Five Reasons Why Designers Developers are Switching to Mac

Advertisement

Designers and developers have many choices to make when it comes to getting work done, from what frameworks, languages, and image editing software to use, to what platform to run. The latter is an oft debated and controversial topic and the mere mention of it risks setting off flame wars of epic proportions, so in the interest of sanity, we’ll try to avoid any direct comparisons to other operating systems.

It’s no secret that there has been a growing trend in recent years toward developers, especially of the web variety, choosing a Mac as their main dev machine. In this two-part series, we will examine some of the reasons behind this trend, look at some of the pitfalls of switching to the Mac, and go over the must-have software and configurations every switcher should be aware of.

First Reason for Switching: Mac OS X

You may have noticed the rise in the number of colleagues and fellow developers who are choosing a Mac as their next computer. If you haven’t, you’re probably either working for Microsoft or you have an MBA. So why is it so compelling?

If you were to ask a die-hard Windows user why he or she thinks people like Macs, they would almost invariably say the reasons are purely about aesthetics. If you were to ask most web developers why they have switched to a mac, however, the refrain would be loud and unanimous: OSX. To be fair to Windows, in terms of raw capability the two offerings differ very little; with enough elbow grease, both systems can be configured in pretty much any way its users wish.

When pressured to explain why they prefer OSX, Mac users often rest on qualifiable and subjective arguments such as “it feels intuitive” or “I enjoy using it more” or even “I can’t explain why I like it better, I just do.” The Windows user, when presented with these arguments, usually rolls his or her eyes and continues on their way. It isn’t until someone truly makes up their own mind to give OSX an honest chance that they can understand what all the fuss is about.

A Few Quantifiable Benefits of OS X include:

1. Open Source Friendly

As a web developer, if there’s one skill you invariably have to develop, it’s the use of a *NIX terminal. Luckily, because OSX is built on top of UNIX, the terminal is ready and waiting. Every Apple ships with a wide variety of open source programming tools and frameworks built in such as PHP, Apache, and Ruby on Rails. Linux users who have grown tired of dealing with hardware issues, especially on laptops, often choose a Mac as their portable solution because it is UNIX based.

It means that the entire world of open source software out there is pretty much guaranteed to run without much hassle. In a world where open source software is a way of life, web developers need a friendly environment to operate in.

2. Quartz Extreme

Quartz is the OpenGL powered windowing system used by OSX. Quartz extreme utilizes the graphics card exclusively, which means no processor cycles are taxed. This allows for a variety of useful features such as Exposé, which dynamically resizes every window on the screen giving you a bird’s eye view of your entire workspace.

Spaces, a feature introduced in OSX 10.5 (Leopard) takes the bird’s eye view a step further by providing a view of multiple desktops. To further illustrate the point, you can activate Exposé inside Spaces and drag these windows from desktop to desktop – any videos that are playing will continue to play and the windows will dynamically resize to accommodate the extra window. Once you get used to this sort of thing, you wonder how you ever lived without it.

3. Core Animation

Core animation provides a way for developers to produce animated user interfaces via an implicit animation model as well as an ‘explicit’ model. In other words, it means some very flashy and useful features are going to start showing up in OS X applications much like the animated menu help system shown in the graphic above. Prodiving developers with a toolset to implement these types of animated effects means software will become more intuitive.

4. Built-in Tools

There are so many useful tools that are built in to the Mac that come in handy for designers and developers that it’s easy to see OSX was built with developers and creative professionals in mind. Take the built-in screen capturing utility “Grab” for OSX, which has a wide variety of options, from selecting down to the pixel the area you want to screenshot, to providing window captures complete with the window frame, to outputting directly to the desktop as a .PNG file.

In fact, some tools were created specifically for designers because Apple has long catered to the creative professional market (indeed, it sustained Apple during their darkest times). More built in tools include:

  • The Digital Color Meter – a tool that allows you to grab the color value of any pixel on your screen.
  • Console – Useful for viewing very large log files
  • Terminal – Mentioned above, complete with many OSS tools like VIM
  • XCode Tools – The Apple development IDE
  • Zoom – easy-as-pie down-to-the-pixel zooming
  • Safari Debug Mode – Similar to Firebug for Firefox
  • Time Machine – dead simple automated backups

5. Unified User Interface

As any student of design knows, consistency is one of the most important principles to adhere to, and it is clear the OSX UI was designed with this in mind. Because of the strict user interface guidelines provided by the Apple software development tools, applications and utilities on a Mac feel like they are all part of the same system.

The menu bar, which for some switchers can be a difficult feature to get used to, adheres to this unification by standardizing the location and layout of the menu options. Drag-and-drop functionality is ubiquitous. Being able to do things like drag an image off your web browser directly into your Photoshop project are a boon to productivity. If it feels as though you should be able to drag-and-drop something, you probably can.

6. Security

Now before you crack your knuckles and start composing your diatribe about why Macs aren’t any more secure than PCs, let me point out a trite but undebatable fact: there’s simply less malware out there for Macs than PCs – a LOT less (partly because Unix is inherently more secure than Windows and partly because Windows is just more wide-spread and Mac users aren’t targeted that often – read more in the article Is The Mac Really More Secure Than Windows?). If you are on a Mac, at least for the next few more years, you can pretty much rest assured your days of worrying about virus and spyware scans are a thing of the past.

7. Textmate, Growl, Quicksilver, and more

There is no shortage of text editors available to developers, but one that seems to keep coming up in recommendation after recommendation is Textmate, the lightweight GUI text editor for OSX. The project management drawer makes it easy to keep track of folders, which for monolithic MVC frameworks like Ruby on Rails and CakePHP is a godsend.

Nested scopes allow users to create their own syntax highlighting which is important in the ever changing world of web development. To speed up the development process, one can utilize “snippets” or pieces of reusable code that can be inserted with a few key strokes. While there aren’t any features that are revolutionary, they are combined in a way that makes for a very unobtrusive coding experience that seems very in tune with the overall feel of a Mac.

In addition to Textmate, there is a whole host of other beloved applications that seem to have been created by people who truly understand and want to emulate the Mac experience, like the quick-launch solution Quicksilver, the system notifications app Growl, and the chat client Adium. These are pieces of software of a caliber that is sometimes difficult to find on Windows. It seems that quality, not quantity, is the best way to describe the Mac software library.

8. Quick Look

OS X not only has icons that display an actual miniature version of the file they are representing, but it’s possible to view the contents of the file in their full glory without having to launch the program they are associated with simply by hitting the space bar. Furthermore, if a group of icons are highlighted, they can be expanded into a gallery view.

9. Virtualization

OSX is the only OS you can get that can virtualize all three major operating systems out of the box. This is a must have for checking browser compatibility. To make life even easier, you can do it right from within OSX using programs like Parallels, Virtualbox, and VMWare Fusion. And if you think web browsers render websites exactly the same regardless of the operating system they’re running on you are sorely mistaken.

Second Reason for Switching: Intel Inside

When Apple made the switch to Intel chips, it upset a lot of Mac fans out there who liked the fact that Apple wasn’t the same as any other X86 box on the market. With the rise in mobile computing, however, Apple was forced to face the fact that the PowerPC wasn’t offering as good a solution as Intel.

They also knew that by offering a system that could run Windows in addition to OS X they would put to rest any compatibility arguments. It turned out to be a good strategical move, and droves of would-be switchers were finally able to take the plunge without being forced to give up their entire libraries of Windows-based software.

OSX can virtualize all three major operating systems out of the box. This is a must have for checking browser compatibility. To make life even easier, you can do it right from within OSX using programs like Parallels, Virtualbox, and VMWare Fusion. And if you think web browsers render websites exactly the same regardless of the operating system they’re running on you are sorely mistaken.

Third Reason for Switching: Less Hassle

Opinionated Software

Some people like hassle. In fact, developers typically love getting their hands dirty customizing, maintaining, and tweaking their operating systems. If you fall under this category, Linux is probably your best fit, followed by Windows. OS X is more opinionated than other platforms. It’s more difficult to customize its look and feel, there’s no easy way to get it to run on anything but Apple hardware, and OS X can be very particular about the way certain things are done.

Opionated software, however, can have its benefits. While it may be more difficult to customize and hack every last aspect of your OS, sometimes it can be nice to have a system where a good many of these choices have already been made for you. Because Apple provides a complete solution, from the operating system to the hardware to a lot of the software that’s bundled in, they have an easier go of making sure the experience is seemless and well tested. Opinionated software can be a very polarizing concept, however.

Take Ruby on Rails for instance, a web development framework where many decisions are made for the developer based on the core contributors’ opinions about best practices. Rails has a preferred javascript framework, database ORM, templating system, and more. You can choose other configurations if you want to, but it shines brightest when you do things the “Rails Way.”

You spend less time customizing and more time actually developing. This hands-off approach can be a major turn off for some developers, but for others it removes a lot of the hassle and reinventing of the wheel. The high rate of Mac ownership among Rails developers could be directly attributed to the analogous nature of Apple and Rails. The analogy is made more apt by any number of PHP vs Ruby on Rails flame wars you can find out there.

Support

Because Apple provides the whole solution, they are obligated to provide support for the whole solution as well. Most developers are perfectly willing to trouble shoot their own computers, but when deadlines need to be met it can be nice knowing that you can offload some of that hassle to people who already know the system inside and out.

Apple has impressive customer service specifically because they support the entire system, rather than just one aspect of the system. It’s also handy to be able to take your machine into an actual brick-and-mortar store rather than deal with outsourced phone support.

Let’s face it, when it comes to a non-technical spouse or family member, we can expect to do a lot of troubleshooting. Just like its nice not to have to worry about troubleshooting your own computer, it’s even nicer not to have to worry as much about other people’s computers. It is reasonable to assume that because Macs typically have less security issues (at least for now), there’s less time spent trying to explain how to avoid malware and actually removing it.

Fourth Reason for Switching: Microsoft

If you like it or not: a big reason why developers have been flocking to Apple is in part due to the fact that it isn’t the big M. When personal computing was still in its infancy, the reverse was true. Microsoft understood that it was the developers (developers developers) that would make their OS successful while Apple’s closed model ended up being a huge mistake.

Once Microsoft started dominating the marketplace, however, the pungent stench of monopoly sparked the open source movement, and more and more developers were starting to wonder if there were better options out there.

Linux is of course the golden child of the open source movement, but despite the efforts of Ubuntu it is still a ways off in terms of being a turnkey solution for most people. Enter Apple: a Unix based system that despite being every bit as closed as Microsoft, is in large part the antithesis of Microsoft.

Microsoft software has the unfortunate feeling of having been designed by committee. Features are packed in with little regard to their usefulness, and aesthetics are seemingly an afterthought. When Vista first launched, the Aero user interface was so flashy it required higher end machines to even run it, somewhat defeating the argument Microsoft was making about the affordability of PCs. OSX was designed to run as well on the most expensive Mac Pro as it would an eight year old Powerbook because they control the solution from hardware to software.

Unfortunately, Windows doesn’t come bundled with PHP, Rails, or any other open-source web development frameworks or languages any time soon. More and more of what we do is in the cloud these days anyways and it is almost starting to feel quaint when you come across new software that runs solely as a desktop client. Microsoft has painted themselves into a corner – they rely on closed formats and standards in a world where open source software, open formats, and open standards are king.

