The Ugly Showcase of Military, Intelligence And Defense Websites


Members of military and intelligence forces around the world risk their lives daily to defend their countries and assist in peacekeeping and aid missions both at home and abroad. The men and women who make up the world’s defense forces make sacrifices that most civilians wouldn’t consider to serve their countries.

So, with everything they do for us, shouldn’t they be represented online by website designs that reflect the honor and responsibility they undertake every day? Unfortunately, that’s not the case in many countries out there. Many military websites out there are some of the worst designs in any industry. Whether they’re outdated, broken or designed by amateurs, some of the websites showcased below are bad enough to make you cringe.

There are some good ones, though. A number of countries have obviously dedicated the time and resources necessary to project a professional and polished Web presence for their members. A number of other websites have obviously put in some effort and are pretty close. If you know of examples of other great military or intelligence websites from around the world, please add them in the comments!

The Outdated

The websites featured here might have looked great 10 or more years ago (which was likely when they were created). But either their designs haven’t been updated in a very long time or their designers are still borrowing conventions from the late ’90s.

Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Argentina1
Everything from the color scheme to the header image to the skinny three-column layout dates this design.


Royal Bahamas Defence Force3
This website wouldn’t look quite so dated if it weren’t for the drop-shadows behind the content blocks.


Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela5
The overall layout of this website screams early-2000s.


Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Belarus7
Very minimalistic website. Unfortunately, gradients, tiny links and many &nbsp-empty spaces make it look dated.


Colombian National Police9
Here’s another great example of a website that would have looked right at home in the late ’90s or early 2000s.


Hellenic Navy11
The thing that dates this website the most is its width: it would look right at home on a screen with a resolution of 800×600.


Macedonian Ministry of Defence13
The layout, the partially rounded corners and the drop-shadow against the background all date this website.


Pakistan Maritime Security Agency15
Using an image like this one as a background was very popular in the ’90s.


Serbian Ministry of Defense17
The layout here is almost grid-like, but it doesn’t quite make it. The color scheme is the most outdated, though.


Slovenian Armed Forces19
Another website that would have been current 8 to 10 years ago.


Spanish Armada21
The rounded colors and glossy buttons would have looked great a few years ago, but now they just harken back to the earliest days of the Web 2.0 style.


The Russian Federation Ministry of Defence23
The design has a striking resemblance to traditional Google AdSense blocks, and the line-height property for the content area certainly should be increased..


Sri Lanka Ministry of Defence25
The color scheme and typography here are definitely reminiscent of Web design 5 to 10 years ago.


U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation27
The skinny layout, color scheme and overall look of this website feel at least 6 to 7 years old.


U.S. National Reconnaissance Office29
This website screams late ’90s and early 2000s, especially the navigation and typography.


Uruguayan Air Force31
This looks like it was based on a standard template from 5 to 10 years ago.


The Poorly Coded

These websites might not have been so bad if they were cross-browser compatible and adhered to Web standards even a little. But they are all so poorly coded that they don’t render correctly in browsers such as Firefox or Safari.

Luckily, there aren’t too many of them.

Brazilian Army33
The coding on this website isn’t noticeably horrible… except for all the thin white lines running through the backgrounds and borders of the content blocks.


Pakistan Navy35
I don’t even want to begin figuring out how they got the rounded-corner background to repeat like that in the main content area.


South African Army37
This website wouldn’t be so bad if it wasn’t for the giant gray bar running down the main column, effectively blocking half the content.


United States Special Operations Command39
The headers for all the content blocks here are fine, except the one for the news feeds, which prefers to be higher up on the page.


The Poorly Designed

These websites are just poorly designed. Some look like they were based on stock templates… bad ones. Others look like they were designed in programs aimed at hobbyists or those needing to set up personal websites (in any case, definitely not appropriate for government agencies).

Venezuelan Bolivarian Army41
Between the color scheme, the header (which doesn’t come close to spanning the whole design) and the broken icons, this website just doesn’t look good at all.


