Smashing Magazine - we smash you with the information that will make your life easier. really.
10 Common Mistakes In Logo Design
With the power of the Web, and more eyes watching than ever, it’s important for a business to communicate its unique message clearly. The easiest way to recognize a company and distinguish it from others is by its logo. Below, we go through 10 common logo design mistakes that you should avoid if you want to create a successful and professional logo.
1. Designed By An Amateur

Avoid websites that promote ridiculously cheap logo packages. You get what you pay for.
A professional business should look professional. New business owners often invest a lot of time and money in property and equipment, but do not often match it by investing suitably in their logo.
Here are the most common reasons why many logos look amateurish:
- The business owner wanted to save money by designing the logo quickly themselves.
- A friend or relative who claims to know a little about graphic design does it as a favor.
- The wrong people are commissioned. (Local printers are not likely proficient in logo design.)
- The business outsourced the job via one of several design competition websites, which are mostly populated by amateur designers.
- The job was given to an online company that offers really cheap logos.
All of the above can result in disastrous outcomes. If your logo looks amateurish, then so will your business. A business should know where to look when it wants a new logo. David Airey offers great insight on how to choose the right logo designer for your requirements.
Here are the advantages of hiring an established and professional logo designer:
- Your logo will be unique and memorable.
- You won’t run into any problems down the line with reproducing it.
- Your logo will have a longer lifespan and won’t need to be redesigned in a couple of years.
- Your logo will look professional.
2. Relies On Trends

Focusing on current logo trends is like putting a sell-by date on a logo.
Trends (whether swooshes, glows or bevels) come and go and ultimately turn into cliches. A well-designed logo should be timeless, and this can be achieved by ignoring the latest design tricks and gimmicks. The biggest cliche in logo design is the dreaded “corporate swoosh,” which is the ultimate way to play it safe. As a logo designer, your job is to create a unique identity for your client, so completely ignoring logo design trends is best.
Logolounge has a great section on its website in which it updates current logo design trends every year. Being aware as a designer of the latest crazes is important, mainly so that you can avoid them at all costs.
3. Uses Raster Images

An example of how raster graphics can limit reproduction.
Standard practice when designing a logo is to use vector graphics software, such as Adobe Illustrator or Corel Draw. A vector graphic is made up of mathematically precise points, which ensures visual consistency across multiple sizes. The alternative, of course, is use to raster graphics software, such as Adobe Photoshop. A raster graphic — or bitmap, as it’s commonly called — consists of pixels.
Using raster images for logos is not advisable because it can cause problems with reproduction. While Photoshop is capable of creating very large logos, you never know for sure how large you will have to reproduce your logo at some point. If you zoom in enough on a raster graphic, it will appear pixelated, making it unusable. Maintaining visual consistency by making sure the logo looks the same in all sizes is essential.
The main advantages of vector graphics for logo design are:
- The logo can be scaled to any size without losing quality.
- Editing the logo later on is much easier.
- It can be adapted to other media more easily than a raster image.
4. Contains Stock Art

Using stock vector graphics in a logo puts your client at risk.
This mistake is often made by business owners who design their own logo or by amateur designers who are not clued in to the laws on copyright. Downloading stock vector imagery from websites such as VectorStock is not a crime, but it could possibly get you in trouble if you incorporate it in a logo.
A logo should be unique and original, and the licensing agreement should be exclusive to the client: using stock art breaks both of these rules. Chances are, if you are using a stock vector image, it is also being used by someone somewhere else in the world, so yours is no longer unique. You can pretty easily spot stock vectors in logos because they are usually familiar shapes, such as globes and silhouettes.
5. Designing For Yourself Rather Than The Client

Never impose your own personality onto a client’s work.
You can often spot this logo design sin a mile away; the cause is usually a designer’s enormous ego. If you have found a cool new font that you can’t wait to use in a design, well… don’t. Ask yourself if that font is truly appropriate for the business you’re designing for? For example, a great modern typographic font that you just love is not likely suited to a serious business such as a lawyer’s office.
Some designers also make the mistake of including a “trademark” in their work. While you should be proud of your work, imposing your personality onto a logo is wrong. Stay focused on the client’s requirements by sticking to the brief.
6. Overly Complex

Highly detailed designs don’t scale well when printed or viewed in smaller sizes.
What better analogy for thumbnail images than fingerprints? You’ll notice the intricacies of your fingerprints only when looking at them really close up. As soon as you move away, those details are lost. The same holds true for highly detailed logo designs.
When printed in small sizes, a complex design will lose detail and in some cases will look like a smudge or, worse, a mistake. The more detail a logo has, the more information the viewer has to process. A logo should be memorable, and one of the best ways to make it memorable is to keep things simple. Look at the corporate identities of Nike, McDonald’s and Apple. Each company has a very simple icon that can easily be reproduced at any size.
7. Relies On Color For Its Effect

Without color, your great design may lose its identity.
This is a very common mistake. Some designers cannot wait to add color to a design, and some rely on it completely. Choosing color should be your last decision, so starting your work in black and white is best.
Every business owner will need to display their logo in only one color at one time or another, so the designer should test to see whether this would affect the logo’s identity. If you use color to help distinguish certain elements in the design, then the logo will look completely different in one tone.
8. Poor Choice Of Font

Font choice can make or break a logo.
When it comes to executing a logo, choosing the right font is the most important decision a designer can make. More often than not, a logo fails because of a poor font choice (our example shows the infamous Comic Sans).
Finding the perfect font for your design is all about matching the font to the style of the icon. But this can be tricky. If the match is too close, the icon and font will compete with each other for attention; if the complete opposite, then the viewer won’t know where to focus. The key is finding the right balance, somewhere in the middle. Every typeface has a personality. If the font you have chosen does not reflect the icon’s characteristics, then the whole message of the brand will misfire.
Bad fonts are often chosen simply because the decision isn’t taken seriously enough. Some designers simply throw in type as an afterthought. Professional font foundries, such as MyFonts and FontFont, offer much better typeface options than those over-used websites that offer free downloads.
9. Has Too Many Fonts

A logo works best with a maximum of two fonts.
Using too many fonts is like trying to show someone a whole photo album at once. Each typeface is different, and the viewer needs time to recognize it. Seeing too many at once causes confusion.
Using a maximum of two fonts of different weights is standard practice. Restricting the number of fonts to this number greatly improves the legibility of a logo design and improves brand recognition.
10. Copies Others
This is the biggest logo design mistake of all and, unfortunately, is becoming more and more common. As mentioned, the purpose of a logo is to represent a business. If it looks the same as someone else’s, it has failed in that regard. Copying others does no one any favors, neither the client nor the designer.
Gareth Hardy is a professional graphic designer and illustrator based in the United Kingdom. You can find Gareth at Down With Design or on a snowy mountain near you.
- 235 Comments
- 1
- 2June 25th, 2009 4:16 am
Thanks, some very good points here.
- 3June 25th, 2009 4:20 am
excellent! the amount of people i see trying to get their “future big business” logo designed for dirt cheap is crazy
- 4June 25th, 2009 4:28 am
Cool article.. very very informative. Big thanks ! :)
- 5June 25th, 2009 4:28 am
Great Article just when i needed.
Thanks a lot. - 6June 25th, 2009 4:47 am
I agree, with everything … i saw too many bad logos :(
- 7June 25th, 2009 4:48 am
This is a great article, I’ll think about this!
- 8June 25th, 2009 5:01 am
Thank you for having the design in black and white first section. Someone starting a logo in color is a tell tale sign of someone who doesn’t really know what they are doing.
- 9June 25th, 2009 5:02 am
I believe that logos should be designed as vector and in pixel formats, especially if your main presence is online. If your going to display in pixels, you need to design for pixels, or else the anti-aliasing on a vector image is not going to look sharp on a computer screen.