Fifth Reason For Switching: Design and Minimalism

Good design gets out of the way. It doesn’t demand to be seen or appreciated. Most of all, good design is something you don’t even notice at first. Bang & Olufsen understands this, and Apple understands this. As of this writing, there are only two styles of Apple notebook: silver and white, and white is only available in the cheapest configuration. Apple notebooks are free of stickers, screws, vents, buttons, switches, and graphics.

What this leaves is a system with little to look at other than the screen in front of you, which is as it should be. The benefit of the entire product development cycle being done under one house is that Apple creates a system that truly feels as though it was created by one person.

At the heart of Apple’s design philosophy is the concept of minimalism. It is a concept that has worked well for companies such as Google. We all remember the gratuitous placement of links and ads on most search engines before Google came around with its simple search bar. After all, it was the search that was the important part, not the content the provider was hoping we would want. Apple figures if not including a feature angers 1% of their consumer base but makes things easier for the other 99% it’s probably worth doing.

Take, for instance, the lack of a second mouse buttom. It may seem like a glaring omission on Apple’s part, but it has had some unintended consequences: because developers can’t simple throw commands into a bloated right-click menu they are forced to think more about the one-click usability of their applications.

Minimalist design has its downsides too, however. Macs lack card readers, often have 2-3 less USB ports than even low end machines, and are typically difficult to customize. For those of you who value a product that gives you many choices, Apple is going to fall short. It is often pointed out that upgrading a Mac is easy: “Just throw it away and buy a new one.”

Humor aside, this isn’t too far from the truth but the good news is that Macs hold their value better than any computer on the market. Instead of throwing it away, sell it on Ebay for healthy head-start on a new machine.

Mac’s Pitfalls

It’s not all sunshine and rainbows for everyone who switches to a Mac. There are the inevitable bumps in the road that everyone experiences when making a major platform change, and for some people these bumps are outright road blocks. Here’s what to be aware of:

1. Control is now Command

Breaking the habit of using control as the main modifier key on your system can take a bit of time and some people never quite get the hang of it. Old habits die hard and muscle memory dies harder. This is a problem that can be solved by re-mapping command to the control key, but when you are using a system that assumes a certain configuration you may run into confusion later on.

2. No Second Mouse Button

Unless you use an external mouse with your Apple laptop you will have to get used to the lack of a second mouse button. The truth is there is no optimal number of mouse buttons. Luckily, you can enable right-clicking in a number of ways on a mac, such as tapping the track pad with two fingers simultaneously or holding ctrl when clicking.

3. No Maximizing of Windows

This is actually starting to become less true as time goes on as ex-Windows users who develop software for the Mac include the feature (for instance, maximize on firefox for the Mac works as expected). But the typical maximize you are used to in Windows cannot be found on the Mac, and for some this can be extremely frustrating. In fact, the whole “stop-light” window controls can at times feel stale and unintuitive.

4. Lack of an “affordable” Mac

Perhaps the most popular sticking point of non-Mac users, price is always at the heart of the debate. Under $1200 or so, there is no question that byte for byte, ghz for ghz, you can get a better raw value by avoiding Apple. Apple has chosen not to enter the sub $1000 PC not because it doesn’t want to grow sales, but because it wants to avoid the dogfight that Sony, HP, and other brands are in for the lower end market.

Profit margins are razor thin in that range, after all. Apple is certainly catering to the botique style consumer. If you are pinching pennies these days the price issue may just be the one pitfall you can’t bring yourself to overcome.

5. Much Smaller Software Library

While this is somewhat mediated by the fact that you can virtualize Windows on a Mac, it is a far cry from being able to run your favorite programs natively on your system. If you are using software on a regular basis that only runs in the Windows environment, you may want to think hard about whether moving to a Mac is worth the trouble.

6. You Can’t Build a Mac (Easily)

Part of the success of Windows was the fact that they licensed it to run on any PC, anywhere. Apple has been closed since the word go, save a brief period where they allowed Mac clones to exist in what turned out to be a devastatingly bad idea. If you’re the type who loves building your own PC from scratch, a Mac is not going to offer much for you.

In general, even the most jaded Windows user is inevitably going to miss at least a few features or aspects of Windows during their switch to a Mac. The best policy to follow is to keep an open mind during the learning process. Try doing things “the Mac way” for a week and keep your skepticism to a minimum.

Above all, ask questions before you make assumptions. There’s a fervent Apple community out there (in case you haven’t noticed) that have solutions for every issue you find, thanks in part to the fact that most of them are switchers themselves. Remember, if you’re having the issue, chances are good some other switcher experienced it before you and created or found a solution.

Conclusion

While not the right solution for everyone, it’s clear that many people are switching to a Mac these days for a good many reasons. Nevertheless, Macs are expensive and require user’s patience and willingness to adapt his or her behavior to a compltely different interface. Mac is certainly not an option for every user, but it is definitely an option worth considering – particularly for designers or developers.

Join us in Part 2 of this series where we examine some of the must have software, configurations, and tricks that every new Mac user should know about. Please feel free to subscribe to our RSS-feed Subscribe to our RSS-feed and follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter.

Mark Nutter runs a web development shop in Minnesota. You can follow him on Twitter where he occasionally says something worthwhile.

  1. 1

    You know – if you are bogging down in your operating system – you aren’t ready for Photoshop.

    I use both – and could care less really – just get me in my application, give me a good graphics tablet and monitor.

    Been at this a long time – routinely do high-end design work, and find this minutia of which platform is better annoying. So a kid in Bangladesh is handicapped because he can only afford a PC – classic OS elitism.

    Take that extra money you save by working in Linux and take a drawing class.

    0
  2. 2

    Jean-Baptiste Jung

    April 26th, 2009 2:21 pm

    Excellent article! Microsoft is like McDonald’s: nasty for your health ;)

    -1
  3. 3

    Mac looks fancy and all, but I’m a die hard Windows fan. I may get a Mac if I win the lottery.

    0
  4. 4

    Mihai Moscovici

    April 26th, 2009 2:23 pm

    Thanks for a balanced review!

    0
  5. 5

    What designers AREN’T using Mac? I’m from a small city in Tennessee and I don’t know ANY designers that aren’t using Mac.

    I understand that some must be using PCs but that headline just sounds funny to me.

    0
  6. 6

    thanks so much i will get mac very soon

    0
  7. 7

    Thank you for the first really BALANCED review – most similar articles are biased by Mac or Win-fans. THANKS.

    0
  8. 8

    Dieter Mueller

    April 26th, 2009 2:30 pm

    How lame.

    I am a freelancer since 1989 – using both Macs & PC. Maybe five but certainly ten years ago there were REAL reasons to use a Mac: better fonts, better applications, better hardware (how that has changed – Macs are basically Intel clones today and Apple’s production standards have slipped in some products) more stable production environment. Today Photoshop is Photoshop (or any other important design tool) – no matter on which box you run it on.

    A good designer delivers good work NO MATTER which tool he uses – even when it’s only pen and paper. Stop that techno & brand fetishism – do some good work instead.

    0
  9. 9

    Forgot to mention that Mac’s are not for gamer’s either. I’m a designer AND a gamer too.

    0
  10. 10

    we’d love to get macs for our studio, but its not the price, software or any geek loyalty that prevents us – it’s the internal technical skills. connecting the macs to the windows active directory, nas server etc isnt something we’ve never done – and help from google isn’t really the kind of reliability we can afford to risk. if something goes wrong – we can’t fix it at the speed and cost we can with a PC. however, we’re getting closer to making the jump!

    0
  11. 11

    Dieter Mueller, you make a good point. Good designers deliver good work no matter what tool they use, but some tools are more usable than others and some environments are better than the others. With the same logic, you could just use Notepad instead of PHP Eclipse for coding which is not right, isn’t it?

    0
  12. 12

    Pros and Cons to both sides of the argument. About personal preference in this day and age. Very nice little article though. Thanks alot.

    -1
  13. 13

    Christopher Wagar

    April 26th, 2009 2:37 pm

    I am SO impressed! I switched to a mac about 2 years ago, but it was all on a whim. Everyone I talked to was either heavily anti-mac, or a fanatic. I wanted a balanced idea of what I was getting myself into, but all I got was a look at the childish ego-war that exists between mac and pc fans. I wish there was an article like this back then! As it turns out, I do prefer mac, but I’m well-aware of it’s shortcomings. Thanks again!

    0
  14. 14

    Wow. That’s so cool that you chose to insult your readers and make assumptions in your opening paragraph.

    +1
  15. 15

    I think there are plenty of reason that are really true (expose and spaces, quicklook, textmate, growl, security, stability…)
    But some other like core animation… I dont really care if my app do little eye candy animations. I just care if they do the job the are supposed to do.
    About the design of the computers… this is too something that it didnt make any diference to me…
    So to me, the main mac features to switch are productivity ones, and no beacuse “mac is pretty”.

    0
  16. 16

    This is all a matter of preference. I prefer to design on a PC because my audience will view my work (most likely) on a PC. There is no end all tool out there that you can get for a Mac or a PC which makes either any better than the other.

    In fact I would rather sand my hands off and try and win a push up contest than partake in an argument about why one is better than the other.

    It is like Coke and Pepsi, they are both softdrinks, but which do you prefer.

    0
  17. 17

    Adam R Garcia

    April 26th, 2009 2:44 pm

    I started designing audodidactically with a PC. I’d have to say that at the time, I had no idea how much better a Mac would be, but when I am forced to get back on them now for presentation purposes, I find basic navigation on a PC counter-intuitive. I think that’s my biggest beef with PCs. To each their own.

    0
  18. 18

    Anyone not using Mac for design already doesn’t know that they don’t know yet.

    -1
  19. 19

    I use XP on the classic theme.

    notepad++, dreamweaver, photoshop…all run nicely.

    plus i enjoy playing games

    0
  20. 20

    Well said, but perhaps this article still comes off as needless Windows bashing. Windows is a viable option for people who need raw power at an inexpensive price. With talent – yes talent – you can achieve the same designs on OSX, Windows, and Linux machines.

    That said, all three operating systems have their pros and cons. Try them all and use what you like. Personally, I’m happy doing the “psd shows as a preview” tweak in Windows 7 and calling it a day.

    0
  21. 21

    …this isn’t really about designers, per se, as much as a general “OSX is cool” article.

    0
  22. 22

    As a mac user, I switched mainly because Final Cut was becoming the standard for video editing, and there was no elegant way of getting less-experienced editors my motion graphics work without it and its stable of codecs.

    I love using the Mac.

    However, there seems to be this constantly-supressed reality that people keep ignoring, which is that even with the latest versions of Adobe’s suite, Windows still runs Photoshop, Flash, and AfterEffects way faster than on OSX.

    EVEN VISTA runs AfterEffects faster, and Photoshop and AfterEffects both take longer to start up on my 2008 iMac with 2.8 ghz and 4 gigs of ram than on my 4 year old PC running Windows XP home.

    If you don’t notice this enough to put it as even a miniscule part of the reason why one wouldn’t use OSX, then I think I know which side of the form/function argument you fall under.

    0
  23. 23

    I started with windows and am yet to be convinced that Macs are better then my PC. Mac repairs are an issue and very expensive as technicians are hard to find in the rural landscape. I still need a debate that challengers my opinion. that Macs and Pcs are like cars. Mac’s are the sports car model (Designer ego) with PC’s being family cars that do the same job minus the ego.

    0
  24. 24

    The biggest problem for possible switchers is probably Apple’s relatively high prices. I’ve been there myself, after having been a hardcore Windows user for over ten years.

    However, when I finally switched to a Mac, all of a sudden the extra euros I did pay we’re forgotten: this machine works so much better!