Cuban National Defence43
I’m not sure where to begin with this one…


Egyptian Armed Forces45
It looks like they couldn’t decide whether they wanted a minimalist website.


Republic of Fiji Military Forces47
This looks like your classic template website, with minor modifications.


Ministry of Defence of Georgia49
This wouldn’t be so bad if the content areas weren’t so disjointed.


Indian Air Force51
This might have been salvageable, except for the horrible alignment.


Kenyan National Security Intelligence Service53
The padding and margins in this website aren’t adequate, and the alignment is off in places. The concept is sound; it just needs to be better executed.


Lebanese Army55
This website might not have been so bad if the colors complemented the camouflage background, rather than clashed with it.


The Philippine Marine Corps57
This is another one for which I’m not even sure where to start.


Polish Land Forces59
Forget for a moment how amateurish this one looks. Notice how the text doesn’t even match up with the navigation buttons.


Portuguese Army61
From the header alone, it’s not so bad. It’s the lower area of this website that doesn’t seem to have any aim.


Romanian Land Forces63
I’m still trying to figure out if that white bar across the top of each column is supposed to be there. Beyond that, they should have paid more attention to how the header colors go with the rest of the color scheme.


Royal Thai Army65
There’s just way too much going on here, and no focal point to grab your attention.


Turkish Air Force67
This almost made it into the “Not So Bad” category below, except that it doesn’t have any focus, and the alignment of some elements is off.


Ministry of Defence of Ukraine69
The ads on this website should be better integrated in the overall design. Other than that, the design looks very dated.


United Arab Emirates Ministry of Defence71
Where’s the content?


Zimbabwe Ministry of Defence73
There’s no color scheme here, and the entire thing looks like something a kid did in class.


The Not-So-Bad

The websites here aren’t terrible. In most cases, only minor things hold them back. Most of them could be great with just a bit more work.

Ministry of Defence of The Republic of Armenia75
Other than the width of this website (which is a bit narrow for even an 800 x 600 display), it’s not a terrible design.


Australian Secret Intelligence Service77
This design is just fine, other than being a bit boring. And the text could be slightly enlarged for easier reading.


Ministry of Defense of Bosnia and Herzegovina79
If more attention was paid to the baseline or vertical rhythm, this would be a reasonably good design.


British Secret Intelligence Service81
The angles in this design should either be better incorporated into the other elements or removed altogether. Other than that, it’s not bad.


This is one of those websites that doesn’t have anything particularly wrong with it. It’s just underwhelming.


Ministry of National Defense of the People’s Republic of China85
The elements on this website don’t quite have enough continuity, but the color scheme and overall layout are good.


Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Croatia87
This website is also underwhelming. Nothing particularly “wrong” with it, but not impressive either.


Ecuadorian Army89
The header here isn’t that bad, but the rest of the website doesn’t match up, and it feels a bit like a generic template.


Ecuadorian Navy91
Parts of this website are great (the slidehow in the header, for instance) but other parts don’t quite match up, particularly the buttons on the right-hand side and the off-center navigation elements.


Armed Forces of Honduras93
This website isn’t bad. But again, nothing makes it stand out.


Norwegian Ministry of Defense95
Another example of a website that doesn’t do anything to stand out.


Peruvian Air Force97
The idea here is good, but the result isn’t very interesting.


Portuguese Ministry of Defense99
Another inoffensive yet unimpressive website.


Portuguese Navy101
This would be great, but it has just a little too much going on. Some negative space would make a huge difference.


Saudi Arabian Ground Forces103
This website is more interesting than some of the others here, but it doesn’t quite pull it together.


Sri Lanka Navy105
Here’s another website that looks like a template. The use of white space could be better and makes everything look a bit disjointed.


Swiss Army107
Another underwhelming, uninteresting design. At least it looks professional.


US Air Force109
A professional yet boring design. But maybe that’s how military websites should look?


