The Creative vs. The Marketing Team: Yin And Yang, Oil And Water
Smashing Editorial: Please notice that the language in some parts of this article may be very informal. If you think you might be offended, please stop reading this article now.
I hate the division represented in this title. It’s the major stumbling block in modern business. Power struggle is never constructive, and it at least doubles workforce effort at a time when streamlined is crucial for a positive ROI. You can spell “team” from the word “marketing,” but I’ve yet to see a sense of it in marketing. What can one spell from “creative”? “Reactive”? I’ve seen plenty of that, and for good reason.
Don’t get me wrong: I love marketing as a practice! Relatively speaking, marketing is a fairly new practice (marketing in the sense of “public”, broad mass marketing, applied to products in the modern age — ed.), and one that has to evolve each day to keep up with consumerism and technology. As a designer, coming up with marketing ideas is orgasmic. Guerilla, sabotage and viral marketing are the work of genius, which is why we don’t see them very often. But you are probably thinking horrid thoughts about marketing practitioners right now, so let’s rethink for a second.
I have known a handful of great marketing people in my career, and they were smart enough to form their own companies. They always managed to do the delicate dance to create something that was effective and not just popular with anyone who might, oddly enough, have an opinion. And then there are the people you see every dreadful day.
It’s A Diverse Crowd Out There
I have a ton of marketing stories, but my favorite one comes from when I was art directing and designing a major push for a new licensed character across all marketing channels. The staff and I worked like crazy to get the lines done in time for approval. It took months — that’s how many lines there were.
After our submission for approval from the licensor, a member of the marketing staff, lower level, came to me, telling me the changes that were needed. First off, don’t tell someone the changes: write them down so that there’s no misunderstanding. Luckily, I was taking notes. One of the changes called for major surgery on the main character to remove markings on their face. It made no sense to me, and I questioned it, but he stood fast and insisted that that’s what the licensor wanted. I asked to see the email from the licensor.
“No.”
I asked that he email the licensor to ask for clarification.
“No.”
The most infuriating thing was that this over-sized man with a cherubic face, looked like Baby Huey from the old Harvey Comics. Sounded a bit like him, too. It was hard to speak with him without laughing. As his new nickname circulated through several departments, a contest started among the staff to try to deal with Baby Huey without laughing.
I knew trouble was brewing, and so, like any smart person who would make file copies or turn off layers, the art staff and I stated cutting the image and placing everything the licensor wanted removed on a hidden layer. We did this to hundreds of pieces. A month later, we submitted the changes, and then (surprise, surprise) the licensor ripped marketing a new one for removing the marking, so essential to the character. An impromptu witch-hunt was held right outside the art department, next to the marketing offices. The president personally led it.
Without wasting any more column space than is needed to state the obvious, Baby Huey was spanked… and I believe the president actually asked him, “What is your major malfunction, Baby Huey!?”
The best part was when I was asked how long it would take to fix it. Explaining to the lay person that I would simply turn on some layers in Photoshop took longer than actually turning them on, but I scored big points with the president, while my “marketing step-brother” was sent to military school.
This doesn’t happen enough. But it does and can happen! At another corporation, marketing was publicly spanked for taking eleven-and-a-half weeks to work on an initiative that had only twelve weeks in total — giving creative, copy and design three or four days to execute lines for hundreds of products. Creative would always get it done, so action to stop it took a while, but the grumbling and angry staff meetings got some relief in the form of at least six weeks.
Are We Or They The Strange Ones?
What do creatives look like to non-creatives? Obviously, everyone thinks they can design an ad or logo in Microsoft Word, so immediately we become snooty, whining snobs. A great marketing person I worked with wrote a recommendation for me and said, “…great designs without a lot of creative baggage!”
“Creative baggage.” What could that mean? For anyone who has wrangled creatives, whether staff or freelance, we can be intolerable freaks. It’s hard to remember the last creative who actually followed my art direction without an argument or apology. We are also weak and lack the social skills to deal with corporate power. We often give up our power in an effort to be seen as “flexible” or “a team player.”
An art director who was firmly a puppet on the hand of the company she worked for gave me this recommendation: “He usually hits strategy, but if some adjustments need to be made, he is very open to suggestion and direction. [Speider] has worked with our team for a long time and understands our process.”
The process was that I went into meeting all smiles, told a few jokes and did exactly what I was told to do. The pay check helped me live with myself.
In most cases, that means doing what you’re told by anyone bold enough to speak their opinion about the creative process and not be questioned. I have had to pull marketing co-workers aside and remind them that we were both reporting to the same person and that no one ever told me anything about reporting to them. I’m not “being difficult”: I’m taking control of my work for my department so that I don’t have to take the fall for failed initiatives and low sales down the road that result from someone else’s design decisions. I never get angry or aggressive, although people who have worked with me say that my sarcasm could be deadly at times. Baby Huey’s ghost haunts me.
Be Different, But Expect The Same
Just the other day, a client showed me a product catalog that I thought was from 1972. It was their 2010 catalog, and the creative department’s directors asked me to bring one of their paper products into the present (or future) and do “something different.” I love when they say that.
I did some of the finest work of my career… some good work. The creatives were really on board, and revisions were almost non-existent. Imagine basically having free reign to design some fun and impressive paper products and having the full support of your clients? Well, no good effort goes unpunished, and I was informed that the marketing department rejected the work in favor of a catalog that looked like a sequel to the one from 1972.
What has the fear in business done to our ability to make fast, hard decisions in the marketplace? Safe and take-a-step-back has gotten us into the mess we’re in right now. How do we get out of it? I include this passage from someone who would refer to himself only as a “suit.”
I have to have the confidence that the design solution is meeting the needs of the client and is achieving strategic/tactical goals. Because of that, if there are elements of your design that I’m uncomfortable with, I will call them out and, in some cases, will nix them. Similarly for the client, they have to be comfortable about how their own brand is being presented, how their market will react, even how their own staff will react.
“How their market will react.” That should be the only concern. And how did this “suit” become the tip of the approval funnel? The truth is that people can’t let go without second- and third-guessing what will be successful. It’s not a question of whether, say, a good marketing plan based on researched demographics would improve a creative brief that professional designers and writers could use to create a cohesive package. The reality is more like, “Just design, and I’ll make changes until I see what I like.” That always makes for a great waste of time and resources.
Business is tight for many reasons, but just one wrong move could cost you big time. My question is, if the marketing plan is sound and the sales staff is competent, then why would those simple little changes that are requested to please people truly affect the product?
”You know, Bob, I was about to buy that package of Fluggelbinders that I wanted, but I couldn’t bring myself to do it.”
“Too expensive?”
“No. The color of the package turned me off.”
Happens like that every day, doesn’t it?! I used that exchange in a committee meeting in which the background color of an exclusive product was discussed and sampled for a week. The marketing manager turned to me and said that I had negated marketing’s input. I thought marketing’s responsibility was to figure out the target audience, their habits, income and so on and how to best reach them through media and other advertising venues — not how blue or green the product should be? Silly me! Maybe it’s a marketing secret that can’t be shared with creative. They’re spies for… something.
Do You Want To Get Involved In Office Politics?
What can one say when sitting in a committee meeting and subjective suggestions are flying around, usually contradicting each other, and people are echoing previous requests but adding “More red” or “Bigger logo” or “I’ll know when I see it”? I sit and listen, take notes and then turn to my contact (if it’s a freelance job) and ask what he or she would like me to implement. To be sickeningly submissive, I say, “Some great insights here, but some are counter to the creative brief and some other directions suggested here.”
I turn to the art director, boss, marketing person or whoever hired me and ask them to go over what they think will be needed. Usually, they tell me just to follow what I was told in the committee meeting. This is when I’m thankful for hourly rates, because the Frankenstein created by the committee is usually too monstrous to please anyone. It goes around and around as long as more than one person has a final say on the project. Imagine what would happen if too many cooks worked on a dish. The chefs I know are insane and would stab and de-bone each other.
When freelancing, you are removed from the eternal struggle between creative and marketing. You are only a tool used by creative and a bludgeon used by marketing to wield its power over creative. Just ignore it and let the creative department deal with it.
But what happens when you are the art director or designer on staff? If you are, then prepare for office politics. The struggle between creative and marketing has nothing to do with design or marketing: it is the good old human impulse to assert one’s power over others, to be the alpha dog.
Whatever your position or department, everyone in it is jockeying for some measure of power over others, from the frowning minimum-wage guard at the front desk who tells you to sign in (as you’re doing it) to the mail deliverer who won’t give you your mail away from your desk to the co-worker who tries to convince you that part of their job is now your job or that part of your authority is now theirs.
Humans usually spend a lot of effort blending in with the herd and shying away from confrontation. Confrontational people know this and use it. When the person taking your order asks if you want to super-size it, do you say “Sure” or “No”? You say yes because your brain and protective nature tell you to go the easy route and say yes. Less aggravation. Why do good girls like bad boys? Because we… I mean they go against the herd, they break with convention, and they’re confrontational.
So, it stands to reason, while you’re in the workplace — where you face the pressure of HR rules, progress reports and the ever-present cliques of workers and executives — that you would feel alone and stay away from confrontational co-workers. But you can bet that they will at least size you up from day one, if not start stealing your authority and setting a standard that will follow you throughout your career at that firm.
You must start a new job with basic knowledge of your rights as an employee. Listen, and be bold, compassionate and assured. Show no fear, and show that being flexible is not the same as being a wimp. Any business book will tell you that the weak die. You have to set your own boundaries when starting a job. If you “wait and see,” then standards will be set for you as you adjust to the learning curve. If you relinquish any territory, you will not be able to get it back. You will open yourself to charges like, “That’s the way it’s always been done, and you said nothing last time.”
(By the way, a comeback to that last line is, “It may have been done that way in the past, but part of my job is to streamline the process to get the best results, faster and more efficiently. I’m sure you’ll love what my system will do for the workflow and product.”)
As with any situation, your gut will tell you what’s right and wrong, as will your job description. To whom do you report? To whom do others report? If a marketing person reports to the same person as you or is lower on the corporate ladder, why would you let them dictate anything if you were not told to follow their lead? Sometimes, someone may be assigned to oversee all aspects of a project. In that case, they are the boss, and that’s that… but that role ends when the project ends.
If a colleague of yours on the same rung of the corporate ladder makes a poor suggestion in a committee meeting, it’s best to nod and just not execute it. Either you’ll never hear a word about it or the colleague will approach you about it — in which case you shouldn’t respond that you don’t have to take their suggestion, which could be labeled as “confrontational” (it’s always the people who defend themselves who are “confrontational”), but rather that their idea, after much consideration, was found to have no merit. Simple and easy. It deflates their ego and could lead to sexual performance problems down the line. How can you argue with that?
“I thought my suggestions were good!”
“Sorry, but I didn’t think so, and no one else echoed your concerns.”
(This cuts the person off from others by setting a line that people would rather not cross. You are showing strength as the alpha dog. The pack will fall on your side.)
A more direct and devastating attack would be to ask, “Why do you think I’m incapable of doing my job?” This is a heart-stopper because it cannot be answered. They may argue that you lack team vision or that they’re protecting the client’s interests. Again, ask why they think you haven’t fulfilled the team’s vision, drawn from the creative briefs, and why they see you as acting against the client’s interests.
It’s like a fistfight. It lasts only a few seconds before the herd breaks it up… Yes, this is confrontation. Even confrontational people are taken aback when confronted, unless they are psychotic — in which case, pray that HR rules keep them from turning violent. And if they do become violent, taking a knuckle sandwich from your lunchbox is a small price to pay to see the aggressor fired and spend a night or two in county jail awaiting a bail hearing, opening the way for you for a civil lawsuit. A win-win situation!