    Best reasons: it doesn’t get slower, there is no blue screen, there are no viruses, malware et cetera and its beauty! Buy one!

    0
  25. 25

    I’ve been a graphic designer, illustrator, and now flash developer for the past 10+ years all on the PC. I agree with Dieter that good designers will turn out good work regardless of platform. I think it has more to do with ease of use than anything that people in general, not just designers, are turning to the Mac. Sure, aesthetics play a big part and being a designer I applaud Apple for having a great sense of it when it comes to UI and industrial design, but that’s just the surface of an OS and a computer.

    I feel like I have full control over the experience when it comes to PCs. I can tweak just about anything about it and if I need more flexibility, I just boot into a Linux partition. If the latest version of photoshop feels slow, I just go get more ram and a new videocard instead of a new system, and if I feel like pushing my CPU, I overclock it. Today if you want the best system money can buy for the job in the creative field, it would clearly be a PC with a 64 bit version of Windows, 8+ megs of RAM, a Quadro CX videocard, two solid state drives in RAID 0 and another 3 1.5TB drives in RAID 10. In other words, the myth that Macs are better for graphics is a lie but sadly some people still believe that.

    Most people just don’t want to have to think about hardware or configuring a firewall, therefore they just buy whatever is easiest so they can just get to work and not worry about these things. That’s why Macs are popular and the elitist and trendy Mac fans couldn’t be happier. I agree that MS has to play catch up, but I don’t think Windows is a bad OS for creative professionals. And for this opinion I will probably be called an MS fanboy, but I’m used to it.

    +1
  26. 26

    Wow, I switched to a Mac but none of those reasons even matter. I actually prefer Windows in most ways BUT…I need quietness! I spent $4000 building a SOTA ‘silent’ PC but my new 3 Ghz 24″ iMac is virtually silent, and there’s no constant flow of warm air coming up from under my desk. Serenity at last.

    0
  27. 27

    FYI, you forgot THE reason that designers use macs: color management. That is the main reason. Period. End of discussion. Nothing else you mentioned in the article couldn’t be done on a PC, except the physical Apple stores. Not a single thing.

    PCs CAN virtualize OSX. PCs CAN run PHP, ruby, etc, with extra software (and no, I DON’T want it built in from the start). PCs CAN do all of the desktop eye-candy, which FYI when I use a mac I turn all of it off (though again the PC requires extra software).

    No I am not a fanboy, I am a person who uses PC+Linux+OSX on a daily basis. They all have their uses, I just needed to correct some factual errors in the article.

    0
  28. 28

    Is there really that much difference between Mac and Windows (Note that I don’t say Mac and PC, because Mac IS a PC). I use both myself and I really don’t feel one is better than the other.

    0
  29. 29

    I switched to mac a few years ago and havn’t looked back since, in fact i bought my mum a pc with vista a short while back, hated it and gave it to me! although i use it as a back up, i really cant stand using it. Macs are simply a far better all round machine.

    0
  30. 30

    Kilian Güntner

    April 26th, 2009 3:16 pm

    I prefer Windows XP still for web design/software devevelpoing – at least for a year or so, then I’ll probably switch to os x or vista (or perhaps something new). Currently i produce results a little bit faster with two mouse buttons by standard, actually and the mac book air processor in such a small package turns on the fan all the time Ive heard ;) //K

    0
  31. 31

    yes, the time has come for apple, especially the new macbooks with the multi-touch pad and leopard. i would never want to do design work on a windows pc again. of course, for play time I still use a windows pc. Gaming capabilities like my pc would cost waaaay too much in a macpro

    0
  32. 32

    I read this article and thought that it would be a red rag to the die-hard Mac haters, of the kind that will call anyone who expresses a preference for the Mac a fanboy, but thus far the comments are remarkably restrained. Smashing Magazine clearly has a better and politer class of readers!

    Good article, though the stuff about single button mice has been untrue since OSX became the default operating system. I will admit however that Apple has never made a good mouse, so you’d be best advised to get one from say Logitech or (horrors!) Microsoft. But they do for the most part work with OSX straight out of the box.

    0
  33. 33

    Incorrect fact on “No Secondary Mouse Button”.
    Seriously, all new unibody Mac laptops have the secondary button. It is up to you that you would like to activate it or not.

    http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1290/picture1y.png

    0
  34. 34

    I just cannot help it, but Mac has brainwashed so many people it’s insane. The Mac is not only more expensive, it’s also a throwaway box after two years. Mac might have been more stable, but that time has long passed. The price is not justifiable anymore. So if you don’t use a Mac, you cannot call yourself designer, wooo. And if you are a developer and switching to MAC, you should be stripped off your title :). I gotta give Mac the thumbs up for marketing though. Make people believe that when they buy the product, they’ll belong to the elite….

    0
  35. 35

    connecticut websites

    April 26th, 2009 3:25 pm

    This article might have made sense 20 years ago, now it just reveals the ignorance of the author…the Mac vs PC argument died a long time ago, now it’s just an urban myth to make mac users feel better about how much money they spend compared to PC users.

    Maybe Mark can also write an article about how crop circles are made by aliens, or how he saw Elvis last week working at Taco Bell.

    0
  36. 36

    My entire design education was completed on OSX, even though I was a Win user. I got my assignments, worked on them in class (Mac), and then went home and worked on them some more on my PC. And I know I am in the minority when I say that I felt more comfortable working on in Win as opposed to the Mac. Up to this day I am still running a PC and loving it, but I am glad that I had the opportunity to learn the OSX environment. Maybe one day I will switch but for now I’m quite happy.

    It is not the tools that make the designer, but how the designer uses their tools.

    0
  37. 37


    Good article but needs some tuning. I got nothing to add but this picture.

    0
  38. 38

    I use windows. I am not a FAN of it. It is just a computer used for running other software. If Photoshop did not run on Windows, i would have switched. All that matters to me is my own creativity (or lack of it).

    0
  39. 39

    Nice try Vitalli, you troll. The first reason you gave is one of two reasons why people switch to Mac:

    1) They don’t really do any work, but rather dream of whimsical fantatic “design careers” that entail using a beautiful Mac (which costs 2x as much as it’s Window counterpart and offers zero technical advantage now that Macs are PCs)

    2) The only other reason why people switch to Mac is because Windows hasn’t come out with a compelling release for years. Once Windows 7 comes out Mac losers will stop creaming their pants over cool looking buttons, and clear backgrounds.

    The thing to remember is: MACs ARE PCs!!!!. They are not Macs anymore. Apple simply manufacturers the same product as HP now, but somehow the ignorance of people denies this great fact in the name of aesthetics. I won’t deny that a MacBook looks great, but so does a golden sink. My sink is ceramic though because I won’t pay extra to be a pretentious poser.

    One final note: Most successful developers/designers are Windows users, and the ones that use Mac, by their very nature will fail.

    +1
  40. 40

    “Linux is of course the golden child of the open source movement, but despite the efforts of Ubuntu it is still a ways off in terms of being a turnkey solution for most people.”

    As an Ubuntu user I have to say that since Dapper Ubuntu has been an option for the average user–and just keeps getting better. I would never consider a mac.

    0
  41. 41

    Damn….. I just started a new job as Senior Designer and the company I work for is all PC based. I’ve been using a Mac now for the past 6 years and having to use a crappy PC everyday is killing me.

    0
  42. 42

    Rails, Textmate, CS4, and OS X == Pure Bliss.

    After using a Mac for a year now, I couldn’t be happier. When I must use my Windows machine, which is quite often (All good architecture software is Windows-only), I feel alone and quite frustrated. But at the same time, I tweak, and customize, and tweak some more–and often enjoy it. When I get back to my Mac, I have nothing to tweak, nothing to customize. But I’ve learned to love opinionated software.

    As for the price, Mac’s are definitely more expensive, but it’s worth it for me. It’s all just about priorities. I’m living on a grad school budget: Macbook Pro, IKEA bed, and some good food. I could easily get a more affordable laptop and have some extra spending money, but I wouldn’t dream of it.

    Overall, nice article, and greetings from Minnesota.

    0
  43. 43

    This has been a paid advertisement by the cult of Apple. Jog on….

    +1
  44. 44

    2 words…

    Appl€ Sucks! 8D

    0
  45. 45

    No, designers who need a very well equipped computer do not buy a Mac out of the same reason that only rich dentists buy a Leica M8 and professional photographers do not. My computer would cost 17000 Euro if it would be a Mac. The difference is 14000 Euro. A Mac is a good thing for a hotel lobby :)

    +1
  46. 46

    Show us your work, not your computer.

    +1
  47. 47

    FALSE

    PC is better

    +1
  48. 48

    I’m not going to get into the Mac vs PC debate, but the nature of this article is just plain messed up.

    When I got my first Mac in 1991, Apple owned something like 92% of the creative market. It was very normal for ad agencies to have Macs in the creative department and PCs for business.

    Today things are very different. If anything, Macs have gained more ground in the mainstream over the past 10-15 years, but PCs have grabbed a bigger chunk of the creative fields.

    This article is bass-ackwards.

    +1
  49. 49

    And as for the aesthetics arguments…

    If you paint your Macbook blue. That is aesthetics.
    If you sandbrush your HP. That is aesthetics.
    If you put a sticker on your laptop. That is aesthetics.

    Construction, materiality, hardware, size, weight, stability, durability, noise, temperature, etc… are most certainly not aesthetics. They are all components of design.

    I can only imagine a true designer would want something he or she sees as well designed, whatever machine that might be.

    0
  50. 50

    I hope NOT to see this kind of article ever more. What will be next if you don’t have iPhone you are loser or if you have iPod you are cool.

    +1
  51. 51

    By the way: Glenn Gould exercised on a Yamaha or even on very cheap pianos. He didn’t use a Steinways. You can find Steinways in many houses of rich people in the middle of the living room.

    0
  52. 52

    The main reason I switched, two years ago, to Mac was I had finally had it with having to reinstall my machine every six months due to Windows crapping out. I swore that the next time I found my machine not able to restart due to some obscure blue-screened code, I would bite the bullet and get a Mac. I am so glad I did.

    Now, whenever I have to play “help desk” for others in my family who are still saddled with Windows, I find my jaw dropping at how slow their systems are. No doubt I’ll be rebuilding them each soon (or getting them Macs!).

    The best reason, and one you don’t mention (that I saw anyway) is: Windows is unreliable, breaks down constantly, and is maddening to use. I’ve become quite spoiled by my Mac Pro. But on the other hand, it does just what I expect it to: it works. Always.

    0
  53. 53

    Designers ALWAYS have used macs… macs were always a designers computer, while PC’s were business computers… while the apps have grown to be used on both – this greyed the usage of computers.. While today its a price difference, since many can design on either, even myself had to switch to a pc even though being a machead for many years before the new macs of mainly image… the apps simply ran faster on a cheaper machine… Its always the right computer for the right task… I still think mac has a long way to go and have yet to see a business be running a mac that isnt a design firm or some new foofoo type of business… sure I love them, sure I still want one, but like so many others, they simply are too expensive… when mac puts out a $399 computer (with monitor/keyboard/mouse etc) then pc markets will be in trouble… electronics now a day are cheaper than ever… 21+” monitors for around $100ish, 1TB hard drives for $100, awesome video cards for $100ish range, memory at rock bottom prices… now is the time apple needs to come out with a recession proof price tag.. Im sure they would get many new users soon as they do this… put the mac mini out for at most $299 THEN we can start seeing some great results… oh and ditch the Air laptop… what a waste – a computer that requires you to have another computer.. did I mention im still a total machead? haha So I hope the prices keep coming down

    0
  54. 54

    I work at an ad agency and we only hire creatives with heavy Mac experience. Any applicant that has mostly PC experience, is Mac hostile, or insists on PC/Windows is disqualified. We’ve been burned too many times from these sorts. They always fail and deliver sub par work.

