year old PC running Windows XP home.

      If you don’t notice this enough to put it as even a miniscule part of the reason why one wouldn’t use OSX, then I think I know which side of the form/function argument you fall under.

    23. 23
      Ruth
      April 26th, 2009 2:55 pm

      I started with windows and am yet to be convinced that Macs are better then my PC. Mac repairs are an issue and very expensive as technicians are hard to find in the rural landscape. I still need a debate that challengers my opinion. that Macs and Pcs are like cars. Mac’s are the sports car model (Designer ego) with PC’s being family cars that do the same job minus the ego.

    24. 24
      Frats
      April 26th, 2009 3:00 pm

      The biggest problem for possible switchers is probably Apple’s relatively high prices. I’ve been there myself, after having been a hardcore Windows user for over ten years.

      However, when I finally switched to a Mac, all of a sudden the extra euros I did pay we’re forgotten: this machine works so much better!

      Best reasons: it doesn’t get slower, there is no blue screen, there are no viruses, malware et cetera and its beauty! Buy one!

    25. 25
      qbix
      April 26th, 2009 3:06 pm

      I’ve been a graphic designer, illustrator, and now flash developer for the past 10+ years all on the PC. I agree with Dieter that good designers will turn out good work regardless of platform. I think it has more to do with ease of use than anything that people in general, not just designers, are turning to the Mac. Sure, aesthetics play a big part and being a designer I applaud Apple for having a great sense of it when it comes to UI and industrial design, but that’s just the surface of an OS and a computer.

      I feel like I have full control over the experience when it comes to PCs. I can tweak just about anything about it and if I need more flexibility, I just boot into a Linux partition. If the latest version of photoshop feels slow, I just go get more ram and a new videocard instead of a new system, and if I feel like pushing my CPU, I overclock it. Today if you want the best system money can buy for the job in the creative field, it would clearly be a PC with a 64 bit version of Windows, 8+ megs of RAM, a Quadro CX videocard, two solid state drives in RAID 0 and another 3 1.5TB drives in RAID 10. In other words, the myth that Macs are better for graphics is a lie but sadly some people still believe that.

      Most people just don’t want to have to think about hardware or configuring a firewall, therefore they just buy whatever is easiest so they can just get to work and not worry about these things. That’s why Macs are popular and the elitist and trendy Mac fans couldn’t be happier. I agree that MS has to play catch up, but I don’t think Windows is a bad OS for creative professionals. And for this opinion I will probably be called an MS fanboy, but I’m used to it.

    26. 26
      C6FlyBy
      April 26th, 2009 3:10 pm

      Wow, I switched to a Mac but none of those reasons even matter. I actually prefer Windows in most ways BUT…I need quietness! I spent $4000 building a SOTA ’silent’ PC but my new 3 Ghz 24″ iMac is virtually silent, and there’s no constant flow of warm air coming up from under my desk. Serenity at last.

    27. 27
      brandon
      April 26th, 2009 3:10 pm

      FYI, you forgot THE reason that designers use macs: color management. That is the main reason. Period. End of discussion. Nothing else you mentioned in the article couldn’t be done on a PC, except the physical Apple stores. Not a single thing.

      PCs CAN virtualize OSX. PCs CAN run PHP, ruby, etc, with extra software (and no, I DON’T want it built in from the start). PCs CAN do all of the desktop eye-candy, which FYI when I use a mac I turn all of it off (though again the PC requires extra software).

      No I am not a fanboy, I am a person who uses PC+Linux+OSX on a daily basis. They all have their uses, I just needed to correct some factual errors in the article.

    28. 28
      Roland
      April 26th, 2009 3:13 pm

      Is there really that much difference between Mac and Windows (Note that I don’t say Mac and PC, because Mac IS a PC). I use both myself and I really don’t feel one is better than the other.

    29. 29
      Daniel M
      April 26th, 2009 3:14 pm

      I switched to mac a few years ago and havn’t looked back since, in fact i bought my mum a pc with vista a short while back, hated it and gave it to me! although i use it as a back up, i really cant stand using it. Macs are simply a far better all round machine.

    30. 30
      Kilian Güntner
      April 26th, 2009 3:16 pm

      I prefer Windows XP still for web design/software devevelpoing – at least for a year or so, then I’ll probably switch to os x or vista (or perhaps something new). Currently i produce results a little bit faster with two mouse buttons by standard, actually and the mac book air processor in such a small package turns on the fan all the time Ive heard ;) //K

    31. 31
      j.wonnell
      April 26th, 2009 3:18 pm

      yes, the time has come for apple, especially the new macbooks with the multi-touch pad and leopard. i would never want to do design work on a windows pc again. of course, for play time I still use a windows pc. Gaming capabilities like my pc would cost waaaay too much in a macpro

    32. 32
      James
      April 26th, 2009 3:20 pm

      I read this article and thought that it would be a red rag to the die-hard Mac haters, of the kind that will call anyone who expresses a preference for the Mac a fanboy, but thus far the comments are remarkably restrained. Smashing Magazine clearly has a better and politer class of readers!

      Good article, though the stuff about single button mice has been untrue since OSX became the default operating system. I will admit however that Apple has never made a good mouse, so you’d be best advised to get one from say Logitech or (horrors!) Microsoft. But they do for the most part work with OSX straight out of the box.

    33. 33
      jobChaowadee
      April 26th, 2009 3:22 pm

      Incorrect fact on “No Secondary Mouse Button”.
      Seriously, all new unibody Mac laptops have the secondary button. It is up to you that you would like to activate it or not.

      http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1290/picture1y.png

    34. 34
      Simona
      April 26th, 2009 3:24 pm

      I just cannot help it, but Mac has brainwashed so many people it’s insane. The Mac is not only more expensive, it’s also a throwaway box after two years. Mac might have been more stable, but that time has long passed. The price is not justifiable anymore. So if you don’t use a Mac, you cannot call yourself designer, wooo. And if you are a developer and switching to MAC, you should be stripped off your title :). I gotta give Mac the thumbs up for marketing though. Make people believe that when they buy the product, they’ll belong to the elite….

    35. 35
      connecticut websites
      April 26th, 2009 3:25 pm

      This article might have made sense 20 years ago, now it just reveals the ignorance of the author…the Mac vs PC argument died a long time ago, now it’s just an urban myth to make mac users feel better about how much money they spend compared to PC users.

      Maybe Mark can also write an article about how crop circles are made by aliens, or how he saw Elvis last week working at Taco Bell.

    36. 36
      Tracy
      April 26th, 2009 3:27 pm

      My entire design education was completed on OSX, even though I was a Win user. I got my assignments, worked on them in class (Mac), and then went home and worked on them some more on my PC. And I know I am in the minority when I say that I felt more comfortable working on in Win as opposed to the Mac. Up to this day I am still running a PC and loving it, but I am glad that I had the opportunity to learn the OSX environment. Maybe one day I will switch but for now I’m quite happy.

      It is not the tools that make the designer, but how the designer uses their tools.

    37. 37
      Philip K.
      April 26th, 2009 3:29 pm


      Good article but needs some tuning. I got nothing to add but this picture.

    38. 38
      Emil
      April 26th, 2009 3:31 pm

      I use windows. I am not a FAN of it. It is just a computer used for running other software. If Photoshop did not run on Windows, i would have switched. All that matters to me is my own creativity (or lack of it).

    39. 39
      mikemike
      April 26th, 2009 3:34 pm

      Nice try Vitalli, you troll. The first reason you gave is one of two reasons why people switch to Mac:

      1) They don’t really do any work, but rather dream of whimsical fantatic “design careers” that entail using a beautiful Mac (which costs 2x as much as it’s Window counterpart and offers zero technical advantage now that Macs are PCs)

      2) The only other reason why people switch to Mac is because Windows hasn’t come out with a compelling release for years. Once Windows 7 comes out Mac losers will stop creaming their pants over cool looking buttons, and clear backgrounds.

      The thing to remember is: MACs ARE PCs!!!!. They are not Macs anymore. Apple simply manufacturers the same product as HP now, but somehow the ignorance of people denies this great fact in the name of aesthetics. I won’t deny that a MacBook looks great, but so does a golden sink. My sink is ceramic though because I won’t pay extra to be a pretentious poser.

      One final note: Most successful developers/designers are Windows users, and the ones that use Mac, by their very nature will fail.

    40. 40
      Anone
      April 26th, 2009 3:35 pm

      “Linux is of course the golden child of the open source movement, but despite the efforts of Ubuntu it is still a ways off in terms of being a turnkey solution for most people.”

      As an Ubuntu user I have to say that since Dapper Ubuntu has been an option for the average user–and just keeps getting better. I would never consider a mac.

    41. 41
      Trav
      April 26th, 2009 3:44 pm

      Damn….. I just started a new job as Senior Designer and the company I work for is all PC based. I’ve been using a Mac now for the past 6 years and having to use a crappy PC everyday is killing me.

    42. 42
      Ted K
      April 26th, 2009 3:45 pm

      Rails, Textmate, CS4, and OS X == Pure Bliss.

      After using a Mac for a year now, I couldn’t be happier. When I must use my Windows machine, which is quite often (All good architecture software is Windows-only), I feel alone and quite frustrated. But at the same time, I tweak, and customize, and tweak some more–and often enjoy it. When I get back to my Mac, I have nothing to tweak, nothing to customize. But I’ve learned to love opinionated software.

      As for the price, Mac’s are definitely more expensive, but it’s worth it for me. It’s all just about priorities. I’m living on a grad school budget: Macbook Pro, IKEA bed, and some good food. I could easily get a more affordable laptop and have some extra spending money, but I wouldn’t dream of it.

      Overall, nice article, and greetings from Minnesota.

    43. 43
      Jason
      April 26th, 2009 3:48 pm

      This has been a paid advertisement by the cult of Apple. Jog on….

    44. 44
      N'FOS
      April 26th, 2009 3:51 pm

      2 words…

      Appl€ Sucks! 8D

    45. 45
      Helen
      April 26th, 2009 3:52 pm

      No, designers who need a very well equipped computer do not buy a Mac out of the same reason that only rich dentists buy a Leica M8 and professional photographers do not. My computer would cost 17000 Euro if it would be a Mac. The difference is 14000 Euro. A Mac is a good thing for a hotel lobby :)

    46. 46
      Emil
      April 26th, 2009 3:53 pm

      Show us your work, not your computer.

    47. 47
      gus
      April 26th, 2009 3:56 pm

      FALSE

      PC is better

    48. 48
      Hobartimus
      April 26th, 2009 3:57 pm

      I’m not going to get into the Mac vs PC debate, but the nature of this article is just plain messed up.

      When I got my first Mac in 1991, Apple owned something like 92% of the creative market. It was very normal for ad agencies to have Macs in the creative department and PCs for business.

      Today things are very different. If anything, Macs have gained more ground in the mainstream over the past 10-15 years, but PCs have grabbed a bigger chunk of the creative fields.

      This article is bass-ackwards.

    49. 49
      Ted K
      April 26th, 2009 3:58 pm

      And as for the aesthetics arguments…

      If you paint your Macbook blue. That is aesthetics.
      If you sandbrush your HP. That is aesthetics.
      If you put a sticker on your laptop. That is aesthetics.

      Construction, materiality, hardware, size, weight, stability, durability, noise, temperature, etc… are most certainly not aesthetics. They are all components of design.

      I can only imagine a true designer would want something he or she sees as well designed, whatever machine that might be.

    50. 50
      Vladocar
      April 26th, 2009 3:58 pm

      I hope NOT to see this kind of article ever more. What will be next if you don’t have iPhone you are loser or if you have iPod you are cool.

    51. 51
      Helen
      April 26th, 2009 3:59 pm

      By the way: Glenn Gould exercised on a Yamaha or even on very cheap pianos. He didn’t use a Steinways. You can find Steinways in many houses of rich people in the middle of the living room.

    52. 52
      Bob Nolin
      April 26th, 2009 4:01 pm

      The main reason I switched, two years ago, to Mac was I had finally had it with having to reinstall my machine every six months due to Windows crapping out. I swore that the next time I found my machine not able to restart due to some obscure blue-screened code, I would bite the bullet and get a Mac. I am so glad I did.

      Now, whenever I have to play “help desk” for others in my family who are still saddled with Windows, I find my jaw dropping at how slow their systems are. No doubt I’ll be rebuilding them each soon (or getting them Macs!).

      The best reason, and one you don’t mention (that I saw anyway) is: Windows is unreliable, breaks down constantly, and is maddening to use. I’ve become quite spoiled by my Mac Pro. But on the other hand, it does just what I expect it to: it works. Always.

    53. 53
      HBSteve
      April 26th, 2009 4:04 pm

      Designers ALWAYS have used macs… macs were always a designers computer, while PC’s were business computers… while the apps have grown to be used on both – this greyed the usage of computers.. While today its a price difference, since many can design on either, even myself had to switch to a pc even though being a machead for many years before the new macs of mainly image… the apps simply ran faster on a cheaper machine… Its always the right computer for the right task… I still think mac has a long way to go and have yet to see a business be running a mac that isnt a design firm or some new foofoo type of business… sure I love them, sure I still want one, but like so many others, they simply are too expensive… when mac puts out a $399 computer (with monitor/keyboard/mouse etc) then pc markets will be in trouble… electronics now a day are cheaper than ever… 21+” monitors for around $100ish, 1TB hard drives for $100, awesome video cards for $100ish range, memory at rock bottom prices… now is the time apple needs to come out with a recession proof price tag.. Im sure they would get many new users soon as they do this… put the mac mini out for at most $299 THEN we can start seeing some great results… oh and ditch the Air laptop… what a waste – a computer that requires you to have another computer.. did I mention im still a total machead? haha So I hope the prices keep coming down

    54. 54
      FrankG
      April 26th, 2009 4:05 pm

      I work at an ad agency and we only hire creatives with heavy Mac experience. Any applicant that has mostly PC experience, is Mac hostile, or insists on PC/Windows is disqualified. We’ve been burned too many times from these sorts. They always fail and deliver sub par work.

    55. 55
      Howard Z
      April 26th, 2009 4:09 pm

      I made the switch 2 years ago, best move I ever made. More stable, no OS slowdown, no defragmentation, no spyware/viruses, no microsoft verification process for the bits of software. Most Mac haters have just refused to use a mac or are going off a 1 hr experience they had with a mac in 2000. Macs are dominant in professional fields for a reason, they are excellent to work on.

    56. 56
      hybrid-kernel
      April 26th, 2009 4:17 pm

      Most of the positives are present on linux. Of course 1 reason they will never be equivalent is the lack of popular multimedia software (All adobe’s stuff, final cut, etc). That is one reason I want a mac – a non-windows computer that can run photoshop naively. If only the mac mini cost <400, then I might buy one. Until then, I can only hope for second hand or a lottery/giveaway.