US Central Intelligence Agency111
This website is way too narrow, and overall it’s just not eye-catching.


US Department of Defense113
Too much is going on here, and the social media links (the icons especially) on the left look out of place.


US Navy115
The icons and banners in the header don’t really fit the rest of this design.


A Few Good Sites

The websites below are the stars of this post. They are well designed, easy to use, professional and worthy of representing the armed forces and intelligence services.

Austrian Armed Forces117
This one’s clean and well laid out, with plenty of white space and a great color scheme.


British Army119
A professional-looking website, with a background that’s more interesting than most.


British Royal Air Force121
Another website with an interesting background and a clean overall design.


British Security Service MI5123
The color scheme here is great, as is the overall aesthetic, which is a cross between minimalist and magazine-style.


Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Bulgaria125
A clean, well thought out design that makes good use of textures and gradients.


Chilean Navy127
The header here is fantastic, and the rest of the layout works well.


Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces of the Czech Republic129
Another great header design: this one doubles as navigation. Each section of the website has a different color scheme, while maintaining the same basic look.


Defence Command Denmark131
A minimalist layout that leaves plenty of white space.


The Finnish Defense Forces133
A clean and organized design, with double-tabbed navigation bars.


Netherlands Ministry of Defence135
The purple color scheme here is unexpected, but it works well and sets the website apart.


Polish Ministry of National Defense137
This is one of the nicest designs in this post, especially because of the header.


Swedish Armed Forces139
A good clean design with a minimalist aesthetic and great typography. The transparent titles over the images on the right really take it up a notch.


US National Security Agency141
Professional, easy to use and coherent: everything an intelligence website should be.


US Army143
The US Army website brings together a lot of content of various types while maintaining a usable and consistent user interface.


US Marine Corps145
This website stands out mostly because of the grid used for the main content area and the ample white space everywhere else.




  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  51. 51
  52. 52
  53. 53
  54. 54
  55. 55
  56. 56
  57. 57
  58. 58
  59. 59
  60. 60
  61. 61
  62. 62
  63. 63
  64. 64
  65. 65
  66. 66
  67. 67
  68. 68
  69. 69
  70. 70
  71. 71
  72. 72
  73. 73
  74. 74
  75. 75
  76. 76
  77. 77
  78. 78
  79. 79
  80. 80
  81. 81
  82. 82
  83. 83
  84. 84
  85. 85
  86. 86
  87. 87
  88. 88
  89. 89
  90. 90
  91. 91
  92. 92
  93. 93
  94. 94
  95. 95
  96. 96
  97. 97
  98. 98
  99. 99
  100. 100
  101. 101
  102. 102
  103. 103
  104. 104
  105. 105
  106. 106
  107. 107
  108. 108
  109. 109
  110. 110
  111. 111
  112. 112
  113. 113
  114. 114
  115. 115
  116. 116
  117. 117
  118. 118
  119. 119
  120. 120
  121. 121
  122. 122
  123. 123
  124. 124
  125. 125
  126. 126
  127. 127
  128. 128
  129. 129
  130. 130
  131. 131
  132. 132
  133. 133
  134. 134
  135. 135
  136. 136
  137. 137
  138. 138
  139. 139
  140. 140
  141. 141
  142. 142
  143. 143
  144. 144
  145. 145
  146. 146

↑ Back to top Tweet itShare on Facebook

Cameron Chapman is a professional Web and graphic designer with over 6 years of experience. She writes for a number of blogs, including her own, Cameron Chapman On Writing. She’s also the author of The Smashing Idea Book: From Inspiration to Application.

  1. 1

    Of course, none of your design-related comments mean much in the grand scheme of things. A website either accomplishes its goals, or it doesn’t. Period. And since you know absolutely nothing about how well these sites accomplish their individual goals, this entire post is merely window dressing. You can say you do or don’t like gradients until the cows come home. But it doesn’t have anything to do with the success of a website.


↑ Back to top