    0
  55. 55

    I made the switch 2 years ago, best move I ever made. More stable, no OS slowdown, no defragmentation, no spyware/viruses, no microsoft verification process for the bits of software. Most Mac haters have just refused to use a mac or are going off a 1 hr experience they had with a mac in 2000. Macs are dominant in professional fields for a reason, they are excellent to work on.

    0
  56. 56

    hybrid-kernel

    April 26th, 2009 4:17 pm

    Most of the positives are present on linux. Of course 1 reason they will never be equivalent is the lack of popular multimedia software (All adobe’s stuff, final cut, etc). That is one reason I want a mac – a non-windows computer that can run photoshop naively. If only the mac mini cost <400, then I might buy one. Until then, I can only hope for second hand or a lottery/giveaway.

    0
  57. 57

    i used to be a die hard fan of PC, i had ms dos, windows (in all its versions) linux and i used to hate the mac until i got to college where i study design (i had never touched a mac before)
    the whole lab had macs…and only one pc with ubuntu…
    i had to learn to use them and then i realized they were not that bad…
    most of the students have macs and when we share files like for example indesign files it was a mess with my old laptop. fonts were not the same, even if i had the same font installed in some cases it would not recognize it exactly as i wanted…
    so i had to change manually everything each time and redo all the layout sometimes, i would waste lots of time.

    my old laptop had lots of problems because fujitsu siemens give no support and release no drivers for this model since 2006 so..when i installed directx 10 everything started crashing and if i had directx 9 nothing would work fine…

    everything was slow, and it was so hot and noisy my classmates would say “what’s that noise??” and i would be ashamed to say “its my laptop” in a room full of mac and the only noisy pc …

    I would hesitate to take my computer with me because it was over 5 kilos and 1 kilo and half for the charger…plus all the books i need to carry and stuff…my back hurted…

    so i finally got tired and got a 17 inch macbook pro and i’ve had it for a month and im not regretting it, it works nicely it dont make noise, easy to carry, don’t heat as much as my old laptop…and its fast :)

    as for the software i used to wonder “what kind of software will i find? will it be difficult to find something to do what i do?”…most things worked out of the box…and the rest…open source software really help a lot…the only thing i miss are some games but i can install a windows emulator for that…so it’s not really a problem

    one of the things i like the most is the magnetic power field, with my pc i was constantly nervous when it was plugged at school because i had to watch that noone passes by and get the cable in their feet and crashes my pc on the floor…

    also, 8 hours of battery that is just great, i had only 1 hour and half and i could not even finish one class without being plugged

    i guess that is why most designers change to a mac…

    0
  58. 58

    Floris Fiedeldij Dop

    April 26th, 2009 4:18 pm

    When my PC broke down and I got a powerbook at the end of 2005 .. I realized after a few weeks I haven’t touched my PC at all .. The switch was completed. I turned my PC into a ubuntu server and got a mac pro 12 months later. And an iMac this year.

    I am never switching, my computer frustrations dropped from 80% to 5% and my workflow went from 45% to 80% .. easily.

    Snow Leopard, true native 64bit .. I can’t wait.

    0
  59. 59

    I am not a tech person so I cannot offer anything innovative to say about the tech side of macs vs pcs, but as a designer my work improved from the point of aesthetics after the purchase of my first macbook in September last year. The minimalism of the machine is non distracting, and as a matter of thought progress, the same became true for my web designs, which became much more space aware, cleaner, transparent, more efficient and more logical, whereas I’ve begun to abhor the screaming, color bursting, busy designs of so many websites, even some showcased here at SM.
    So yes, the switch to a mac has made the difference and it’s quite apparent in my design process.

    0
  60. 60

    “Mac might have been more stable, but that time has long passed. The price is not justifiable anymore.” ?

    I disagree with this one. I’ve seen more issues in 4 months with my wife’s Vista laptop than I’ve seen in 2+ years with a MacBook Pro.

    Realistically I think PC is perfectly fine for any use, but you really can’t discount the great features inherent with the Mac and the lack of baggage by not using Windows. Bottom line is that if you care about gaming or want to save money, than a PC is for you. If you don’t care about those things as much then a Mac provides less danger of virus problems, a more stable environment (you can crash one program on a Mac and still save and shutdown others, not sure I’ve ever seen this as a possibility in a PC).

    All that said, designers are “switching to a Mac?” Seems to me that most designers originated on the mac.

    0
  61. 61

    I heard JJ Abrams loves Macs

    0
  62. 62

    I use both Macs and PCs regularly, and I still can’t agree with most of your points besides perhaps the first one. Expose typically annoys the shit out of me (where windows will move unintentionally) but some of the productivity stuff can be useful. Enough to justify the price? Absolutely not.

    PCs — and I think this is pretty fair — are a much greater value.

    0
  63. 63

    I’ve never understood number 6 (less malware out there for the MAC). Why would anyone be stumped by the extra vulnerabilities of Microsoft Windows to the degree it would become a factor in deciding which platform to develop on? Any “webmaster” or web programmer will surely spend 5 minutes installing a virus scanner – on either platform – so how is this even a remotely viable concern?

    I hear this “Microsoft is more secure because there is less Malware for it” argument all the time, in the general sphere of the OS debate. But I think it’s bogus that the higher level PC user would ever be worried about it. I give you, perhaps if it is a new webmaster and a new PC user all at once, maybe then. But otherwise, meh.

    -D

    0
  64. 64

    Wow, I remember when this was a site about web design. Out of the many reasons given here, most have absolutely no application to design.

    Also, I love how the article pushes open-source, despite the fact that Apple charges far more for their apps (which are just as closed and proprietary as any other vendor). When I was using Mac running OS 10.1, I was pretty pissed to find out that I need to upgrade my whole f’ing OS to update Safari and iPhoto.

    Finally, how can the author praise the whole one vendor solution aspect in the same article that knocks MS for being too controlling.

    Windows, OSX, Linux it doesn’t matter they’re all the same in many ways. Each has pros and cons. However, it’s nice to see irrelevant, opinion pieces instead of actual design content.

    +1
  65. 65

    I use all 3: XP on my home machine, Ubuntu on my laptop, an iMac at work.
    I’m a developer and a gamer.

    All 3 systems crash – and for the uses they crash under, they crash at about the same rate. (eg: my XP machine crashes while gaming only, the iMac crashes randomly and for oddball things not under heavy load, and the laptop/linux crashes generally when installing things)
    All 3 systems have silly UI quirks, good bits, and neat things.
    All 3 systems can be configured to act like the other, and all 3 can run vitual copies of the others. If you have to install software to virtualize, its not “out of the box”. if you’re talking about dual/tri-booting, this isn’t special.

    I find the Textmate/Growl/Quicksilver reason to be rather weak – mostly for the Textmate part. 1) Its not bundled with the OS. 2) Its not free. 3) It doesn’t have features you won’t find in other programs. It IS however, hard to find a free text editor for OS X. I spent a week looking. I finally settled on Komodo Edit, because then I could have the same program on ALL 3 platforms that I use, and not have to relearn different editors each time. Quicksilver also has parallels on other OS’s, though they work different. Growl is neat, but, I don’t consider it’s functionality unique.

    I don’t have some of those “built in tools” on my iMac? Since its from work I don’t know how old it is, but I am running 10.5/Leopard. Granted, there’s plenty of great widgets – but all 3 OSs do that too.

    One good reason to switch, however, is Microsoft itself. I’ll agree with that reason, even though I’ll continue to have one and sometimes upgrade it for gaming.
    I’ll also agree with the less hassle reason, if you’re comfortable with the sometimes necessary customer service calls that can entail – because you’d rather focus on using it, than fixing it.
    If you like the looks of a Mac, that’s a fine reason to switch too.
    Though the comments implying that every other product isn’t as minimal/well designed is sort of a strawman argument. Some do have such things, but plenty don’t. And for those of us who build our own systems, you get what you want.

    Some of the pitfalls also don’t really exist – like others have mentioned.
    I can use 2+ mouse buttons, I can maximize windows, moving Command to the Control location was easy. Though the rest of the 3 are true – price, software and building. I think, as a work-only machine in my case, its great. My software needs are well within the “Mac scope”. I wouldn’t be able to justfity to myself, purchasing a new mac. A refurb, probably. The lack of same-system upgradability however, is I think a major issue. I haven’t had to rebuild an entirely new machine since buying the first one. I’ve probably purchased in parts, over time, 1/2 the amount of ‘new machines’ I’ve had (eg: upgraded enough to reinstall the OS, but carry-over parts enough to halve the cost). Laptops are an exception to this rule, and Macs will always do well there.

    Until they allow for more same-system upgradability, they’ll continue to essentially “hate” gamers and game-developing companies. For me, that’s the major difference. I can’t game on it – so I can’t have one for a home machine. If I were just a console gamer, perhaps, but I’m a computer and console gamer.

    Windows has to be lauded for this, if nothing else, making heavy commitments to gaming – gaming has pushed the chip manufacturers further and further, and brought us high-end graphics and 3d rendering. The abiilty to replace discrete parts of a system, and to install it on nearly anything crazy you could build, allowed the graphics crazyness to exist and thrive. Its possible that they could have just swapped places, early on, and we’d all be talking about how switching to Windows and away from the Evil Apple Empire. Either way, if you’re going to compliment Apple on its less broad approach, you have to credit what the broad approach has given us.

    0
  66. 66

    mhhh.. ..and i thought smashing was about objectivity. no, just paid articles.

    +1
  67. 67

    Gawd is Smashing ever sucking these days. This article is a prime example of why. Mindless blathering with misinformed opinions that are completely irrelevant to design. Newsflash: a tool is just a tool, and focusing on the tool rather than the output of the designer makes you look like a total tool. That’s why Mac fanboy/girls are so hated these days.

    I’ve been in design for nearly 20 years, and guess what? The reality is that designers are switching to PC. When I started out in design, everyone used Macs. Now, more and more designers I meet are PC users. My position? Whatever floats your boat, as long as you promise to just get to work and not evangelize about why your choice is so much better than someone else’s. It’s totally gauche and lame, and has no bearing on the quality of work one can do.

    +1
  68. 68

    No offense, but…there are designers who don’t use Macs?

    I’ve been in this business over 15 years and I’ve never met a single person or shop who counted on anything else. Shops will sometimes have a few Windows machines around for cross-platform issues or Windows-only solutions such as imposition software, but 99% of actual work is done on Macs.

    Though I admit it’s not all that unusual to run across “designers” who use Publisher and then wonder why their pieces cost twice the amount to print.

    0
  69. 69

    We also need to be honest and cite clever advertising.

    +1
  70. 70

    Adrian Harvey

    April 26th, 2009 5:14 pm

    Another pointless Mac vs. Windows Article – I’m disappointed, would have expected better from Smashing Magazine!

    “Mark Nutter runs a web development shop in Minnesota. You can follow him on Twitter where he occasionally says something worthwhile.”

    Pity he says nothing worthwhile in this article

    +1
  71. 71

    Open Source Friendly
    And yet the freeware offerings are slim pickings. How is that free FTP software working out for you? Ohhh Cyberduck… yeah, nice. It’s simple to say the least.