On the other hand, you might encounter a “squeaky wheel,” who runs to the boss demanding “respect” and a title over you. Often, in the interest of a quick resolution, the boss lets the squealer have their way. You’re only hope is to calmly state your case, note your accomplishments without the squealer’s input, and add that it’s a business office and not a therapist’s office for people to work out their personal problems by laying them on others. Firm, direct and sound.
If Squeaky gets their way, then you’re doomed. But then, you don’t really want to work in a place like that anyway. If the boss would so easily knock you down the ladder, then you need a new boss. If you get your way, others will fear confronting you. I think coining the name for Baby Huey may have frightened my colleagues into avoiding my displeasure and gaining a nickname of their own.
The Enemy Within?
Once you establish that you are not a push-over, most people will respect your boundaries, and the natural order will be restored… with an occasional bump as a stray member of the herd probes your weak spots. Those weak spots, as some will discover, are your department colleagues: lowly designers and writers who will surely tremor when someone storms into the office and demands the changes that “I called for in the meeting.” Now you, as that lowly worker, have another problem. You have just given up your power to a stranger and put your creative director in a tough spot. Your actions affect how your supervisor controls the department and your job.
The proper thing to do is to tell the intruder that you are just a designer or writer and that they really need to speak to the creative director so that they can assign the proper revisions and work. Then smile and point to the creative director’s office. If your colleagues are on their toes, one of them will summon the creative director to come into the department and protect his or her minions from intruders. I’ve done it a gazillion times.
Summon your righteous indignation, flair your nostrils and imitate the tiger. When the interloper leaves, send an email gently reminding them that they must come to you for any requests, because only you know everyone’s schedule, and all changes must be signed off by you, as department head. Don’t assume that HR will intercede to stop this; they believe that the process should be flexible enough to keep work flowing. And as long as the bloody wound isn’t squirting arterial red like a fountain, HR likes as few problems as possible.
Points to Remember
- You were around. In fact, aside from occasional bathroom breaks and meetings, you’re around 12 hours a day on average.
- You are responsible for everything that comes out of your department and will be held accountable for it.
- People want their way and will try anything to get it.
- Don’t allow people under your authority to sabotage your power or security.
- Prepare a response to an objection or make a list of responses for when a ridiculous argument is used to attack you.
- HR wants the easiest path to peace and calm. Present all squealers as troublemakers and not team players. Use corporate-speak to your advantage.
- Sometimes you will lose the battle. Sometimes you will also lose the war. Form as many strong allies in the company as you can. The higher the executive level, the better!
- Does someone want to comment on a design in a conference meeting? Make some well-educated comments yourself. Perhaps you see a hole in the marketing plan, or the project doesn’t have enough creative time, or the sales material is a week past deadline. Bring it up gently and kindly. I believe that’s called passive-aggressive. Use it!
- Grab power, and don’t wait for it to be offered. Take on an extra project; start an initiative yourself; or earn a few million dollars for the company. They’ll sit up and take notice.
Power grabs are often made by people too incompetent to do their own work, and public displays of “directing” are thought to mask that incompetence. They often are. But handled correctly, they aren’t, because they won’t get the chance.
Every Relationship Has Good And Bad Times
When I worked at one large corporation, I was closing up my office and the art department at 7:00 pm on a Friday night when a young woman from the marketing department caught me in the hallway and asked to step into my now locked office. She immediately went into an act about how “her” project was so important and how I had to do it by Monday and email it to her because she would be away for the weekend.
I looked at her in silence. I asked who she reported to and learned it was one of my subordinates (if you went by the order on the corporate masthead). I told her I would talk to her boss on Monday to find out why she would have the utter nerve to hope that I would be in the office at 7:00 pm on a Friday night and then expect me to work all weekend on something that was not important enough for such a tight deadline. She stormed off.
I don’t remember why I was late on Monday, but as I walked down the hall, people were shouting for me to check my email. There was an email from the young lady I spoke with on Friday evening. She must have gone back to her office and written a very angry message, courtesy copying the entire corporate division, about how unwilling I was to work on her project, and how she was cancelling it, and how I was costing the company millions of dollars and immortal souls, and hail Satan, hail Satan, and so on.
In walks her boss, one of those fine marketing people who I mentioned do exist. The young lady had the project for three weeks (grabbing it as her first project and naturally wanting to make a big splash), and as I suspected, it wasn’t time sensitive… Mind you, she sat on it for the previous three weeks, and it did have to be at the printer the very next day. Being of sound minds, the head of marketing and I were able to come up with a solution, work hard together and make the deadline. Creative and marketing did it… together, with no arguments or stepping on each other’s toes or egos, and we both shared in the glow of accomplishment. It can happen. Maybe we just need guns to our heads at the time?
(al)







Laneth Sffarlenn
July 20th, 2010 3:08 amWow! I am going to need to re-boil my kettle for this one… I’ll be back :P
Speider
July 20th, 2010 5:30 pmIt’s a two-kettle story. Hope you got to finish it.
Denny
July 22nd, 2010 8:03 amMore of a pot/kettle story really…
Speider
July 22nd, 2010 11:18 amHa-ha! (in Nelson’s/Simpsons voice)
Boba
July 20th, 2010 3:22 amYou do realize that this was published 4 days ago on the author’s blog with a couple of words changed?
http://schneidersweb.wordpress.com/2010/07/16/yin-yang-oil-and-water-creative-and-marketing/
Speider
July 20th, 2010 5:32 pmYes. There are published and unpublished stories on my blog. Hope it didn’t ruin the surprise.
steve
July 21st, 2010 10:17 am^ This was, or should have been, one of the ‘Unpublished Ones’
:)
Speider
July 21st, 2010 10:51 amBaddump-bump-bump! ;)
The Tall Designer
July 20th, 2010 3:24 amThis:
“The struggle between creative and marketing has nothing to do with design or marketing: it is the good old human impulse to assert one’s power over others, to be the alpha dog.”
Is absolutely key – it happens time and time again in every office I work in ( front end freelance contractor, 11 years in the trade http://www.thetalldesigner.com).
People will continue to do it until they stop *being* human so I’m not sure I can offer any solutions to deal with it other than honesty – if an idea is stupid, say so, politely, expressively and with justifications, but you can still say it’s stupid.
If that fails – threaten to do some actual user testing to decide which is best ;)
Jeroen Marechal
July 20th, 2010 3:24 amWow, seems a like a great article. Did just only read a few parts, will be reading the rest later tonight.
Kris Handley
July 20th, 2010 3:29 amTweet from Smashing Magazine – “Oh-oh: we are going to publish quite an article in a couple of mins. This could be the loudest article we’ve ever published.”
Probably the most boring article I’ve read on here.
Aubrey
July 20th, 2010 4:35 amYou must be in marketing.
Allie
July 20th, 2010 5:20 amHey now.. I’m in marketing and I thought it was very interesting… Well. I guess I am from a design background so now I can see both sides. :)
Aubrey
July 20th, 2010 10:58 amNo harm meant Allie, just a little joking :)
I’m a creative that works in a marketing department.
kirsief
July 20th, 2010 7:21 amHaha! Good one!
Jack Nycz
July 20th, 2010 7:38 amhaha, well said!
Speider
July 20th, 2010 5:35 pmI know many creatives that work as “marketing” people, too. Better when creative and marketing are the same person…so an account manager can then step in with their wonderful ideas.
Rav3
July 22nd, 2010 8:47 amARGHHHHHHH ive had that happen to me once, i had the whole thing ui, colors, everything, in comes the account manager and the clients “designer” friend. Well, my design came out the other way looking like a unicorn puked a rainbow on top of it. Worst thing about it is they loved it and i got a raise.
Speider
July 22nd, 2010 3:41 pmMoney helps. Dorothy Parker said something about money not buying health or happiness but it did buy a diamond studded wheelchair.
Jen Walter
July 20th, 2010 8:27 amWow I disagree. Been in the business now for 10 years and this article still hits the nail on the head as far as what people need to remember. Some of these suggestions might not be the best as far as “making friends” goes… but in theory, you’re not at a job to make friends, you’re at a job to do the job.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 5:38 pmThanks for getting it (as did many others, but there will always be other opinions). Yes, there are those who want to be “friends” and seen as “cooperative” and “nice.” Those are the people who go home at night and fight anxiety because they are pushed around all day.
There are people who are very happy just doing what they are told. If that makes for a better workplace and it rolls off your back, then I say enjoy!
Speider
July 20th, 2010 5:41 pmThe majority disagrees, but I always welcome opposing opinions. I just have to weigh the validity when they are in the small minority or it would be design-by-committee trying to please everyone. Perhaps the next article will be to your liking.
You get major points for just reading the whole thing!
jono253
July 20th, 2010 3:31 amFantastic post, every time you give up a piece of ground on a project it’s so much harder to get it back the next time.
I recently redesigned a corporate newsletter and was met with “lets not re-invent the wheel”, “this has worked in the past” and “there’s not enough time to do a plan” right from the start. Suffice to say the end result was a mishmash, jumble of half-baked thoughts and ideas… won’t be including that one in the portfolio!
Dan Murphy
July 20th, 2010 6:23 amThat can be the most frustrating thing, churning out work that you just aren’t proud of. But hey, meeting brand standards!
olakunle Olayinka
July 20th, 2010 11:37 amHey Dan, i do agree very frustrating indeed but most times after spending long hours on the project, i just frown and give what the marketing guys want while smiling at my paycheck.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 5:47 pmAnd that’s sometimes what you have to do; smile and cash the paycheck. I, as with most creatives, have many pieces of bad design directions crammed into the back of my closet. One commenter on another article wrote that a “great designer can make a great design with the challenges set out by controlling clients.”
Well, not when they direct every small thing. Take the money and run…and hope they don’t show it around town (although they will leave your name out). I had a client who, after micromanaging the design, wanted me to affirm what a great design it turned into. He asked when it would be on my web site so he could show people before it was produced. I told him it wouldn’t go on my site and he was crushed…and only paid a third of his bill. I considered putting it on my site with copy claiming it was the worst design in the history of the universe.
Snowball2
July 20th, 2010 6:20 pmAre you serious? “won’t be including that in the portfolio” or “work that you’re not proud of”? Apparently you are under the impression that you are an “artist” and are creating your personal portfolio on company time instead of being PAID to do a JOB. Stop investing your self-esteem in a newsletter and deliver creative that actually accomplishes its goals, doesn’t just look pretty.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:55 pmFirstly…I love your screen name. So, in which marketing department do you work?
Some people can just present a resumé when searching for a new job but creatives need to show what they have created. It’s visual job. Show a creative director bad design solutions, then have the version you did before the “helpful ideas.” A creative appreciates the original thought and understands the final design-by-committee. Show the work without that starting point and you won’t be hired because it is assumed you were responsible for the design. Show the work to a non-creative and their first thought may be that you play it safe. They won’t hire a safe designer…you just get beaten down into that later after you start the job.
A good creative sees the message and designs the different elements to sell that message. A hack makes things that are pretty but don’t fulfill the purpose. I am a designer and a professional. Sometimes I am an employee with certain rights to, as HR always repeats from harassment training, “a safe and comfortable workplace.”
“Stop investing your self-esteem in a newsletter and deliver creative that actually accomplishes its goals, doesn’t just look pretty.” Are you referring to my writing for Smashing?