    57. 57
      kiedis
      April 26th, 2009 4:18 pm

      i used to be a die hard fan of PC, i had ms dos, windows (in all its versions) linux and i used to hate the mac until i got to college where i study design (i had never touched a mac before)
      the whole lab had macs…and only one pc with ubuntu…
      i had to learn to use them and then i realized they were not that bad…
      most of the students have macs and when we share files like for example indesign files it was a mess with my old laptop. fonts were not the same, even if i had the same font installed in some cases it would not recognize it exactly as i wanted…
      so i had to change manually everything each time and redo all the layout sometimes, i would waste lots of time.

      my old laptop had lots of problems because fujitsu siemens give no support and release no drivers for this model since 2006 so..when i installed directx 10 everything started crashing and if i had directx 9 nothing would work fine…

      everything was slow, and it was so hot and noisy my classmates would say “what’s that noise??” and i would be ashamed to say “its my laptop” in a room full of mac and the only noisy pc …

      I would hesitate to take my computer with me because it was over 5 kilos and 1 kilo and half for the charger…plus all the books i need to carry and stuff…my back hurted…

      so i finally got tired and got a 17 inch macbook pro and i’ve had it for a month and im not regretting it, it works nicely it dont make noise, easy to carry, don’t heat as much as my old laptop…and its fast :)

      as for the software i used to wonder “what kind of software will i find? will it be difficult to find something to do what i do?”…most things worked out of the box…and the rest…open source software really help a lot…the only thing i miss are some games but i can install a windows emulator for that…so it’s not really a problem

      one of the things i like the most is the magnetic power field, with my pc i was constantly nervous when it was plugged at school because i had to watch that noone passes by and get the cable in their feet and crashes my pc on the floor…

      also, 8 hours of battery that is just great, i had only 1 hour and half and i could not even finish one class without being plugged

      i guess that is why most designers change to a mac…

    58. 58
      Floris Fiedeldij Dop
      April 26th, 2009 4:18 pm

      When my PC broke down and I got a powerbook at the end of 2005 .. I realized after a few weeks I haven’t touched my PC at all .. The switch was completed. I turned my PC into a ubuntu server and got a mac pro 12 months later. And an iMac this year.

      I am never switching, my computer frustrations dropped from 80% to 5% and my workflow went from 45% to 80% .. easily.

      Snow Leopard, true native 64bit .. I can’t wait.

    59. 59
      Agnes
      April 26th, 2009 4:23 pm

      I am not a tech person so I cannot offer anything innovative to say about the tech side of macs vs pcs, but as a designer my work improved from the point of aesthetics after the purchase of my first macbook in September last year. The minimalism of the machine is non distracting, and as a matter of thought progress, the same became true for my web designs, which became much more space aware, cleaner, transparent, more efficient and more logical, whereas I’ve begun to abhor the screaming, color bursting, busy designs of so many websites, even some showcased here at SM.
      So yes, the switch to a mac has made the difference and it’s quite apparent in my design process.

    60. 60
      Bryan
      April 26th, 2009 4:23 pm

      “Mac might have been more stable, but that time has long passed. The price is not justifiable anymore.” ?

      I disagree with this one. I’ve seen more issues in 4 months with my wife’s Vista laptop than I’ve seen in 2+ years with a MacBook Pro.

      Realistically I think PC is perfectly fine for any use, but you really can’t discount the great features inherent with the Mac and the lack of baggage by not using Windows. Bottom line is that if you care about gaming or want to save money, than a PC is for you. If you don’t care about those things as much then a Mac provides less danger of virus problems, a more stable environment (you can crash one program on a Mac and still save and shutdown others, not sure I’ve ever seen this as a possibility in a PC).

      All that said, designers are “switching to a Mac?” Seems to me that most designers originated on the mac.

    61. 61
      Gee
      April 26th, 2009 4:23 pm

      I heard JJ Abrams loves Macs

    62. 62
      Rob
      April 26th, 2009 4:26 pm

      I use both Macs and PCs regularly, and I still can’t agree with most of your points besides perhaps the first one. Expose typically annoys the shit out of me (where windows will move unintentionally) but some of the productivity stuff can be useful. Enough to justify the price? Absolutely not.

      PCs — and I think this is pretty fair — are a much greater value.

    63. 63
      Dave
      April 26th, 2009 4:33 pm

      I’ve never understood number 6 (less malware out there for the MAC). Why would anyone be stumped by the extra vulnerabilities of Microsoft Windows to the degree it would become a factor in deciding which platform to develop on? Any “webmaster” or web programmer will surely spend 5 minutes installing a virus scanner – on either platform – so how is this even a remotely viable concern?

      I hear this “Microsoft is more secure because there is less Malware for it” argument all the time, in the general sphere of the OS debate. But I think it’s bogus that the higher level PC user would ever be worried about it. I give you, perhaps if it is a new webmaster and a new PC user all at once, maybe then. But otherwise, meh.

      -D

    64. 64
      Ian
      April 26th, 2009 4:33 pm

      Wow, I remember when this was a site about web design. Out of the many reasons given here, most have absolutely no application to design.

      Also, I love how the article pushes open-source, despite the fact that Apple charges far more for their apps (which are just as closed and proprietary as any other vendor). When I was using Mac running OS 10.1, I was pretty pissed to find out that I need to upgrade my whole f’ing OS to update Safari and iPhoto.

      Finally, how can the author praise the whole one vendor solution aspect in the same article that knocks MS for being too controlling.

      Windows, OSX, Linux it doesn’t matter they’re all the same in many ways. Each has pros and cons. However, it’s nice to see irrelevant, opinion pieces instead of actual design content.

    65. 65
      Emily
      April 26th, 2009 4:36 pm

      I use all 3: XP on my home machine, Ubuntu on my laptop, an iMac at work.
      I’m a developer and a gamer.

      All 3 systems crash – and for the uses they crash under, they crash at about the same rate. (eg: my XP machine crashes while gaming only, the iMac crashes randomly and for oddball things not under heavy load, and the laptop/linux crashes generally when installing things)
      All 3 systems have silly UI quirks, good bits, and neat things.
      All 3 systems can be configured to act like the other, and all 3 can run vitual copies of the others. If you have to install software to virtualize, its not “out of the box”. if you’re talking about dual/tri-booting, this isn’t special.

      I find the Textmate/Growl/Quicksilver reason to be rather weak – mostly for the Textmate part. 1) Its not bundled with the OS. 2) Its not free. 3) It doesn’t have features you won’t find in other programs. It IS however, hard to find a free text editor for OS X. I spent a week looking. I finally settled on Komodo Edit, because then I could have the same program on ALL 3 platforms that I use, and not have to relearn different editors each time. Quicksilver also has parallels on other OS’s, though they work different. Growl is neat, but, I don’t consider it’s functionality unique.

      I don’t have some of those “built in tools” on my iMac? Since its from work I don’t know how old it is, but I am running 10.5/Leopard. Granted, there’s plenty of great widgets – but all 3 OSs do that too.

      One good reason to switch, however, is Microsoft itself. I’ll agree with that reason, even though I’ll continue to have one and sometimes upgrade it for gaming.
      I’ll also agree with the less hassle reason, if you’re comfortable with the sometimes necessary customer service calls that can entail – because you’d rather focus on using it, than fixing it.
      If you like the looks of a Mac, that’s a fine reason to switch too.
      Though the comments implying that every other product isn’t as minimal/well designed is sort of a strawman argument. Some do have such things, but plenty don’t. And for those of us who build our own systems, you get what you want.

      Some of the pitfalls also don’t really exist – like others have mentioned.
      I can use 2+ mouse buttons, I can maximize windows, moving Command to the Control location was easy. Though the rest of the 3 are true – price, software and building. I think, as a work-only machine in my case, its great. My software needs are well within the “Mac scope”. I wouldn’t be able to justfity to myself, purchasing a new mac. A refurb, probably. The lack of same-system upgradability however, is I think a major issue. I haven’t had to rebuild an entirely new machine since buying the first one. I’ve probably purchased in parts, over time, 1/2 the amount of ‘new machines’ I’ve had (eg: upgraded enough to reinstall the OS, but carry-over parts enough to halve the cost). Laptops are an exception to this rule, and Macs will always do well there.

      Until they allow for more same-system upgradability, they’ll continue to essentially “hate” gamers and game-developing companies. For me, that’s the major difference. I can’t game on it – so I can’t have one for a home machine. If I were just a console gamer, perhaps, but I’m a computer and console gamer.

      Windows has to be lauded for this, if nothing else, making heavy commitments to gaming – gaming has pushed the chip manufacturers further and further, and brought us high-end graphics and 3d rendering. The abiilty to replace discrete parts of a system, and to install it on nearly anything crazy you could build, allowed the graphics crazyness to exist and thrive. Its possible that they could have just swapped places, early on, and we’d all be talking about how switching to Windows and away from the Evil Apple Empire. Either way, if you’re going to compliment Apple on its less broad approach, you have to credit what the broad approach has given us.

    66. 66
      Fabien
      April 26th, 2009 4:40 pm

      mhhh.. ..and i thought smashing was about objectivity. no, just paid articles.

    67. 67
      mave
      April 26th, 2009 4:46 pm

      Gawd is Smashing ever sucking these days. This article is a prime example of why. Mindless blathering with misinformed opinions that are completely irrelevant to design. Newsflash: a tool is just a tool, and focusing on the tool rather than the output of the designer makes you look like a total tool. That’s why Mac fanboy/girls are so hated these days.

      I’ve been in design for nearly 20 years, and guess what? The reality is that designers are switching to PC. When I started out in design, everyone used Macs. Now, more and more designers I meet are PC users. My position? Whatever floats your boat, as long as you promise to just get to work and not evangelize about why your choice is so much better than someone else’s. It’s totally gauche and lame, and has no bearing on the quality of work one can do.

    68. 68
      Amy
      April 26th, 2009 4:51 pm

      No offense, but…there are designers who don’t use Macs?

      I’ve been in this business over 15 years and I’ve never met a single person or shop who counted on anything else. Shops will sometimes have a few Windows machines around for cross-platform issues or Windows-only solutions such as imposition software, but 99% of actual work is done on Macs.

      Though I admit it’s not all that unusual to run across “designers” who use Publisher and then wonder why their pieces cost twice the amount to print.

    69. 69
      David Walsh
      April 26th, 2009 5:05 pm

      We also need to be honest and cite clever advertising.

    70. 70
      Adrian Harvey
      April 26th, 2009 5:14 pm

      Another pointless Mac vs. Windows Article – I’m disappointed, would have expected better from Smashing Magazine!

      “Mark Nutter runs a web development shop in Minnesota. You can follow him on Twitter where he occasionally says something worthwhile.”

      Pity he says nothing worthwhile in this article

    71. 71
      Anrkist
      April 26th, 2009 5:21 pm

      Open Source Friendly
      And yet the freeware offerings are slim pickings. How is that free FTP software working out for you? Ohhh Cyberduck… yeah, nice. It’s simple to say the least.

      Built-in Tools
      Windows has these in the form on non-built in tools that you download if you want them. Vista has them, but I don’t want them.

      Unified User Interface
      I work with people who can’t even copy and paste to the correct folder in OSX. They are smart people who have worked with the system for years and still have issues getting things in order. I can’t help but think it’s a OS issue.

      Security
      Just as vulnerable. The fact less people use the system is the reason why it has less attacks. Recent articles suggest OSX is becoming a target. Hooray for Mac users, you get your spotlight now.

      No doubt, I bet I’m not the only one who touched on these subjects. It’s not a bad system but it has just as many faults as any other. Post was a little long and as always from a Mac user, self infatuating.

    72. 72
      Agnes
      April 26th, 2009 5:24 pm

      Here’s another point to make: if you are a true designer, and you cannot afford to buy or finance a mac, then you are not a designer.
      SM may lose some readers, but the true designers are here to stay. ;)

    73. 73
      adwin
      April 26th, 2009 5:28 pm

      I am still playing with Windows right now and not switching to Max. If i need unix based, I will choose ubuntu or opensuse. But I admit, in Linux, there are lots of software but not as easy to use as in mac.

    74. 74
      Mario
      April 26th, 2009 5:34 pm

      Nice Mac propaganda!

    75. 75
      Joseph
      April 26th, 2009 5:35 pm

      I recently switched to Mac and I love it – most of it. But two things itches me
      - battery charger heats up so quickly and hence have to charge while shut down and have to work on battery. Not so good design
      - To use function keys (on laptop), I need to press two keys (fn + function key). Again, not so good design for often used keys

    76. 76
      Matt French
      April 26th, 2009 5:39 pm

      Macs is better at graphics and they have lots more fonts so are better for designers.

      Seriously, Macs have a nicer interface, but most of the “main player” apps are on both and run equally well on both (though PC’s seem to have a speed advantage on Adobe stuff). Frankly, if you have worked on any major production, debates about PC vs Mac are quite pointless. You use whatever runs the software you need to run. Unfortunately, in the high-end film graphics area, Apple has really dropped the ball. FCP is good enough for TV stuff I suppose, but the slow death of Shake was embarrasing and has cost Apple dearly in the high-end market. The majority of studios have shifted away from Apple hardware and software solutions.

      However, it is obvious that Apple is not “about” computers anymore. Music players and phones are their core business now and it shows. The intel Macs are hardly impressive pieces of hardware.

      Don’t get me wrong, I love my Macbook Pro, but I am not drinking the Apple kool-aid yet. It is just a computer and anyone who defines their lifestyle around a computer is more than a little sad.

    77. 77
      Jim
      April 26th, 2009 5:41 pm

      Wow – Smashing Mag used to actually have useful, interesting posts about design stuff. But I can understand it’s a lot more profitable to simply run an Apple commercial instead.

      If I want shallow, biased tech “reviews”, I’ll go to Engadget instead – thanks.

    78. 78
      vrpj
      April 26th, 2009 5:42 pm

      I’ve been designing on Macs and PCs since the beginning of computer based design. PCs lost this battle many many years ago. I know Nobody who designs on PCs. Designers don’t have the time to put up with the crapolla that comes along with a PC.

    79. 79
      Anita
      April 26th, 2009 5:48 pm

      The Mac vs. Windows debate will wage eternal, and the comments to this article make some really good points for both sides of the argument. Better points than the actual article does, so I’m not sorry I took a look.

      That said, the condescension and blatant hypocrisy in this article really rubbed me the wrong way.

      The opening stated:

      “…in the interest of sanity, we’ll try to avoid any direct comparisons to other operating systems.”

      And yet, the body of the article is rife with such diplomatic gems as:

      “If you were to ask a die-hard Windows user why he or she thinks people like Macs, they would almost invariably say the reasons are purely about aesthetics.”

      “The Windows user, when presented with these arguments, usually rolls his or her eyes and continues on their way.”

      So… apparently it’s not okay to directly compare the two systems — In the interest of sanity, you understand — but it IS okay to make broad-based, negative assumptions about the people who use Windows. I’m glad we cleared that up.

      Argument of Mac vs. Windows aside, this is horrible, unprofessional journalism, and is the latest in a disturbing trend of the same at a site that I used to value for it’s smart and informative content. Fail, Smashing Magazine. Huge fail. What a disappointment you’re becoming.

    80. 80
      Tami W
      April 26th, 2009 5:49 pm

      Expose alone is worth the price of admission. I have typically used a pc at work and mac at home, and I am always amazed at how much smoother my work flow is on a mac. I think it is due largely to expose and the speed at which I can switch between programs/windows.