    Built-in Tools
    Windows has these in the form on non-built in tools that you download if you want them. Vista has them, but I don’t want them.

    Unified User Interface
    I work with people who can’t even copy and paste to the correct folder in OSX. They are smart people who have worked with the system for years and still have issues getting things in order. I can’t help but think it’s a OS issue.

    Security
    Just as vulnerable. The fact less people use the system is the reason why it has less attacks. Recent articles suggest OSX is becoming a target. Hooray for Mac users, you get your spotlight now.

    No doubt, I bet I’m not the only one who touched on these subjects. It’s not a bad system but it has just as many faults as any other. Post was a little long and as always from a Mac user, self infatuating.

    0
  72. 72

    Here’s another point to make: if you are a true designer, and you cannot afford to buy or finance a mac, then you are not a designer.
    SM may lose some readers, but the true designers are here to stay. ;)

    0
  73. 73

    I am still playing with Windows right now and not switching to Max. If i need unix based, I will choose ubuntu or opensuse. But I admit, in Linux, there are lots of software but not as easy to use as in mac.

    0
  74. 74

    Nice Mac propaganda!

    0
  75. 75

    I recently switched to Mac and I love it – most of it. But two things itches me
    - battery charger heats up so quickly and hence have to charge while shut down and have to work on battery. Not so good design
    - To use function keys (on laptop), I need to press two keys (fn + function key). Again, not so good design for often used keys

    0
  76. 76

    Macs is better at graphics and they have lots more fonts so are better for designers.

    Seriously, Macs have a nicer interface, but most of the “main player” apps are on both and run equally well on both (though PC’s seem to have a speed advantage on Adobe stuff). Frankly, if you have worked on any major production, debates about PC vs Mac are quite pointless. You use whatever runs the software you need to run. Unfortunately, in the high-end film graphics area, Apple has really dropped the ball. FCP is good enough for TV stuff I suppose, but the slow death of Shake was embarrasing and has cost Apple dearly in the high-end market. The majority of studios have shifted away from Apple hardware and software solutions.

    However, it is obvious that Apple is not “about” computers anymore. Music players and phones are their core business now and it shows. The intel Macs are hardly impressive pieces of hardware.

    Don’t get me wrong, I love my Macbook Pro, but I am not drinking the Apple kool-aid yet. It is just a computer and anyone who defines their lifestyle around a computer is more than a little sad.

    0
  77. 77

    Wow – Smashing Mag used to actually have useful, interesting posts about design stuff. But I can understand it’s a lot more profitable to simply run an Apple commercial instead.

    If I want shallow, biased tech “reviews”, I’ll go to Engadget instead – thanks.

    +1
  78. 78

    I’ve been designing on Macs and PCs since the beginning of computer based design. PCs lost this battle many many years ago. I know Nobody who designs on PCs. Designers don’t have the time to put up with the crapolla that comes along with a PC.

    0
  79. 79

    The Mac vs. Windows debate will wage eternal, and the comments to this article make some really good points for both sides of the argument. Better points than the actual article does, so I’m not sorry I took a look.

    That said, the condescension and blatant hypocrisy in this article really rubbed me the wrong way.

    The opening stated:

    “…in the interest of sanity, we’ll try to avoid any direct comparisons to other operating systems.”

    And yet, the body of the article is rife with such diplomatic gems as:

    “If you were to ask a die-hard Windows user why he or she thinks people like Macs, they would almost invariably say the reasons are purely about aesthetics.”

    “The Windows user, when presented with these arguments, usually rolls his or her eyes and continues on their way.”

    So… apparently it’s not okay to directly compare the two systems — In the interest of sanity, you understand — but it IS okay to make broad-based, negative assumptions about the people who use Windows. I’m glad we cleared that up.

    Argument of Mac vs. Windows aside, this is horrible, unprofessional journalism, and is the latest in a disturbing trend of the same at a site that I used to value for it’s smart and informative content. Fail, Smashing Magazine. Huge fail. What a disappointment you’re becoming.

    0
  80. 80

    Expose alone is worth the price of admission. I have typically used a pc at work and mac at home, and I am always amazed at how much smoother my work flow is on a mac. I think it is due largely to expose and the speed at which I can switch between programs/windows.

    The KB shortcuts in adobe products also seem much more intuitive. Maybe I’m imagining it, but I doubt it, macs have been the choice of graphic designers for eons, so there has always been close ties between adobe products and mac.

    I was a pc person, and then for a long time, I wanted to be a mac person but couldn’t justified the cost and the “apple tax”. However, I eventually got a used mac, and now couldn’t imagine going back.

    That, and you can’t beat an os that allows you to upon a terminal and use vi on a default install.

    0
  81. 81

    @ Anita
    Just because of one tiny post, now SM has become a disappointment? That’s funny. Just one blog post, and move on to next! That’s the way blogs are, as inconvenient truth that may be.
    (now a mac user is rolling her eyes)

    0
  82. 82

    In the time it takes to bitch about what brand of glowing box you use, you could have designed something. Seriously, use what you like and shut the hell up.

    +1
  83. 83

    I felt this article was semi-decent.

    NOTE TO THE EDITOR: I would love to see your sources for this article. Otherwise, this is a bad example of what a Smashing Magazine article should be. Please continue to read below.

    There are so many false within this article onto what’s going on in the PC world. Bare in mind that I am a designer and web developer, with experience between Mac and PC. I love my MacBook Pro, and I will continue to use it proudly.

    “Apple has chosen not to enter the sub $1000 PC not because it doesn’t want to grow sales, but because it wants to avoid the dogfight that Sony, HP, and other brands are in for the lower end market.”

    An Apple Computer does not compare to a PC computer. Apple factors the cost on the laptop, OSX, support, and convenience, without the hassle. Due to recent stock reporting Q1 2009, Apple has reported an increase in revenue (mostly from their iPhone products); therefore, they have no reason to lower prices if consumers are willing to pay a hefty amount for their product. Also, If you notice the difference in prices between each Apple Laptop within the same series, you’ll see that they’re spaced out by roughly $300-500 (we’re talking about Apple stores, and their vendors such as Best Buy). This is done due to limiting selection, so choosing the Mac that’s right for you is easier. If they did introduce a laptop within that factor, there would be a decrease in sales of the higher-end laptops, and an increase in lower end.

    “Unfortunately, Windows doesn’t come bundled with PHP, Rails, or any other open-source web development frameworks or languages any time soon. More and more of what we do is in the cloud these days anyways and it is almost starting to feel quaint when you come across new software that runs solely as a desktop client. Microsoft has painted themselves into a corner – they rely on closed formats and standards in a world where open source software, open formats, and open standards are king.”

    If you’ve been following up with Smashing Magazine articles, you’ll find there are several websites that offer free development solutions to downloading onto a Windows PC. Not all solutions are available right out of the box, but I feel that would be OK. Microsoft has developed asp.NET, and allows you to download a free version of Visual Studios Express 2009 from their website. It’s not the essential choice for web development, but I wouldn’t go as far as lack of solutions available. In terms of your cloud computing statement, OSX includes development software out of the box. Wouldn’t that defeat the purpose of referencing cloud computing to begin with? Please, explain to your readers.

    Your article does express valuable information for why designers switch to Macs. You’ve clearly outlined it, but few of your reasons are subtle without including several more sources to back up your statements. It’s a pretty big deal.

    +1
  84. 84

    I use both every day and both for graphic design.

    Beasty PC = 2 grand, beasty MAC = 6 grand.

    Nuff said.

    0
  85. 85

    @Anita

    Thank you for pointing that out. I completely agree 100%. I expected something a little better from Smashing Magazine than to see this.

    0
  86. 86

    SmashingMagazine we are done. You have just lost another viewer. This article is just complete crap, I cannot say it any better then it was said above

    “…this isn’t really about designers, per se, as much as a general “OSX is cool” article.”

    Here is some of the bs you “claimed” in this article.

    “It means that the entire world of open source software out there is pretty much guaranteed to run without much hassle. In a world where open source software is a way of life, web developers need a friendly environment to operate in.”

    Uhmm what.. Yes it may have been based on unix when it was started but not any more… OSS is more widely available on PC then mac, and 100% on linux.

    “…partly because Unix is inherently more secure than Windows…”

    Wait which OS got hacked in under 5 seconds by a year old exploit? O yea… Mac. Which os did he state was hardest to hack? Windows, which browser? Chrome.. No safari, no OSX.

    OSX can virtualize all three major operating systems out of the box. This is a must have for checking browser compatibility. To make life even easier, you can do it right from within OSX using programs like Parallels, Virtualbox, and VMWare Fusion. And if you think web browsers render websites exactly the same regardless of the operating system they’re running on you are sorely mistaken.

    Yes you said this twice, but all 3 OS’s can do this, just not right out of the box. Honestly how many people do this? Only a select few which is exactly why it should not be included in the OS by default. As you said Minimalism, but I say bloat.

    Opinionated Software

    This is a very bad thing, I have lost a lot of respect for you by saying this is a good thing. This gives apple complete and total control over everything. If apple wanted every window to have a big pink and purple button in the middle of the window, what could you do about it? Nothing

    Most developers are perfectly willing to trouble shoot their own computers, but when deadlines need to be met it can be nice knowing that you can offload some of that hassle to people who already know the system inside and out.

    Heres a true story for you.
    Apple: We need you to send your computer in for us to check it. You should have it back in 2-4 weeks….
    I never have a problem meeting deadlines when I don’t have a computer for 2-4 weeks. Great support my ass.

    Unfortunately, Windows doesn’t come bundled with PHP, Rails, or any other open-source web development frameworks or languages any time soon.

    Just as you said minimalistic. Why would anyone but web developers want php and rails running on their computers? Noone wants that crap on there except web developers and we make up a very small percent of computer users.

    As I stated above you have lost another viewer. I hope you change and write quality articles again so you don’t lose more.

    0
  87. 87

    The reasons above are not the reasons for switching to a Mac at all.

    I only agree with two statements above, the feature “Spaces”, it eases my workflow and saves me a lot of clutter than working on XP.

    Second, the small amount of software available to Mac. While all Adobe products are available, Mac is certainly not for 3D designers.

    0
  88. 88

    @Agnes

    You might want to read the entire comment, as I said, “…is the latest in a disturbing trend of the same…” IE, a lot of the articles I’ve been reading here have been sub-par. I’ve been faithfully following and recommending SM for a couple of years now, and the recent content just doesn’t seem up to the quality I’ve come to expect.

    You seem to be making the assumption that my criticism is to do with the Mac vs. Windows debate (As in, I’m a Windows user and I just want to complain about a Mac article), as you’ve mentioned being a Mac user. My complaint has nothing to do with Mac vs. Windows (I love Macs), it’s to do with crappy and biased journalism posted under the guise of objectivity.

    0
  89. 89

    I’ve got the best of both worlds. I was always a windows guy and plus, I never wanted to pay so much money for a mac when you can build a 10x faster PC for the same price. I recently discovered that you could install MAC on a custom PC. Sure it was a little tricky but it was THE BEST thing i have ever done. I now have a custom mac that i can upgrade just as easily as a PC. And its hella fast.
    I have dual booted Leopard and Vista on my custom built PC, so when uni work comes I boot into Leopard, and its great because I cant get distracted by any games(since they are all on windows). If at any time i need to do anything on windows, i restart and select windows. Voila.
    If you’re interested I’m sure a search engine should give you all the information you need.
    Just make sure you own a copy of OSX to make sure you’re not doing anything illegal.