Are you suggesting my work does not accomplish its goals? You wouldn’t be that bold to assume you know me that well, so I assume it’s a general slap to creatives.
jono253
July 21st, 2010 1:36 am@snowball2 During my time as a designer I have found that sometimes what a client considers to be in their best interests often isn’t.
Being PAID to do a JOB is one thing, but if a job is worth doing it is worth doing well.
If someone hired you build a house but then took away the blue prints and said make it out of polystyrene i’m sure you wouldn’t showcase it to future developers!
Sometimes you have to grit your teeth and go against your principles to design something that you know is terrible but a good designer will also act as an advisor and give the client the benefit of their experience. At the end of the day if the client chooses to pursue a bad idea / design the designer has the right to choose whether or not to let it stain their reputation.
steve
July 21st, 2010 10:20 amI agree with Snowball2!
-and no, I am not in “Marketing”
Speider
July 21st, 2010 10:55 amOh, Steve, my honorable foil…
You don’t like my articles but you keep reading them. Could this be love?
Nicole
July 22nd, 2010 11:27 amPart of what makes a good designer is the drive to improve and come up with the best visual solution for the problem at hand. This means taking things personally sometimes. I know your casual feedback isn’t actually a referendum on my worth as a human being, but it’s important to invest some of my self-esteem in whatever crappy piece of marketing collateral you want me to put out. If I don’t care whether I make good work or not, I’m not going to make good work.
I’m the sole in-house creative reporting to a much larger marketing team, and I’ve noticed that my coworkers and I have much different ways of measuring success and my worth to the company. Not to be a delicate flower here, but people are harder on creatives. I’ve never heard anyone say “This marketing initiative was terrible and I hate it” (not “this marketing initiative needed stronger messaging and more time to refine it”- I mean direct, unconstructive criticism), but people have no qualms about saying “I hate the colors.” (and again, not “the colors make this hard to read” or anything that would be useful)
When whatever creative and marketing make together fails and we all get fired, you’re not going to put that failed marketing initiative on your resume, and I’m not going to put the shitty newsletter I made for it in my portfolio. See? We’re not so different after all.
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 12:57 am@Snowball2: guess you’re a marketing person or just read the article with early onset prejudice then decided to leave a comment . if you’ve experienced the life of a creative, you wouldn’t be so harsh and condescending when you posted your comment.
i have been in the creative world for only 3 years and have to admit that i am rather young in the game. though young, i have encountered a lot of “know-it-alls-without-actually-knowing-what-they’re-talking-about people” in the industry, at every turn. there are those that actually stay with you and comment on every line, color, shape of a design and they don’t even have background in designing or don’t even know how to work a computer. to them i say: “i am in this job/position because i know what i am doing. and the people that hired me saw that i can and will fulfill every design JOB that they throw at me.”
it’s comforting to know/read that a lot of creatives feel the same as i do or have the same experiences that i had. this makes the color of the cloud above my head a little brighter..
at the end of the day, if you’re a designer/artist/creative, it’s not just about the paycheck (though a fat one wouldn’t go unappreciated), it’s about being proud of what you’ve done and having something to show for what youo’ve been slaving over.
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 1:01 am@steve: i guess you’re not a creative as well, and haven’t experienced a day in the world of creatives… because if you are, you’d see that there is truth in the article
veneratio
July 20th, 2010 3:33 amAmen to the section on recording, somehow, (even if its on a napkin, back of greasy pizza box, or the intern’s arm) of changes that you aren’t sure of from someone who isn’t directly in charge of any project.
S S, great article and very spiffy.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 5:51 pmThank you, Veneratio! Oh, the stories of the different people who try to get involved. It is, of course, the point of the article about not being nasty or mean, but to assert your rights as an employee, hired to do a certain job. Why take direction or make changes because someone tells you to do it? In the end, at year-end review time, the creative has to answer why something didn’t work. Saying you did as you were told doesn’t cut it (catch-22).
Dusan
July 20th, 2010 3:43 amNice one :)
Milos
July 20th, 2010 3:44 amexcellent!
Rochelle Dancel
July 20th, 2010 3:50 amI’ve never worked in a place where Creative and Marketing have been that exclusive from one another (but maybe that’s just something that happens in uber big companies…?). I work in a Marketing team, and I am the Creative – I either design stuff myself or I commission creative. Despite the fact that we also have a Technical team, Marketing has its own developer that sits within the Marketing team to expedite design and development processes across channels. There’s no way we’d be able to do our jobs if all three functions didn’t sit together as we’d effectively be designing, developing and marketing out of context and then praying that all the dots joined up afterwards. That said, we don’t do things by committee either – we’re well aware that there’s a reason that we don’t all do the same job.
Crys
July 20th, 2010 7:03 amWhat you described, about hoping the dots join up afterward, is how every large company I’ve worked at has done things. It’s insane.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 5:58 pmI’m sending you my resumé! ;)
If it was all a horror show, we would not continue doing what we love. As Crys point out, it is rampant, mostly in larger firms and mega-corporations…but sometimes that also provides a bigger cushion. At Warner Bros., we went into the conference room, every department gave their report, we all did our things and went back at the end of the week. If you were behind, every department head was there to hear it. There was no design-by-committee because everyone would be open to it with their own reports.
Sure, people would filter into the art room later to air their change ideas, but those where easy to wave off as, and it’s a big point in this article, why make changes if someone is lower on the corporate ladder and they are not valid points (always listen first and then judge and execute)? To be “nice?”
Every firm has it’s own dynamics depending on the people above and below you.
Radu
July 20th, 2010 3:50 amI could’ve sure used these pointers about…erm..3 years ago :) Very well written article, Speider, and painfully true. The corporate world is definitely a fickle little bitc…..
Speider
July 20th, 2010 5:59 pmThanks, Radu! If you noticed how long this article is, you’ll know it took three years to write.
;)
Kate
July 20th, 2010 3:50 amBig post. Advance apologies for big reply. Frustratingly expected you to scream: “Marketers are arseholes!!” at any moment. But you didn’t. Um, well done for that.
I’m not entirely sure whether you were addressing the marketing / creative relationship / conflict or just conflict in the workplace generally. Or, you wanted to address the marketing / creative conflict, but were worried about the possible reaction from marketing types and decided to make it a more generic post towards the end. The irony. Either way, having spent 15 years as a ‘Marketing Professional,’ I can only agree with you and sigh meaningfully at some of your stories of poor behaviour. My own experience of the typical marketer who wants you to make changes – unreasonably – beyond the original brief and is rude to boot, is a complete lack of conviction in their own confidence. A good marketer can sell the first creative treatment to clients, easily. They just need to have confidence in their own ability and in their relationship with the Creative in charge of the treatment.
Respect is an issue. Marketers (glorified sales people, devil’s little helpers – take your pick) do suffer from the eternal egotistic top-of-the-tree problem. They feel they own the client because they have the relationship with them. This therefore, gives them carte blanche to steam-roller any other business process, creative or otherwise. They suffer from hideous ambition and brashness which nearly always hides deep-seated insecurities of not ‘making it.’ Creatives on the other hand, want to achieve through the process of producing wonderful art and tend not to get the latent marketing ambition. Ironically though, to achieve commercial success, creatives need to understand the market and target audience – at times – better than the marketing dept and this knowledge is frequently abused by marketing.
I’m happy to say that I’m one of the smart ones who formed my own company, full time copywriting. I couldn’t stand the marketing environment for its rush to get a result at the expense of yep, I’ll say it – humanity. I now work with designers and creative agencies. It’s bliss.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:09 pmYes, there are good and bad — marketing and creative people. It’s not that I shied away from bashing marketing or such, and for a long article, could you imagine the book I could write on the entire dynamics?
Office politics are a nightmare. In a small firm, everyone knows everything about you. In a big corporation, the rumors and innuendo travel quickly as well. People are people.
I was hoping to educate people to the fact that as creatives, we are not just the “pretty picture makers” who work for love and not money. I wanted to open eyes to the fact that creatives also have rights and should not help place themselves at the bottom. There are so many trying to do that on a daily basis, why help them by pulling the trigger of the gun they’ve forced to your head?
Oddly enough, when lines are drawn between humans, as with animals marking their territory, it usually settles into compliance. I like using the wolf/dog pack analogy because it is so close to how humans function (according to sociologists and dog lovers).
With strong fences, so to speak, we work better as neighbors. A team, rather than individuals out for themselves and spending too much time on office politics and not the office products.
Thanks for responding. I really enjoy other opinions and insights, as do the readers.
Josh
August 4th, 2010 2:25 pmAfter spending the majority of my day reading a lot of your posts (“Designers, “Hacks” and Professionalism: Are We Our Own Worst Enemy?” being the first of yours I’ve read) – if you wrote a book, I would buy it without a second’s hesitation.
I love your writing style, and you always have something great to say and fun to read.
Holly
July 20th, 2010 3:53 amAbsolutely fantastic article.
Ash
July 20th, 2010 3:57 amThis is what I & I’m now sure many others encounter all the time. I hate they way we are seen as just people who make pretty pictures & thus only need to do as we are told & do it in 5% of the total project time.
I also hate the way we are told that the Client/Customer(s) wont like it, based on nothing other than a thought in that person’s head of “I know exactly what others are thing all the time. Therefore I know they wont do/read/like/buy this”.
Shocking!
Great article.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:16 pmThank you! Unfortunately, if you are a subordinate to the person making the bad decisions, you must do what they want and hope the paycheck is worth the therapy you need down the road. If they make the wrong calls, they will either get the Baby Huey treatment from their boss or the creative department will be held responsible.
There’s another article in there, about the blame game, I suppose.
hood_lord
July 21st, 2010 11:52 pmVery Corrrect!! I honestly agree with Ash!!
There are some guys who think they are the best at it & know everything!! But the problem is they can’t do it themselves but feel great amending your designs, destroying the beauty of your work all in the name of the client ( this isn’t professional, this is too heavy, the font is so small, very complicated blah.. blah…)
My works also suffered a lot due to the marketing guys! But as I was a beginner, I thought they were really doing the right thing & then as time passed by, I soon realized that some of them tell me to “remove/change this or that, the client wants it” without having a talk with the client. They experiment their own fantasies & ideas with my design!!
I don’t mean I’m perfect but I’m a professional!!
I do work to earn my bread but when I’m into it, I’m into it ! I love creating things!!
An eye-opening article for me indeed!!
Jamie Stanton
July 20th, 2010 4:06 amGood to see an article on the realities of Office / Work Politics. You’re right in saying that a lot of these confrontations are down to territorialism and alpha-male showdowns, and not necessarily the design / wireframe / strategy itself.
Learning how to deal with these situations professionally and competently while standing your ground and getting positive results and happy clients – is what separates the men from the boys.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:18 pmLet’s not be sexist! ;) Women from the girls, too (that didn’t sound right).
Either learn to deal with it or be a victim of it. Office politics are almost everywhere. If it’s not at your workplace, stay forever!
Jenni
July 20th, 2010 4:11 amThe issues I’ve had are based around me being a weird hybrid – doing HTML, web design, web copywriting, social media stuff and SEO, rather than just one thing. Unfortunately I’ve worked in marketing departments where the people who made the decisions were either completely clueless about the internet (and not willing to listen) or thought they knew everything. Either way, some terrible decisions were made (delete a Google Adwords account with 8 yrs of good history? remove the search engine from the ecommerce website? sure, let’s do it! etc etc) which I had no control/influence over. These people are usually great in other areas, but unwilling to listen or accept any advice, or explain any reasoning they have (because there isn’t any), or just saying flat out ‘No’ for no reason, just like in your example above. Mostly I’ve found that these people are out solely for their own gain/convenience rather than thinking about the company.