- 10June 25th, 2009 5:03 am
good article…suits as a remainder :)
- 11June 25th, 2009 5:03 am
A great article. Like the above. It important that the logo works to small scale and also looks good when photocopyed in black and white. Lot of new / fresh designers need to be aware of those facts. Im sure most designers here would agree with this: Never use Clip Art!
Never follow trends as mentioned, it becomes to common and not original.
The key is to be original/Unique.good job smashing!
- 12June 25th, 2009 5:09 am
Great article. Simple, concise and some great ideas. I’m currently looking to brand a new blog so this is very relevant and helpful. Cheers.
- 13June 25th, 2009 5:11 am
Wonderful collection. We know most of them but still great as a refresher.
thanks - 14June 25th, 2009 5:14 am
Don’t go cheap, but at the same time don’t spend millions and overpay. You can get really good work for a good price.
- 15June 25th, 2009 5:15 am
TOO MANY PEOPLE IGNORE NO. 6!!! IT MAKES ME RRRRRRRRRAAAAAAGE!!!!! >:[ >:[ >:[
Keep it simple, stupids. The best logo is an easily recognisable, reproducable and understandable one. Look at McDonald’s, Shell and Nike for some unbeatable and timeless logos.
- 16June 25th, 2009 5:16 am
Excellent article. I believe that with experience, talent and conscience a designer may override items 6 and 7 – on the older days, those would be cardinal rules but with technology there’s more room for detail and less need for monochrome prints – so a creative approach is possible.
- 17June 25th, 2009 5:17 am
Great article. These are just a couple of the mistakes I’ve seen in Logo Design. I actually wrote a blog titled “Design for Client, Not Yourself”. I think that designer egos are one of the biggest hurdle for most designers.
If you aren’t willing to LEARN and EXPAND your designing abilities, you might as well quit and take up crochet or something.
- 18June 25th, 2009 5:24 am
I will DEF. tweet this….my god how I HATE hearing “oh my cousin’s dog sitter works at a print shop part time”. NO! For the love of god please don’t hire them. Quit being cheap and hire a professional.
- 19June 25th, 2009 5:26 am
lunetta: I thought I was the only one. Thanks.
- 20June 25th, 2009 5:26 am
Yes – lots of good tips there to bear in mind when doing logo design.
- 21June 25th, 2009 5:28 am
I design all my logos in Photoshop but have software to convert them to vectors. Slowly but surely learning illustrator but I work so much quicker in photoshop.
- 22June 25th, 2009 5:28 am
Great article, but some companies whould never understand…
- 23June 25th, 2009 5:35 am
COMIC SANS FTW!
- 24June 25th, 2009 5:42 am
great article…
Thanks to SM
- 25June 25th, 2009 5:49 am
Nice article, the smashing productions logo is neat :)
- 26June 25th, 2009 6:02 am
Great run through! I had to learn these the hard way, but after each failure I picked up on what was the right way to do it.
But to throw out an exception – is it true that Twitter only paid $6 for their logo (the bird on the branch)?
- 27June 25th, 2009 6:03 am
Thank you for stating the obvious! So-called designers today are doing a huge disservice to their clients by abusing Number 5 (designing for yourself). That leads to overly complex, color-dependent logos (Numbers 6 and 7). The commenter “lunetta” above is missing the point when saying technology today allows for greater detail and use of detail. So what?? Just because you can zoom in 1600% in Illustrator doesn’t mean you won’t end up with mud when viewed or printed at 100%. I tell clients that their new logo should look good at any size, whether on their business card or on the side of a bus. I also tell them their business card should be distinctive when viewed from across the room. Meeting those two objectives is not easy, and it’s why great logo design is never cheap.
- 28June 25th, 2009 6:05 am
Very well put! I couldn’t agree more. All of these points were spot on.
- 29June 25th, 2009 6:08 am
I dont usually make a lot of logos but use them and it is so frustrating to get a bad logo and try to use it in good design.
Another good suggestion that I have to explain to clients a lot is:
Try not to make a TALL logo, its hard to use in various formats. Especially if the graphic is tall and the words are small… When you shrink it down the words just go away. It happens more than you would think.. ><
- 30June 25th, 2009 6:13 am
Always love these type of articles.
- 31June 25th, 2009 6:16 am
Great article! cheers!
- 32June 25th, 2009 6:20 am
It’s a little ironic that the right-side advertisements on Smashing are filled with “New Logo for $100!”-type ads; that, and all the logo trends articles posted here from time to time.
That said, I still love this place.
- 33June 25th, 2009 6:30 am
good article. I second Nathan’s comment above; those kind of ads should not have a place on such a website as this.
- 34June 25th, 2009 6:30 am
The article is indeed good,
but well… do you remember this?
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/04/05/logo-contest-sketches-and-designs/ - 35June 25th, 2009 6:30 am
Great article, gives me something to think about…
Quick question – on the image for #2, what font is used for “Like everyone else”?
- 36June 25th, 2009 6:38 am
I think I can add another mistake to this list and its don’t let the client dictate how to design the logo. The client is not (in most cases) a creative designer, and even thought they might have an idea of what they want, or sometimes they know exactly what they want, ultimately they should leave the designing to the designer. I have a client who did not like the designs I made so he actually invited me over and sat next to me and had me tweaked the design to his liking. While I admire his initiative and making my job “easier”, the final design is one that I would not put into a portfolio.
- 37June 25th, 2009 6:39 am
I agree with all of the common mistakes except for point number 7. Color is just as important as the imagery and typography of a logo. I understand the reasoning in the past for making sure that your logo looks well in a monochrome situation but I believe that’s not the case anymore. Digital printing is obviously overtaking all types of materials. Everything from wide format printing down to small micro sized printing is done digitally.
The time to switch from thinking in just black & white is yesterday.
- 38June 25th, 2009 6:44 am
Excellent article, thanks for sharing!
- 39June 25th, 2009 6:48 am
@freshalex if there wasnt no client input my portfolio would be 3 times the size. There is just no telling them sometimes “dont be a sheep and follow trends”.
All of these are very valid and if you consider any of them then your not really a designer, just someone who knows how to use design software (and there is alot of those people around, you know who you are)
- 40June 25th, 2009 6:51 am
@TOM, The reason a logo should work well in monochrome is sometimes your logo is used by other people who’s budget (or the material on which it is being printed) does not allow for colour printing.
- 41June 25th, 2009 6:58 am
I cannot agree completly to point 7. Okay there is no doubt that in professional logo-design you should use colors with a high contrast. But the logo you marked as “good” on the right side suffer from something different I was taught: Don’t use small geometrical patterns in logos!
When you think of greating a good logo, just forget all the gradients, shiny effects and small details like shadows. Rely on one simple rule: Design a logo as if you would design a coat of arms! Because the rules of heraldy are the same as for logo design: Recognizable, easy to remember and unique. As long as you keep those rules in mind you will create great logos! I will do a tutorial for German designers on my website in the nearer future! - 42June 25th, 2009 7:00 am
Good tips, spot on!, i haven’t thought about doing the logo on b&w and adding color later, i like that idea.
- 43June 25th, 2009 7:05 am
Really nice article! Logo design isn’t one of my best skills.
- 44June 25th, 2009 7:12 am
@NATHAN I totally agree, there should not be ads for $100 logos on a site that writes an article like this. What are you trying to tell us Smashing? Seems a bit hypocritical.
- 45June 25th, 2009 7:18 am
@MArc, I definitely understand the reason for creating some logos that can translate well into black and white for a company that has to budget their production quality for their identity. But for the businesses that were mentioned above as a “future big business” they should not limit their designs to limited printing. Especially since digital printing is the production way of the “future” and now.
People would not question companies that adopted technologies quickly in the past, such as a store that incorporated digital store, an online store. And now its a no-brainier for a serious store to do.
- 46June 25th, 2009 7:19 am
Great, great article. Maybe my favorite SM article ever!