    0
  90. 90

    I don’t really care about the whole Mac/Win debate. From a productivity perspective, Adobe runs good on both, and there is plenty of webdev software on every platform.

    Now, what would be useful is an article on how to do cross browser testing for free on any given platform. Safari on Windows is easy, but what about IE6 7 and 8 simultaneously on both Mac and Windows?

    0
  91. 91

    Dominic Whittle

    April 26th, 2009 6:14 pm

    How about that CS4 on mac runs like a dog compared to CS4 on windows?
    Yeah, so if you’re a designer and you don’t mind your productivity slowed…. get a mac.

    (I have a brand new top-spec 15″ unibody MacBook Pro)

    “Unified User Interface” — Macs are let down by a total lack of consistent keyboard shortcuts. And don’t pretend people don’t use keyboard shortcuts. MY TIME IS IMPORTANT.

    0
  92. 92

    Joe Brightwell

    April 26th, 2009 6:16 pm

    While the cost of a Mac might be more competitive with the PC-equivalent in North America or Europe, down under the cost of a Mac with the same specifications as a PC is nearly double.

    For example, last year I would’ve bought a MacBook Pro but the cost was too much – $3000 NZD MacBook Pro vs a $1300 NZD Dell Vostro. I then used the remaining money to go on a holiday and to buy/update Adobe software.

    For me, cost is the only factor in the PC vs Mac war. If cost weren’t an issue, I’d definitely have both. PC desktop machine for home, MacBook Pro for a laptop.

    In regards to employers hiring Mac-only staff, I think that’s silly but as designers we should be more prepared and skilled with multiple operating systems.

    A good chunk of design companies down under use Macs but most use PCs, while a lot of the general public are brand-whores and spend their cash on Macs just to be cool.

    Oh and if your PC has got spyware or viruses, then stop looking at stupid email forwards, porn or warez websites. I haven’t had trouble with those things for years with WinXP for both work and home (and I’m still using it!). I haven’t even bothered with Vista yet…

    0
  93. 93

    The Poker Jerk

    April 26th, 2009 6:19 pm

    I have the real reasons:

    1) Because they are hipsters
    1) Because it’s trendy
    1) Because they think they’re “supposed to” since they are designers
    1) They think it will make them look cool
    1) They really think it’s better, since they never used a PC before

    0
  94. 94

    Its true that the tool is important in design, but this article is a shameless plugging of MAC… not that I am a die-hard PC user, nor a MAC pisser. C’mon, arent these up in the Mac site already? Why must we post a remake in SM?

    Design, regardless of machine… is nothing without the persistence, creativity, inspiration… and the latest Adobe.

    0
  95. 95

    I’m a Mac whore and simply hate PC because of Microsoft and Windows. Exactly as SM pointed out.

    We all know PC is a powerful tool. But you people pointing out price and power are totally missing the point of this article.

    Intuitiveness people……intuitiveness………..

    0
  96. 96

    I’m not switching to any company that nicknames their new Operating System version “Snow Leopard”.

    0
  97. 97

    @ Anita
    This is a blog. Not journalism. A blog is an opinion driven content since its inception.
    I am not a part of SM staff, I just think your comment isn’t just, quite on the contrary- I find the content very useful. You can’t find it anywhere else, if you do, give me a link or two.
    You always have the option not to visit this or any other particular blog, so the complaining is useless, a waste of your and our time.

    0
  98. 98

    either, it’s just a matter of getting used to it…and the budget of course. ;)

    0
  99. 99

    Now that Apple is taking sooooo much business away from Micrososft, I no longer feel moved to evangelise to avoid being absorbed by the “Borg.” I’m just happy knowing I’m no longer on the endangered species list. There are some rational reasons I prefer MacOS: I spend “zero” time running my computer and 100% of my time being productive; I don’t have to worry about criminals who live only to destroy my peace of mind – I have been connected to the internet since the early 1990s / have never run anti-virus software / have never run a firewall / have never caught so much as a sniffle; my computers cost more – but they come with a basic suite of “bugless” interoperable applications I would pay a lot to install on an IBMpc clone.

    To each their own – the article is factual and not overly opinionated in my opinion.

    0
  100. 100

    The real reasons people switch to mac.

    #1 they look hip when they work in a coffee shop

    #2 apple spends millions making commercials paying off bloggers like you to promote their product, and microsoft spends nothing comparatively on marketing.

    This article is a piece of shit. Completely unbiased. Right. I like the negatives for macs… no right click button and control is command… Oh shit..

    Oh, I can drag and drop images from my browser into photoshop too…

    I think they both have their benefits, and I like working with macs, But come on, this reads like an apple advert. You are all sheep.

    0

  1. 1

    Arguing on the Internet is like running in the Special Olympics.

    Even if you win, you’re still retarded.

    +11
  2. 2

    Ehm…

    Developers? Are you sure about that? Parsing around some html and css isn’t exactly development.

    Most any CS class is taught in Windows/Linux, always has been. Compiling in OSX is pretty crap. Xtools is pretty horrid. Eclipse/Zend kill it.

    Ruby on Mac? Uhhh Ruby is free.

    Python perhaps? Yeah Python is free too…

    MAMP? ummm XAMPP on Windows, LAMP on linux

    Adobe products? Are you serious? It’s on both.

    Textmate? You actually paid 30 dollars to edit some text LoL

    * The Digital Color Meter – umm Windows ColorCop free, done.
    * Console – uhh command line, cygwin, power shell
    * Terminal – vim is FREE
    * XCode Tools – pretty horrid, visual studio/eclipse/zend are all better
    * Zoom – windows has this built in.
    * Safari Debug Mode – Safari is hands down THE worst browser out of the big 4.
    * Time Machine – if you can’t figure out windows backups well… please stay away from my companies equipment. There is a reason we lock all you “designers” out of important file systems/admin levels.

    Intel Inside? uhh okay, have fun paying double to triple the price.

    support? umm Genius bar workers aren’t that technical, sorry to break it to you.

    virtualization? you are kidding right, Windows has been doing this forever.

    textmate/growl… again, pathetic. filezilla notepad++ komodo eclipse…for the win…

    open source friendly? uhhh open source stuff runs like crap half the time in Xwindows.

    Anyway, do not trust this article if you are an aspiring developer, you should probably start learning linux thought, don’t waste your time with darwin/mac…

    Only reason you would need a mac to dev on is if you are working with iphone/ipad sdk or writing actual mac apps in objective c or cocoa.

    +10
  3. 3

    Zitat from:

    8. Dieter Mueller (April 26th, 2009, 2:30 pm)

    “How lame.

    I am a freelancer since 1989 – using both Macs & PC. Maybe five but certainly ten years ago there were REAL reasons to use a Mac: better fonts, better applications, better hardware (how that has changed – Macs are basically Intel clones today and Apple’s production standards have slipped in some products) more stable production environment. Today Photoshop is Photoshop (or any other important design tool) – no matter on which box you run it on.

    A good designer delivers good work NO MATTER which tool he uses – even when it’s only pen and paper. Stop that techno & brand fetishism – do some good work instead.”

    now its me:

    Really lame, its just about the image. Apple has a nice clean Design. For shure! You love it as an Designer or developer or whatever. But i use windows at home. Its more flexible and developers can do every job on this platform. i think the macDesign is really good and the biggest point why you love it. My windows pc is build up from single parts by my own i installed an customized windows and that feels really personal to me. Why do you say my mac? he looks the same like all the other once :-) Why should i pay alot of money for a brandname. I dont trust both of them but apple looks more like the big company wich closes the doors for other companys. i hate ipods! :-D i hate the i muhahaha and the cake is a lie!!! So for every one a piece of cake!

    +9
  4. 4

    Currently I’m freelancing as a web designer, but I have far more professional experience as a developer. I spent around 5 years working on protocol stacks and OS firmware with another 2 years working on sever side software. I also happened to switch from Windows to OSX earlier this year, and I think your list is not representative of why developers move over to OSX.

    I’ll start by saying that I do like OSX better than Windows XP / Vista and I have found the OSX experience to be quite nice. Windows 7 has some nice touches I miss in OSX, but I prefer OSX at this point. The interface is fast and consistent, the integrated tools make everyday life easier, and Apple’s directed tool and API designs have made the vast majority of third party software quite enjoyable to use.

    However, none of these things had any bearing on why I switched from Windows to OSX.

    To the vast majority of software developers out there, the OS is simply a tool and nothing more. Aesthetics and consistency of design are not a major concern as long as it can efficiently and effectively get the job done. I cannot stress this more. Developers are concerned with getting the job done and the OS is just a means to get there.

    Your list is inverted in a sense. Functionality is the main concern for developers, not in the sense of having a solid consistent interface, but rather does the system provide the functionality I need or want. A lot of software developers are educated as either engineers, computer scientists, or mathematicians. We’ve spent years exposed to some of the most arcane finicky software there is and typically have a fairly strong UNIX background. For developers, convoluted or somewhat poorly designed interfaces are sometimes an acceptable trade off for functionality and not even a question if the software is simply not available on OSX.

    For instance, hardware designers will not work on OSX simply because the board layout and circuit design tools are not available. There are alternatives, but asking a professional hardware engineer to work with OSX alternatives would be equivalent to asking a graphic designer to use MS Paint instead of Illustrator or Photoshop.

    Imagine for a moment that your article is on a special bundle of tools on sale at the local hardware store instead of operating systems. Your article talks about how nice the finish is on the hammers, how there is a solid well thought out toolbox included in the package, and a perfect set of screw drivers with rubberized grips and magnetized heads. If I’m a wood worker looking for a skill saw it doesn’t matter how well designed the toolbox is or what kind of special chrome platting is on the hammers. I’m looking for a skill saw.

    Way down at the bottom of your list you mention a small caveat — the fifth caveat to be precise — “Much Smaller Software Library”. This is precisely the reason developers would or would not move to OSX. OSX is a great OS, and it’s a nice balance between aesthetics and functionality, but if it doesn’t provide the functionality a developer wants then none of that matters.

    The reason why I switched was because Windows did not provide the functionality that I wanted, which is to say iPhone development and a higher performance more well supported RoR stack. If you ask a developer who moved from OSX from Windows, you’ll often get a very similar response. There are typically specific reasons why they switched and many of those will having nothing to do with the reasons you mentioned.

    I’ve avoided addressing the specific points of your article until now, because I feel that it would be somewhat distracting. However, here are some complaints:

    Open Source Friendly:
    Windows has the vast majority of OSS available either natively or via Cygwin

    Quartz Extreme:
    Speed is the primary concern. Remember you’re talking to people who spent half a decade studying engineering or mathematics — alt-tabing is often faster when you have memorized the entire alt-tab order. Especially when Expose is just about useless when you’re looking at a dozen terminals and VIM windows.

    Core Animation:
    Again, it’s a great thing, but you’re talking to people who spent months of their lives writing assembly or using the abysmal stone age mess which is R (a statistical software package) — suffering through software when it provides features that are simply not available on OSX is fine

    Built-in Tools:
    Third party alternatives to the ones listed will get the job done whether it’s pretty or not. The claim that VIM is a reason to move is farcical since I’ve been using VIM on Windows for over a decade now. On XCode, frankly Visual Studio is an excellent tool with many features not available in any software on OSX, but again it’s just a tool. If I need to write OS X software I’m not going to use Visual Studio. You mention Time Machine as a reason to switch, but developers use revision control systems such as Perforce, Subversion, GIT, etc. Backups are nice, but I can just as easily get a new machine, image the drive, then grab all the latest code from the repository.