It’s incredibly frustrating, because these companies always have separate teams with no one person looking at it from all angles, and no one ever looks at the bigger picture until the project is finished, decisions have been made, etc.
Thankfully I now have a job where there’s a small team making intelligent decisions and it’s really easy for me to put my ideas across and learn new things, rather than spending my time having to think about how to put my views across politely or wasting time with pointless/damaging activities.
ZAM
July 20th, 2010 4:12 amAs expected a “smashing” post.
Wish all would read this to get an idea of what they think about creative.
” Drink the blood of the creative and you will be able to create bigger logos ”
I like it ;)
rr404
July 20th, 2010 4:14 amThese reality make me laugh and cry at the same time.
Laugh when i got time to and cry when it *ucks up with my personnal work to organize a “you put us in that situation so at least help me/us resolve it by not being so LAZY” meeting
The million dollar guess is : what side of the fence am I ?
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:23 pmSounds like you’re under the fence. Think about it this way; would HR rules encourage someone being belittled in a meeting or called “lazy?” Would the people saying these things say the same thing to a stranger or a family member? Why should you, as an employee be expected to take such abuse?
Jorgen
July 20th, 2010 4:16 amGreat article!
Would love to see more of these.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:23 pmYou shall!
steve
July 21st, 2010 10:21 amYou’ll be sorry!
(as no doubt, will I!)
Speider
July 21st, 2010 10:56 amBut you’ll read it, Steve, so I win!
Gary Aston
July 20th, 2010 4:30 amGreat article, could have been written from my own experiences.
As designers, what we do looks easy from the outside; so, everyone thinks they can do it (I’ve stood next to one of our marketing department as she explained to the client that our work looked so good because of the computers we use — nothing to do with years of training and a good eye!)
Often marketeers – particularly juniors/admin types – stumble into the industry, while designers have spent years studying, paying their dues and yearning to be in that role. Is it any wonder designers explode when told how to do their job by someone who was a waiter three months prior?
summerbl4ck
July 20th, 2010 6:29 pmHey, that’s not fair. Marketing takes study too. (I have the student loans to prove it.) It’s an us vs. them attitude that puts people on the defensive from the get-go. Let’s put our dukes down and try to work together. I’ve worked with great designers who give me options, who ask penetrating questions that go beyond the brief. And I’ve worked with thoughtless designers who do only what is in the brief and nothing more and can’t take any feedback without crying (literally). But I try not to let that color my interactions with every new designer or team I work with. Hopefully we all want the same thing, success.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:58 pmGood for you! The less ego involved the better for the team. And yes, there are creatives who are trying on one’s nerves. I’ve had to fire many of them.
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 1:52 am@Gary Aston: that’s one of the things that facilitates a “GRRRR!!!” moment for me, when non-creative people take charge and give/force their insights/ideas on things they have no knowledge of, which in the end belittles the creatives’ skills, talents and experiences.
@summerbl4ck: no offense meant. i guess gary, myself and many other creative folks are speaking from experience. my thanks to you for being understanding and i guess a good marketing folk to work with. :)
Boo
July 20th, 2010 4:34 amSpeider
July 20th, 2010 6:24 pmAAAA! You scared me. Why is my cat posting?
Henrique
July 20th, 2010 4:38 amGood article, but as a marketing man I have a consideration. The war is not between marketing dpt and creatives, but is between the amateurs and the good-workers. The “Baby Huey” was an assh*le because he was a “lower-level” professional, with low experience in real market business. As said, the departments must work together, one helping another, and so the jobs go on.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:25 pmAs with my conclusion. Why spend so much time and energy on power plays? Because that’s all some people have. No talent but the ability to create smoke and mirrors.
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 1:53 amagree henrique
Brittany
July 20th, 2010 4:43 amI’m surprised there is no mention of marketing treating creative like IT just because we’re “good with computers.” I can’t even tell you how many times I had to do minor hardware upgrades and clean off grossly infected harddrives at my last gig, where I was a web dev. Then “hey, why isn’t the site done?”
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:27 pmThat happens to everyone who knows how to turn on a computer. Ever been called by a friend or neighbor whose computer is down and they want you to fix it because you “work with computers?”
Nicole
July 22nd, 2010 11:37 amAt my first job, as a temp, I had a boss who was still learning how to use Microsoft Word (he’d been using WordPerfect) and would call me in to help him. One day he yelled from the other room “Nicooooole the words as disappearing when I type!”
I walked in, pressed the Insert key, and said “It’s fixed” as I walked out the door. So satisfying.
Paul Foth
July 20th, 2010 4:52 amThe subtitle of this article is confusing. Yin and yang each contain the seed of the other; i.e., they’re inseperable. Oil and water do not mix. “Yin and yang” and “oil and water” are different ways to conceptualize the relationship between two entities, but the way they’re presented in the subtitle implies that they’re the same. “Yin And Yang, Or Oil And Water?” would have been a more accurate subtitle, and perhaps would have suggested a different way to write the piece. (Then again, the “vs.” in the title implies oil and water rather than yin and yang, so maybe yin and yang should have been dropped altogether.)
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:36 pmYes, perhaps too western of a usage, and I apologize if it caused any offense. I was using it as a metaphor for the constant “struggle” (although Taoist philosophy generally discounts good/bad distinctions as superficial labels, preferring to focus on the idea of balance. The idea that yin and yang has a moral dimension originated in the Confucian school, most notably Dong Zhongshu).
I had hoped it was the dimensions of yin and yang, including the “seeds” are the metaphor that we, although in different departments are tied together, working towards the same goal. Office politics may be seen as the balance of yin and yang being fought by one side of the equation. Oil and water, as you pointed out, is different and further apart, never to balance. The third, creative and marketing was meant as a progression from balance to a total free-for-all.
Perhaps not a title by Hemingway, but it’s published and too late to change. I appreciate your post. Educational and I will be avoiding such symbols in the future. Thanks!
Paul Foth
July 21st, 2010 4:54 amYou are a gentleman and a scholar, sir.
Schmoo
July 21st, 2010 9:34 amI think I’m gonna bring my own salad dressing when I crash a BBQ either of you guys throw…
Speider
July 21st, 2010 10:58 amHA! Thank you.
steve
July 21st, 2010 10:24 amI am going to eat a chicken Wing and abuse my Wang* Then cover both in Oil and Water!
* Dont look so aghast, Wang is my short Asian intern! (Don’t feel sorry for him, he’s a real prick!)
Speider
July 21st, 2010 10:59 amThere are times I like you, Steve. I haven’t decided if this is one of them.
Agos
July 20th, 2010 5:14 amAmen. But be wary, this kind of behavior does not come exclusively from marketing, and does not target creatives alone.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:36 pmOffice politics happens everywhere humans work…and penguins.
Oscar Dias
July 20th, 2010 5:19 amGreat article! I think the discussion is valid not only to arts and marketing, but all the creative and non-creative teams… like development and sales… sometimes it even looks like they’re different companies.
dkardys
July 20th, 2010 5:35 amI really enjoyed reading such a candid and opinionated article/rant…nice work! Maybe for your next post you can share some to personal insight into the relationship between the creative and sales teams?
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:39 pmJust remove the word “marketing” and substitute “sales”…or “account managers” or “janitorial staff.”
mouzone
July 20th, 2010 5:36 amHunter S. Thompson warbles on about office politics… interesting, I suppose.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:40 pm“Fear and Loathing at the Water Cooler.”
Katrina Miller Fallick
July 20th, 2010 5:49 amI’ve worked in design, AND marketing for about 13 years and I find this to be…off. Yes when I was fresh out of school I had some of the difficulties described, but I’ve come to see working well with others, both marketing, the client, as the mark of a true professional.
Sometimes your “brilliant fresh creative” IS off brand. Sometimes (always) what the client wants IS the right thing. True, they may no know how to ask for it, or what it’s called, but it’s our job to explain that making something bold doesn’t equal making it stand out, etc.
I’m way more frustrated at all the “clever” creative that is off brand, and off target, that I see being pushed onto clients by “designers” who think WAY to highly of them selves.
That, and the attitudes represented in this piece seem to be much more closer to those of my interns, than of the creative directors I’ve worked with.
Kate
July 20th, 2010 5:59 amJust as well you see ‘working well with others’ as the ‘mark of a true professional,’ because your writing is dreadful. Tsk. Experienced, mature clients buy good creative because they need to be guided. Not because what they want is always right. Surely. Otherwise they’d be creatives.
Excuse the rant, but it takes one ex-marketer to stand up to another. You won’t get this from a creative. They’re too nice.
All the best.
Snowball2
July 20th, 2010 6:35 pmThe client is right because they are paying for it–not because they are “right” in the absolute sense of the word. And that’s a pretty arrogant statement that people come to a designer to be guided. Your client is not a sheep. if you can’t convince them that your clever design is worth trying, then it’s not worth it. Clients often have good financial reasons to be risk-averse. It’s not their job to be your guinea pig for creative experiments.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:46 pmIt’s a bit too far to say, “creative experiments.” Let me put it this way, do people tell plumbers how to run pipes? They trust that the plumber knows his/her job and will do it right for maximum water flow and/or flushing.
Do I try to show the client the best solution? Of course! That’s my job. If they want the wrong direction, I will advise them so. If that’s what they want, that’s what they get and I walk away knowing that when it doesn’t perform as well as it could, the client/company will lay the blame at my feet. It’s one thing for a freelance client, knowing they won’t be a repeat client but it’s another thing when you are relegated to the role of “village idiot” by your coworkers.
Snowball2
July 21st, 2010 7:32 amBy creative experiments I mean, the creative teams I’ve worked with who delivered products without logos and then tried to argue that the negative space looked better or who designed a catalog for our middle-aged+ audience with thumbnails so small that my 20 yo eyes could hardly see them. And then when I push back, I get “if you haven’t tried it, how do you know it won’t work?” I’m all for testing but let’s be reasonable. “Trust” that as a marketer I do know something, or that your radical design just isn’t a creative direction I’m willing to go in–or spend my (these days) minuscule budget on.
Meg
July 21st, 2010 1:32 pmThen clearly you hired a bad plumber, Snowball. That would explain the very poor graphic design choices they made. It may have something to do with the ‘minuscule budget’ aspect. Most graphic designers I know that are worth their salt charge the going rate or more.
So yes, get someone who knows their stuff in the industry and you SHOULD trust them. Hire amateurs and you get poorly laid pipes!
Speider
July 22nd, 2010 11:43 amCouldn’t have said it any better than Meg did. Now that you have finally identified yourself as a “marketer” and made some telling statements, aside from coming on much too strong in your responses, it sounds as if you would not agree with any of my articles that outline bad clients, broken contracts, low budget and fighting to get paid.
This article doesn’t really address creative and marketing as opposing magnetic forces; it is meant to show the most common form of office politics and how creatives, usually the target for low person on the totem pole, can protect themselves as employees and not abuse objects.
Can creatives and marketing work together to create greatness? Of course! It was the last paragraph of the article. I can’t blame you if you didn’t make it that far in a 3,700 word article, but at what point did you stop reading and make this comment? So many people saw the same problem and told anecdotes of their own experiences, SB2 and still you feel an anger and resentment towards creatives.