      The KB shortcuts in adobe products also seem much more intuitive. Maybe I’m imagining it, but I doubt it, macs have been the choice of graphic designers for eons, so there has always been close ties between adobe products and mac.

      I was a pc person, and then for a long time, I wanted to be a mac person but couldn’t justified the cost and the “apple tax”. However, I eventually got a used mac, and now couldn’t imagine going back.

      That, and you can’t beat an os that allows you to upon a terminal and use vi on a default install.

    81. 81
      Agnes
      April 26th, 2009 5:54 pm

      @ Anita
      Just because of one tiny post, now SM has become a disappointment? That’s funny. Just one blog post, and move on to next! That’s the way blogs are, as inconvenient truth that may be.
      (now a mac user is rolling her eyes)

    82. 82
      bob
      April 26th, 2009 5:55 pm

      In the time it takes to bitch about what brand of glowing box you use, you could have designed something. Seriously, use what you like and shut the hell up.

    83. 83
      Rayan
      April 26th, 2009 5:56 pm

      I felt this article was semi-decent.

      NOTE TO THE EDITOR: I would love to see your sources for this article. Otherwise, this is a bad example of what a Smashing Magazine article should be. Please continue to read below.

      There are so many false within this article onto what’s going on in the PC world. Bare in mind that I am a designer and web developer, with experience between Mac and PC. I love my MacBook Pro, and I will continue to use it proudly.

      “Apple has chosen not to enter the sub $1000 PC not because it doesn’t want to grow sales, but because it wants to avoid the dogfight that Sony, HP, and other brands are in for the lower end market.”

      An Apple Computer does not compare to a PC computer. Apple factors the cost on the laptop, OSX, support, and convenience, without the hassle. Due to recent stock reporting Q1 2009, Apple has reported an increase in revenue (mostly from their iPhone products); therefore, they have no reason to lower prices if consumers are willing to pay a hefty amount for their product. Also, If you notice the difference in prices between each Apple Laptop within the same series, you’ll see that they’re spaced out by roughly $300-500 (we’re talking about Apple stores, and their vendors such as Best Buy). This is done due to limiting selection, so choosing the Mac that’s right for you is easier. If they did introduce a laptop within that factor, there would be a decrease in sales of the higher-end laptops, and an increase in lower end.

      “Unfortunately, Windows doesn’t come bundled with PHP, Rails, or any other open-source web development frameworks or languages any time soon. More and more of what we do is in the cloud these days anyways and it is almost starting to feel quaint when you come across new software that runs solely as a desktop client. Microsoft has painted themselves into a corner – they rely on closed formats and standards in a world where open source software, open formats, and open standards are king.”

      If you’ve been following up with Smashing Magazine articles, you’ll find there are several websites that offer free development solutions to downloading onto a Windows PC. Not all solutions are available right out of the box, but I feel that would be OK. Microsoft has developed asp.NET, and allows you to download a free version of Visual Studios Express 2009 from their website. It’s not the essential choice for web development, but I wouldn’t go as far as lack of solutions available. In terms of your cloud computing statement, OSX includes development software out of the box. Wouldn’t that defeat the purpose of referencing cloud computing to begin with? Please, explain to your readers.

      Your article does express valuable information for why designers switch to Macs. You’ve clearly outlined it, but few of your reasons are subtle without including several more sources to back up your statements. It’s a pretty big deal.

    84. 84
      Matt Palmer
      April 26th, 2009 5:57 pm

      I use both every day and both for graphic design.

      Beasty PC = 2 grand, beasty MAC = 6 grand.

      Nuff said.

    85. 85
      Rayan
      April 26th, 2009 5:59 pm

      @Anita

      Thank you for pointing that out. I completely agree 100%. I expected something a little better from Smashing Magazine than to see this.

    86. 86
      CoryMathews
      April 26th, 2009 6:00 pm

      SmashingMagazine we are done. You have just lost another viewer. This article is just complete crap, I cannot say it any better then it was said above

      “…this isn’t really about designers, per se, as much as a general “OSX is cool” article.”

      Here is some of the bs you “claimed” in this article.

      “It means that the entire world of open source software out there is pretty much guaranteed to run without much hassle. In a world where open source software is a way of life, web developers need a friendly environment to operate in.”

      Uhmm what.. Yes it may have been based on unix when it was started but not any more… OSS is more widely available on PC then mac, and 100% on linux.

      “…partly because Unix is inherently more secure than Windows…”

      Wait which OS got hacked in under 5 seconds by a year old exploit? O yea… Mac. Which os did he state was hardest to hack? Windows, which browser? Chrome.. No safari, no OSX.

      OSX can virtualize all three major operating systems out of the box. This is a must have for checking browser compatibility. To make life even easier, you can do it right from within OSX using programs like Parallels, Virtualbox, and VMWare Fusion. And if you think web browsers render websites exactly the same regardless of the operating system they’re running on you are sorely mistaken.

      Yes you said this twice, but all 3 OS’s can do this, just not right out of the box. Honestly how many people do this? Only a select few which is exactly why it should not be included in the OS by default. As you said Minimalism, but I say bloat.

      Opinionated Software

      This is a very bad thing, I have lost a lot of respect for you by saying this is a good thing. This gives apple complete and total control over everything. If apple wanted every window to have a big pink and purple button in the middle of the window, what could you do about it? Nothing

      Most developers are perfectly willing to trouble shoot their own computers, but when deadlines need to be met it can be nice knowing that you can offload some of that hassle to people who already know the system inside and out.

      Heres a true story for you.
      Apple: We need you to send your computer in for us to check it. You should have it back in 2-4 weeks….
      I never have a problem meeting deadlines when I don’t have a computer for 2-4 weeks. Great support my ass.

      Unfortunately, Windows doesn’t come bundled with PHP, Rails, or any other open-source web development frameworks or languages any time soon.

      Just as you said minimalistic. Why would anyone but web developers want php and rails running on their computers? Noone wants that crap on there except web developers and we make up a very small percent of computer users.

      As I stated above you have lost another viewer. I hope you change and write quality articles again so you don’t lose more.

    87. 87
      Kay
      April 26th, 2009 6:05 pm

      The reasons above are not the reasons for switching to a Mac at all.

      I only agree with two statements above, the feature “Spaces”, it eases my workflow and saves me a lot of clutter than working on XP.

      Second, the small amount of software available to Mac. While all Adobe products are available, Mac is certainly not for 3D designers.

    88. 88
      Anita
      April 26th, 2009 6:05 pm

      @Agnes

      You might want to read the entire comment, as I said, “…is the latest in a disturbing trend of the same…” IE, a lot of the articles I’ve been reading here have been sub-par. I’ve been faithfully following and recommending SM for a couple of years now, and the recent content just doesn’t seem up to the quality I’ve come to expect.

      You seem to be making the assumption that my criticism is to do with the Mac vs. Windows debate (As in, I’m a Windows user and I just want to complain about a Mac article), as you’ve mentioned being a Mac user. My complaint has nothing to do with Mac vs. Windows (I love Macs), it’s to do with crappy and biased journalism posted under the guise of objectivity.

    89. 89
      joenutz
      April 26th, 2009 6:05 pm

      I’ve got the best of both worlds. I was always a windows guy and plus, I never wanted to pay so much money for a mac when you can build a 10x faster PC for the same price. I recently discovered that you could install MAC on a custom PC. Sure it was a little tricky but it was THE BEST thing i have ever done. I now have a custom mac that i can upgrade just as easily as a PC. And its hella fast.
      I have dual booted Leopard and Vista on my custom built PC, so when uni work comes I boot into Leopard, and its great because I cant get distracted by any games(since they are all on windows). If at any time i need to do anything on windows, i restart and select windows. Voila.
      If you’re interested I’m sure a search engine should give you all the information you need.
      Just make sure you own a copy of OSX to make sure you’re not doing anything illegal.

    90. 90
      JasonG01
      April 26th, 2009 6:11 pm

      I don’t really care about the whole Mac/Win debate. From a productivity perspective, Adobe runs good on both, and there is plenty of webdev software on every platform.

      Now, what would be useful is an article on how to do cross browser testing for free on any given platform. Safari on Windows is easy, but what about IE6 7 and 8 simultaneously on both Mac and Windows?

    91. 91
      Dominic Whittle
      April 26th, 2009 6:14 pm

      How about that CS4 on mac runs like a dog compared to CS4 on windows?
      Yeah, so if you’re a designer and you don’t mind your productivity slowed…. get a mac.

      (I have a brand new top-spec 15″ unibody MacBook Pro)

      “Unified User Interface” — Macs are let down by a total lack of consistent keyboard shortcuts. And don’t pretend people don’t use keyboard shortcuts. MY TIME IS IMPORTANT.

    92. 92
      Joe Brightwell
      April 26th, 2009 6:16 pm

      While the cost of a Mac might be more competitive with the PC-equivalent in North America or Europe, down under the cost of a Mac with the same specifications as a PC is nearly double.

      For example, last year I would’ve bought a MacBook Pro but the cost was too much – $3000 NZD MacBook Pro vs a $1300 NZD Dell Vostro. I then used the remaining money to go on a holiday and to buy/update Adobe software.

      For me, cost is the only factor in the PC vs Mac war. If cost weren’t an issue, I’d definitely have both. PC desktop machine for home, MacBook Pro for a laptop.

      In regards to employers hiring Mac-only staff, I think that’s silly but as designers we should be more prepared and skilled with multiple operating systems.

      A good chunk of design companies down under use Macs but most use PCs, while a lot of the general public are brand-whores and spend their cash on Macs just to be cool.

      Oh and if your PC has got spyware or viruses, then stop looking at stupid email forwards, porn or warez websites. I haven’t had trouble with those things for years with WinXP for both work and home (and I’m still using it!). I haven’t even bothered with Vista yet…

    93. 93
      The Poker Jerk
      April 26th, 2009 6:19 pm

      I have the real reasons:

      1) Because they are hipsters
      1) Because it’s trendy
      1) Because they think they’re “supposed to” since they are designers
      1) They think it will make them look cool
      1) They really think it’s better, since they never used a PC before

    94. 94
      anne_nime
      April 26th, 2009 6:23 pm

      Its true that the tool is important in design, but this article is a shameless plugging of MAC… not that I am a die-hard PC user, nor a MAC pisser. C’mon, arent these up in the Mac site already? Why must we post a remake in SM?

      Design, regardless of machine… is nothing without the persistence, creativity, inspiration… and the latest Adobe.

    95. 95
      charlie
      April 26th, 2009 6:25 pm

      I’m a Mac whore and simply hate PC because of Microsoft and Windows. Exactly as SM pointed out.

      We all know PC is a powerful tool. But you people pointing out price and power are totally missing the point of this article.

      Intuitiveness people……intuitiveness………..

    96. 96
      Jody
      April 26th, 2009 6:29 pm

      I’m not switching to any company that nicknames their new Operating System version “Snow Leopard”.

    97. 97
      Agnes
      April 26th, 2009 6:37 pm

      @ Anita
      This is a blog. Not journalism. A blog is an opinion driven content since its inception.
      I am not a part of SM staff, I just think your comment isn’t just, quite on the contrary- I find the content very useful. You can’t find it anywhere else, if you do, give me a link or two.
      You always have the option not to visit this or any other particular blog, so the complaining is useless, a waste of your and our time.

    98. 98
      benz
      April 26th, 2009 6:39 pm

      either, it’s just a matter of getting used to it…and the budget of course. ;)

    99. 99
      Keir Douglas
      April 26th, 2009 6:44 pm

      Now that Apple is taking sooooo much business away from Micrososft, I no longer feel moved to evangelise to avoid being absorbed by the “Borg.” I’m just happy knowing I’m no longer on the endangered species list. There are some rational reasons I prefer MacOS: I spend “zero” time running my computer and 100% of my time being productive; I don’t have to worry about criminals who live only to destroy my peace of mind – I have been connected to the internet since the early 1990s / have never run anti-virus software / have never run a firewall / have never caught so much as a sniffle; my computers cost more – but they come with a basic suite of “bugless” interoperable applications I would pay a lot to install on an IBMpc clone.

      To each their own – the article is factual and not overly opinionated in my opinion.

    100. 100
      Jeff
      April 26th, 2009 6:44 pm

      The real reasons people switch to mac.

      #1 they look hip when they work in a coffee shop

      #2 apple spends millions making commercials paying off bloggers like you to promote their product, and microsoft spends nothing comparatively on marketing.

      This article is a piece of shit. Completely unbiased. Right. I like the negatives for macs… no right click button and control is command… Oh shit..

      Oh, I can drag and drop images from my browser into photoshop too…

      I think they both have their benefits, and I like working with macs, But come on, this reads like an apple advert. You are all sheep.

    101. 101
      Agnes
      April 26th, 2009 6:48 pm

      It’s worth noting how vile and arrogant are some PC and Microsoft Big Brother defenders.

    102. 102
      Harper
      April 26th, 2009 6:53 pm

      This article is poorly written, poorly researched, and lacking substance one could find looking 5 minutes on a digg comment section. Way to state the obvious in an extremely large amount of words. Also right clicking on the buttonless macbook is SO.FUCKING.EASY. Why do people moan incessently about it? Its awesome.

    103. 103
      Fakir
      April 26th, 2009 6:58 pm

      This is totally stupid! Retarded reasons for me as a designer to switch to mac :P

    104. 104
      looselycoupled
      April 26th, 2009 7:00 pm

      I just wanted to let anyone know that the “OSX86/Hackintosh” movement has gotten very mature as of late and installing OSX on a PC is far simpler than it used to be. The simplicity depends on your brand of PC or the components involved as some are more Mac friendly than others, but just about every mainstream/popular PC from Dell, HP, Acer, etc has had all the bugs and kinks worked out.

      Any of new model Dells are very easy. I have a Dell e1705/9400, and I used a program called “iPC” (there are many others as well) to install OSX on a second partition and it was a SNAP! After installing OSX, I ran an app called “Post-install Dell Utilities” and then everything was working perfectly. I have full nVidia graphics, 1920×1200 res, full Sound, WiFi, ethernet, Firewire, and even Card reader. Bluetooth is the only thing being finicky.

      insanelymac.com/forum/ and hackint0sh.org for more info..

    105. 105
      josh
      April 26th, 2009 7:09 pm

      Install noscript and you don’t need to worry about malware/spyware anymore.

    106. 106
      ผมเอง
      April 26th, 2009 7:12 pm

      If you are a ‘real’ designer, then I think you realized that the skillful designer can produce good work regardless to platform. It’s 2009 right now man, software or hardware or even OS isn’t that much different like in the past.

      I’m disappoint with this article, SM. I always found design tips & trick regardless of platform here, but this article is just…a mistake.

      จะแมคหรือจะพีซีมันก็แค่เครื่องมือนะครับ ถ้าคนออกแบบไม่เป็นต่อให้ใช้แมคหรู UI สวยๆ งานที่ได้มันก็ไม่ได้สวยขึ้นแต่อย่างไรหรอกนะผมว่า อันที่จริงผมว่ามันหมดยุคที่จะบอกเครื่องนี้ดีกว่าเครื่องนั้นแล้วนะ แต่ก่อนอาจจะใช่ แต่ปัจจุบันมันแทบจะไม่ต่างกันแล้วนะผมว่า

    107. 107
      Wardell
      April 26th, 2009 7:20 pm

      I’m a web designer who’s done quite of bit of work with Macs and I haven’t experienced anything compelling enough to cause me to want to make a personal switch.