    Textmate, Growl, Quicksilver, and more:
    I use gVIM. Others use Emacs. It will be very difficult to argue that Textmate offers anything that is not available in either of those packages. If anything, Textmate is an effort to make some of the power that’s available in VIM and Emacs accessible. Every feature you mentioned is available in VIM and Emacs, and quite a few of them are available in even MS Dev. Quicksilver and what not is nice, but recall that we’re trying to get a specific job done here. Growl does nothing to help developers get a job done. Furthermore, there are viable alternatives on Windows of which I used to use many.

    Quick Look:
    Great, except it’s useless for code.

    Virtualization and Intel:
    Nice if you’re targeting OSX, otherwise VMWare Workstation is superior since it’s geared towards enterprise deployment, management, and development. If you’re used both Fusion and Workstation you’ll know what I mean. Also, web developers are subset of the development community and not representative of the whole.

    Support:
    On troubleshooting, I don’t think you’re considering the typical developer environment. The reason why developers often diagnose and fix their own issues is usually a pragmatic one: it’s faster. If you have a difficult problem with your system or software, typically technical support will be a massive waste of time on both OSX and Windows. On hardware, if there’s a problem you simply replace it. Corporations stock hardware and if you can’t solve it quickly, just replace the entire system and let IT figure out how to fix your old box. It seems like this article is geared towards solo web developers, which isn’t really the reality for most developers.

    +8
  5. 5

    Hello, I'm pointlesss.

    April 28th, 2009 4:56 am

    I’ve been a developer since (insert ridiculous date here) and I’ve always used (insert irrelevant OS here), even on my old (insert old school computer name that makes you sound cool and knowledgeable here). After (insert huge number here) years as a professional, I can honestly say that (insert irrelevant OS here) is much better than any other OS.
    (insert irrelevant OS here) has never given me problem and anyone who says otherwise is just angry and unhappy.

    Also, check out my article on the “Forty-three and a half reasons why albino Uzbekistanians flatulists are switching to Pepsi” (the answer might surprise you). It’s full of facts and pertinent points.

    Buy Pepsi.

    +7
  6. 6

    I’ve used both Mac and Windows, and I must say I feel more at home with Windows. Though I’m not a Mac hater.

    I’ve heard the only real solid argument against Windows for Designers (away from all this “I prefer…” and subjective choices) is that Mac OS X handles fonts better, which is why printing presses use them etc. I’ve heard that they won’t accept files sent to them from a PC, is this true?

    +7
  7. 7

    mac != .net

    Real developers will know what that means.

    +6
  8. 8

    Hollis Bartlett

    April 27th, 2009 9:28 am

    The big point everyone missed including the article author is the genius behind Apple’s marketing, and the evidence is shown here. Apple have polarized everyone between OSx and Windows, when in fact Apple is a computer company. A better comparison would be Apple vs. Dell or something, especially when comparing esthetics and stuff like that. My Dell Studio laptop has more features than a Macbook, way more power, runs Adobe stuff fast, and never crashes despite the heavy use it gets. Oh, and it cost half as much. I’d buy a Mac if they were reasonably priced, but they’re not even close.

    Yes, some PCs suck. But some don’t. If you get a quality PC from a decent vendor with support, it is every much as stable as a Mac. The problem is some people comparing their old PC with WIndows 98 to their new Mac they bought to replace it. It’s the same as me saying my old blue iMac sucked big time compared to my new 64 bit Vista Dell.

    +6
  9. 9

    Ah, the PC vs. Mac debate.

    I have both. I don’t think I’ll ever buy an Apple desktop, and I don’t think I’ll ever buy a Windows-based notebook. Apple knows how to make good notebook machines – well-designed cases, useful function buttons and decent aesthetics. But the standards are slipping a lot – what the hell is up with this glossy obsession. I can see more of my face than I can the screen, unless I start burning my eyes with the ridiculous backlight.

    For me, the Mac OS (7..8,9,X) has always been a long way behind windows in terms of pure utilitarian usability. With the one exception of the Expose task switcher – that’s been a godsend on my portable use. But Expose isn’t anywhere near perfect. It’s always been a lot slower than Windows, the features you list up there are largely useless to me, or superficial. OSX doesn’t have a unified UI and you know it. Quartz Extreme isn’t a big deal – Vista/Win7 have the same class of compositing UI engine – and you really don’t gain much other than eye candy (which, coincidentally, slows one down). Security is a non-issue – Mac OS has issues, Windows has issues, and neither is more or less open-source friendly than the other.

    When it comes to third party apps, if you’re a home or hobby user, Apple’s got your back – TextMate is neat, Growl is great, and Adium is smooth as butter. But for bigger apps, Windows is many years ahead. The Adobe Creative Suite runs better on Windows – and you can downgrade to CS1 or 2 for some apps if you’re sick of Adobe’s UI & performance bullshit. Try that on an Intel Mac – yeah, didn’t think so. Java apps run better on windows. IDEs on Mac OS X are terrible compared to their windows counterparts. Even multiplatform Java-based IDEs like Eclipse and NetBeans just work a lot better on Windows (thanks to Java on OSX…).

    Really though, the biggest motivating factor for me right now is the fact that on the desktop, I can get almost twice the performance for half the price, and I’m not locked down to Apple’s hardware, so a year later I double my performance again for a quarter the price of a new mac. Notebooks are different – you’re locked in either way, and Apple makes a superior machine – or at least, they used to – I’m not so sure anymore.

    +6
  10. 10

    @David Ma: You sure made my day! thank you for posting a trully amazing response i totally agree with you, i was starting to get pissed by the second while i was reading more and more comments until i read yours, THANK YOU

    this is truly weird, im a developer (not just for web ) and i must say that the facts are kinda obscure on this article, im not saying if i prefer a Mac or a Pc because its silly, and i wont say i prefer windows over OsX or Linux, i do know lots of designers that works with OsX and some that works with windows (heck even some that use linux as well) it all comes to what you feel will improve your tools and not wich one is pretier or capable, i have fixed machines with all 3 Os and i have seen all 3 of them crash, i just dont see whats the big deal with all of this comparisions.

    in the end you are using a tool to achieve your goal dont try to convince other people to use your tools if they have their own

    +5
  11. 11

    What on earth is this article? Reasons why developers are switching (which is far from being a given), or reasons why the user thinks OSX is cooler? Done much astroturfing lately?

    Some of these points are just absolute rubbish.

    “Open source friendly” … and my Windows machine isn’t? That’s news to me, considering how much open source software I actually use, not to mention that I’ve got a Linux(Cygwin) that I can use without any problem, and a full Apache web server with MySQL and PHP installed (thanks to Xampp). Yeah, I had to go to Google, search for them, download and install, but frankly, if someone is too stupid to be able to do that, then they shouldn’t even be thinking of owning a computer.

    “Built in tools” … I’ll get a Freeware or Open Source tool when I need it, instead of having built in tools that I may not want.

    “Textmate, Growl, Quicksilver, and more” … are you being serious? You’re telling me that I can’t get Windows applications that can do these things? Windows has a built in quick-launch utility: the run Box. Setup shortcuts in c:\windows, name them to one keyword (e.g. “ff” for firefox) then just go Windows-R, type “ff”, hit enter. Doesn’t suit you? Go to lifehacker and find a few freeware ones. There are plenty. For Textmate, use Eclipse (or use Context for something very lightweight). For an IM client use Trillian, Pidgin, or a host of others that are out there.

    “Security” … Haven’t had a virus or piece of malware on my machine for many, many years now. A bit of common sense and education goes a lot further than deciding to choose a Mac or PC.

    As for the “Switch because it’s Microsoft” argument … if you honestly believe that Apple are somehow going to behave any better as a company should their market power and market share increase, then you’re either delusional, or an Apple fundamentalist. What you should say is switch to something like Ubuntu and go completely Open Source.

    Frankly, a good workman NEVER blames his tools. I’m so sick of the “OSX Mac is better than Windows PC” (and vice versa) debate, that I use it now as a good sign that someone is too obsessed with things that just don’t matter.

    SM, let’s move away from the fan-boy garbage, and stick to what you do best.

    +5
  12. 12

    I feel like I’m the only person who dislikes the interface with Macs. I strongly dislike the one-button mouse (especially years ago when the mouse was perfectly circular), the GUI, and the location of various aspects of the system. I don’t find them intuitive at all! I do like the operating system base, but I’ve done web development/design on Windows machines for years and even after almost a year of using a Mac at work/at school, I still won’t make the change.

    I’m of the same opinion as a lot of the responders that Mac is the “hip” and “trendy” thing to do. At my college a lot of our programmers call it “trendy garbage”. Not worth the price for the small benefit.

    I’m also a gamer and most games are not compatible with Macs, unfortunately. Further fueling the fire for me NOT to get one.

    +5
  13. 13

    I’ve used Macs and there isn’t really anything wrong with them, but Windows FTW for me. I also game and can build a stronger computer with the amount of money I would be putting into a Mac.

    And with regards to this article’s title, “developing” is no different with these two OSes in my opinion.

    +4
  14. 14

    Quit yer yappin! All of ya!

    +4
  15. 15

    @expressions
    Don’t express opinions as facts. Stating that C# is the “best language” is a matter of opinion and is not a fact. I’ve written applications using both C# and Objective-C and I prefer to write in Objective-C for Mac OS X and the iPhone. If you’re going to say that one language is the best, at least provide a reason for your answer. I’m sure you’re also aware of the Mono project as well.

    As far as Adobe applications such as Photoshop, Illustrator, and Dreamweaver – the article never stated that they were any different on Microsoft Windows or Mac OS X. This statement that you provided was unnecessary.

    There could be a multitude of reasons as to why most viruses aren’t targeted towards Mac OS X. 1. Perhaps the writer doesn’t know Objective-C or C++; 2. Smaller, but growing, audience; 3. Lack of knowledge in the Mac OS X operating system. Seeing as how you seem to know both operating systems inside and out, I’m sure you’ve thought of these possibilities.

    I don’t know of anyone who would buy a Mac specifically because of the support for Ruby or Ruby on Rails. As a Ruby on Rails developer, I would not even purchase a computer just because it ships with support for the framework. However, I would purchase a computer based on the user experience, consistency, and applications. I’m not sure if you’re aware, but most operating systems come with bundled software. Yes, Microsoft does this too.

    “if are developing for windows you are developing for larger audience.” Please humor me more. The audience isn’t Microsoft Windows users – it’s who you decide to target. You don’t target users based on the operating system. If I had a designer or developer that had this mindset, the developer would no longer be working for me.

    Saying they are alike has some validity. Of course they’re going to be alike – they’re both operating systems. Who knew? Those are the only similarities I can think of.

    If you’re going to post statement as if they’re factual, provide reasoning. I had thought that the school systems had taught this in elementary and middle school levels.

    +4
  16. 16

    Let me deconstruct your horrid article, since you are clearly not a developer or involved in IT:

    1. Open Source Friendly
    Um. Yea. You can run UNIX VM on a PC, or any other VM. You can even multi boot LINUX + Windows XP etc, using BAT files. If anything, as you stated throughout the article, APPLE is CLOSED! About everything, it’s all licensed; you have to pay more to develop on a Apple then a PC, period. The Open Source movement was anti licensing, exactly the sort of thing Apple does 110%.