As this is an international site and many people are using English as a second language to reply (and you have my heartfelt kudos for writing English better than I), I won’t assume you are American and that the words you have used here are how you communicate a creative brief to your “bad” designers. BUT if you are and that is your level of communication, then you need to work on that communication. Perhaps the designers aren’t getting enough information from you to meet your mind’s expectations? Are they getting the demographic information?
Just yesterday I had to pry demographic information out of a new client. When I started naming marketing avenues with the same demographics, he had no idea these avenues had the same demographic. See what good communication can bring to the table?
As I tell creatives, SB2, try listening and try discussing and work as a team and not as the wall protecting vital secret information or the funnel of taste.
Jenni
July 20th, 2010 6:22 am‘Experienced, mature clients buy good creative because they need to be guided. Not because what they want is always right. Surely. Otherwise they’d be creatives.’
Not necessarily, many clients hire the ‘good creative’ because they say they don’t have the time to do it themselves. These are often the people that think simply owning a copy of Photoshop Elements means they can create the digital equivalent of the Mona Lisa without effort – they simply ‘haven’t had the time’ to try out the program which is why they haven’t done it.
It’s rarely the designer who gets the last say. Even when something is literally impossible, the client gets angry and immediately says that they will go to someone else.
More often than not, the client who has been immersed in the brand/brands, customers, sales etc will know what works and what attracts their particular clientele better than a designer, particularly a freelancer.
Have you ever seen http://clientsfromhell.net ?
Meg
July 21st, 2010 1:29 pmThe clients you’re speaking of Jenni aren’t the same clients Kate was speaking of. Kate was talking about ‘Experienced, mature clients’ and you were talking about ‘clients from hell’ ;)
So I believe her original point still stands because sadly not every client is ‘Experienced and mature’
Sam Barnes
July 20th, 2010 6:26 amI am a creative and I will stand up to you.
And I fully agree with Kate:
“Experienced, mature clients buy good creative because they need to be guided. Not because what they want is always right. Surely. Otherwise they’d be creatives.”
That is the SOLE reason we (creatives) have 4 YEAR degrees. Otherwise, anyone with Youtube or Lynda.com subscriptions can learn how to use the programs, and then they just become a tool, a pixel pusher.
Also, I would like to point out that this part of your comment: “‘designers’ who think WAY to highly of them selves.” – speaks VOLUMES about what you really think of creatives, and what is hidden behind your oh-so-nice comment.
However, I would like to end this reply by saying I am appreciative and happy you work well with fellow creatives in your workplace. At least that is a comfort.
Chris Lorensson
July 20th, 2010 5:51 amnice to see some heartfelt opinions on the blog-o-tron, keep ‘em coming SM!
(And BTW, we feel your pain dude!)
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:47 pmYou were married to my ex-wife? ;)
Deborah Wood
July 20th, 2010 5:55 amTwo words: Creative Strategy. Make sure you have one before you begin any project. Ideally the account and creative people work on this together, have the client review and agree with it BEFORE any creative work begins. This gives you a document to work from and go back to should things go off track when presenting the creative. I create these strategies myself when I don’t have an account person to work with, it just makes life easier.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:48 pmExactly! Thanks.
Bob H
July 20th, 2010 5:59 amInteresting enough article but the cute little personal crack about the appearance of the person who crossed swords with Mr. Schneider, “The most infuriating thing was that this over-sized man with a cherubic face, looked like Baby Huey from the old Harvey Comics. Sounded a bit like him, too. It was hard to speak with him without laughing. As his new nickname circulated through several departments, a contest started among the staff to try to deal with Baby Huey without laughing.” just sounds petulant and small on his part.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:50 pmYes, I suppose but there were so many incidents with BH. You earn a nickname either through some horrid mistake or tease or it’s badge of honor.
Trust me, the entire company wouldn’t have used the nickname if he didn’t deserve it.
Bob H
July 21st, 2010 2:51 amPerhaps but no need for you to throw this into the story. Made you sound petty, to my mind
Speider
July 21st, 2010 11:13 amDoes the Bob H stand for Bob Huey, and I touched a nerve with a childhood nickname? I just thought it was a humorous way to illustrate my point but I understand your feelings about it. You are a kind soul, I’m sure.
I have to admit that when I was younger and thrust into one of the biggest corporations in the world (and my mistakes, which were quite a few, are lessons for all of us), I was dumbfounded by the cruelty I witnessed. It was like an elementary school playground. As can happen, I fell into it. I did cruel things to people. I’d like to think they deserved it and although memory doesn’t serve well of those times, I’m confident they did.
Still, it was a lesson in humility and I can stand here and say I haven’t given anyone a nickname, except my kids, in over a decade. As for Baby Huey and his whereabouts today — he’s not on any of the big business sites and the people I keep in my network from that job haven’t heard from him. Another victim of business Darwinism.
Roo
July 20th, 2010 6:09 amAwesome article. Spot on. So relieved to hear our creative department isn’t the only one going through this eternal struggle :)
Sam Barnes
July 20th, 2010 6:20 amThis article was DEAD ON to the very first design job / experience I’ve ever had. I kid you not. Before I was even out of college for design, I took their job with a year left in school, and was murderously beaten over the head with the marketing and sales executives, which in turn made me angry immediately at anyone who even related themselves to marketing in ANY fashion whatsoever.
They even let me go in the most unprofessional manner known to man because I wouldn’t just be their “tool.”
Not a good experience for someone who isn’t even finished with their degree and looking to make a fresh entrance into the industry…but LUCKILY, and thankfully, I buried my anxiety issues over their months of torture, and was hired by the most amazing company in the world. Today, I love our marketing people. Hell, I love all of our people. Everyone and everything is so well managed and taken care of…it’s the dream job of a lifetime. And I am thankful to have it.
In summary, I would like to say I am thankful for your article because until this very moment I was still secretly frightened it was all my fault for trying to protect client interests, for standing up for my work, for being “difficult.” But now i know I’m not the only one out there who was beaten with the “do it until it looks right” stick.
Thanks again!
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:51 pmThank you!
Patrick
July 20th, 2010 6:20 amThis sounds a bit bitter, and I have to say, I’m glad not to have worked in any of the places you have. It *is* important to stand up for your expertise, but you also need to do it in a non-confrontational way. Constant chest-butting like a couple of drunks on a Saturday night won’t get you anywhere in the long run. If you treat work like a war, you’ll be shot as often as your ‘enemies’.
Alan
July 20th, 2010 6:21 amWho ever came up with the idea to try and separate these two things is a moron. You can’t design if you don’t have strong grasp of marketing, and you can’t market if you don’t have a strong grasp of design, they are on in the same.
Kate
July 20th, 2010 7:06 amI’m in danger of monopolising this post. Delete me if I’m boring but, Alan, the marketing and design disciplines are technically very different. I spent three years learning about the marketing mix, pricing strategies, research etc etc (snore) which are elements that don’t get covered in such excrutiating depth at design school. They are certainly complimentary, but definitely separate. It just takes enlightened marketers and creatives to accept the similarity in the purpose of their roles, not the function of them (and no, I’m not being virtuous, I left the industry a while ago). I have a grasp of design (and a love of it), but my personal technique never progressed much beyond finger-painting.
I think the conflict in this post – or another avenue to explore perhaps – is how creatives and marketers behave when working at the behest of very large clients / employers or in the commercial world generally. Because if we were all left to do our jobs in another world where capitalism wasn’t King, or where design and marketing services were always independent, I think we’d all get along just fine. But this really is off brief now.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:57 pmPatrick, It’s about the ideal of a team working together as one and not a battle of individuals trying to set themselves above others through intimidation. If someone tries to make me voluntarily lower myself below my hired position, I will be “confrontational.” Some might call it asserting one’s rights.
Creative and marketing are the mother and father to the product they conceive. Working together raises a wonderful adult. Fighting and struggling only creates a switchblade carrying juvenile delinquent.
I always welcome opposing opinions because we all learn from other thoughts. Would you mind expanding on your post and tell us what your position is at your firm and with what department?
Patrick
July 20th, 2010 11:00 pmI’m freelance now, but in my last job, I was the designer and developer in a small marketing department. I was lucky enough that the marketing people respected my expertise and I respected theirs. I know that’s not always the case. I’ve worked in other (non-design) contexts where I’ve experienced exactly the confrontational people in other roles you refer to.
I agree entirely with your comment here. I read your original article slightly differently, but I think we are essentially on the same page.
Speider
July 21st, 2010 11:15 amGreat! Thanks for reading. Some really controversial stuff coming up in the future.
Josh
July 20th, 2010 6:49 amI’m the sole full-time designer/creative (web and print) in my company’s marketing department. I cannot tell you how much this resounds with me.
Thank you for writing this, very good post with some very helpful advice.
DC
July 20th, 2010 7:37 am@Josh – I feel your pain… why is it that Marketing think/feel it’s their job to Art Direct you??? That you’re the monkey and they are the organ grinder… “Just push the buttons monkey!” “Make red, no green, no lighter green, move it left, a bit more…” Grrrrr.
Crys
July 20th, 2010 7:22 amHey! Stop following me around work! ;)
I think Alan above is spot on. The biggest problem that divides the two types of department is that to really be effective at either you have to at least have a basic understanding of both… only no one ever explained that to either side while they were learning so unless you happen into it you just don’t figure it out. Nothing is more disheartening than to go into a marketing meeting and explain the viewer reaction to dissonant inconsistencies and brand identity and have everyone stare at you blankly and then ignore you, or to go into a design meeting talking about the primary demographic of the user/viewer and have everyone look at you like you grew a second head.
Jay Dalisay
July 20th, 2010 7:28 amNow this is an article!! Well written!!
Mike
July 20th, 2010 7:28 amWow, this is exactly how it goes in the workplace. I have to say I may have things a little harder… the marketing person is the wife of the person I report to.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 6:59 pmYou’re doomed.
Deezy
July 20th, 2010 7:41 amMy ADD kicked in right about when you insulted the “lower-level” marketing guy’s appearance.
Bob H
July 20th, 2010 8:16 amI felt same thing…to me that took away from the entire article.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:00 pmDid you come back?
Bob H
July 21st, 2010 2:54 amand you are a sensitive soul, perhaps? I was curious to see what other people thought about the little petulant sidenote. Business is full of travails, etc etc etc on and on..perhaps a little perspective would temper this talk a bit.
steve
July 21st, 2010 11:56 amI thought it was indicative of all the whiny ,assholeish behaviour attributed to ‘creatives’ who all look like the sleek slim “Mac Guys” and who talk to no one in particular (as their wrongly held MEphones have dropped their call long ago (not due to antennae issues, but how much bullshit can a finely tuned electronic device take?)
Speider
July 22nd, 2010 11:50 amSteve — is it medication time?
By the way, you never did mention what your role is in our industry. If you’re getting to be this much of a fan of mine (will anyone with the screen name “Steve” please us a number or initial so I can tell if one Steve is wigging out or there are four Steves), we really should know more about each other.
steve42
July 22nd, 2010 1:31 pmthe Artist formerly known as “Steve”
Speider
July 22nd, 2010 1:59 pmAh, good; 42 — the answer to everything.
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 2:54 amtell me, honestly, haven’t any of you guys have that BH experience? haven’t you given a nickname or 2 to anyone just to vent out?