    108. 108
      Meegs
      April 26th, 2009 7:20 pm

      I love reading the comments just as much as I love reading the article…

    109. 109
      Franco
      April 26th, 2009 7:22 pm

      APPLE is for graphic designers and accounting’s! If you really work…MICROSOFT!!!

    110. 110
      modobodo
      April 26th, 2009 7:22 pm

      We’ve been burned too many times from these sorts. They always fail and

      deliver sub par work.

      Bull.

      I’ve been a designer for a long time and I’ve worked in every media – print, web, video, animation and even signs. I’ve also used both Macs and PCs and still do. I don’t know anything about who you hired before, but blaming it on their use of PCs over Macs is lame and suggests that the problem was more likely you.

      Admit it FrankG…it’s not about sub par work. It’s about Mac-obsessed PC hatred.

      I’ll bet you can count on one hand the number of times you’ve ever used a PC and each time you went at it with an agenda of gathering yet more things you could hate about them.

      It’s an irony, of course. Ask any Mac-obsessed designer why they like Mac and they’ll say, “It’s just so easy and intuitive.”

      That it is. I picked up everything I needed to know about each new Mac OS in about 5 minutes. What advantage would “heavy Mac experience” give you over light Mac experience – say, a month? In my experience very little.

      What’s so much better about working on a Mac over a PC? I use the full Adobe suite and everything I use works almost exactly the same on both machines. Working on a Mac doesn’t make me more creative or make be do better work any more than PCs do the opposite.

      So why was a job in your company so challenging to a PC user? The only challenge your former employees had was you looking down your nose at them because of a computer choice. Which was pretty sad.

      These PC designers you spoke of…so they love design and they love to create and unfortunately, as a cash-strapped student, they couldn’t bust out $2500 for a new MacBook Pro. So instead of taking advantage of an opportunity to introduce them to a new OS, you decided to hold it over them and judge them unfairly because they don’t use the same tools you’re obsessed with.

      BTW, from what I’ve observed, the shift is exactly opposite of what this article suggests. 10 years ago, I couldn’t find a designer who used a PC. Now, their everywhere. Most of them grew up using PCs at home and in school so most new web designers are more and more PC-oriented. And knowing both is like speaking two languages – something most people would consider an asset.

      At least the up-and-comers will more than likely evaluate their computer choice based on actual experience rather than snobbishness and hysteria.

      But not a Mac-obsessed guy like FrankG.

      Most non-Mac-obsessed designers have a keen appreciation for the strengths and weaknesses in both machines, I, like many fellow web designers I know, have used both. I like Macs for print design and Music production while prefer PCs for web design (Safari is an astonishingly crappy browser and all updates are bound in increasingly crappy versions of the formerly awesome iTunes). For video and Flash, I can go either way.

      Both computers crash or hang and both have occasional hardware glitches, though I will give Apple an edge for overall stability. Still, PCs crush them on available apps and overall cost-effectiveness.

      And there ain’t nothing to be proud of in the Mac mouse. It’s a piece of junk. The ball is too small and refusing to put a right mouse button on one is pointlessly absurd. A company that rightfully prides itself on it’s awesome achievements elsewhere, sticks users with a low-function device with lousy ergonomics.

      But you can’t tell that to guys like FrankG. Sadly, his close-mindedness – and the close-mindedness of the article writer – is still all too common in the design world.

    111. 111
      dragoshell
      April 26th, 2009 7:23 pm

      I just have to say that this article is almost full of *BULLSHIT*.

      Why? Because as a designer who uses the Creative Suite from Adobe, there’s absolutely no difference between working on a MAC or a WINDOWS machine. Btw, they are both called PCs or micro-computers. There might be a little differentiation for more money towards a workstation. But that would be more suited for a game/CAD/3D/etc. developer and not for the use of CS.

      Still, I appreciate this article, as it shows the features of OS X. I also believe that the article deviates from presenting the benefits which a designer might have by switching, to ones concerned with usability for a NEWBIE user, but that’s just my opinion.

      AND forgot to say that I love the tech support photo which shows iPhone service. Just lame.
      LE:check your contact form on your website, you big WEB developer! It doesn’t appear correctly neither in FF nor in IE. It might show up right in your Safari, but not in other browsers. Developer my ass.

    112. 112
      Nick
      April 26th, 2009 7:30 pm

      Wow, a lot of angry and insecure weenies on this board. Get over it. I use both Mac and PC. I just got hired by a web company, and they use Macs. The company before used PC’s, and they gave me the old Mac cuz I was the new guy. It was an 800mhz G4 with 768 megs of ram….slow as a dog, about 7 yrs old, but you know what?? It still worked, and never crashed. Its a friggin living fossil. PC’s just dont do that. I used to own a first gen Mac Powerbook G4…500mhz G4. Bought it in 2000, ran great until I sold it in 2005. Been PC ever since. Yes, you can get plenty of PC’s for a lot cheaper. The fact remains the parts are NOT the same. It might be an Intel in that Mac, but the motherboards are pure Apple. The cases are pure Apple.

      I dont know why so many posts from PC users getting offended and claiming to never come back to SM because of this article. Its mostly true. I had a Toshiba Tecra M4 laptop….well, lets be honest, I had 3 of them. They all broke, all in a 4 year span. First one last just a bit over a year until warranty expired, nvidia card broke, but since its on mobo, entire laptop was a deadweight. So I bought a new one on eBay….paid $200 for a 2 yr warranty from Squaretrade…takes effect after seller 90 day warranty. 2 weeks later, once again, mobo died, returned to original ebay seller, he sent me another one. This one lasted about 2 years until the video to screen converter died, Squaretrade couldnt fix it, they refunded my entire purchase from 2 years ago….so I basically got a free upgrade to a brand new Sony Vaio VGN-FW laptop. So far so good. Previously I had a Sager Laptop….that POS worked great hardware wise, but the structure was horribly built. The lid kept on cracking and I kept on replacing the frame of the lid until I gave up sinking more and more money into it. I’ve had the PSU and video card of a Sony desktop blow for no reason….and a custom built by me from high end Newegg parts PC go through a PSU, video card, and both onboard network cards die. All these problems in the last 5 years alone, ever since I sold that Mac Powerbook. Not to mention the countless Winblows reinstalls, crashes, BSOD’s, and viruses. I hate Winblows, but I love to game more.

      My point being….both systems have their strengths, but Mac IS overall, just a better buy, a better deal, and a better OS. My 1996 Mac Umax S900 clone STILL works flawlessly, NOTHING has died in that machine. All the Mac’s I have owned worked flawlessly, and either have been sold off, or still work. BUT….they are pricey at first, and games are just better on a PC, period. Its the reason why I bought this Sony Vaio laptop instead of a Macbook….$1100 as opposed to a similarly configured Macbook Pro which would run about $2700….AND, I just ordered $1500 worth of new PC parts for my custom PC rig….an i7, ASUS X58 Deluxe mobo, 12 gigs of ram, and two (dual) nVidia SLI 260 GTX video cards to upgrade to a kicking gaming rig……a similar Mac Pro would cost around $3000.

      Again, granted, Mac’s are pricey off the bat, but I do feel they are worth it, IF you dont game. If I was a console gamer, I would be all Mac. My whole point is though…again, reading some of the insecurities from PC’ers. Why do you get so upset over this article?? Does the truth hurt you that much?? And I do agree that some Mac users need to get over their elitism. Both systems are fine, and in the long run, probably cost the same. Buy a PC for a lot less, but keep replacing failing hardware until the cost is the same as the Mac, and waste money with downtime due to those hardware failures and loss of time and productivity, or go buy a Mac and shell out a lot more from the get go, and not be able to play as many video games, unless you dual boot or run Parallels and run Vista or XP. Either or…WHO CARES!?!?!?!

      Everyone has their own opinions and experiences with each platform….but so many of you need to get over your insecurities. I buy PC’s for home use, and work on Macs at work. I dont care. My only needs are Adobe CS, Maya, Cinema 4D, Suitcase, Firefox, and COD4 and COD:World at War. =)

    113. 113
      Agnes
      April 26th, 2009 7:32 pm

      The reason there is so much outrage is because the article has actually pointed out the truth- most real designers prefer macs, it’s that simple.

    114. 114
      Matt Parker
      April 26th, 2009 7:32 pm

      7 or so years ago the argument was MAC was faster than PC. Was this because MAC’s were using SCSI and PC’s were slow IDE? Couldn’t you have spent the extra money to build a SCSI PC that could match the MAC SCSI performance? However, now they are the same guts in a different box. The bottom line for me and my business is higher productivity, which translates to higher profit. I can purchase 1 new PC (box or notebook) every 12-18 months for the cost of 1 MAC (box or notebook), which I would have to use for two – three years before being able to buy a new machine. Why would I purchase a MAC when hardware advancements happen almost overnight? I prefer to purchase a PC more often and stay up to date with technology instead of forcing myself and my employees to use an outdated MAC while technology moves to better possibilities. No one wants to sit and wait on an slow machine to process your design files. Higher Productivity = Happier Employees = Higher Profit.

    115. 115
      Luna
      April 26th, 2009 7:33 pm

      Good article. I agree with it in most points, but even though I love Mac OSX, I can’t fully commit to it as my only OS for graphic design. I switch between OSX and Windows on a regular basis, because I find that some programs work well on the latter and not the former or vice versa. Also there are programs that are available only for one platform and never for the other, and the alternatives aren’t just quite cutting it.

    116. 116
      SirInv
      April 26th, 2009 7:35 pm

      I don’t know where people get that the MAC operating system is user friendly??? I have done a design course and music course where I was forced to use a MAC. I could not stand every moment of it, I found the MAC OS really unintuitive, so much so that the courses I attended basically wasted my time by trying to force MAC down my throat. In Australia most institutions use MAC by default as a kind of brainwashing for the easily led and people who can not think for themselves, so they choose MAC.

      Other operating systems can easily accept PHP or other programming frameworks by just installing the suitable opensource software. Is that all that hard, seriously

    117. 117
      Doranwen
      April 26th, 2009 7:37 pm

      1. If I want Open Source friendly, Linux is actually far more open source friendly, and there is far more available out there that’s Linux-based than Mac-based.
      And I don’t prefer built-in tools because I like to find the right program for *me*, which may not be the right program for everyone else.
      The unified user interface has the buttons backwards from EVERY OTHER OS, which feels like they decided to be obstinate just ’cause, and since the makers of OS X have ultimate control over how things look on a Mac, they get to tell you “that’s the way it is, deal with it!” I’d much rather have extra control over things rather than have it all look like it was made by the same person.
      The “Macs don’t get viruses, so get a Mac” argument will lose its power as soon as Macs conquer a large share of the market–the virus makers will simply target them instead of Windows. So anyone making that argument must surely realize that they’re basically saying their OS isn’t very popular yet. Also, keep in mind which OS got hacked first in the browser hacking convention? OS X, with the Safari browser. Windows got hacked last. Security is more about user behavior than anything, though. I haven’t had a virus in several years, and the last time I got one was because I downloaded a crack and forgot to scan it before using it. I can’t remember the last time I got a virus or spyware when I didn’t do something extremely foolish. I simply don’t have problems with it, and I’m still using Windows XP.

      2. As someone else stated above, most people DON’T need to virtualize all three OSes out of the box. My fiancé virtualizes Windows now and then as necessary, but he runs Ubuntu natively and uses it for all his personal tasks. If he needed to, he could virtualize OS X too, but Apple makes that exceedingly difficult because they want to lock people into using their computers. Fortunately for him, he deals mainly with servers, and Linux is the most suited to that sort of thing.

      3. I actually would consider that MORE hassle. What one designer thinks everyone will be happy with, I might find very annoying. I want control over my computer; I want to make it look as I want it to look, to behave as I want it to . . . which is why I have Windows XP dualbooting with Ubuntu and will get myself a laptop for running Ubuntu only when I have the money. I get very attached to a specific look, and hated the upgrade to Internet Explorer 7 (which I thankfully rarely have to use, as Firefox is far superior) mainly because they locked down the ability to customize it.

      4. Again, if you truly want freedom, Linux, not Mac, is the antithesis of Microsoft. Mac is just as controlled as Microsoft is, just in a different way. In fact, it’s even more controlled in some ways, since Windows can be installed on any PC, but Mac cannot be legally installed on anything but a Mac-produced PC, as far as I know. Linux, on the other hand, can be run on just about ANYTHING, and will work with ancient underpowered machines as well as the top of the line, providing the same core basics to all users yet allowing them the freedom to change their OS around, install their choice from thousands of programs, and customize it exactly as they like.

      5. All this boils down to is that some people like the Mac look–and others like the look of other machines. I don’t see how the Mac look is somehow superior to any other machine, just a personal preference. This is the sort of thing that drives us Windows users nuts, when Mac fans ramble about how superior Macs are in some way or another that is really just personal preference. Just because YOU like doesn’t mean it’s the best thing and we’re supposed to want to switch to it!

      And the pitfalls are serious ones to some. I use keyboard shortcuts all the time, and would go nuts if I didn’t have all the ones I was used to, or if they didn’t work with every program. I’m extremely accustomed to right-clicking–as both Windows and Linux permit it, it’s actually a little odd for Macs to leave out such a handy feature. Just because it forces designers to think more doesn’t make it a good thing! The low economy may force people to budget better, but I can’t think of too many people praising that fact. And speaking of the economy, it’s more important than ever that people have solid-quality low-price machines to use. Apple likes selling high-priced stuff mainly because they know people will buy it for the brand name and the “aura”. “Ooh, see, I have a Mac! Now I’m cool!” But buying a computer with Windows or Linux on it may be the better way to go right now, especially if you’re scarce on money. And if you can piece together a computer from parts cheaper, then you can either install a copy of Windows (if you have one), or (at any time, whether you own a copy of any OS or not) install one of the many Linux distributions. Ubuntu is a popular one, and it is both user-friendly and powerful. You can also design your own gaming PC and install Windows on it (no such possibility for the Mac, even if the Mac were a good computer for playing serious games–it’s NOT). And lastly, the amount of freeware and open source software available for Windows and Linux each greatly outweighs the amount for Macs. For Windows, for instance, there are usually several different programs available for each major function needed, and a million little ones to do specific functions you never thought of. The are whole sites devoted to choosing the best freeware solution from a selection of several programs, and the contenders are usually very high-quality and have many excellent features. In contrast, some types of programs are difficult to find for a Mac, and often a user has only one or two options when a Windows user may have four or eight. Linux has almost as many as Windows and more are being developed every day, making it a strong contender too (plus more of the software for Linux is liable to be open source).

      And whereas previously there used to be a big difference between the programs and quality thereof available for the Mac and Windows when it came to design, that gap has shrunk considerably, and many people find that it doesn’t matter which OS they’re on if the computer has the right amount of power (some find that the Mac is slower with some tasks, even). Linux is not to be left out either–there are many high-end programs that work just fine on it (or even were designed for it), such as CinePaint, and it’s fully functional for many tasks.