    2. Quartz Extreme
    Wow, Direct3D, OpenGL; been on PCs for years; same with 3rd party open source apps that let you switch desktops etc, since Windows 95. The graphics options on PCs is what brought you OpenGL, and all those pretty CGI movie effects you see. They are available now, and more powerful then ever.

    3. Core Animation
    Didn’t you just say that “cloud computing” is the future, yet here you tout a client development feature. You are seriously talking about animations as “flashy”, there are reasons why Gamers who play “flashy” games use PCs.

    4. Built In Tools
    All those tools exist in Windows, and more. Keep calling yourselves “developers” etc. while you are coding in some text program some CSS…

    5. Unified User Interface
    Wow, the interface hasn’t changed in around 20 years! Great job apple, it just got “flashier”. You can drag an image off your Firefox into your Photoshop now, on a PC…sigh

    6. Security
    There is simply less malware out there because malware targets enterprises, who would never, ever, sign contracts for infrastructure for business with Apple.

    7. Textmate, Growl, Quicksilver, and more
    Every one of those apps have multiple free or pay options on Windows or the web. And who in their right mind would develop a multi-million dollar multi-tier application using Textmate…

    8. Quick Look
    Seriously, why is this useful? You probably only have Photoshop and Safari open anyways, since thats pretty much what 99% of all Mac users use. And yes, there is an Alt Tab feature in Windows, its pretty revolutionary, back in the 90s……. ..

    9. Virtualization
    Out of the box, but how much more $$$ for the box? Microsoft offers FREE VM now, for all Windows users. VMWare exists on PC. And yes Browsers most like render the same, and there are sites out there to help with that. And wait, weren’t we on the topic of development? Oh wait, you’ve been talking about “design” since step 1!

    2nd Reason : Intel
    The reason they switched to Intel was because PowerPC chips were trash, period. Plus you repeated your virtualization argument…

    3rd Reason : Less Hassle
    Opinionated Software
    How is this a good thing? Every REAL developer wants full control, and understanding of the solution. Also, you can code Ruby on PCs! Also you are touting out of the box solutions and claiming “development”, you might as well call WordPress “development”. Again, your a designer, clearly, not a developer.

    Support
    LOL, how is this pertinent to development? Are you going to go ask a minimum wage “Gen1us” how you should handle your abstract variables, database queries, page rendering lifecycles? Yea, I thought not. But he’d gladly sell you a new iPhone speaker set for 200$.

    5th Reason : Microsoft
    I don’t think they are perfect. But seriously if you think Apple is NOT designed by committee, then you clearly live in your own little world, or this is your first job. And no, OSX does not run well on an 8 year old Powerbook LOL.

    And oh man, theres the pot calling the kettle black with “they rely on closed formats and standsrds”. Apple is NOT Open Source, its 110% licensing; look into how much it costs to buy development licenses to create some iPhone apps sometime.

    And once again you make yourself look uninformed and NOT a developer, the concept of cloud computing has been here since, well forever, it’s basically just web programming with social networking, get a clue.

    Design and Minimalism:
    Build your own PC! And why are you saying Google and Yahoo are great designs, have you not looked at the showcases on this site??? Have you not seen the amazing 1000s of PC cases you can get yourself and mod all you want? Have you not seen an Enigma/Rainmeter desktop in all its glory? Probably not.

    Anyways. This article is horrid, as it doesn’t even touch on what developers CAN do on a MAC, its just an Apple vs. PC article. I really respected Smashing until this nonsense. Please just stick to design and showcases.

    I am biased toward PCs, because if you really know what you are doing they are a superior platform, period. But if you are an everyday Joe, Macs are great; they allow easy web surfing and some fun apps.

    However. Keep spending $$$ on Apples and PCs, because I like the competition. Microsoft has to try harder now, they were stagnant for a while. And that competition only makes things better for all of us in the end, Apple or Microsoft or w/e.

    +4
  17. 17

    I don’t see your point of claiming Mac’s security. The number of exposed (publicly known) bugs does not represent how many bugs are actually inside the OS. It might be simply because Windows (for example) has a larger user base and received more attention on its security, thus more bugs are found. There have had been projects like the Month of Apple Bugs, Month of Kernel Bugs that reveals a lot of bugs in a month. All I am saying is you need statistical references to support your reasoning unless you are an expert of this particular domain.

    +4
  18. 18

    when i switched from mac to pc about a decade ago, the speed of my output/workflow more than doubled. this was primarily due to the two-button mouse, windows keyboard shortcuts, windows explorer, and the speed of working in DOS mode. all i care about is how quickly i can get from point A to point B. the only thing the mac does (and yes, I have worked on a mac in recent years), is slow me down. why? it just takes a longer to do all the same things. and i really don’t give a crap about what it looks like since i spend 99% of my time in the same looking applications anyway. photoshop on a pc looks the same on a mac. FF in a pc looks the same on a mac. PHP in a text editor looks the same on a pc as it does on a mac. i just don’t get why some people are actually proud of the fact that they’ve got a mac for which they’ve paid nearly twice as much! kind-of reminds me of my jr-high days when i actually felt better about myself because of the Polo shirts that I wore which cost twice as much as ordinary shirts. at the end of the day, it was just a shirt, and Polo was the one smiling. (maybe the same is true for Diesel jeans… I mean c’mon!!! now who’s kidding who?)

    +4
  19. 19

    Link is broken… It’s says a lot about using a MAC for web developing. :)

    +4
  20. 20

    Jack Franklin

    April 27th, 2009 9:21 am

    Not that greater article IMO.

    Last time I looked, my laptop has a mouse (trackpad, essentially the same), a keyboard, a screen, runs the adobe programs easily and runs everything I need, I look after it and I think in 6 months I’ve had 1 crash. My laptop cost be £400, the nearest Mac laptop is substantially more, and for a student, that’s too much to pay.

    Yes I would love a Mac and when I am older and hopefully have more money I will buy one. But the entire MACS ARE MUCH MUCH BETTER argument needs to be given up. It’s not true. And yes I have used Macs before for work – I’ve done various work experience at graphic design companys on Macs, and to be honest maybe they were a little better but certainly not enough to make me want to fork out the extra cash.

    +3
  21. 21

    Sorry but this is BULLSHIT! MAC price is OVERPRICED for NO REASON. Windows have EVERYTHING what MAC have all soft and even more then MAC. This is just a commercial.

    +3
  22. 22

    Hahaa… I wonder if some people even read the article, as I see a lot of “OMG, you CAN use Photoshop on Windows!!” arguments.

    I think it’s just because the strikethrough for the title font doesn’t come out very clear.

    The article is about DEVELOPERS using Macs. ;)

    I’ve worked on both, and I can simply say I prefer Macs as they’re less of a hassle (for me) than working on a PC.

    But to each their own. You won’t see me running to my PC-using friends thumbing my nose at them or trying to convince them to switch. Just work with what you’re happy with, but it doesn’t hurt to keep an open mind, either.

    +3
  23. 23

    The Digital Color Meter – a tool that allows you to grab the color value of any pixel on your screen.
    Really? OMG that’s advanced! And such a fancy name! It’s digital, not analogue like on the crappy PC, where you take photos of the screen, print them and measure the color using a magnifier and a Pantone Book.

    Because of the strict user interface guidelines provided by the Apple software development tools, applications and utilities on a Mac feel like they are all part of the same system.

    Sure, that’s exactly what Stalin thought. Wear uniforms, be part of the system, don’t dare to be different.
    PC2Mac on Twitter

    +3
  24. 24

    Miture Binesderti

    September 3rd, 2010 4:41 pm

    @Mohit: If it’s hard on a Mac you’re doing it wrong.

    I’m amazed that you were able to google how to change the pointer speed by a command prompt but didn’t find a link to System Preferences. I think you may just be one of those people that finds everything in life difficult because you want it to be so.

    Also you don’t change the mouse pointer speed in windows by magically waving your mouse around and having windows know what you mean (as you imply). Instead you do this:
    1) Click on start.
    2) Click on control panel…
    2a) Unless it’s not there so you have to click on system
    2b) Unless it’s not there so then you have to click on programs
    2b1) Click on system
    2b2) Click on control panel
    3) Click on the mouse icon
    ( it may be in different locations depending on how you have your control panel setup)
    4) Click on the motion tab…
    4a) Unless a third party driver is installed on your system like Logitech then good luck finding it among the 47 tabs.
    5) Slide the slider.
    Note: Do NOT turn on the mouse trails because it will bring every game you play to a crawl.

    How do you do it in on a Mac?
    1) Click on System Preferences (the little gear icon on your menu bar)
    2) Click on the mouse icon that says “Mouse” (makes sense huh?)
    3) Slide the very first slider that says, “Tracking speed.”

    Or

    1) Type mouse in Spotlight (you don’t even have to type it all, just “mou”)
    2) Press enter
    3) Slide the very first slider that says, “Tracking speed.”

    The problem is not the OS, it’s you. You don’t like things that are different. They make you uncomfortable by tickling that primitive instinct that change is bad. This does not make you a bad person, it just makes you normal. However your level of anger at change is something you might want to look into.

    +3
  25. 25

    I have used PCs and Macs all my life, my MacBook Pro is a piece of shi__t compared to my PC. Mac laptop are SO slow, if you have $10,000 and buy a mac desktop that’s another story. Imaging spending $10k in a desktop PC?

    +2
  26. 26

    You guys conviced me, I’m now going to buy a mac, cause every good designer you know uses one. It’s so cool to become a top designer now, cause my creativity was blocked from jealousy so long. Thank you!

    +2
  27. 27

    “The other nice thing is that I can do work almost as quickly on my 5-year-old iBook G4 as I can on my brand new 24″ iMac”

    Your brand new 24″ iMac must be pretty darn slow then.

    I own A PC, a Mac(laptop), and my children use Ubuntu. The all have pro’s and cons, but I am much more productive with my PC.

    +2
  28. 28

    @a Martin, 356

    I’m not against Macs or PCs, they are both great platforms. I am against the radical nature of uneducated Apple fanboi’s. Macs are great for the new PC user (and yes a Mac is still a Personal Computer, PC). But the majority of developers in the real world do not use Macs, period.

    And this article doesn’t belong on such a great website like Smashing Magazine; just delete this article else this place turn into an engadget or macrumors or other such nonsense site.

    +2
  29. 29

    jesse is right

    +2
  30. 30

    Odd, I know not one developer that uses a Mac, open source user or otherwise.

    Mac is no more open source friendly that Windows, in fact there is probably more open source software that will only run in Windows.

    I wonder if the percentage of malware on Apples vs Windows matches the install base. In my mind why bother targeting a smaller base of users if you have a larger market to attack ?

    Textmate – wow one editor like most major pieces of software on the market for a Mac – I can’t even count the number of editors I haved tried over time, all probably just as good

    Windows has been doing system virtualisation long before Apple ever dreamed of it. Again, not just one choice of software to do it. Many!

    I am wondering when Apple are going to be hit with the same anti-trust lawsuits for including all that software they do with the operating system. Same set of rules should apply to them that apply to Microsoft!!!

    As for Apple support – in South Africa it’s non-existant – watching my designer friends silly enough to use it trying to get a RAM module swapped in warranty has been extremely entertaining – the local distributor is a crook.

    This article is written by a typical Microsoft basher – get a life…

    I wonder how much Apple paid Smashing Magazine for this fluff piece ? I think this is the last time I visit this site. RSS reader (yes one of many on Windows) – DELETE!

    +2

↑ Back to top