Speider
July 28th, 2010 2:00 pmYou should have heard the complaining when Steve42 got her nickname!
erik
July 20th, 2010 7:58 amsuch an entertaining article to read! Thanks so much!
doesn’t make me feel as bad now when i have to flex a little muscle in the revision process :)
Anne
July 20th, 2010 8:33 amGreat article based on experiences—written by a true creative. It’s good to hear the reinforcement that it’s not just that creatives are less understood and more that people are all just fighting to be the alpha dog. Great insight for creatives to better understand and deal with the corporate climate
I have been told I’m not a yes man and many of the other labels the author mentioned. When was having a brain such a bad thing? I also had someone refer to creative and strategy as the beauty and the brains-they must have gotten that from someone else’s idea of putting people into nice neat little boxes (Mad Men maybe-never watched it I was too busy working).
Fact is that I am just not good at office politics-I know it’s one of my flaws. But I’d rather spend that 75% of my day creating meaningful solutions that I can be proud to say I had a part or helped inspire in others.
Wes
July 20th, 2010 8:57 amThis whole article is my everyday! Glad I’m not the only one. I am one of four guys in the creative “department” for the marketing “team” (of which there is no creative director). For me, it’s very very rare if we ever get deadlines on anything we do… until the day before it’s needed. Then it’s magically the designers fault if it’s not ready on time.
Great article!
Vimal
July 20th, 2010 9:41 amIt reflects my experience. Very nice article.
Mario
July 20th, 2010 10:01 aminteresting write up. :) thanks
Rua
July 20th, 2010 10:02 amAs someone who is losing that war, this was an incredibly helpful article to read…knowing that I’m not the only creative out there who struggles with this sort of thing. However, it’s hard to find a way to fight back when one of those squeeky wheels wants you out. Thanks for writing this article. It will help me hold my head up during my remaining time here.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:03 pmAll is not lost if you have been pushed into a corner. You can take baby steps to regain some sort of control over your own job function. It takes longer than laying down the law right off the bat, but it is possible. Sometimes it’s just easier to move on and take the lessons learned.
Megan Brown
July 20th, 2010 10:04 amOh man! Hit it right on the head. I especially like this
“I thought marketing’s responsibility was to figure out the target audience, their habits, income and so on and how to best reach them through media and other advertising venues — not how blue or green the product should be? Silly me! Maybe it’s a marketing secret that can’t be shared with creative. They’re spies for… something.”
We’re still trying to figure out how to get marketing to do some proper research. It seems to be an afterthought of theirs… which is crippling our media and branding efforts. There are a lot of marketing ‘jokers’ out there and few truly great ones. They are very easy to spot, just by their level of insecurity alone. Are they confident and show mutual respect toward peers? Or are they compensating for their lack of competency by disrespecting others?
Word to all marketing professionals :: It only takes a few minutes for creatives to realize if you are just collecting a paycheck, or if you respect yourself enough to do something with your career.
Alice
July 20th, 2010 1:35 pm“It only takes a few minutes for creatives to realize if you are just collecting a paycheck, or if you respect yourself enough to do something with your career.”
Well said. Our “marketing” department is run by one of these paycheck collectors and it literally took me less than one day to figure this out. I have no idea how this person keeps their job, and it pains me to see millions of dollars and opportunities lost as this person scampers around the office, making sure everyone knows “that’s exactly what I was thinking.”
Richard
July 20th, 2010 10:59 amI can’t believe this is meant to be a serious article, I expected to read the comments with everyone laughing.
Sure, office politics are a reality, but the pent-up bitterness and ego issues! Overcompensating for feeling like the little guy and seeming to be proud of the tough persona you’ve invented. Surely we designers are better than this.
Any competent person can deal with the majority of situations without resorting to intimidation or the underhanded tricks the article seems to recommend.
Kevin
July 20th, 2010 12:17 pmThank you Richard, I had the exact same reaction to this article. I’m shocked at the number of people who see this as “spot on”. There’s just too much bitterness here to take it seriously. Yes, I’ve encountered many difficulties working with marketing in my 10 years as a designer, but over time I’ve figured out how best to handle these situations while maintaining civility and creative integrity. Then again I made a decision early on in my career that I wouldn’t work for companies unwilling to respect both me and my time, maybe that’s the difference.
Visual
July 20th, 2010 1:21 pm@Kevin “Then again I made a decision early on in my career that I wouldn’t work for companies unwilling to respect both me and my time, maybe that’s the difference.”
And you couldn’t have said it any clearer. I do believe the economy is also playing a huge role in the bitterness. Many in this field are overworked and under-appreciated which is causing a rift between all-levels.
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 3:08 am@Richard: if you are one of the many who can relate to this article, then you would see how “serious” this is, even if it was meant to be or not. you can laugh about it and even chuck it up to some “bad experience that you wold forget to ‘fit-in’” or you could choose to BELIEVE in yourself as you call yourself a designer.
designers are people to and we have the right to feel slighted when we are. who are you to say how another designer or another person should feel about an issue you yourself have not experienced? that is how people feel, that is how designers feel/felt. if they vent through this article, who are you to say that they “Overcompensating for feeling like the little guy and seeming to be proud of the tough persona you’ve invented.”
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:09 pm“Seems” being the keyword. They are not tricks or underhanded — they are positive approaches to the problem. But, if everyone agreed with me, it would be suspect that the zombie apocalypse had begun.
You are, fortunately, not in the majority and there was little laughing. I do welcome (and thrive on) opposing opinions. Would you expand on what your experiences are as a creative? How many people are in your office, is there design by committee, office politics or power struggles? If not (and not every office suffers this) then how does your firm operate?
JakeT
July 20th, 2010 11:16 amLet me sum up the article:
Marketing people are mean (unless they’re some of ‘lucky few’ that I don’t hate). Your only strategy for dealing with them has nothing to do with learning about customers, customer needs, the target market, your employer’s business or strategy–instead make sure you browbeat anyone who disagrees with you by saying things like, “Why don’t you think I’m competent enough to do my job?!!”
This will in turn make you the alpha dog. In so doing, you won’t have to talk to mean people. Or little people who aren’t as cool as you.
Then you can spend all your time deciding what color things should be. Because that’s your goal as a designer, to be as creative as possible with little to no regard to your coworkers, employees or the business you work for.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:16 pmI was hoping the moral of the story is that creatives, as with any employee must see the end product and sometimes that means fighting office politics for the betterment not only of the product but to be happy and engaged in the work and the company itself.
The conclusion I hoped got through was that it is possible for a team comprised of people who should and can work in harmony (Yin and Yang) to come up with a great solution and not step on each other’s toes (oil and water) so it doesn’t become creative vs. marketing. It’s counter productive.
Would you mind keeping the discussion going by telling us your position at your company and why you believe “spend all your time deciding what color things should be. Because that’s your goal as a designer, to be as creative as possible with little to no regard to your coworkers, employees or the business you work for” is what not only myself, as writer, is trying to bring out in the open, but also the numerous comments acknowledging that it exists and is counterproductive?
Joe Stevens
July 21st, 2010 5:37 am“Then you can spend all your time deciding what color things should be. Because that’s your goal as a designer, to be as creative as possible with little to no regard to your coworkers, employees or the business you work for.”
Design should be influenced by the goals of the project and the needs of the end user, not by the ego of coworkers and employees. Thats what I got from the article.
Speider
July 21st, 2010 11:26 amExactly! Thank you for actually reading the entire thing. I wonder how many people just read for three or four minutes and clicked on another link or got angry and pounded out a reply?
Thanks for the reply, too!
Mimojito (aka Efren)
July 20th, 2010 11:51 amSpeechless. Hits the topic straight on the head and keep smashing away until there is nothing left but a pulpy mess. L-O-V-E it!!!!
Bobby
July 20th, 2010 12:14 pmI subscribe to the SM RSS feed and I don’t normally fell the need to respond but this was a great article; so many valid points and unfortunately valid issues within the workplace, a lot to take from this and put into practise.
Thanks!
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:16 pmI appreciate that! Thank you.
Joe Barstow
July 20th, 2010 1:02 pmyou have written a piece of pure genius. wholesome, sincere and brutally honest. you brought some negative points to the plate and ended it with a positive polish. I’m inspired not only by your philosophy on modern-day work-ethic, but your writing style as well. many. many. thanks.
8D
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:19 pmThank you but I’ve just accepted an offer for a marketing position (came in several hours after this article went live) and I need you to change all the “Ts’ in your response to “Ws” and end each sentence with the word “penguin.”
Now get me some coffee while we continue the creative meeting without you.
(Kidding!)
Crys
July 22nd, 2010 1:33 pmSadly, that’s actually happened to me. The bit about the coffee. “Hey, can you run down to Starbucks while we have this meeting on the user interface you just designed?”
Visual
July 20th, 2010 1:13 pmThis article truly hits home. It seems that breeding from bad gene pools is happening far too much. I’m of the mindset that if you want things done right the first time then you probably should find another planet or species to work with.
The biggest failure I see is that each rung of the ladder can’t do their own jobs while working towards the same goal. Typically power-hungry, alpha dog executives dictate not by what the market wants but what they themselves want out of it. Then the creative team of designers and/or programmers can’t do what they do best without the interjection of creative-minded, the almighty and wise executive (who I guess will be purchasing or using the product that is produced).
The pay doesn’t heal the pain anymore.
I am dissappoint.
July 20th, 2010 1:37 pm[Offtopic: by the way, did you know that Smashing Magazine has one of the most influential and popular Twitter accounts? Join our discussions and get updates about useful tools and resources — follow us on Twitter!]
Really smashing?
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:22 pmAll I know is I awoke this morning to this article being published and it had 509,000 reposts (300,000 more than the RSS feed). Really!
Makka
July 20th, 2010 1:48 pm<3 this article
Matt Beischel
July 20th, 2010 2:03 pmGreat article! Really hits home. I remember the one time I almost got fired over refusing to listen to a still-in-college marketing manager and put a big, flowing ribbon graphic on the cover of a male-targeted publication.
Bori
July 20th, 2010 2:18 pmSo many of scenarios mentioned above are so universal and common. I was a new hire in this ad agency and I played nice until I found others were pushing too much. I organized a little meeting with my art director and the marketing rep, explained my concerns in a calm manner and sent the marketing rep to spank.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:23 pmIt’s hard to get people to step back so be very proud of yourself. Now, once bitten, twice shy for next time?
Otcho
July 20th, 2010 2:29 pmVery interesting discussion. I am a bit of everything: a marketing-guy, sales person, designer and IT as I am responsible for an online shop, where you have to bring all those worlds together. I think that designers/creatives feel the need to invent something, do something different, because the same as before is very boring. Right? Marketing-Guys feel like they have to prevent change, but often have no clue why the style guide is as it is. But they know for sure, that there have to be rules. Sales people don´t care, they know that good design may help a lot, but can´t believe that its that important. The IT department doesn´t care if its #00000000 or #99999999 – it only has to work. Too simple?
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:30 pmI will be the first to admit that there are creatives that do see the design over the message but I truly love to present an innovative solution and hope it will pass in some intact form or another. To the other end, we can take our cues from advertising and Hollywood; how many remakes will they produce? Is doing what was successful with a different company successful but safe? Are we in a recession because creative thought and innovation has been ignored for so long and evident in the auto manufacturers and other corporations now declaring “creative solutions” (many articles on mainstream media about creative thinking solutions being sought by corporations) are the key to success but still quashed by middle managers set on the status quo and that weekly paycheck.
steve42
July 22nd, 2010 2:47 pm“Are we in a recession because creative thought and innovation has been ignored for so long…”
No.
We are in a recession because there was no regulatory oversight (the appropriate laws already existed) and laws that WERE in place were repealed.
three words. CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS
All risk has to be insured.