- 47June 25th, 2009 7:21 am
I agree that the logo should be colorless.
Web pages today make it a possible to change themes easily and now a colorful log clashes with the theme. So I try to make a good black and white PNG, so the transparency shades the color giving it a hue no matter what theme is used. - 48June 25th, 2009 7:25 am
I like. Well done. Thanks…
- 49June 25th, 2009 7:27 am
great article, definitely a topic which can be hard to find decent free info on. As mentioned above logo lounge is a subscription site, so these article are quite useful and informative. cheers
- 50June 25th, 2009 7:29 am
Great article, Gareth. :D
- 51June 25th, 2009 7:33 am
You could use one of the links here in SM for a $100 logo, and then combine that with some of the free icon sets, and one of the free wordpress themes, and you’re going to look VERY professional! (note sarcasm).
- 52June 25th, 2009 7:36 am
Nice work, Gareth! Each point is relevant, and I kept thinking.. “Yeah, very true!” Keep it up, and I look forward to your work in the future.
- 53June 25th, 2009 7:45 am
Thanks you. Very usefull
- 54June 25th, 2009 7:52 am
I won’t even LOOK at logos with swishes.
- 55June 25th, 2009 7:53 am
While I agree that following trends can cause problems, being able to keep up and design by these standards is important.
Sure, you want to be “ahead of the curve”, but realistically you need to make a buck. If you’re a professional, that is.
What I mean is this. There’s a reason that certain designs are trendy… because for the most part they are successful and popular. Yes, in a perfect world, you will innovate and lead clients towards an original design. However, for the most part, clients will want “something like that one” or a logo that is in some part based on another successful logo. I can’t tell you how many designs I’ve made that were finally sold because I added a web 2.0 style reflection.
These are great guides though… each one could have it’s own page full of examples and how-to guides for designing, from inception to completion.
Just understand that having a foundation based in originality and avoiding trends may not get you much work. Even if they aren’t portfolio-worthy, learning the techniques behind trendy design as well as practicing making some (even if you never use them) is important.
Sometimes you just have to do what the client wants. You gotta eat!
- 56June 25th, 2009 7:54 am
This is a great article. Part of the reason we charge so much for logos is that they are so important to the brand of the client.
Especially #10. We get many prospective clients who say “make our logo look like ‘Company A’. We tell them that their logo needs to be unique, and they just don’t get it. They just want to keep the costs down but we try to explain that they really aren’t doing themselves any favors in the long run with a derivative logo.
- 57June 25th, 2009 8:07 am
This is a great article. Lots of good advice for people who are new comers to logo design and design in general actually. Gives business people a chance to create a design brief from and informed position.
- 58June 25th, 2009 8:12 am
You should mention pictures, because I have run across some clients that want an actual picture in their logo. I’m like WTF, serisouly???
- 59June 25th, 2009 8:19 am
Don’t get me wrong, I love coming to this site and reading the articles, but doesn’t this article completely contradict the several other “beautiful and creative logos” posts? Most of the logos showcased were shiny and full of overused gradients (#2), and relied heavily on color (#4). Sure they looked awesome as designs, but it’s kind of confusing to have one post saying these are great designs, then another post saying to avoid doing what most of them did.
Otherwise, great tips!
- 60June 25th, 2009 8:22 am
It’s so fun to look at those $20 logo design contest entries!
- 61June 25th, 2009 8:33 am
@ Tom
I think the point about color is not to “rely” on color in logo design. As you can see from the concenric circles in color in the demo – this design clearly doesn’t work in color - 62June 25th, 2009 8:37 am
…. and how many times do you see web sites attempt to use a complex logo as their favicon!
- 63June 25th, 2009 8:43 am
I like these ideas…but… I think many times designers think that they are the most important part of a new business. While I wish that was true, most start up businesses are hitting the ground running and just need something to put on their stuff. Their cash and time is tied up in their new equipment and new business and unfortunately can’t drop $500 on a logo. It’s up to designers if they want some money (which is better than none), or to hold out for some someone willing to pay top dollar.
- 64June 25th, 2009 8:48 am
“Yeah, yeah, don’t be cheap!”
While I understand designers ought to be paid well for their work, it seems like a chicken vs. egg problem. People need logos for new companies. In most cases they are bootstrapping and don’t have the resources to pay for a good logo. This is usually my dilemma. Any suggestions on how to solve this problem?
This article was very timely as I just posted a job on 99designs… $195 prize… go ahead, call me cheap!
- 65June 25th, 2009 8:56 am
So for those that are on a budget where do you go? I guess the stock answer is “find a good logo designer” but for those not in the industry this is sort of like finding a good doctor or dentist. You know they are out there but for most it’s hard to tell the good from the bad.
- 66June 25th, 2009 9:00 am
A very usefull post to many designers and beginners!
Thank you again!
- 67June 25th, 2009 9:17 am
i kinda like the fingerprint logo! a lot actually lol
- 68June 25th, 2009 9:32 am
Gareth – Great Post!
I couldn’t agree with you more. People are visual. When they think of your business, they’ll think of your logo. If it’s memorable, they’ll think of it often. If it’s not, they might not think of you at all.
I recently re-did my business website, and initially thought I could save by using my old logo. Man was I wrong! The old, dated logo brought the whole site down… I needed a change and fast.
I saw a banner on SmashingMagazine.com, and was able to find a local logo designer who went beyond anything I could have imagined. Not cheap, but I absolutely love the new look he gave my business.
After using my old logo for over 4 years, I realized I never once had someone randomly give a positive comment on it. I’ve now had my new logo for about a month and have had people who I haven’t talked to in a year call just to tell me how great it looks.
Value that as you may, but in my opinion, if a logo alone can compel someone to pick up a phone and call, the investment was worth every cent. In my case, that call eventually turned into a new client, which made this the best money I’ve spent in awhile…
- 69June 25th, 2009 9:37 am
i would have add:
1. using gradients
2. using shadowsbtw: what’s the smashing magazine logo : just S or S + SMASHING MAGAZINE ?
- 70June 25th, 2009 9:51 am
Yes, great article!
I generally disapprove of the “web 2.0″ style of logos and other logos that rely on color, gradients, etc to work (despite the fact that I have made a few recently – I’ll sacrifice “designer’s ethics” for cash ;) . Why do people want logos like that? That’s an icon, not a logo… Any truly good logo should look good in B&W, it should be simple but express exactly what’s needed, et cetera, and if you can’t come up with something that follows these rules that Smashing has posted, then you just aren’t creative enough – and I’ve been there, a designer can’t always have a revolutionary, world-changing concept. But I think we can all agree that truly good logos aren’t just a shiny bubble that goes in the corner of a website.
The comment on price is true, as well; in my quest for more clients I’ve registered on Elance, and it’s HELL for true designers there. All these people bid $50 for a logo, and the people looking for the logo are only willing to pay $50 – and they end up getting what they payed for. Sure, I’ve made a little money there, but it’s hardly worth the time spent bidding and time spent on the project.
- 71June 25th, 2009 9:51 am
Very good.
- 72June 25th, 2009 10:03 am
One of the best! This brings me back to reading SM.
Thank you. - 73June 25th, 2009 10:10 am
Great article. I hope people realize the common attributes of disposable logos.
- 74June 25th, 2009 10:19 am
Awesome article! This is one of my new favorites on SM.
- 75June 25th, 2009 10:26 am
It is one of the best and simple article on logo designig till date. Thank you verymuch.
- 76June 25th, 2009 10:35 am
Smashing article :) Learnt a lot of good tips!
- 77June 25th, 2009 10:46 am
Boring Article
- 78June 25th, 2009 10:47 am
Good article, this is what we’re tought at school. All the basics.
- 79June 25th, 2009 10:48 am
Hah…great article but you guys break #2. I find that hilarious.
- 80June 25th, 2009 10:49 am
Very good refresher for people thinking about conducting a brand discovery process.