      In conclusion, although there are some good points as to why Mac fans like the Mac, this post is not very objective, and underemphasizes some important details that show why the Mac is not necessarily superior.

    118. 118
      Neeraj Kumar
      April 26th, 2009 7:40 pm

      I am a Linux user. And also use Windows also.
      Sadly, I haven’t seen anybody here near me using Mac. I think the main problem with Mac is that it’s too costly.

    119. 119
      Agnes
      April 26th, 2009 7:41 pm

      And one more last comment- I don’t buy the argument that you all “outraged” commenters work on BOTH a PC and a Mac. Who does that? Unless you mean you have a PC at home and a mac at work, which proves the point the magazine’s made in this post- which is most design firms use macs.
      I do not buy it that you use both at home, that’s a LIE. Switching between the platforms, not speaking of actual computers is inefficient and ineffective, and slows down the work flow.

      The main argument for owning a Mac for me is its sustainability. They last much longer, are a living fossil like one of the above posters pointed out, which means that there is less toxic waste thrown into landfills. Macs are greener in that regard, and that alone should be the reason to invest in a mac. You can always resell it and recover a large chunk of its value while recycling the machine at the same time.
      With a cheap PC, you can just throw it away when it breaks down.

    120. 120
      modobodo
      April 26th, 2009 7:41 pm

      A little heavy-handed, there nick…especially considering the singular point of view of the article and the condescension of the writer. And while you had good luck with your Macs, let me assure you that they too break, fizzle out and go bad, too.

    121. 121
      modobodo
      April 26th, 2009 7:48 pm

      I don’t buy the argument that you all “outraged” commenters work on BOTH a PC and a Mac. Who does that?

      Really experienced (or just really curious) designers for their own purposes. Workflows depend on the work. A print workflow is different from a web-design workflow…and both a different from animation. And some of my Windows audio production software has no Mac counterpart.

    122. 122
      Chris Afici
      April 26th, 2009 7:52 pm

      Awwwww… so nice to see that this largely turned into yet another ‘I’m right, you’re wrong’ discussion. Good job to all of you whose arrogance lead you to somehow believe that you must be correct and everyone who has a differing preference is an idiot. And all in the name of such a mind-blowingly important issue. Holy. Innocent people die all over the world, but my identity is determined by which format I use. Go forth for the cause good soldiers. For all the others who just wanted a good discussion… sorry for the rant!!

    123. 123
      Ted K
      April 26th, 2009 7:53 pm

      I must note that the author develops in Rails. If you want to do Ruby on Rails, you will switch to a Mac. Otherwise, your life will be a living hell.

      Also, can we please talk about design intentions? I’m sick and tired of hearing “designers” relate everything to money and profits. If that’s what you value in life, then I guess that can be your basis for this argument. But I sincerely hope more people design with larger intentions than to simply make a buck.

    124. 124
      TJ
      April 26th, 2009 7:58 pm

      Yea, no.

      I couldn’t help but notice the vast majority of “pros” listed for the Mac were eye candy and nearly all of the “cons” were deal breakers.

      Mac just doesn’t have the support from the market that PC has and when all of the software I want/need is either PC only, or available on both, there’s absolutely no reason to get a Mac. And this is completely ignoring the price tag, where Mac is simply unreasonably high on for all the true negatives with the system.

      If I wanted a blogging toy/word processor I’d buy some old Mac on craigslist. If I want a power machine the only option is PC.

    125. 125
      Jeff Putz
      April 26th, 2009 8:12 pm

      That Windows doesn’t come with any development tools is technically true, but it’s only a half-truth. You can download and use, for free, C#, VB.NET and the Visual Web Developer product for ASP.NET development. The .NET Framework itself is now mostly shared source, and several of the newer frameworks, including ASP.NET MVC are available with full source code. Which frankly doesn’t matter, because championing open source on an OS that is not (OS X) is completely stupid.

      I have all Macs, but I develop on the Microsoft platform in Parallels. The tools are amazing, the evolving frameworks are incredibly useful. And people who can actually bill large sums of money are doing that instead of writing articles about which OS to use.

    126. 126
      Jeff
      April 26th, 2009 8:14 pm

      I’m surprised that the readers of SM cant realize that this is a paid advertisement for Apple. Its a necessity for SM to monetize their blog, so I don’t blame them.

      But why get upset? Its like yelling at your TV.

    127. 127
      henry
      April 26th, 2009 8:17 pm

      Don’t follow trends that the problem with some people they tend see be like monkeys(monkey see, monkey do). I use macs at school and I’m not missing anything i wish they had more PC’s there. I still don’t see why I would use a Mac instead of my 22′ HP Windows 7 Touchscreen monitor haha! I love my PC. Im a loyal Windows user!

    128. 128
      trebor
      April 26th, 2009 8:23 pm

      nice advertisement.

    129. 129
      Trozdol
      April 26th, 2009 8:25 pm

      It’s funny I read plenty of comments saying that the look of a program or a OS doesn’t make any difference. And only functionality is important, they’re right but whats wrong with liking the look of something. When cell phones became common people couldn’t really pick the style and there wasn’t much of one anyway, but then Nokia came out with all those covers and started the trend of pretty phones. Would anyone really want to carry around those unattractive bricks? I personally can’t stand doing anything on a computer with the Windows Classic theme on it just distracts me. As for software animations and stuff I was impresses with Coda’s Sites thumbnails that flip around and Apples minimize genie effect. No, it’s not necessary but it’s cool.

      I think GM said it best…

      “It’s not more than you need, just more than you’re used to.”

    130. 130
      russell
      April 26th, 2009 8:28 pm

      I find it annoying when people say “PC” sucks. These are the people who bought vista at best buy and spent 300 on a starter computer expecting it to run the same as $1200 (overpriced) hardware. They all use the same chip now, just go find better hardware to go along with your cpu and run what you want.

      of course mac runs faster than your average computer because there are companies like HP out there selling crap.

    131. 131
      jdee
      April 26th, 2009 8:28 pm

      >>It means that the entire world of open source software out there is pretty much guaranteed to run without much hassle

      you are out of your fucking mind. cant we do better than this shitpost smashingmagazine? had come to expect much better.

    132. 132
      Marie-Louise Gariépy
      April 26th, 2009 8:31 pm

      You should correct that part about no second mouse button. On my MacBook pro (new generation), using two fingers instead of one is like a right click. This is actually a great feature and work much better than my old pc laptop.

    133. 133
      Tim Kerrick Dot Com
      April 26th, 2009 8:48 pm

      what about the Mac Mini??

    134. 134
      Regenbogen
      April 26th, 2009 8:55 pm

      Most of people that said they can’t stand Windows Classic theme or default Luna Blue,(I agree that they look very ugly) surely didn’t realized the customize capability of Windows that superior than a Mac.

      Did you ever heard of Visual Style? (I guess not) There are thousand of them for Windows, since a very long time ago. *yawn*
      browse theme here:
      http://browse.deviantart.com/customization/skins/windows/visualstyle/?order=5#order=9

      oh, and these Visual Style is free, you don’t need to buy software like Shapeshifter or so to change theme. I think that’s the reason why people who loves aesthetics buy a Mac, they didn’t know that Windows can be customized!! (That’s why we always see XP with default Luna Blue theme, and default “Bliss” wallpaper!)

    135. 135
      modobodo
      April 26th, 2009 8:55 pm

      “You should correct that part about no second mouse button. On my MacBook pro (new generation), using two fingers instead of one is like a right click.”

      You don’t appear to understand the difference between a ‘mouse’ and a ‘track pad.’

    136. 136
      Anil Reddy
      April 26th, 2009 9:02 pm

      very well balanced article, i have mac and PC, i test the websites that i build on both the platform, if single click mouse on mac is bothering than u can still plug your windows mouse to it.

    137. 137
      Micah
      April 26th, 2009 9:04 pm

      I have been running OSX Leopard on my Acer laptop for a couple of weeks now, but I just switched back to Ubuntu. It ran very smoothly, as good as if I bought a brand new Mac (with only a couple problems, like having to rely on USB wireless, but nothing too obnoxious). But I really think that the best parts of Mac OS X Ubuntu has without too much effort.

      And I think the best parts are:
      - It uses a UNIX kernel, so open source software works on it without too much of a problem, mostly. Not nearly as well as Ubuntu, of course. You especially miss out on the open source GUI programs, unless you’re willing to run stuff with X Windows, which makes it run like crap.
      - Some of the flashyness (Spaces and Expose especially) are actually not only pretty, but very useful. Gnome has supported multiple desktops for a long time, and mixing it with Compiz (the flashyness for Linux) makes it so you have some more and flashier choices for using multiple desktops. And Compiz also lets you specify effects to get run when moving the mouse to the screen corners. My favorite part of the OSX interface is being able to select any of my open windows by moving the mouse to the top-right corner, and I can do that just as smoothly in Ubuntu.

      One thing that Mac OS X is seriously lacking is Free, open source development tools. TextMate is great, but it’s proprietary and costs money, which is quite frankly obnoxious. Linux has so many better choices (notable Bluefish and Geany) for programmers editors.

      And Mac OS X, as well as Windows, lack a package manager. This is a concept that’s foreign to a lot of people who aren’t used to using Linux, and it’s a shame, because I feel like smart package management that uses repositories is the single best feature an OS can have. MAMP and XAMP have made it easier to install Apache and get a working local dev environment, but actually running this stuff on Linux is so much better, and if you’re at all a sysadmin, it’s so much easier to deal real programming. For OSX and Windows, people are used to downloading programs off of websites and running the installers, and programs off of websites are notorious for installing in different ways, in different locations, and being kind of a pain to uninstall, not to mention not having good auto-updating features, and oftentimes containing spyware or malware. A good package manager makes this problem completely obsolete. Unfortunately, package managers are kind of hard to work when software costs money, but hopefully that problem will go away sometime soon too.

      The only reason I would consider using a Mac as my main OS is because Adobe hasn’t ported their software to Linux. Otherwise, it’s really not worth it. I think the author of this article hasn’t actually given Ubuntu a fair try, or they’d realize that things just work quite a lot more than they’re used to.

    138. 138
      Jeff Geerling
      April 26th, 2009 9:18 pm

      It’s amazing how quickly pretty much every post comparing a Mac to anything (in this case, no particular system) devolves into name calling and exclamation points.

      I would simply state that the primary reason I use a Mac instead of a PC is the window management/Quartz environment. I normally work with Mail, Safari, FireFox, VMWare, CyberDuck (FTP), Textmate, Dreamweaver, Photoshop, Aperture, iTunes, iCal, iChat, NetNewsWire, Colloquy, Tweetie, TextEdit, and Illustrator all open at the same time. With Exposé, Spaces, and the ability to have windows from separate apps open next to each other without having to resize and reorder them, I can work about 10x more efficiently than I can on a PC.

      I tried switching to a PC at my workplace earlier this year and failed miserably. I could do my work, sure, but it took at least twice as long to do simple tasks such as grab a set of files from a server, edit them, build some graphics for them, save them all to the server, then check the pages across multiple browsers. Maybe Vista is way better than XP in window management, but I doubt it based on preliminary testing.

      The other nice thing is that I can do work almost as quickly on my 5-year-old iBook G4 as I can on my brand new 24″ iMac, even though the benchmarked speeds are many times slower. This is because even older Macs still run the main system and less-intense apps with ease. In fact, OS 10.5 runs *faster* than 10.3 on the old iBook. Show me a 5-year-old PC that runs Vista *faster* than XP, and I’ll give you a dollar.

    139. 139
      loo
      April 26th, 2009 9:32 pm

      total ads and non-sense

    140. 140
      Agnes
      April 26th, 2009 9:47 pm

      Does anyone REALLY believe Apple needs advertising to designer base???

      Ugh. Morons.

    141. 141
      anjum121
      April 26th, 2009 10:14 pm

      its good but what about ubuntui.I like pc but i love ubuntu its like having sex :)

    142. 142
      Charles Myers
      April 26th, 2009 10:24 pm

      Great article.. As a windows user and a Mac user, I enjoyed the comparison. Although one point was the secondary mouse click, you can now (on the newer macs) designate a corner of the mouse pad for the secondary mouse click in System preferences (very minor issue compared to what others are discussing).

      Also, I read a comment (or two?) about active directory. There is nothing simpler than doing it on the Mac, just need to go to your Utilities and use the directory service and add your domain (select Active Directory) then you are away… Its pretty easy. I do this all the time.

      The main reason I enjoy using a mac is primarily the ease and stability of the desktop… I understand that some people want specific tools, heck I have been known to use good ol bootcamp to use an app or tool i needed that isnt present on the Mac. With no problems whatsoever. As a long time Mac user, I have seen the development of many tools and apps that cover the gauntlet of ones that are available on the PC if not its pretty easy (ive found) to find ones that are equal (and a lot of the times) better.

      This is just my experience, I still use my PC for games (although less and less thesedays thanks to my PS3 and xbox360)…. but it still has its uses….

      Anyway thanks for the article… I loved reading it.. Keep up the goodwork….

    143. 143
      atomus
      April 26th, 2009 10:32 pm

      2. Quartz Extreme
      Spaces, yeah? But the Photoshop CS3 and CS4 have bugs with spaces. This is the main reason to not switch to Mac!
      http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb403496&sliceId=2

    144. 144
      mc
      April 26th, 2009 10:34 pm

      At uni ten years ago, I studied design using pre-OSX Macs. It wasn’t the best experience. They would crash frequently when trying to use a browser and bringing up the console wasn’t as useful as CTRL-ALT-DEL on a PC. There were other reasons why I never adopted the OS. (And using Windows beforehand wasn’t one of them, I used MacOS before I heard of Windows).

      Ten years into the future, I use a PC. I don’t get blue screens. All versions of Windows since Win2K have been pretty stable.

      So while OSX may well be great, Mac’s OS was terrible for a time. While Windows might have been buggy in the past, it’s been fine since Win2K.

    145. 145
      Jan
      April 26th, 2009 10:35 pm

      Personally, I am a Mac fan. I just couldn’t afford one around this time for my personal use. We use Macs where I work at and I love it’s usability and interface. But IMO, if you’re a designer, it doesn’t matter whether you have a Mac or a PC when designing. The thing that only counts is talent. I know someone who has the nicest Mac desktop and laptop but he still sucks designwise. And if he were on a PC, he would suck just as much. If you suck, then you suck whatever platform you’re using. Period.

    146. 146
      toomy
      April 26th, 2009 10:41 pm

      I agree with what most of what is said. I have a small business and use Mac (12) for security/ease of use/reliability and Windows (2) for IE only suppliers.

      One thing that is not mentioned most of the time is resale. Last month when Apple came out with the new mini’s I replaced 3 that we had. We had bought them about 5 years ago for $600 (+$80 more for more memory). Last week I sold them on ebay for an average of $325, try reselling a 5-year old $600 PC for $325 (or any Mac-PC comparison) Mac’s also have great resale value, which I considered when originally purchasing.