Logically to laymen like you and me, that means if I borrow 1,000 I have something of VALUE to provide in case I cant fork up the 1,000 (aka Collateral)
But what if instead of HARD CASH or Physical collateral like a car, I had an INSURANCE POLICY i.e. from Geico that ‘covered’ the 1,000 debt?
So far so good!
Now, on this insurance policy, I pay premiums – as with all premiums, they go into a pool, a portion of that pool pays for any loss events.
But what if, instead of paying into the pool, I fking spent it!!???
What if our ENTIRE FKING FINANCIAL SYSTEM WAS BUILT ON INSURED RISK *THAT WAS NOT INSURED*??/
THAT young man, was the seed of our recession, not “subprime mortgages” not NINJA loans ( No INcome Jobs nor Assets) but simple speculative and ultimately excessive over leveraging, a collapse of a house of cards.
Speider
July 22nd, 2010 6:58 pmUm…I’m just going to stand over there for a while.
Sergei Tatarinov
July 20th, 2010 4:41 pmBrittany July 20th, 2010 4:43 am
I’m surprised there is no mention of marketing treating creative like IT just because we’re “good with computers.” I can’t even tell you how many times I had to do minor hardware upgrades and clean off grossly infected harddrives at my last gig, where I was a web dev. Then “hey, why isn’t the site done?”
–
That’s exactly why I decided to leave the office work behind and become a freelancer. Happy ever since.
Patrick
July 21st, 2010 1:26 amThis is so true. I’ve even been asked to fix photocopiers because “I know about technical stuff”… (As it happens, I can fix photocopiers sometimes, but only because anyone but a retard can open up the machine and pull out jammed paper.)
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 3:24 am@patrick: agree! as with most digital photocopiers used these days in offices, if there is a malfunction, the screen shows you the cause of it and in some cases, how to fix it.
steve42
July 28th, 2010 9:43 amThat wasnt a “screen” … that was a mirror!
Speider
July 28th, 2010 2:01 pmMedication time.
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 8:03 pmmissed your medication again, steve?
steve42
July 30th, 2010 9:59 am“missed your medication”
…. If you were really a “creative” you would have creatively come up with your own witty retort, instead of parroting one from above!
Taylor Van Sickle
July 20th, 2010 6:31 pmStop whining dude.
Speider
July 20th, 2010 7:30 pmAnd leave show business?
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 3:27 am@Taylor Van Sickle: if you see it as whining, it would sound like whining. but if you read between the lines and see the anecdote as they are, something that really happened, you’d see the point of this article.
steve42
July 28th, 2010 9:35 amno, actually if it sounds like whining …it is!
(listen)
even if it sounds like I just farted, you really cant tell that…
oh
wait.
Ange
July 20th, 2010 8:37 pmGreat article, thanks.
terina
July 20th, 2010 11:12 pmthis is awesome! thanks
most of the time it feels like i might as well not be at work… it will make no difference. they’ll just change the colors to what suits them & design everything in microsoft WORD. sigh
steve42
July 28th, 2010 9:38 am“most of the time it feels like i might as well not be at work… it will make no difference. they’ll just change the colors to what suits them & design everything in microsoft WORD. ”
I agree.
Legally, you are not entitled to that salary you now spend.
To ease your moral dilema (as if “creatives” had morals!) just donate your money to the Steve Jobs Fan Club!
Speider
July 28th, 2010 4:33 pmSteve, stop scaring the straights!
paul
July 20th, 2010 11:48 pmThanks for this article. Good reading :) and many great tips.
Creative Ideas that Sell – cruzine.com/2010/07/01/creative-ideas-sell/
Bartosz Oczujda
July 21st, 2010 12:14 amThe thing is, people should treat one another with respect. I don’t care who you are, a marketer or a designer, treat my work with respect and I’ll do the same.
Things you are pointing out in this article arise mostly from lack of communication and understanding.
Speider
July 21st, 2010 12:21 amAnd, as you pointed out, respect! Our socialization skills are getting very twisted. But would society go on if the majority of people were rotten? It’s a joy to find work with people you enjoy and grow to love and respect. Actually, despite “Baby Huey,” that place was my favorite place to work.
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 3:30 amrespect is what we need.
i.e. the reactors in this comment thread, instead of antagonizing the article and the writer, respect that it did happen to him (and to many others) and that he has the right to feel as he feels.
Speider
July 28th, 2010 4:34 pmExcept Steve42 is exempt.
Tom
July 21st, 2010 12:29 amThat was an absolutely fantastic read, great insights too. It’s great to read up about your experiences.
Even though a lot of it is obvious (and should be obvious) sometimes you need that reminder, or rather to hear it from someone else again for it to sink in.
Just awesome. Would love to see more articles from you in the future!
Speider
July 21st, 2010 1:21 amThere will be. If you haven’t seen my other posts, just click on my name link at the top of the story (273 feet above this comment).
Thanks!
Rich Moog
July 21st, 2010 12:48 amThis article doesn’t just relate to big companies… The whole article is my company I’m at right now! I now understand what is really going on. Time to reshape my CV me thinks…
Thanks Speider for such an honest and in-depth article.
Libré
July 21st, 2010 1:32 amPAINFULLY PAINFULLY true. Can relater to this post 100%
Speider
July 21st, 2010 1:32 amThanks, Rich! Unfortunately, I have worked for several really big corporations. The operating method in place cannot be fought, but it can be a little more comfortable. Within tighter confines, such as a corporation with very heavy rules, some people try to stretch out a bit.
Small companies, well, there are humans there with wonderful and wacky traits and foibles. It’s just a little closer emotionally and the drama seems bigger.
Many people point to non-creatives wanting to show their friends or superiors what “they” designed and I’m sure that’s part of it. Designing is fun and that’s why we do it. But the human animal has certain personalities that harbor one or all of the seven deadly sins. Eight if you’ve ever said you love Walmart, out loud.
When presented with either an opportunity or a need to move on, should we not take a chance? My brother-in-law is a saint. The man has worked for the same company for 30 years and has seen the odd people come and go. Peers and superiors. He put up with a major amount of grief. But slow and steady won the race for him. I haven’t had that patience in my life. So, who is wrong, me or my brother-in-law? Is either of us right?
pasxal
July 21st, 2010 2:09 amNice article! Made me smile on numerous occasions :)
It’s always a struggle between different departments and standing firm as a designer. Another struggle we can write books about, is the difference between coders and designers :) And in combination with marketing often the way of the lowest costs is chosen, resulting in less-usable applications…But hey, we did it in time and with fewer hours spent! (yeah…the application doesn’t look so pretty as the initial design, it’s hasn’t got all the functionality we wanted, looks a lot like “that other thing the marketing department saw”, is very confusing for users and doesn’t run very smoothly, but we finished it!)
sigh…..
Ricardo Rocha
July 21st, 2010 3:30 amGreat article! Did live many of dose situations, in another type of job, and probably had some bad decisions. Would love to read this article before dose problems appeared, would, without a doubt answered in a different way… well, that’s live.
Marketing should be next to creativity, and normally is, bat when you have bad professionals working with marketing or the other way around things it the fan. Communication problems, hierarchy problems normally have a bad result, hopefully we have e-mails :).
JohnnyTheMonkey
July 21st, 2010 4:10 amOnly had time to skim through this article but it’s sounding pretty bitter. still in uni, i hope this isn’t the general outlook of people in the real world design
Speider
July 21st, 2010 11:23 amIf you can slog through it in one or two readings, I think you’ll find it more of an observation on what is, as attested through so many responses affirming this goes on globally, a bitter situation in the real world.
yourwaytomagic
July 21st, 2010 4:15 amA good designer also has to knows a lot of marketing. That’s my opinion!
Have a nice day my friends,
Stefan
Steve
July 21st, 2010 4:27 amGreat post!
John
July 21st, 2010 4:59 amMan, that was one looong article but totally worth the read. I’m a freelance developer and I’ve been in the middle of the creative / (marketing or client) battles. Having an interest in UI, I’ve seen some designers come up with some exceptional work only to be browbeaten by the client so that the end result turns out to be less acceptable! Unlike in the scenarios you described, these battles are more to do with ego and ignorance rather than any power plays. But in the end, the end result is that you end up with something that is less than stellar. Thankfully people think coding is magic and tend to leave us nerds alone!
Alex
July 21st, 2010 4:59 amDoing both marketing and creative, I have the following to say:
1) You will get idiots in any department that you work in.
2) Whenever your job is execution, there’s going to be all sorts of ridiculous demands made on your output.
3) Generally marketing and creative are not on the same wavelength and this makes conflict.
4) There are definitely recurring issues with creatives from marketing’s perspective. I can’t count the times I’ve had beautiful, inspiring creative work done – but it was way off the mark for the target market, the product, or the corporate brand. It’s hard for people to understand “I really love what you’ve done here, but it doesn’t accomplish what we need”.
5) The creative end is the deliverable product of marketing effort – without marketing research, strategy, and objectives, creative design would be art for art’s sake (which is fine, but not very productive).
Joe Stevens
July 21st, 2010 5:29 amFantastic article. One of the best one’s you guys have ever done. Its going in my reference bookmarks.
Mike Render
July 21st, 2010 5:55 amAmen!
Pete Morley
July 21st, 2010 6:24 amQ: How many creatives does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: Does it have to be a lightbulb?
Sorry, had to get that in. This post summed up my first three years in the industry, working in-house. After working in a studio for four years I’ll never, ever go back to being an in-house designer, every day was design by committee. I even had to fix a hoover once (I can only assume because it had a wire attached).
Kim Louis-Jean
July 21st, 2010 6:32 amI cannot express how tremendously eye opening this article was for me. After having been laid off from a web design company, I was employed as the chief web designer at a magazine. I have been working here for a few months and am constantly being rubbed the wrong way by my boss in regards to design changes. For the longest time I could not understand why I just couldn’t get along with her and after reading your article it has dawned on me. She is marketing and sales, and that is all she cares about. Yet she believes she has the knowledge and experience to dictate design changes that result in a most embarrassing product. I have had difficult clients before but have never dealt with marketing until now. I realized too late that I was not assertive enough and confident enough in my skill in the beginning and now am stuck dealing with the aftermath. Your article has helped me understand what I did wrong and how I should handle it in the future. And now I know that I am not alone in this struggle. Truly, thank you.
Lexi
July 21st, 2010 9:04 amGreat article! I had an unpleasant conversation with the marketing department just last week, this article reassured me that I did the right thing in standing my ground.
Sky
July 21st, 2010 10:36 amGreat article.
To add, I record EVERYTHING because of what you explained in the article and have for the last few months. The nonsense between marketing, project managers and creatives is tiresome and often makes for unhappy colleagues and stressed out creatives!
superpao
July 21st, 2010 11:56 amwow story of my life. im one of those creatives that don’t do corporate & political speak, and it IS costly on meetings, etc. ive found that the higher the individual on the marketing ladder is, the more ridiculous the request. no, really, i DO NOT want to underline or caps every other word
steve
July 21st, 2010 12:06 pmI read the entire article AND all the comments.
I believe that it could have benefited from some minor editing (for length) as it seemed to use more time to say simple things that could/should be expressed more succinctly.
My feeling is however, that this article is the four-legged fish, a step up from primordial ooze amoeba (otherwise known as the “Best Of” List – 20 Chocolate Websites! 40 CSS Templates! – utilizing the internet equivalent of a 4 year college degree, 10 minutes of Google, Screenshots, and cropping with MS Paint.
no, this was , as I said, a step up.