- 81June 25th, 2009 11:14 am
Thank you! Excellent and timely. I need a logo right now, and was already figuring out that I need to a) not do it myself and b) not get a friend / amateur to do it. This also gives me some guidelines to check against when I do get something submitted to me.
- 82June 25th, 2009 11:25 am
The amount of times I have heard from prospective clients “we’d love to use you but your too expensive!” – You get what you pay for.
- 83June 25th, 2009 11:27 am
So where do you find logo designers when even $500 is stretching a budget? LogoWorks?
- 84June 25th, 2009 11:31 am
No. 6 is my favorite… I’m always thinking about K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid)
- 85June 25th, 2009 11:38 am
Ha! Love #8… Comic Sans should be permanently banned from EVERYTHING!
- 86June 25th, 2009 11:44 am
It’s odd that people confuse “monochrome” with “black and white”. A well designed logo should be as effective in a single color as it in in full color. That color can be black, or white or the official company color (IBM blue comes to mind somehow). Assuming you’re eventually going to print something in medium to large quantities – say 10,000 – 100,000 fliers or something – printing with 1-2 pantone colors is generally cheaper than printing in CMYK.
- 87June 25th, 2009 11:50 am
Troy – lets not forget to add Papyrus to that list…
- 88June 25th, 2009 12:04 pm
Troy & JayDee – also add Monotype Corsiva.
Awesome article. I strongly agree w/ 7 and 9. The others should be common sense.
- 89June 25th, 2009 12:58 pm
I’ve been working on my own logo for a few weeks, and this article changed my curse. Thank you smashing for these beautiful things you show me everyday!!!
- 90June 25th, 2009 1:01 pm
This was a really good reminder of the pitfalls we sometimes can fall into remember revise, revise, revise.
After several rounds of great solutions we sometimes get what some may call the client poo poo platter. combining 2-4 design options. This is where great account service can help.
#11 Sometimes unavoidable client dictation, see #1.
- 91June 25th, 2009 1:10 pm
Needs to be read by the clients, unfortunately, and not (just) by the designers.
…and every time I’ve suggested vectors, or the importance of clarity when small and in black and white, people often roll their eyes and say, ‘This is 2009. Those rules are for years ago.’
- 92June 25th, 2009 1:14 pm
Very nice article! keeps me coming back here :)
You get what you pay for..
- 93June 25th, 2009 1:16 pm
What’s difficult is when the client wants everything on this list, I feel like the last couple of clients I’ve had have been over the top ridiculous with their demands for inappropriate or multiple fonts, too many colors, too complex, and yes even using stock art from istockphoto. Methinks I need to get better clients :)
- 94June 25th, 2009 1:38 pm
Funny thing is that some of these logos in this post are actually much nicer than the current SMASHING MAGAZING logo ;)
- 95June 25th, 2009 1:44 pm
not bad, just had to notice that i violated against at least 3 of your rules when making the last band logo design :-/ but oh well, i was aware of not applying all that “business” rules.
- 96June 25th, 2009 2:00 pm
Great article!
Also a good tip for when you are designing a logo: If you have multiple designs you want to present to your client, never include the ones you ‘hope’ they won’t choose… it always ends up awkward. They either think you’re a mediocre designer, or they end up choosing that exact logo.
Restrict it to just 2 and include different versions of those (colors, black/white, greyscale). If they don’t like them, you should have a general idea of what they don’t want and take that into account when designing their new top-notch logo ;)
PS: And as an added bonus, a lot of these tips/rules apply to website designs as well. Too many (start up) businesses put up a cheapo website designed by their neighbor’s nephew who ‘knows stuff’…
- 97June 25th, 2009 2:04 pm
ehh, I dunno about color anymore. I used to agree but if you can stomach the printing costs I dont think it matters overly much anymore. of course it depends on what your plans are, if shipping boxes are involved then it is somewhat difficult to print that pretty logo on it in bulk.
On another note I disagree with how the bevel/glow (add in gradient/shadow too for this) comment is handled. The logo should be designed without these since they are not really features of the logo at all. They can be added later if you want but the logo should not contain them at all.. they are just decoration.
Take the smashing logo, it works in single color and on here it has a gradient and shadow.
- 98June 25th, 2009 2:19 pm
Bravo! Well said.
- 99June 25th, 2009 2:25 pm
@josh
I think you’ve got it spot on… it’s not that thatGareth Hardy is saying that your logo is should be black/white, it’s just that it should work in b/w… and by designing it that way ensures it does.btw… I see a lot of people dismissing the black&white/greyscale logo as a thing of the past, but you’d be surprised how many companies still use a fax. (and as far as I know, they still don’t print in color)
- 100June 25th, 2009 2:29 pm
Thanks mates.
- 101June 25th, 2009 2:46 pm
I agree with Wouter–don’t dismiss the notion of ensuring that logos will still work in B&W. The whole idea of a logo is to create an identity that will last and can be used in any type of application into the foreseeable future. Who knows where that company may expand in the future and there may be situations where the use of a B&W logo is not only practical because it’s cheaper to reproduce, but may be aesthetically more desirable than a colour logo.
- 102June 25th, 2009 3:32 pm
Excellent article :) Well done!
- 103June 25th, 2009 3:38 pm
This is the best post I’ve seen on the very real SPECIFIC drawbacks of not going with a professional logo designer. Any business that starts out with a logo that only works on the Web will be faced with a far more expensive and risky rebranding challenge when they expand into print media or any medium that requires grayscale or resizing for other uses.
I am currently researching a post about the differences between inexpensive logo design, logo design contest sites, and working with professional designers with a major emphasis on what you don’t receive and how that can impact you in the long run. This post really contributes and will, of course, be recommended and linked.
- 104June 25th, 2009 3:54 pm
Top stuff SM. I’ve been meaning to write on this very subject and you’ve managed to say a couple of things I hadn’t considered.
- 105June 25th, 2009 4:09 pm
LMAO article!
- 106June 25th, 2009 4:20 pm
When will you web guys ever get the message. It’s not about ‘Logo Design’. It’s about having a cohesive visual identity. A system. A logo is juts a mark and on it’s own means very little. It it’s usage and what surrounds it that makes the big different, otherwise it’s just more visual noise. Here’s a great example of an identity system that doesn’t even need a logo… http://www.heads.ch/index.php?content=referenzen&lang=en#82-Dynamic-Branding–Namics
- 107June 25th, 2009 4:21 pm
There is no such thing as a ‘professional’ logo designer.
- 108June 25th, 2009 4:36 pm
Leave COMIC SANS alone!!!!
- 109June 25th, 2009 5:59 pm
Everything about this list is bad, because:
1. Logo’s acquire meaning not through their design, but through a company’s actions. If you need a logo, you can start with a simple black dot. What helps your business is your brain and how you act, not your logo. Your logo represents nothing, if you don’t.
2. Logo’s should not be made for anyone else but yourself. If it is your business to make logos for others, you are in the business of pretending that you care or understand what someone else represents. You don’t. You just want a stupid design award for your design work (and are probably willing to pay a jury for it). Start realizing that revenue is the real reward. Why don’t you design for yourself and trade products or services? Are you so confident in your skills?
3. The first point of this list is a fabrication, written to appeal to designers who sell logo design, and not written to inspire any understanding about logo design. “amateurish” and “professional” are words without meaning. Hallelujah.
4. A logo should reflect a purpose (note that I didn’t write: “have a purpose”), which means that its conception should be attached to something you have already done. If you allow an agency to make up scenarios, you are just paying for creativity, and diluting your identity.
5. Theorizing logo design is as futile as theorizing about naming. The name Michael Jackson carries meaning not because someone put that name together.
6. Each of the points in the list can be refuted by real-life examples. If you are a logo designer, find those examples. That could give you all the reasons not to design for others, but only for yourself. The world will not get better if everyone wants to tell everyone else how to run aspects of a business. Are you satisfied by living in a meta-economy?