    147. 147
      Angie
      April 26th, 2009 10:43 pm

      One reason for NOT using a MAC: it’s far less environmentally friendly:
      - Apple uses more components that are harmful than PCs: see Greenpeace’s review of high tech companies… even if Apple has recently improved, that wasn’t difficult considering they were performing last on the rating scale…
      - Desktops and even worse, laptops are nearly impossible to technically upgrade. Some of you might say Apple last longer… but I don’t know any designers with machines older than 3-4 years… while you can virtually upgrade anything on a PC, from your hardware to your battery…

    148. 148
      Beel Steven
      April 26th, 2009 10:51 pm

      i’m ok with most of the reasons except for one: the support
      This is very poor as for me. And when it even comes to fixing, it’s too expensive.
      I used to have a Dell. As for the hardware it has a very good support.

    149. 149
      Vygantas
      April 26th, 2009 10:52 pm

      what a bunch of crap

    150. 150
      Ricardo
      April 26th, 2009 10:57 pm

      Aw, how cute! Another one of “these”… For all things you say it sounds that really we don’t understand why they do or don’t go to this or that platform.

      1. Status Quo, Macs have always been associated with design… That’s it.
      2. …

      The same things could be said about going to Linux, or changing Laptop Brands…

      It’s more of a “i like this one better” thing rather than a conscious decision. With “humid screens” desktops and “melt my lap” laptops, and those awesome “Why should I pay extra for this memory just because it comes from Apple” moments, many don’t really go all conscious about this.

      I’ll say this once and leave this topic all along: You buy whatever it is you like. If you love it, then continue using it. If you don’t, try something else. It really is that simple.

    151. 151
      Beel Steven
      April 26th, 2009 10:57 pm

      To Angie: you should recheck the list, as Apple is more environmental friendly than Dell and HP -> http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up

    152. 152
      Niels Matthijs
      April 26th, 2009 11:06 pm

      1 reason why people will switch back from Mac: their stuff breaks. Easily. All the time. Continuously. Sadly their hardware is complete failure, and for the price you’re paying …

      And I for one hate the “design consistency”, but that’s just because I don’t like the Mac design much. So basically, everything looks consistently ugly.

    153. 153
      Henrik
      April 26th, 2009 11:13 pm

      There are two reasons why you might not switch.
      1. It is pricy.
      2. Not a system for gamers. ( Activition, id and ea are the only large ones who deliver games for mac )

      Other than that, you will get a better, faster and less noisy system by switching. More than you pay for – pc vs mac.

    154. 154
      anonymous
      April 26th, 2009 11:18 pm

      A Mac is a computer, not directly an operating system,.. i see no reason to switch a type of computer directly… there are many reasons why you should choose a pc over a mac as well.
      Outside that,… taken into account that Windows 7 is on the way, which its performance doesn’t do under for a Mac OSX. Especially not price-wise.

      From the comments, being a designer and not use a Mac, is a shit comment. Weren’t designers suppose to NOT do the same always? As long as you got a proper screen.

    155. 155
      Cayon
      April 26th, 2009 11:21 pm

      REALLY LAME ARTICLE.

      i´m very disappointed about smashing magazine!!!!

    156. 156
      TheKat
      April 26th, 2009 11:26 pm

      Quite frankly, Macs are for people who just don’t really know how to use computers – no matter what the “artistes” say. And if something breaks, you need to replace the whole computer. I wanted to make my gaming faster on my PC, so rather than chucking it away and getting a new one, I simply purchased a new video card, swapped it out and away I went. And you cannot get into the operating system to tweak it up like you can on a PC. The Microsoft haters are to be expected, but in all honesty, all they do is make Mac users look like sheep.
      “Twice the price, half the power, a quarter of the applications. But who cares, it’s a Mac!” – so the saying goes.

    157. 157
      Aljan
      April 26th, 2009 11:30 pm

      I totally agree with the last reason.. But I think this isn’t a good article, sorry.. Choosing one of them is just a personal thing, just like smarthphones for example. I’ve used both, but I returned to Windows, but that’s just my opinion!

    158. 158
      tom hermans
      April 26th, 2009 11:33 pm

      This must be the most unhelpful article SmashingMag published in a very long time. No real news, instead a more-or-less biased approach of the beaten-to-dead mac vs pc-discussion.

      I’m not against Apple, I’m not against PC, it’s the tools that do the trick, and for me (and most people here I guess) any machine that can run a browser, a text-editor (notepad++) and the Adobe Creative Suite will do. And if I knew how to run all that stable on Linux (preserving more resources), I would switch immediately.

      At this moment our multimedia dept. is run on pc, while graphics use mac. They both have their problems…

    159. 159
      Florian Dellé
      April 26th, 2009 11:38 pm

      Excellent article. As a hardcore Windows-user, It really make me think abou my next desktop solution.

    160. 160
      Dietmar
      April 26th, 2009 11:45 pm

      @Brian: Wow, all designers in your small little town using a mac? great :)
      Anyway, there are some very good reasons why designers should not switch to Mac:
      -> It’s quite expensive
      -> The difference in performing graphical issues between a MAC and a PC is not that big anymore
      -> PC’s are still faster in rendering 3d work
      -> Staying with your PC system doesn’t force you to also buy new software
      -> Most of your clients won’t experience your website as you do, because they don’ t use the Safari Browser…, because they don’ t use a Mac.
      For German readers visit my article on this subject @ http://www.pixel-kingdom.com/top_news/warum-dann-doch-kein-apple/

    161. 161
      Ultimedia
      April 26th, 2009 11:46 pm

      I love my Mac and i would never go back to Windows…

    162. 162
      Mike
      April 26th, 2009 11:46 pm

      I can tell you 200 reasons why designers stay with windows.
      apple is like a high-class whore. nice to look at but way too expensive for the performance ;)

    163. 163
      ManEatingfish
      April 26th, 2009 11:49 pm

      I’m a designer and a gamer too, when I want to game I just boot my 24″ iMac into Windows XP through BootCamp and play Games, I have windows just set up for this reason alone.
      Therefore I get the best of both worlds, a workable well thought out environment for designing and a hack ‘n slash environment for games
      Believe me 24″ rampaging Zombies in Left4Dead look and play as good as any PC!

    164. 164
      Heiko
      April 27th, 2009 12:00 am

      Also a user of both worlds and still not convinced of OSX for any reason beyond aesthetics.

      Those of you, who want to use Textmate on Windows have to checkout e – Texteditor, which offers a lot of the same features, supports Textmate-bundles, is highly customizable and also is ridiculously cheap.

      Software should really be the last reason for people to switch, for there is a much larger software-base available on Windows, except a few applications that have been made exclusively available through Apple (e.g. Logic, Shake, etc.).

      The only thing I truly love about MACs is their visual appeal.

    165. 165
      Greg
      April 27th, 2009 12:15 am

      Ugh. Some people HAVE given Macs an honest try and either don’t care for them or simply don’t care. Also, as an early poster stated, what designers are NOT already on a Mac? They’ve been brow-beaten into submission years ago.

      I thought Smashing was above comment-baiting with a low-grade topic like this? But here I am, baited… ;)

    166. 166
      MorayWeb
      April 27th, 2009 12:17 am

      A really interesting article that has arrived in my Google reader at a time that I am fighting to put cash towards my “I want to switch to mac” fund! It was nice to see a list of negatives as well although they didn’t have any impact on my desire to move my design/development needs and uses across to Mac.

      The article seems to have sparked an incredible number of replies, but it’s the good old Mac vs. PC debate so it was always going to! :) I have bookmarked this one so I can come back and make use of the comments to aide my decision to move further…

      Great article, thanks!

    167. 167
      Jon
      April 27th, 2009 12:26 am

      I was a Windows user for around 10 years before I switched to the Mac 4 years ago. I am not a Mac user because the hardware is sexy or because I am an Apple fanboy, I am a Mac user for a very simple reason – it makes me more productive. I open my laptop lid and it’s on, instantly, ready for me to start work. I have everything organized in Spaces and the drag-and-drop interface makes things very quick.

      P.S. To the person above who said Macs are only used by people who don’t know anything about computers – I spent 2 years working in tech support. I fixed computers all day – I didn’t want to then have to fix more when I got home. Part of the reason I am more productive on the Mac is that it is very low-maintenance. It is a tool that works for me and I shouldn’t have to work for it.

    168. 168
      Ash
      April 27th, 2009 12:40 am

      I find this article completly useless. I work on both, and the question between Mac or PC is only a matter of personal taste or experience. This is subjective. This article is not an information with objective arguments, it’s just a point of view I don’t find interesting. Sorry.

    169. 169
      ederntal
      April 27th, 2009 12:40 am

      I’m in Paris and all designers i know loves Mac!

    170. 170
      adnweb.es
      April 27th, 2009 12:42 am

      Ok, Apple is sexy but ¿can you know if a design is made with apple or windows? No
      I want to buy a MAC for my desktop but is toooooo expensive.
      With 2500 € you can buy an basic Mac for design.
      With 2500 € you can buy the mother of all PC’s

      Maybe in the next life….

      Congratulations for the blog.

    171. 171
      Jorg
      April 27th, 2009 12:45 am

      In my opinion there’s no specific reason for “Designers” to use a Mac.

      If I could afford one I would buy a Mac, but rather for leisure than for work.

    172. 172
      Neon
      April 27th, 2009 12:51 am

      A computer is a tool. Nothing more. Focus should be on what you achieve with it, not on the machine. OSX, Windows or Linux, you can do everything in any of them with a little knowledge. Be creative and achieve with what you have rather than get drawn into the marketing, they all want to sell you a new computer when most of the time you really don’t need one.

      For everything you’ll ever need, you need a tool. Not a Mac. Not a PC. Not a pointed stick. (Well sometimes)

    173. 173
      LucasGo
      April 27th, 2009 12:57 am

      This is silly. Designers have always used Macs.

      Anyway it’s about the result, not what you use to get there.

    174. 174
      Tyron
      April 27th, 2009 12:57 am

      I use both mac and pc as they both have their respected pros and cons but to be brutally honest I don’t like the people who use macs. They are just so anal. As a designer you are taught not to be close minded yet the die hard mac users are all about rules. It’s like they are their own religion. “Genesis 1: And God made the Apple Mac…Do not use a PC. Do not get a second mouse button or you will perish in the hell of diversity.”

    175. 175
      Nikolai
      April 27th, 2009 1:10 am

      I am a designer and I use both PC and Mac. I hate Macitude and Mactax though. I like a proper mouse. I can not and probably never will forgive Apple for designing a round mouse, that turns in your hand as you are working.

      Having said all that. If Adobe ever do linux versions of Photoshop, flash etc. I will jump ship to Ubuntu.

    176. 176
      kmjk
      April 27th, 2009 1:14 am

      I’ve been a Mac user since 1992 and I have never even thought about switching to Windows, eventhough most of the jobs I’ve held actually required me to work on a PC (running Windows).

      The number one reason for preferring Macs, to me, is OS X. Maintenancing Windows is a total nightmare, and just about every application that is Windows only sucks (in terms of UI design, usability etc.).

      Though I have recently thought about giving Ubuntu a try (due to financial constraints), I really want to (and need to) run PS, Illustrator and InDesign etc. natively.

      I actually used GIMP at my last job, but honestly, it doesn’t even come close to Photoshop.

      I just like the user experience I get out of apps like Safari, iTunes, iPhoto, NewsFire, Things, Transmit, Textmate etc.

      The G4 Powerbook I’m writing this post on has been in use since 2004 – not one OS re-install. Not one single crash.

    177. 177
      zx
      April 27th, 2009 1:19 am

      Of course people love Mac, on Mac, you can only do things the way Apple says you will do them. On Windows you can actually choose and wow thats something the “Generation Sheep” just can’t do, they need to be spoonfed by Apple. Instead of few hundreds of components, you can choose only a few “blessed by apple”…
      I use PC, I have everything I need, design tools (photoshop, illustrator), developer tools (apache, php, mysql) and of course all other multimedia, I built it myself, it’s 100 times sexier than the Apple’s white nonsense, has a hardware thousand times more powerful than Apple at the same price range and not even the most expensive Apple (that costs around 5 times more) is as powerful as this. I’m free to do anything I want, not just Apple approved things. Current Windows operating system is few years ahead of Mac OS X. Mac OS X has: poor application compatibility, small application portfolio (I’d say there is few hundred thousand apps on Win, does the Mac has atleast few hundred?), limited acessories (yay I like that printer, what, doesn’t work on Mac? what, this one doesn’t either?… ), primitive user interface (seriously, one application menu on top and you have to switch apps and travel to the top to get the other one’s menu? thats like retro from era of old VGA monitors) , uselessly huge “dock” that fails at showing whats on and whats not and I could continue. Mac OS X is all about effects, not effectiveness and productivity. I’m pretty sure all of the Apple Sheeps will either totally ignore this or point out that I’m some kind of an imbecile – go ahead, feel free, I don’t care, I’m not the one using Mac OS X… Apple has only one good thing and that is its marketing department, they can sell anything, however bad and crappy for any ridiculously huge price and people will even stand in line whole day for it.

    178. 178
      mike
      April 27th, 2009 1:19 am

      Okay:
      1. “OSX is built on top of UNIX” No it isn’t it is built on top of BSD, which looks similar, but is even better

      2. “Lack of Software”
      The Mac has plenty of software built exclusively for it.
      Almost anything that will run on Linux will also run on OSX
      Anything that will run on BSD will run on OSX
      With the move to Intel processors, anything exclusive to windows can be run via Boot Camp, or Parrallels, or ….
      In other words, the Mac has a larger software base than any other platform.

      3. The Command Key/Control Key thing.
      That is silly – these commands were copied from the Mac in the first place, so it is the PC that is doing things wrong.

    179. 179
      Siddharth Menon
      April 27th, 2009 1:24 am

      I think its a wrong to say that using Mac would earn u good design… The OS before OSX etc had no great revolution to it. Yes switch to Vista was a big leap for me atleast.

      But I use PhotoShop, dreamweaver and no matter what platform I use it works and responds the same. At time I think vista has a better memory management be that if ur working on 2-4Gb or 8GB ram.

      This artical is kinda trying to push sales of MAC for wrong reasons. And yes I don’t say MAC is bad at all.

    180. 180
      stabfish
      April 27th, 2009 1:32 am

      Most designers I know are currently unemployed, or have second jobs. And they have macs as well. Food for thought people…

    181. 181
      Quakeulf >:3
      April 27th, 2009 1:33 am

      I’m a designer and I won’t ever switch to Mac as it is now.

      It has to have a hefty price reduction, a sleeker, less demanding OS visually, more compatibility with games and other programs and more horsepower for me to switch to it.

    182. 182
      m_dzo
      April 27th, 2009 1:38 am

      well, SM … you choose a controversal topic here… but I agree with it for the most of your arguments :) I have to say that I work every day in a web agency since 3 years now on PC, Vista for more then a year and there is nothing to compare with the Macs I have. The only good news about PCs is that Vista is not running that bad overall, but it’s just not as good as Mac OS X, and by far!!! After some month of uses, Vista like Xp is going slower every week: for example Illustrator and Photoshop take the double of time to open, you may have time for format and re install but I don’t… It is THE reason you have to choose Mac for design work, productivity ! The fact that Macs are pretty is a nice bonus…

    183. 183
      Kailash Gyawali
      April 27th, 2009 1:59 am

      I love my MacBook Pro and I am BIG fan of OSX, I have never experienced any problem on my mac since I have been using it, I just love apple

    184. 184
      mkk
      April 27th, 2009 2:04 am

      Macbook pro’s hidden feature – it can also cook egg!!

      Please follow the link to view the cooking egg on Mac Book Pro.
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/prakaz/3395237918/

      Read what Apple says ):
      The bottom surface and some areas between the keyboard and LCD hinge of your Apple portable computer can become very warm after extended periods of use.

      This is normal operating behavior.

      The bottom of your Apple portable may become very warm during normal use. If the computer is on your lap and gets uncomfortably warm, remove it from your lap and place it on a stable surface.
      http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1778#

      Solution to over the heat problem:

      I bought “USB Notebook Cool Pad” having three fans on it to keep cool my MacBook Pro.

      Now I am using this and got 95% heat away… I almost use my mac book pro 8 to 10 hours daily.

      Follow the link to see Pad video:
      http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1920621/usb_notebook_cool_pad/

    185. 185
      ziczac
      April 27th, 2009 2:07 am

      I love to read and get inspired by Smashing Magazine. But this “article” is the worst, unnecessariest and worst researched ever. If the author really meant what he wrotes, go back under your stone and buy a mac. Who cares? I don’t.

      Next time: Five reasons why designers buy at Edeka food store.

    186. 186
      thomas ling
      April 27th, 2009 2:08 am

      Mac, i love it.但我相信视窗会做的越来越好。

    187. 187
      kocsmy
      April 27th, 2009 2:12 am

      wtf is this article? lots of bullshit.

    188. 188
      Steve
      April 27th, 2009 2:29 am

      PC = crash, viruses, frustration.
      Mac = smooth running, reliable, stable

      PC Users = angry, jealous, argumentative
      Mac users = relaxed, successful, happy.

    189. 189
      Nörden 1
      April 27th, 2009 2:45 am

      Colormanagment is the big thing!

      The most successful designers are Mac users, and the ones that use Windows, by their very nature will fail.

      I have never seen a designer that´s good and uses windows.

    190. 190
      Bill
      April 27th, 2009 2:49 am

      PC=diverse, creative, powerful
      Mac=un-inspiring, boring, slow

      PC Users=Defensive (with every right to be), Clever, Entrepreneurs
      Mac Users=Dull, Anal, Have rich daddies

    191. 191
      Adi
      April 27th, 2009 2:50 am

      a lot of developers developers are also gamers gamers!!!

    192. 192
      Tom
      April 27th, 2009 3:13 am

      As a long-time Windows user, being handed a Macbook Pro on starting my latest job was a little daunting. I have to say that I really don’t see what the world seems to in OS X. “Windows is always crashing, OS X, solid as a rock.” Well, this is anecdotal of course, but in my experience over the last few years, my XP machine has maybe died two or three times, once a driver conflict, once a rather disasterous hard drive failure and one other was an unexplained crash. In the 6 months I’ve had this Mac it’s ground to a complete halt 10 or 15 times–you know the kind where the spinning mouse cursor sits there and you are unable to do anything. I’m a web developer. Occasionally I’ll crack open Photoshop but usually I’ll just have Eclipse open, perhaps mail, sometimes an FTP client. And, given that, how come this dual core, 2GB machine feels like swimming in treacle? It’s not VERY unresponsive and it’s hard to put into words but it just … JUST feels slightly slow to react to what I do, scrolling slightly behind my movements, click response taking fractions of a second longer than feels right. It’s tiny, but again on XP, it feels instantaneous, and the cumulative effect makes the system feel much less responsive. I don’t care what my machine looks like.. I like the Macbook’s trackpad.. that feels awesome, but otherwise it’s just the OS I care about, and how quickly and easily I feel I can work.

    193. 193
      argento
      April 27th, 2009 3:14 am

      Disapointing article realy. Smashing what happened this time. I realy don’t know. In the article it was no mentioned that 80% of final user on internet are windows user. Nobody cares ha ha ha. Outch BIG mistake. That’s all folks.

    194. 194
      I can advertise too
      April 27th, 2009 3:14 am

      Here

    195. 195
      Chris
      April 27th, 2009 3:18 am

      ** Bahh removed my comment, I shouldn’t rise to flamebait like this article **

    196. 196
      Martin
      April 27th, 2009 3:23 am

      Not a smashing-quality article, to say the least…

    197. 197
      hcabbos
      April 27th, 2009 3:26 am

      Article title should be “developers” not “designers.” Even the second paragraph references “developers.” The fact that the majority of designers and design firms use Macs has been well established for many years.

    198. 198
      Kai S.
      April 27th, 2009 3:41 am

      You have indeed forgot one big Reason FOR switching to the mac: The Joy of Use!

      I was forced to switch to mac after more than 10 years on windows by my last company.
      First I was confused and a bit frustrated, ’cause some things just are different and “my workflow” was gone, but after 2 month I was as quick as before, later even quicker and the work just makes much more fun on OSX!

      The joy of use is just great on apples products! MS will never reach that level, they are feature-driven and design by committee …

    199. 199
      T
      April 27th, 2009 3:44 am

      To end this: I met lot’s of Mac Users that are just silent and happy their pc is working despite the fact that they don’t understand computers much and lot’s of Win Users that don’t understand their computer and think it’s a hard thing to understand and maintain. Some are very competitive and commenting all over the web that Mac sucks.

    200. 200
      OneSeventeen
      April 27th, 2009 3:48 am

      I run a network with almost 30% Mac’s and 70% PCs, and our web design team refuses to go Mac. Our graphics department has an awesome Mac Pro with 4GB of RAM and dual quad-core xeon’s, which rocks… but she wishes she had a decent PC instead.

      We do have an all-Mac video department and some office users that prefer Apple, but I think this article does paint with a broad brush.

      I loved the article, very well written, but I believe it is looking at a smaller sample than the author realizes. What is most important for a graphic designer is to understand how art works, regardless of the brush they are holding.

      As for me, I use Windows, Mac, and Ubuntu on a regular basis and enjoy them all. (Although setting up a good web-dev environment with the specific version of Apache, MySQL, and PHP that I prefer is by far hardest on the Mac… and Inkscape requires X-11 which always causes me issues…) I still love my MacBook, but I don’t see all the benefits I was told would be there.

      (No seriously, good article…. I’m not ranting, just letting people know I don’t work for Microsoft, nor am I an MBA, but myself, the web development team at work, and our graphics department at work all prefer Windows for the same reason most designers prefer Mac: because they are comfortable with it and can get their work done faster in an environment they are familiar with.)

    201. 201
      Wilmark
      April 27th, 2009 3:48 am

      While you did try to be balanced i think you are missing some important points- Macs are PC’s. They use all PC components. I am a power user – who works across may different development environments. There has been a new trend to use multiple computers – I use five – each targeting a different set of tasks. I build them all, one is a mac clone – its very easy to build if you choose the hardware very carefully with what is know to work – you will realize with his option you have far superior range of hardware to work with than Apple offers and it can be upgraded. I regard the hardware and their associated parts as consumables – i throw out and move stuff around every two months – its not about being cool or a status symbol – its very practical and functional. I am not a windows fan and i dont expect MS to put out a perfect operating system (for me) that will be used by 95% of the population, but I will consider myself to be a jackass if I paid 2000$ for a very basic system system that i cant upgrade. I think this article at Toms Hardware which came out earlier this year puts things in perspective.
      http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/apple-windows-linux,2080.html

    202. 202
      Kat
      April 27th, 2009 3:54 am

      The comments are better than the main article.

    203. 203
      T
      April 27th, 2009 3:56 am

      I think we should rather ask: Why Adobe has such a tight grip on all of the graphic industry? The workflow is so bad as shortcuts and functions change between PS, ID, AI … :(

    204. 204
      Tom Bradshaw
      April 27th, 2009 4:00 am

      I use a Mac at work and a PC at home, I’ve never had a problem with my Mac and I’ve had problems with every PC I’ve ever owned. I’d like a Mac at home, if only it didn’t mean purchasing new software… Ok, rant over…

    205. 205
      uberamd
      April 27th, 2009 4:03 am

      I swear if I see another comment about how “I play games so I need a PC” I am going to lose it. Mac’s come with Boot Camp… you can play games for god sakes. I was just playing some Call of Duty 5 on my Macbook Pro a week ago. Argh.

    206. 206
      Dominik Jakubowski
      April 27th, 2009 4:04 am

      I think we are not in a Kindergarten anymore. Apart from that the funny thing is that only Mac-user start such discussions, maybe the have some deep complexes.

    207. 207
      Apple
      April 27th, 2009 4:09 am

      Thanks for the ad!

      - Apple

    208. 208
      Kevin-K
      April 27th, 2009 4:12 am

      Good article..

    209. 209
      Marcos Garcia
      April 27th, 2009 4:12 am

      Nice post, like the reasons why designers are switching, not really sure about pitfalls for mac. I mean some of the pitfalls are really not a big deal such as right clicking, maximizing windows and affordability. In my mind, you get for what you pay for, comparing the price of a mac to the price of a pc is like saying to a designer oh well you can spend thousands of dollars on Adobe Suite and make incredible designs or you can use Paint which is free and get the same results.

      Just does not work that way. Mac’s cost what they do because they are dependable and durable. I know that if I purchase a Mac, nothing will happen to it while on the other hand if I get a PC, you never know.

      Besides, if you are a serious designer, money is not so much of the problem because the way I see it, I am a good designer and a $3000 investment on a Mac is worth every penny when I am going to be able to create designs that will bring me in so much more money than that. Just a thought.

      Anyway, good post just wanted to put out what I thought some downfalls might be.

    210. 210
      EarlZ
      April 27th, 2009 4:23 am

      “OSX was designed to run as well on the most expensive Mac Pro as it would an eight year old Powerbook because they control the solution from hardware to software.”

      This is a load of bull, show me an 8 year old Powerbook that can run the latest OSX that smooth, its the same with vista you cant expect a windows 98se machine to run vista at best performance.

      “Perhaps the most popular sticking point of non-Mac users, price is always at the heart of the debate. Under $1200 or so, there is no question that byte for byte, ghz for ghz, you can get a better raw value by avoiding Apple. Apple has chosen not to enter the sub $1000 PC not because it doesn’t want to grow sales, but because it wants to avoid the dogfight that Sony, HP, and other brands are in for the lower end market.”

      Its not that Mac does not want to compete with the lower end market, truth is because they cant OSX requires a pretty hefty amount of hardware thats why the cost is higher and the “Mac certified hardware” is a load of bull too.

      Comment #8 really sums up everything. If you really need a mac to “design” something better think twice of claiming to be a “designer”

      btw im typing this on my Air ;)

    211. 211
      Philip
      April 27th, 2009 4:29 am

      I use both a mac and pc and agree pretty much with everything stated in this article. I am using my mac more and more and my pc less and less – particularly because of mac only software titles (such as coda and css edit) that blow away anything for the pc.

    212. 212
      Rusty
      April 27th, 2009 4:53 am

      Lets face it. It worked!!! We all know who likes what better now….

    213. 213
      Wilmark
      April 27th, 2009 5:03 am

      A Lot of the replies that favour Macs and Dont favour Windows/PC have some falacies that are almost what you’d expect from a religious following:
      “in the long run they are the same price”
      “Mac’s cost what they do because they are dependable and durable.”
      “you can play PC games with bootcamp”
      “the hardware on a PC has to be changed frequently”

      I could go on

    214. 214
      Timothy
      April 27th, 2009 5:20 am

      I have to say, you are dead on when saying that it is a pitfall that you can not maximize a window on a Mac. I use Windows, OSX and Linux and the one and only aspect of a Mac that kills me is that you can not maximize the windows. Though, the windows retain memory. This means that if you leave a window at a large size when it is closed it will open to those same dimensions. But it still drives me crazy.

    215. 215
      Tereno
      April 27th, 2009 5:30 am

      The main reason why I use a Mac is due to OSX. At school and quite possibly down the line, I’ll be developing on Unix and so OS X provides me with the best UI for Unix and a Unix terminal. Cygwin on Windows just doesn’t cut it.. MSN on Windows is probably one of the reasons I still use Windows. And the fact that it’s cheaper to set up 3 monitors..unless someone knows how to do it with something cheaper than a Mac Pro?

    216. 216
      Jesse Myer
      April 27th, 2009 5:30 am

      I like Apples and Macs. But, as a lead C# and .NET developer for around the past 8 years, I find that PCs facilitate my needs for the software I use on a constant basis:

      Visual Studio 2008
      Adobe Photoshop CS4
      MS Outlook + Office

      Also, most project management and file repository software (sans TFS) are becoming web based; which is nice for cross browser compatibility. If I was purely a designer, and not jack-of-all trades developer / PM I would be working on a Mac. But once I need to create a web based application that incorporates several different database types, AJAX, LINQ, and tons of functional requirements; I need my Visual Studio.

      Is it a perfect world, no. But thats what I do.

      PS. I’m also a gamer, so Macs are out of the question as far as home (work)place.

    217. 217
      T
      April 27th, 2009 5:31 am

      I wonder why when a magazine talks about windows no-one complains, but as soon as one tries to say that there are alternatives some shout “AD” & “religous”?!?

      Also I have never met someone who bought a mac mainly for it looks. That’s just a stupid argument by some people. Probably they rant at high class fashion clothes aswell. Everybody got their taste and arguing about it is stupid & childish.

    218. 218
      Jesse
      April 27th, 2009 5:35 am

      Programming on anything on a Mac is like programming in Notepad. CSS is not “development”.

    219. 219
      Leo
      April 27th, 2009 5:58 am

      Nice Spot Commecial!
      There is no reason that i read on this article to change to Mac Platform. I love the diverse software and hardware that i have, and that i Can’t have on Mac platform.
      And Develop is not write some text on textmate.

    220. 220
      vrpj
      April 27th, 2009 6:10 am

      I’m not a “hipster.” I’m a practical guy who wants a platform that lets me do my work with little OS drama. And that’s what a Mac gives me. And when I want Windows, I’ve got that too on my MacBook Pro. Two computers in one.

    221. 221
      miniMAC
      April 27th, 2009 6:25 am

      I agree fully with this article with the statement. The operating system X is one of the best, even as to reliability!

    222. 222
      Jonathan
      April 27th, 2009 6:34 am

      Hilarious how the old Mac v. Windows question riles some people up. Personally, I want Apple to stay small. It’s a proven fact that the bigger you get the more quality suffers. Look at the banking industry as an example.

      Anyways, I use Windows at work (required) and a Mac the rest of the time. At work, we replace PC’s around every two years and they aren’t your typical business PC’s (you know, bare minimum base model); my current PC is running XP Pro (they weren’t dumb enough to switch to Vista), 3 GHz processors and 2 GB RAM. But, it will be replaced in a few weeks because it’s already dying. Are there things I could do to improve it’s performance? Sure, but my IT department wouldn’t be happy that I did their job for them.