The purpose of life is to trade, not to creep into the lives of others and pretend that you can paint success into a logo.
- 110June 25th, 2009 7:20 pm
Excellent article and it’s all fact.
The biggest offender I see from clients, especially in publications is the use of too many fonts. I spend as much time educating clients on design standards and communciations as I do on design fore them.
- 111June 25th, 2009 7:37 pm
g8 article
thanks - 112June 25th, 2009 8:47 pm
Schneider you’re spot on from the business standpoint or that of an entrepreneur, but these articles are obviously written for the designers point of view, and in that respect I would say with the exception of the first one, it’s pretty valuable. Great article, but SM you have to admit that having a great logo is completely uncorrelated with success in business, if only that more highly funded projects have the budget to get a “professional” designer to do their work.
- 113June 25th, 2009 8:57 pm
It’s very useful for me,great:)~~
- 114June 25th, 2009 9:44 pm
Loved the Article, thanks SM
- 115June 25th, 2009 10:10 pm
Awesome article!
- 116June 25th, 2009 10:15 pm
Now if only we could get CLIENTS to read this blog!!!
- 117June 25th, 2009 10:57 pm
Excellent stuff – in my short career as amateur logo designer I have already made all of those mistakes – good to see them again.
Currently trying to become amateur++ – see you later ;-)Andreas
- 118June 25th, 2009 11:46 pm
There is a large Japanese toy company who merged with a large video game company in 2005 who’s actual logo gets the company name back to front. No its not cultural, its a genuine mistake. So maybe mistake number 11 should be – name on logo, different to actual company name.
- 119June 25th, 2009 11:55 pm
A couple of technical things that was not mentioned in this article, esp. in point one, talking about amateur vs. professional logos. One outcome from an amateur logo designer is basically that your logo cannot be used, because it has the wrong technical specs. So I thought I would just list some technical stuff, since this article did focused more on the design, and not the tech stuff. Needless to say, the tech stuff needs to be in place for the logo to even be used. So here are four very common errors I meet in my job:
1. Outlining of fonts. There is nothing more annoying to me, I work for a design agency, than to get logos together for projects from other “professional” graphic designers have made, and they have not outlined the fonts, so the font gets replaced when I try to open the file, and it just messes up the whole logo. ALWAYS remember to outline your fonts!
2. Logos made on white background instead of with transparency. You have no idea how many times I have basically gotten an image inserted into an eps-file. From ”Professional” designers Basically logos that are made for only one background color instead of making them so they can fit on both dark, light and colored backgrounds. This was briefly mentioned, but I wanted to emphasize on the transparency! Please remember to put the logo on transparent background!
3. Not making compound shapes of the logo-elements. Very often combined with the point above, so it takes forever to make a logo monochrome for printing stuff i.e. in black and white. Clean up your file before you send it away to others!
4. Not making monochrome and black and white and inverted monochrome versions of the logo. This article did mention the point that many designers rely on color, but should have also more specifically mentioned that a professional logo designer should always make versions of the logo ready to use for different kind of print jobs, or make the logo in such a way that it is easy for me to change the logo into 1 single color for black and white printing.
/ end whining, back to coffee
- 120June 26th, 2009 12:03 am
@josh about not caring about black and white logo and just using color: I have worked with music festivals and band-logos and the sponsor-logos, and basically, when I make posters for a festival, it is the festival that decides how the posters should be printed, not the single band or sponsor. For example it is quite common to have all the sponsoring logos in one color to make them blend in more with the poster. So I guess my point is that for your own printing – you can of course pay more and always get it printed in neat color, but what about when your client sends the logo away to be used with somebody else, sponsoring/bands/promoting elsewhere? Then you should have thought about a logo in 1 color. :)
- 121June 26th, 2009 12:03 am
Great article. Worth five stars out of five.
- 122June 26th, 2009 12:27 am
@N.N.: yap! Especially like these “not cleaned” up files … sometimes it takes hours to clean up all the little small lines, shapes and even senseless/unclosed paths in logodesigns.
And btw: B/W is really important! Just look at all the small newspapers, your stores should advertise in… Another point for me should be the difference between web and general logodesign.
- 123June 26th, 2009 12:45 am
funnily enough smashing magazine already broke rule number one, if not rule number two and so on already.
Smashing magazine didn’t only get non professionals to make the logo, they relied on people from their own community, most of the people in this community are trying to LEARN. its like getting a kid to build your house.
and don’t tell me that the shininess haven’t been a trend for the last 3 years. - 124June 26th, 2009 12:47 am
MJ R.I.P
- 125June 26th, 2009 1:04 am
Nice to see the word spread…
- 126June 26th, 2009 2:49 am
I’m not a pro designer, but I want to say I disagreed with a lot of the edicts in the article and responses. Only posters Alex E. Schneider and N.N. (search for “outlining of fonts”) say things that make me think they have actual practical experience. In many cases, posters say things that make me think they’ve never read a book on logo design.
1. It is hardly unusual for companies to announce a re-branding exercise, get a lot of public derision for their logo, and quietly fix it. In other words, highly-paid pro designers can get it wrong too.
2. Designers don’t usually deliver a *single* logo design. They produce *dozens* of forms designed for different media, scaling, etc. These different forms often appear identical when you’re flipping through a sample book, but when you look at them closely you can see that they’ve simplified small details on a logo scaled for a business card, and they’ve applied little highlights to give some modelling on the spot-color version, and so forth.
3. I agree that having a photograph as part of a logo is bound to cause problems. But that’s all part of dealing with the client — you have to explain what those problems are going to be. For instance, explain that he’s going to *need* multiple versions of the logo — that way he won’t think your design sucks because it didn’t work on business cards, he’ll just say “yep, we need to pay the designer again to generate a new version, just like he told us”.
Sometimes, of course, you can’t convince the buyer. Just document your objections, and take the money. And remember, sometimes the customer is actually *right*.
- 127June 26th, 2009 4:37 am
A good collection of good (and some bad) logo’s can be found here: http://logopond.com/
Just another big mistake that’s been done many times is to go to your client with just a single design! Always create at least three designs in a complete different style. Put away your old designs and clear your head (in your own way)… After that you can begin you new design.
Le Marquis
- 128June 26th, 2009 4:59 am
Use to make these kind of mistakes all the time as a rookie, I’d rather draw something on paper before I get any ideas for a logo.
Never start working at the computer, always think what the logo should represent. - 129June 26th, 2009 6:06 am
How funny, when i read this article (very good by the way) there was a banner on top of the page: PROFESSIONAL BROCHURE DESIGN TEMPLATES
Speaking of professional design :)
- 130June 26th, 2009 6:06 am
@RCKY Totally with you on the B+W, same with N.N., you don’t always have control over the print specs. Methinks too many posters here don’t really qualify as *graphic designers* – more like html coders (and probably good ones too) who use photoshop tutorials to bang out “look and feels”.
If you can’t build it in vector, it will suck (why vectorize it after? holy cleanup! Don’t kid yourself with vector trace software – unless you have to I guess).
Photoshop for a logo? Not only a raster nightmare but people please, don’t jizz in your pants!
- 131June 26th, 2009 7:22 am
I agree! Great article, straight and clear to the points. A must read to both clients and designers.
- 132June 26th, 2009 7:31 am
I would be very interested if you could take a look at the logos on my site and let me know what you think. I am always trying to improve so any comments are welcome. link
- 133June 26th, 2009 7:53 am
I think the worse thing is to use the wrong fonts, I can forgive other things but when I see Comic Sans it makes me shiver
- 134June 26th, 2009 8:09 am
This comment is undeniably negative so brace yourself. This list is obvious to designers with any sort of respect for communication design. Point #5 is not a line in the sand by any stretch, I can think of numerous successful marks that do not follow this methodology for example the bank of new york logo that is now extinct due to a merger, its possible to create versions of the logo to reflect the application. Distinctiveness is not solely built on simplicity its built on….well….distinctiveness. #7 is not a relevant point of view, professional firms specializing in branding will always create version of marks for each usage along with a brand guide, these version will utilize percentages for one color reproduction and will even tweak them (color kerning if you will) to create contrast. Overall this article loses site of the big picture of building strong brand identities that have the ability to express themselves across all mediums, reducing itself to an article solely about “logo” (which in that I suppose it lives up to its title).
- 135June 26th, 2009 9:12 am
Excellent article, especially number 2 “Focusing on current logo trends is like putting a sell-by date on a logo.” this is so true.
- 136June 26th, 2009 11:20 am
This is a great article. Think too about color printing in your choice of colors. Make sure that it looks good in digital production printing and process color offset. Spot colors and varnishes can be great on some print pieces, but don’t rely on them to look good.
- 137June 26th, 2009 12:43 pm
Wow, actually some time we can dig goldmine, great points made here, lovely post!
- 138June 26th, 2009 1:59 pm
The number 7 can be converted to grayscale, and it works, for axample maybe the orange could be a 80% of black and the yellow a 40%, am i wrong?
- 139June 26th, 2009 3:27 pm
Alter Falter, wie sich die Leute hier geben! Haben sich wahrscheinlich erst vor einem Jahr die nötige Software vom “PiratenStrand” gesaugt und spucken hier die großen Töne, von wegen, wie toll der Artikel für ANFÄNGER seih… aber sieeee würden noch dieses und jenes anders/besser(!) machen… das interessiert uns doch die Bohne, Leute.
Trotz allem finde ich den Artikel wirklich schön zusammengefasst.Ich wünsch’ euch was SmMag
- 140June 26th, 2009 5:51 pm
This is a great article to point clients at. Thanks for that!
- 141June 26th, 2009 11:19 pm
This is the sort of thing we try to ingrain to our clients!! Love it!
- 142June 27th, 2009 2:58 am
anybody here need a logo? I can make one for you for as cheap as 10.000$
that should make me a professional one, right? - 143June 27th, 2009 12:40 pm
I’ve always found a common mistake is for a client to think that their logo should somehow literally reflect who they are, like a graphical cariacture of the people in the company. Instead, a logo should reflect what they are. The difficult part of a brand/corporate identity isn’t the logo, it’s creating the great product, service and support system that build loyal customers – would you think differently of Lexus or Apple if their logos were a different shape? Based on the teaching of Tom Hughes Iv’e written a short PDF summary, err rant, on this topic here.
- 144June 27th, 2009 1:16 pm
Watch how you phrase #1; beginning designers need to get work in order to build their portfolio and become “established and professional.” If nobody hires them, the logo designer will be a dying breed!
- 145June 27th, 2009 7:02 pm
Article is alright, another list of “rules”. If you follow them, again, you are not thinking outside the box. It is ok sometimes to break the rules, but no doubt all technical requirements should be always followed (resolution, outlined fonts, spot colors etc…., … or not, it depends on project).
Style wise – it always depends.
For example:
9. Has Too Many Fonts
logo for font online store – why wouldn’t they include couple of fonts just for fun to show variety of fonts they offer?7. Relies On Color For Its Effect
what if the logo is for printing services company?Every rule has an exception.
Every business should concentrate on their services better than logo itself. Every one would agree the logo is good if business is successful.
- 146June 27th, 2009 8:32 pm
I’m guilty with some of the mistakes above. My favorite would probably be “contains stock art” Now that I’ve been made aware. I will try to be unique and professional all the time.
- 147June 27th, 2009 8:42 pm
yeah… talking about staying away from trends – Smashing Magazine one great source of trends :) imho
good blog, nice showcases, but pretty pretty pretty trendy. I think a lot of people would agree.
no offense
- 148June 27th, 2009 10:05 pm
great article… I liked number 6 and 8 the most.. sometimes we forget considering them focusing on the idea we have in mind then wonder why it didn’t look good..
- 149June 27th, 2009 11:04 pm
Here is some simple advice. Spend money on not having a bad logo. Spend money so you don’t end up with a piece of clip-art and comic sans. But DO NOT spend money on having a GREAT logo (unless you’ve got money to burn.) Google did not have a great logo. Are there a billion CBGBs shirts out there because the logo is so awesome? Get a GOOD logo and provide a GREAT service.
- 150June 28th, 2009 1:34 am
Great Article ! A Must for Designers ! Keep it Smashing !
- 151June 28th, 2009 2:09 am
very informative
Will keep the tips in mind while designing my lobo - 152June 28th, 2009 3:02 am
Great, now I can continue to design my amateur logos much better :-P
- 153June 28th, 2009 3:47 am
Great tips, thanks for sharing :)
- 154June 28th, 2009 5:52 am
“7. Relies On Color For Its Effect” is really a very common mistake.
good article for absolute beginners… - 155June 28th, 2009 11:59 am
great! really clear post, nice read
thanks for it ! - 156June 28th, 2009 12:59 pm
Good article, as a newby designer I really found it helpful and thought-provoking!
- 157June 28th, 2009 5:11 pm
What is wrong with you people? You’re so amazed and so affirmative, it’s like a global disease. The article may have some good points, but it’s not exactly the groundbreaking revelation from the Design God himself!!
- 158June 28th, 2009 6:56 pm
Nice article. A good logo is something every business should not skimp on. More people need to realize that the latest trend will not last as long as their company will (hopefully). Unique logos are key to brand recognition and every designer should strive to give their client just that.
Thanks for the info. - 159June 28th, 2009 9:25 pm
I love number 8.. xD You used Comic Sans!!! haha..
- 160June 28th, 2009 9:26 pm
Great article. There’s a prevailing micro-trend of writing these sorts of “how-to design a good logo” articles going on across the blogosphere. This one, however, takes the cake with it’s concise, demonstrable images. Three cheers!
- 161June 29th, 2009 12:35 am
Nicely and briefly put.
The examples illustrate the points extremely well.Well done :)
- 162June 29th, 2009 12:41 am
Very nice article! very useful.
- 163June 29th, 2009 2:04 am
This article gonna help me to redesign my own logo.. All-over again ….Shukriya (thanks SM)
- 164June 29th, 2009 4:18 am
Very useful!! Thanks a lot, I’ll keep in mind all this tips.
- 165June 29th, 2009 8:16 am
Good guidelines to follow (and break sometimes). Any of you seen/read any of Martin Lindstrom’s stuff (brandsense, buyology)? He’s got some interesting views on the future of logos and branding. Marboro did a billboard ad just displaying cowboys and no logo at all because they found out that that image is so ingrained in smokers minds it gives them a craving.
- 166June 29th, 2009 9:24 am
A good logo does not need a computer to be created. A good designer does not need a computer to create logos. And the best logos are those created before computers start to create logos.
- 167June 29th, 2009 1:57 pm
Agree with all, though I’m with Tom some of the way in that #7 is not an absolute. Google and Firefox look like good branding to me yet rely heavily on colour.
- 168June 29th, 2009 9:11 pm
Some good facts are in this post! I hope that clients read this article too.
- 169June 29th, 2009 11:31 pm
dissapointing article smashing, another cliched list from the traditionalist…#7 makes my head hurt.
The advise is great for a beginners however i was expecting something more juicy from smashing. Counterpoints:
#7
Clearly colour can ‘make’ a logo and is not a mistake logo designers make. Yes an interesting graphic form will almost necessarily make a logo work however this statement has plenty of counterexamples. I.e. Succesfull logos that work as result of color execution. google anyone? amongst many. - 170June 30th, 2009 12:16 am
I would not agree 100% on the point: “Keep logo simple”. Look at Sony Ericsson’s new logo – it’s incredible detailed and contains gradients.Good article though…
- 171June 30th, 2009 2:46 am
Excellent advices and great article !!!!!!!!!!