      On the other hand, I just bought a new MacBook and love it. But I still have my old PowerBook. I’ve owned it since January 2005 and over four years later it’s still running strong. In fact, it runs better than my work PC even though the Windows PC has better tech specs. Passed it down to my kid. So for those who say Macs have two years life at best, you’ve obviously never owned one.

      What does it come down to? OS X. Since it was introduced Windows has never been able to catch up and I doubt Windows 7 will be any different. And the fact that Apple makes the hardware is nice too. Nice not having to ask “Is this a software co. issue or a hardware issue?”. I can just go to Apple’s support page or an Apple store and get help. But these points have already been mentioned several times.

    223. 223
      Lance
      April 27th, 2009 6:40 am

      As a Mac (home mobile) and PC (work; home gaming) user, I find this article to make too many assumptions without proper research and statistics. And, generally, it “feels” like something that would have been written three or four years ago.

      Extremely poor article, Smashing; I don’t see how this article is serving anybody. For Mac research, there are far more comprehensive articles (and entire sites) dedicated to such (it would have been great to include those), and it will only seek to alienate die-hard PC users by fanning a rapidly-diminishing anti-Microsoft fire. Additionally, the author never seemed to decide if this was a “reason to switch” article, or a “should you switch, here are some ways ease the transition” article (could have been a good one!).

      Who approved this one for publication?

    224. 224
      Joshua Parker
      April 27th, 2009 6:40 am

      This is definitely the reason I use and prefer a Mac: (“it feels intuitive” or “I enjoy using it more” or even “I can’t explain why I like it better, I just do.”) Nothing against a PC, but I don’t feel the same. There is just something about the Mac that draws me in and causes me to use it more.

    225. 225
      Eric Boyer
      April 27th, 2009 6:42 am

      No matter how one sided or balanced an article is, the “Mac vs PC” war is always a field day for nerds around the world.

      For most _successful_ developers, they are probably using macs. They have probably nailed down their work flow, and work significantly faster than the average windows user, and is most likely worth a bit more because of this. There are so many little things that can speed EVERYTHING up (that yes can most likely be emulated on windows) that just help so much.

      I love developing on Macs and PCs. My workflow includes both. Primarily, most of it happens on the Mac side.

    226. 226
      Kim Korte
      April 27th, 2009 6:44 am

      One of the best mac/windows reviews I’ve ever seen!
      The point with Quicksilver, Growl, TextMate & Adium could have been my own. I love those 4 pieces of amazing software so much :D (especially Quicksilver)

      Thank you so much for this article, I will right now “spread the word” ;)

    227. 227
      Dexter Barsinister
      April 27th, 2009 6:50 am

      Excellent piece and right on target. One minor quibble: you mean to say that Macs “have 2-3 fewer USB ports,” not “have 2-3 less USB ports.” “Less” applies to a continuous quality; “fewer” applies to a discrete, integer-like quantity.

    228. 228
      Ali Baba
      April 27th, 2009 6:54 am

      There is some parts I don’t agree with:
      1. You can run LAMP on Windows use XAMPP or you can just run Linux if you want.
      2. What about virtualization? You can run Virtual machines on Windows too.

      If you have talent you can do anything on any system and PC doesn’t equals Windows.

      The reason OSX is better because Apple controls hardware.
      And it has nothing todo with anything else.

      FREE Apple Ad from Smashing Magazine!

    229. 229
      Tracy
      April 27th, 2009 6:56 am

      I don’t get the PC’s die faster argument at all. But, it’s because in my personal experience with PC’s all of them have lasted 7+ years and they never died on me. It’s only because a 7 year old PC is pretty much a dinosaur and you always want to upgrade that I’ve replaced. But they were still working.

      I’ve been running an Alienware now for the past 5 years, only did an upgrade in memory and it’s pretty much perfect for me. But my itchy finger to buy something new is bothering me. I checked the specs on the low end MacPro and compared with what I can get with Alienware for the same price. I am going for my alien yet again.

    230. 230
      modobo
      April 27th, 2009 7:00 am

      From my point of view, it doesn’t matter what system or OS you use as long as you get the results you want.

      My only problem is with folks who chose to be snobs about their choices. From my observation, Many Mac zealots justify their attitudes by spreading technically illiterate nonsense and factually untrue assertions that equate to, “Macs are magic and make you creative while PCs are evil and make you incompetent.”

      Those types deserve all the scorn and ridicule anyone can hurl at them.

    231. 231
      Derek
      April 27th, 2009 7:02 am

      I had horrible experiences with every single WIndows machine I’ve used (running many different iterations of the OS). I switched to a MacBook Pro and iMac two years ago and both have been a dream to use – no glitches, no crashes, no viruses, no problems.

      I think the article presented some good arguments for switching – some were, granted, simply personal reasons, but largely the article had good points.

      And I’m not a fanboy – really – I gave Windows every chance I could (98, 98SE, ME, NT 2000, and Win7 beta). All had many of the same problems. While I do run XP in VMWare for site testing, you contrast my WIndows experiences with my problem-free Mac(s) and I’d never touch a Windows computer again as a day-to-day, primary or secondary machine.

      @jesse: You stand corrected: CSS *is* development. XHTML is development. PHP is development. Etc.

    232. 232
      Tim Garner
      April 27th, 2009 7:06 am

      Man the fan boys came out of the woodwork for this one. Your commentary aside this article was excellent comment bait. Well Done!

    233. 233
      Will Peavy
      April 27th, 2009 7:40 am

      “Being able to do things like drag an image off your web browser directly into your Photoshop project are a boon to productivity.” — You can do that on Windows.

    234. 234
      smh
      April 27th, 2009 7:51 am

      I would say that Macs are more expensive to buy but cheaper to run. I never have to waste time reformatting, defragmenting, virus scanning, getting rid of the cruft. My macs run as well today as the day I bought them. Contrariwise, my PC enthusiastic friends always need help fixing a printer, re-connecting to the internet, getting rid of some mal-ware. These are the hidden costs of Windows that you continue to pay for.

    235. 235
      pots
      April 27th, 2009 7:56 am

      never read that much bullshit.
      it all depends on your workflow.

    236. 236
      WebKarnage
      April 27th, 2009 7:57 am

      There are some good and some hilariously bad comments on a generally good article.

      As someone who is creative is 3 big areas and wants to use one computer to do it all, I have no choice. It’s a Mac. If I wanted to get consistent great running in the music world, the web design world and the video world (I’m no Adobe user either, geez that stuff costs more than my Mac does anyhow) if I wanted to do all this on one Windows machine it just wouldn’t run well enough. 300 apps added to the system, and it runs the same, no slower, no crashes. Could I do that with Windows XP or Vista? No. I’ve seen it tried. They ended up with 2 machines (separated the music) both of which fall over more than my Mac. They even have a 3rd for office stuff, I just have 1. My Mac is so much cheaper than 2 Windows machines (let alone 3).

      So to all those who think Macs are just for being cool, wrong. For some of us (I know it’s not everyone) they are the only sensible choice.

    237. 237
      Straun
      April 27th, 2009 7:58 am

      It is just a shame that the memory management is poor. As soon as you hit the limits everything grinds to a halt.

    238. 238
      ricardo
      April 27th, 2009 8:04 am

      i cant deny that mac is a really powerful machine, and it comes with really cool features and stuff , but its expensive and i’d bet my left nut that a good designer can create the same amount of work with the same quality on the same amount time using a pc for half of the money, So i dont really see the need to change. Mac doesnt offer anything for me that makes me earn more money, so im gonna stick to PC for now.

    239. 239
      Jmiles
      April 27th, 2009 8:07 am

      I just built a hackintosh yesterday and so far I like it. I’m a die hard Windows guy and ASP.NET developer, but I want to write iphone apps, so I needed a machine with osx. My current problems are all with adding hardware, but I know thats because I have an illegitimate box. I have liked the OS overall, but as a .NET developer, I don’t see it becoming my primary machine anytime soon.

    240. 240
      boss
      April 27th, 2009 8:16 am

      Macs are for the rich suburb kids, and Windows are for their older brothers.

    241. 241
      Beau
      April 27th, 2009 8:19 am

      This is kind of like comparing a Maseroti to a Ford Taurus. You can argue that the Maseroti is faster, and more elegant, but who has more drivers, and why? If Macs were truly superior they would own the market. The fact is they cater to a specific type of consumer, which is precisely what this article presented.

      I am skilled on both Macs and PC’s and I, frankly, prefer PC’s. My personal preference is the only arena which matters in terms of superiority.

      That said, Windows, for better or worse, is ubiquitous across the print and design markets primarily because of its bang-for-buck-iness. I work at a high end print shop which uses Xeon-based, PC workstations. On rare occasions we get properly formatted, ready to print PDF’s. More often than not, we usually need to refer to the original creation files to fix the stuff we can’t in Acrobat/Pitstop. The fact is this: in smaller markets 95% the creation files we get, are created on PC’s, not Macs. We have a Mac in the office for just such an occasion, but otherwise it gets used very little.

      You can argue that, with Macs you can just emulate Windows to open PC files, which is true. But at the same time, there is a significant speed trade-off for running the Windows emulator to open PC files. Consider that the Adobe Suite already runs faster on PC’s than it does Macs and you’ve got yourself a recipe for constant aggravation.

    242. 242
      The facts
      April 27th, 2009 8:19 am

      These are facts:

      - If you use Windows, everything around you will explode and you will die a very painful death. Every single project you start on a windows machine will disintegrate and then a little popup will appear and point at your crotch area and laugh. That’s a fact.
      - If you use a Mac, women will make sweet love to you 24/7. Anything you design/develop will become an instant success… Money will actually shoot out of the DVD drive!

      …or maybe… we should all STFU and get back to work…

    243. 243
      Tom Dempsey
      April 27th, 2009 8:23 am

      No, thank you!

    244. 244
      Blair C.
      April 27th, 2009 8:25 am

      1. Windows, Mac, Linux, BeOS, etc. It’s personal preference. Let your work define you as a designer or developer. Not your tools.

      2. Smashing will usually post a follow up to this article with a Windows slant. I’m an Apple user personally, but I’d love to see the counter point.

      3. It isn’t “MAC”, it’s Mac. There is a difference and programmers and developers should know that “MAC” stands for “Media Access Control” or MAC Address. “Mac” as in “Apple Mac”.

    245. 245
      Justin Floyd
      April 27th, 2009 8:54 am

      I’m a designer first and a user second, My primary tool? a Sketchbook. I don’t care what tool I have. I will design the hell out of something regardless. In the 90’s I used Macs exclusively, now almost PCs exclusively. Having used Macs and PCs in the work place for the last 10 years I believe the choice comes down to preference. Security, intuitiveness, cost, style, compatibility – you can throw all of that crap out the window. As we continue to suffer the great homogenization of our society the perceived differences between the platforms with shrink to nothing.

    246. 246
      John Deszell
      April 27th, 2009 8:57 am

      I have yet to join the Mac family, primarily because of the price. I’ve used Mac’s a good bit before in college and yah they are nice, but I don’t see myself gaining much from them. I am in need of a new laptop soon and it would be nice to get a Mac. But I just can’t bring myself to spending double the amount for a similar laptop and having to buy another copy of Creative Suite that I already legally purchased for Windows.

      Who know’s…maybe I’ll bite the bullet, but I can get a really nice laptop for $600-800 from Dell or HP that will run just as fast.

    247. 247
      Robin
      April 27th, 2009 9:00 am

      I’ve been designing websites for nearly 11 years, probably when many of the commenters here were still in junior high (or worse elementary school). If we’re talking about EXPERIENCED designers, I’d say I prefer a PC over a Mac any old day. I don’t feel that Macs are worth what you pay for them and having worked on both, PC’s have always seemed to run the programs I need to use on a daily basis much better than a Mac.

      This whole “real designers use Macs” talk just disgusts me. A “real” designer is good on any machine they happen to be on. If you can only design on a Mac, maybe the issue isn’t the machine, but your own skills.

    248. 248
      scribld
      April 27th, 2009 9:02 am

      I bought a PC 3 years ago. It runs XP and all the software I need to do my development work. The OS doesn’t crash and it isn’t slow. I’ve never had to “re-image” or “re-install” the OS. I have had multiple hardware crashes on hard drives but that has nothing to do with the OS. I still use that same PC for development. I haven’t had to refresh my hardware over the years to go to a new slicker looking version. It weigh’s 4.5lbs and I get just under 5 hours of battery life off it still. It does what I need and I spent a whopping $1200 on in at the time. Not bad but considering my investment of $400 a year it’s pretty good. I’m not worried about the look of it as my clients just care about the final product.

    249. 249
      Jon
      April 27th, 2009 9:08 am

      Er, am I the only one who’s slightly mystified about all these arguments based around designer preferences when this part of the article is trying to address developer issues?

      In other news, I remain unconvinced that a Mac can provide all the developer software that is available for windows, or for that matter linux. There’s a -lot- of developer based stuff on sourceforge etc which is free and open sourced. While I know the Mac workflows are a good one, many of my friends who are developers have customised their setup to such an extent that it would take crowbars to move them over to a Mac.

      Also the argument about Macs having Rails, etc set up by default is also not really the point. Developers set up their dev environments and that’s a good thing. I wouldn’t want my dev setup done for me. I’d have to go through the full config to make sure it reflected my online environment anyway.

    250. 250
      DavidA
      April 27th, 2009 9:08 am

      Seriously, half of the people did not even read this article, if you did, you would know its not about designers on a mac its about why -SOME- developers are switching to a Mac.

      I work on a Mac, and I prefer working on a mac. I multitask like you wouldn’t believe, and MAC’s OS for devleopment is 1,000% more efficient then any PC. I work on a PC at work because I have to do C# coding and I need the windows environment, but if I could use a Mac I would.

      Anyone who has worked on a PC and a Mac consistently and says working on a PC is better is out of their goddamn mind.

      If half of you idiots read the article, they are specifically saying why SOME developrs are choosing to switch over to Mac. It’s true, they are. With virtualization & dual boot, why the hell do you even NEED a PC anymore? Seriously? I have played games on a bootcamp partition of XP and can play games flawlessly.

      Also to the idiots who keep saying “Its all about the work you do not your tools”, I dunno bout you, but I’d rather use a SHARP axe to cut wood, not a dull blunt rusted one. But hey, that’s just me who wants to be productive and efficient.

      Seriously, I’m not even a Mac enthusiast, in fact I hate people that are. Especially the people who sit in coffee shops. I grew up using PC’s my whole life. When I started using a mac I still didn’t like it, but after DEVELOPING (yes I said developing) on it for some time, going back to PC is like driving a 1985 honda civic with a shitty exhaust. I dunno bout you, but I prefer my Beemer.

      1. I am right. 2. You are wrong. 3. If you object see #1


    1. 00

      There are no trackbacks at this time. If you are interested in leaving a trackback, please use this URL.

    Leave a Comment

    Make sure you enter the * required information where indicated. Please also rate the article as it will help us decide future content and posts. Comments are moderated – and rel="nofollow" is in use. Please no link dropping, no keywords or domains as names; do not spam, and do not advertise!



    Advertisement Advertise with us!
    Join in Smashing Forum
    Visit job board Post your job
    Add this widget to your site!
    Advertisement