- 172June 30th, 2009 2:48 am
I ‘am happy
- 173June 30th, 2009 2:52 am
Nice article with good insights about logos.. It may help designers.
- 174June 30th, 2009 5:57 am
the tips here are obvious, but there one thing I can’t agree with. There’s no guarantee that the top designer for lots of money won’t use the same concept that you can buy for $10, just because there are thousands of such concepts
- 175June 30th, 2009 8:30 am
nice article,
if i hire an icon designer, i can test these things
thx a lot - 176June 30th, 2009 9:09 am
Wow! some people really miss the point of this article. Having a well designed logo doesn’t guarantee success, but having a well designed logo that reflects the cores of the business will certainly help in your promotion of the business. Stating business ethics is missing the point of the article and sadly shows your contempt for designers.
The monochrome/B&W point is another one that some people don’t seem to have grasped. The logo should work without colour not because of the need to save money in print but because it concentrates on the design and impact of the logo. As for digital printing this is reserved for small runs and though the quality is very good it has draw backs, including the limitations of CMYK and material it can print on. It hasn’t yet replaced web offset or litho and it certainly won’t replace digital media.
The logo’s I’ve created are all designed in B&W first and then figured for RGB, CMYK or Pantone. The colours may have already been decided but they can cloud the design if introduced too early.
A great read, which should be the foundation for many readers. Remember, its important to know the rules before you start bending them. - 177June 30th, 2009 9:33 am
I have to agree with ReadyPhotoSite, there no guarantee that an expensive designer won’t use the same concept as a cheap-o designer. Anyone, not just 20 year veterans, can come up with a good logo as long as the preliminary work, research, thought, communication and creativity have been put in place. The only way to get better at creating logos is… creating more logos. The more you do, the better you will get. -Henry
- 178June 30th, 2009 10:12 am
I think this was a good article. I think starting out everyone tends to break these rules, maybe one or two. I’m a big enforcer on starting in black and white. I think that sample used, could’ve been turned into black and white easily, but for the sake of the argument it made its point. It was very useful and I’m passing on this link.
- 179June 30th, 2009 10:49 am
In reference to points 8 and 9; Doyald Young said “Every logotype is its own font.” After picking the right font modify certain characters for that particular grouping of letters, because the spelling isn’t going to change. The original font was designed for many possible combinations of letters. Also don’t fall into the “Pick a font, pick a color, here’s the logo” lazy design trap.
- 180June 30th, 2009 4:14 pm
I have done quite well as a designer for some years now. Recently the phone doesn’t ring as much as it used to do and the cashflow is waning. Is it the economic crisis? I think not. The real reason is because I freakin’ hate this “profession” –to the guts– and I have an increasingly bad attitude about it. I totally agree with Mr. Alex Schneider. Quit pretending; most of us don’t give a rat’s posterior about “the client”. That’s the main problem with us “creatives”: what we really want is to inflate our egos to mounstrous proportions by winning stupid contests & getting praise from our colleagues. The world is going to be a very different place in the coming years. Is graphic design a commodity? Hell yeah. even good design. Just masturbation of the aesthetic sense.
- 181June 30th, 2009 4:26 pm
i totally agree. but you’re preaching to the choir. how do we educate our clients to these points without crushing their egos?
- 182June 30th, 2009 4:32 pm
Haha, this is a great post! I just had a conversation with a new client that finally decided to stop doing design work on the cheap. The conversation was basically a run down of the points Gareth makes.
Sharon, just crush their egos but in a nice way. If they knew what they were doing they wouldn’t have hired you.
- 183June 30th, 2009 5:08 pm
a good article and very informative
- 184June 30th, 2009 8:33 pm
do you realize how repeatedly using the word “amateurish” in your articles seems to cause an insurmountable amount of pain in my ear drums.
- 185
- 186
- 187July 1st, 2009 5:38 am
Great post! I think we all have had these conversations with a client or two. People just don’t realize the importance and power of a logo or brandmark.
createID – cr8id.com
- 188July 1st, 2009 6:48 am
@bronxgd – quite possibly the phone is not ringing as much because you have such a sh***y attitude. just sayin’
As for the posters who don’t think that there is a need for black and white versions of logos – I think that you possibly are not aware of all the ways a logo gets used and reproduced. I have been a Sr Graphic Designer for a large international corporation for several years now and I have seen the logo used in many ways – many of them preclude the use of any color, gradient, or detail entirely. For example:
> Promotional items. Often only one color can be used and it needs to be a solid.
> blind embossing. for those neat-o corporate gifts like notebooks with leather covers, or briefcases
> Silk screening
> Awards. Often these have the logo etched into them. no gradients, no details, no colors.
> signage
> corporate communications that get printed on BW laser printers
> 3D. Logo gets made into a 3D sculpture or giant 3D signThe list goes on. A well produced logo needs to retain its essential character in all types of use. In addition, the Designer has not done their job unless they deliver the logo with all production issues attended to: Effects expanded, transparency flattened, fonts outlined, gray scale version, flat color version (B&W), reverse (knockout) version for dark backgrounds, and all of those exported in the common formats that average office workers will need: jpeg or gif for the web and email signatures, PNGs with transparent background for those Powerpoint presentations with colored or textured backgrounds, hi-rez TIFF for the people that need hi-rez but cannot use vector files like .AI and .CD. All that stuff needs to be packed up in a nice organized fashion, including a brief style guide for all of it, and delivered to the Client.
Another reason to hire a Professional – nothing to do with egos. - 189July 1st, 2009 7:11 am
Really enjoyed this post! Number 1 really is the number 1 rule – I wish more people would realise that you really do get what you pay for when you get design work done on the cheap. Thanks for sharing :-) Adam | Web Design Blog
- 190July 1st, 2009 7:16 am
Nice reminders for all of us.
- 191July 1st, 2009 4:47 pm
logo, simply small but big deal, good article 4 starter
- 192
- 193July 1st, 2009 6:25 pm
While all these points make sense and are completly true to a designer customers dont care what the logo design no no’s are if they they have it set in their mind what they want.
If they like and want 4 differnet font types thats what you do no matter what you think.
yes its a crime but they are the customer paying your wage at the end of the day no matter what design world rules there are.And we were all “amateurish” at one stage or another
- 194July 2nd, 2009 12:06 am
Damn straight. Every logo designer should already know these rules. Mistake 1 – Designed by An Amateur, brings to mind a larger issue occurring in the design industry. Crowdsourcing websites like crowdSpring, oDesk, 99designs, Elance, and craigslist have convinced business owners they can get an award winning, strategy-driven logo for $50-150. These websites are quickly degrading the worth and value of logo design. Sure, logos are supposed to look cool but they’ve got to produce an emotional reaction within the target audience.
- 195July 2nd, 2009 4:29 am
you`re 100% right with this! Many customers buy cheap logos, low quality and copied! That`s not right! The designers that copy and don`t have a personal idea are not designers, they are just humans that wants to make money without work!
Great post!
- 196July 2nd, 2009 5:33 am
It is amazing how many amateurs are out there. They know nothing about logo design. Even in a recession companies should never never ever ever be cheap when it comes to logo design.
- 197July 2nd, 2009 9:20 am
Nice article, for the beginners out there.
- 198July 2nd, 2009 10:36 am
I agree with them all but budget is always a factor and for that I would suggest it’s o.k. to go with decent stock art or a amateur that you can pay only if you like it.
Charles
- 199July 2nd, 2009 10:52 am
Definitely a good article for beginners, but also serves as a reminder now and again for the more seasoned vets too!
- 200July 2nd, 2009 12:20 pm
A good overview. Thanks.
- 201July 2nd, 2009 1:21 pm
This is a great tool , especially the specifics on the vector vs. raster.
- 202July 2nd, 2009 1:55 pm
I can agree on everything except ‘rule’ 7. I think a (great) logo must have the ability to look nice, even in a monotone setting. Great article anyway. Although maybe if you dind’t knew or felt this things from within, you maybe have to ask your self if you should do it yourself.
- 203July 2nd, 2009 3:01 pm
OK, I totally admit! I think this article is written for someone like me. I really strive to make logos unique, but never with too much success. Besides the point, I make logos for the people who have confidence in my designs. They know in advance that I am not a designer, that I have no design experience, and that I want to make them the best logo that I can. Therefore, the (few) people that I have made logos for have leaned to love them, and that is what I think makes my logos unique.
Here is a link to my site where you can see some examples of what I am talking about. - 204July 3rd, 2009 8:32 am
hi guys, can anyone suggest me a good logo designer..u can reach me at shesh_maurya at web.de
- 205July 3rd, 2009 7:45 pm
Number 7: The second one looks crappy, and the first one would not show up as just a circle when converted into grayscale. One side would be darker than the other because of the different color lightness. While it’s a good tip to avoid intricate details in slightly different colors that might be impossible to distinguish when black and white, most logos that depend on colors still look good in greyscale. (For example, ebay, google, pepsi, AT&T, NBC, etc)
- 206July 3rd, 2009 7:47 pm
Not to mention UPS, and how often do you see a logo in greyscale these days?
(Didn’t notice the edit button, sorry)
- 207July 4th, 2009 2:35 am
very nice and important article…for all graphic designers, either they are beginers or professionals…..unfortunately most of the designers today, dont getting the purpose and the main guidline about logo design. i think everyone should know about the points you mark in the above article…..its a good overview … thanks.
- 208July 4th, 2009 1:12 pm
Awesome article, but MyFonts isn’t type foundry, but font distribution service. Just to make sure that all is really clear.
- 209July 4th, 2009 5:12 pm
Very well said! I agree, above are the common mistakes for creating a logo! :)
- 210July 6th, 2009 9:51 am
Amazing article!
Juan Manuel Garrido. EGA Futura. - 211July 6th, 2009 12:04 pm
Very intresting!
- 212July 6th, 2009 10:15 pm
Very very true! These simple, basic common-sense steps are what separates the true logos from mass produced ones!
- 213July 8th, 2009 9:48 am
Some good ideas about the behind-the-scene details of graphic design.
- 214July 17th, 2009 6:28 am
Great article! I laughed out loud on several of those pointers.
- 215
- 216July 20th, 2009 7:05 am
Great article! I hired Gareth a view months a go, he does great work! Good job Gareth!
- 217July 24th, 2009 1:20 am
i liked your 10 common mistakes know your site sir thanks
- 218July 25th, 2009 10:06 am
these are really helpful hints…thank you
- 219August 1st, 2009 6:24 am
This is a great article. I’ve been doing logo designs for a couple of years and have had many clients INSIST on breaking so many of these rules. I know I’ve lost a lot of jobs because of it, but I’d rather not be associated with amateur mistakes like these. Again, great article!
- 220August 6th, 2009 4:59 am
A great list of 10 f***ing obvious points about logo design.
- 221August 8th, 2009 10:52 pm
This was extremely helpful. I had no idea about the mistakes I was making. which happened to be half.
- 222August 16th, 2009 10:52 am
I’ve gotta say I do love the “Smashing Prints” logo even if it is too complex
- 223August 17th, 2009 3:45 am
I think you should add tall logos to the list. For me those are the biggest pain and just don’t seem to fit right anywhere.
- 224August 28th, 2009 3:39 pm
Of course a site for graphic designers is going to argue that a startup shouldn’t skimp on a logo. However, most startups are cash strapped and thus don’t have the funds to hire a fancy pants graphic designer. It is how good a company executes that eventually matters…not how good it’s logo looks. You can always slowly morph a bad logo into a good looking one over time.
- 225August 30th, 2009 10:50 am
Awesome! I am definitely a beginner (took a few design courses, taking more for design certificate in jan) and this is a great article! I just designed a logo for my mom’s company and I’m happy to say I’ve avoided all of these mistakes! Thanks!
- 226August 30th, 2009 9:59 pm
This resource is awesome! Best read ever, thanks!
- 227September 5th, 2009 11:49 pm
great article, helped a lot with some logo research i’m doing. great resource, simple and good information!
- 228September 8th, 2009 3:45 am
This article was very helpful
I knew about not using all of the different fonts, but that is the only thing. everything else in this article, like making your design overly complex. - 229October 3rd, 2009 1:27 am
Really useful article… Now one can understand how many factors involve in making a good logo, because you have to display it from favicon to your product.
- 230October 17th, 2009 11:02 pm
This would help clients of graphic designers understand some of the thought that goes into completing their work. Just one criticism though – not all cheap logos are trash. I offer low priced logo design services to give new businesses a chance to get going on a budget, and experience working with me before progressing to print jobs. Leisa at Alexandra Design, Australia
- 231October 29th, 2009 12:15 pm
Too bad the Smashing logo looks exactly like Salon.com. Try again.
- 232November 5th, 2009 11:38 pm
thanks for guidelines, I was searching tips exact like these are !!
- 233November 16th, 2009 4:48 am
veeeeeeeeeery usefull :)
- 234November 17th, 2009 12:28 pm
Logos are perhaps my favorite thing to create for a client. I find most of my clients through Elance. Did you hear of the new energy drinks at http://www.ElanceEnergy.com with a flavor called “Logo Lemonade?”
- 235November 19th, 2009 5:45 pm
I could have sworn I posted a comment on this months ago but I have just read all of your replies and I’m happy that this article helped many people.
To all those who think the points are “obvious” you are forgetting the title of the article. These are the “most common” mistakes I see being made by designers and non-designers every single day.
Thanks for reading, it was a pleasure to write.
- 00
There are no trackbacks at this time. If you are interested in leaving a trackback, please use this URL.
Leave a Comment
Make sure you enter the * required information where indicated. Please also rate the article as it will help us decide future content and posts. Comments are moderated – and rel="nofollow" is in use. Please no link dropping, no keywords or domains as names; do not spam, and do not advertise!
Interact
Popular
- 100 Wordpress Themes
- Photoshop Tutorials
- Fantastic Wallpapers
- 40+ Excellent Freefonts
- Dual-Screen Wallpapers
- Wordpress Themes for 2009
- Illustrator Tutorials
- Incredible Free Icon Sets
- High-Quality Free Fonts
- 30 Scripts For Galleries
- Photoshop Text Effects
- Useful Icon Sets
- Web Design Trends
- iPhone Wallpapers
- Before Launching a Website
- CSS Layouts And Templates
- Photoshop Actions
- Stunning Pictures and Photos
- Fantastic HDR Pictures
- Logo Design Tutorials
- Free Design Templates
- 10 Mistakes In Logo Design
- Photoshop Custom Shapes
- 40 Creative Design Layouts
- 8 Layout Solutions
- 53 CSS Techniques
- Photography Techniques
- Black & White Photography
- Styling Design Elements
- CSS-Based Forms
- 50 jQuery Techniques
- 50 Portfolio Websites
- 50 CSS Techniques
- Creative Logo Designs
- Desktop Wallpapers
- 25 Open Source Mac Apps
- 50 Free Icon Sets
- Apple ad bombing Windows 7 on Google - http://bit.ly/28ctPq
- Atatonic - a fresh CSS framework - http://bit.ly/4oOV2w (via @umutm)
- @HrvojeKC yes, that's an interesting idea. Maybe when the waiting is over, we'll write a detailed post about it.
- @benbeltran thanks, Ben, your support means a lot to us.
- @dandenney thanks for the nice words, Dan - really appreciate it.
- @TheKheiron well, it's not entirely our fault. But we will certainly learn a lot from this horrible experience.

(13 votes, average: 4.85 out of 5)
Great article for beginers :)