The pandering “me too”
The Dennis Miller like rant in the sinking boat as the creative hands clap and pat backs together, ignoring the bailing bucket (wrong color) or the Oars (we don’t pay for sex, and wouldnt know what to do with it anyway if it were free!), offering the Misery Loves Company “Shared Angst Moment” without any real solutions, directions or clues
-Kinda like Lifetime ™ Network For Women :)
Speider
July 21st, 2010 12:17 pmI wish I could tell which Steve is which on these posts.
I’m not getting the oars and sex analogy but the examples and solutions of holding onto one’s own career power and path seem to be understood by many of those who posted comments. The ever growing number of retweets and reposts on other blogs make me wonder if I should just yell, “no soup for you!”
steve
July 21st, 2010 12:38 pm“The Oars and Sex Analogy”
This caricatures the mincing, limp wristed interior Decorator who sees “Oars” thinks “Whores”
The ever growing number of retweets and reposts on other blogs make me wonder if I should just yell, “no soup for you!”
Why have soup, when you can have the Primordial Oooze?
Indeed, lets dispense with other arbiters of journalistic brilliance, heck – screw the Pulitzer prize, and lets rate all qualitative arguments instead via “page views”, “downloads” and “tweets”
Hey! I came across this article which I didnt really read, but I understand it shares my worldview AND the fellow has an iPhone too!
T W E E T!
Speider
July 21st, 2010 1:39 pmYeah, me, too!
B A R K!
steve
July 21st, 2010 12:28 pmI read the entire article AND all the comments.
I believe that it could have benefited from some minor editing (for length) as it seemed to use more time to say simple things that could/should be expressed more succinctly.
My feeling is however, that this article is the four-legged fish, a step up from primordial ooze amoeba (otherwise known as the “Best Of” List – 20 Chocolate Websites! 40 CSS Templates! – utilizing the internet equivalent of a 4 year college degree, 10 minutes of Google, Screenshots, and cropping with MS Paint.
no, this was , as I said, a step up.
The pandering “me too”
The Dennis Miller like rant in the sinking boat as the creative hands clap and pat backs together, ignoring the bailing bucket (wrong color) or the Oars (we don’t pay for sex, and wouldnt know what to do with it anyway if it were free!), offering the Misery Loves Company “Shared Angst Moment” without any real solutions, directions or clues
-Kinda like Lifetime ™ Network For Women :) *
*But instead of women, we have Whiny Bitches*
*Legal Disclaimer: The two are not the same thing!
Speider
July 21st, 2010 1:37 pmGlad you had to repost that with the added sentence. That really made for a valid argument.
David
July 21st, 2010 1:39 pmI wonder if your team member might have shown less animosity towards you if you weren’t mocking him for his physical appearance and calling him names behind his back.
i.e. “The most infuriating thing was that this over-sized man with a cherubic face, looked like Baby Huey from the old Harvey Comics. Sounded a bit like him, too. It was hard to speak with him without laughing. As his new nickname circulated through several departments, a contest started among the staff to try to deal with Baby Huey without laughing.”
Speider
July 21st, 2010 1:45 pmNo. He earned the nickname by many, many such incidents although it’s true it was a bash on physical things he couldn’t control. Perhaps he should have been called, “Incompetent Man,” or the like.
But why are we feeling sorry for him? Does anyone feel sorry that he almost caused thousands of hours of work to be useless because he tried to hide his inability to communicate not only with team members but also the client? If I had followed his instructions to the letter, it would have been the art department picking up the mess with endless hours and overtime (which would come out of MY budget and not marketing’s budget). As it was, the action of cutting and layering took long enough when it didn’t have to be done at all. So I was cruel to him?
David
July 21st, 2010 2:07 pmI take this to mean that the way his voice and physical appearance may not have been the “most” infuriating things about him then? And that his actions and attitude may have been worse? I don’t know him, so I’ll take your word on it that he deserved to be laughed at behind his back and called names. It’s simply my observation that this type of behavior in an office does little to foster a cooperative spirit from anyone. And in an article, while it may be emotionally satisfying to disparage such a person, it often detracts from the more important points you may have wanted to make.
Speider
July 21st, 2010 2:57 pmDuly noted.
Pix
July 21st, 2010 2:58 pmThis article is brilliant, i’ve read it twice! It’s great to read an article written by someone that ‘gets’ it! I had dreams of being a graphic designer… but after completing all the courses, gettings the jobs, i’ve become a slave to marketing changes and accountants with opinions… tomorrow is a new day… TIME TO CHANGE!
Thanks for the inspiration :)
Speider
July 21st, 2010 3:24 pmCheers to your success! Borrowing from another article of mine, when my last firm started laying off creatives, I would try to comfort them by saying that with creative talent, there’s so much one can do — almost limitless!
Personally, I spend most of my time answering these posts and fencing with Steve (above), but after that, I create initiatives for a company. Why wait for them to call? I think of a product line or such and pitch it to them. I just got off the phone with someone I’ve pursued for some time, sending initiatives and I hit it today, along with an offer to write for their regular line. I didn’t do it sitting on my arse, and that’s a big problem for freelancers.
So find another situation, create that thing you’ve thought about for years or try something new. Above all, be happy with what you do.
Best of luck!
Chi
July 21st, 2010 3:59 pmWow, that was a very fresh look into the world of a designer. Thanks for the tips
federico
July 21st, 2010 4:09 pmI want all the poster images in hi resolution for printing XD
Evan
July 21st, 2010 4:09 pmgreat article, lots of laughs and sound advice :D
mark
July 21st, 2010 6:06 pmWhile I appreciate the almost humorous anecdotes, I think it does a disservice.
If there is a gulf between the two, shouldn’t we be doing all we can to bridge it?
Speider
July 21st, 2010 7:39 pmWithout writing a book, the lessons on protecting your rights as an employee and your position as someone who will must answer for failed initiatives or projects, seem to be seen by almost all responders here.
Bridge it by asserting your rights, being flexible where you can without compromising your position, job and career and remember the goal of being happy at your work.
hood_lord
July 22nd, 2010 12:25 amLovely Article !
Gave me a feeling of “You’re not alone” or “You’re not the only one”.
I’ve thought about this problem for a while & I think the best solution for me is to increase my communication skills & go on as with the marketing myself!
I’m glad I’ve a friend who’s a marketing director but respects every views of mine as a designer! I seek that respect & trust on everything & everywhere I work! But, if it had been so, this article wouldn’t be so great!!
You better act as water to fire Steve (you’re fencing with Steve!! ):>Nice one!)
He makes the comments panel interesting!! He is either a mastermind or some attention seeker!!
Palak
July 22nd, 2010 12:34 amThe comments seem to be more interesting than the article .. lolz
hood_lord
July 22nd, 2010 12:50 amGreat Article!!
Experience Speaks wiser than knowledge!! :)
Makes me realize that I’m not the only one who faces this problem! I’m not alone!
I’m gonna take my stand & also be flexible to plausible ideas from the sales!!
what i used to do was either had a fatal combat with the sales team(sometimes with my supervisor as well that nearly got me fired) or a complete surrender! & I was confused!
I knew I wasn’t perfect but I realized I’m going good with my work!
I love creating things, beautiful things. Ya I do it for bread but when I start doing it, I’m completely into it! I don’t think about how much am I gonna be paid for the work but how the works gonna be?
It is really hard when one of your hard work is considered a mess and a mess a you just did excellent!! (that happened to me!)
But this article truly enlightens me!
Thanks
P.S. Best of luck with your fencing with Steve. I really like that man! He adds a spice to the comments ! Either he’s extraordinary or some guy with complex that seeks attention!
Speider
July 22nd, 2010 2:54 pmI’m beginning to think he’s an extraordinary complex.
;)
Thanks!
N
July 22nd, 2010 2:47 amSo I’m not the only one dealing with this? Group therapy anyone?
In my web dev/marketing struggles, I’ve done much pondering and stumbled upon the following.
* Since I know and understand the basic tenets of art and it seems so obvious to me, it took me a while to realize not many people know this seeming obvious stuff – things like symmetry vs. asymmetry, negative space, etc. Thus why I get a lot of requests for centered text and filling up webpages with loads o’ crap. And these people can see and have opinions, so their opinion is equal to mine. Right? (right…)
* A lot of people mistakenly believe that more communication is better communication.
* In my experience, a little knowledge is very dangerous. They’ve read a Smashing Mag article, I’ve read the same article and have 10 years experience – so, yeah, that’s about equal footing. (SM is good, but not that good).
* Marketing lives on data, and I’d argue many times shield themselves from having to make hard decisions or assume risk by relying on it. Don’t get me wrong – data is good. Data-informed decisions are better. Decisions based on data alone is bad.
* In the case of web design, it’s much more accessible than other artistic productions. I saw a comment on a blog once that summarizes the issue well (paraphrasing here): “People watch TV and no one thinks they can go direct the show. But for some reason, people use websites, and they suddenly think they’re UX designers.”
I could go on and on.
Orlando
July 22nd, 2010 5:39 amExcellent article Speider!!! I have been designing for over 17 years. From the second I read the title I knew it was going to poke some people the wrong way. At the end of the day these “TWO GREAT MINDS” need to work together for the benefit of the client, not for self gratification.
steve
July 22nd, 2010 12:46 pmwhat makes you think that between the two of them, a mind exists and even if found, that it would be great?*
*Especially if one or 1/2 of them is yours?? :)
Speider
July 22nd, 2010 1:57 pmBad day, Steve? Perhaps you are spending too much of it insulting others?
mark
July 23rd, 2010 9:50 am^ What’s wrong with “self gratification” – Is’nt that what all designers do anyway?
Raphael Pudlowski
July 22nd, 2010 7:24 amSpeider, another excellent article ;) love to read your stuff!
baki
July 22nd, 2010 7:31 amThis article was dead on! Please, please, please keep writing this sort of thing.
Speider
July 22nd, 2010 2:52 pmOkay, but Steve won’t be happy.
;)
baki
July 23rd, 2010 6:23 amScrew Steve, whoever he is.
mark
July 23rd, 2010 9:50 amyou first!
Speider
July 23rd, 2010 5:57 pmI’m dreading the comments I expect for my next article.
Red
July 22nd, 2010 7:51 amI have the pleasure of being the only creative among a marketing team for a large company. Being a vendor from another company I am here alone with no real support system so I’ve had to learn to pick my battles. There is often a lot of designing happening over my shoulder which at first was tolerable and has mutated into infuriating. So needless to say this article really hit home with me. Thanks.
Evelyn
July 22nd, 2010 11:53 amSpeider, this is a very insightful article.
As a marketing girl, I can’t count how many times sales mix what I do with what creatives do (“It shouldn’t be that hard for you to make a brochure right?”) Until now I work with a design intern do I realize even creatives & marketers think & approach things differently. Would love to know more about how these two can work together more effectively. Any thoughts & suggestions?
steve
July 22nd, 2010 12:50 pmForbid BOTH of them from reading articles like this, and forbid your “creative” (I dont know when the f*k an adjective morphed into a friggin noun) from reading articles altogether!
Instead, have him, her, or transgender concentrate on not being an annoying prick when asked to do something and resist submitting their “judgment” for that of the esteemed marketing and development staff.
Hark! Do I hear, “Win Win” ?
Speider
July 22nd, 2010 1:52 pmI think we hear “crazy-crazy.”
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 7:26 pmwhat’s wrong with you steve?
may_0501
July 28th, 2010 7:27 pm@evelyn: “Would love to know more about how these two can work together more effectively.” ~ what a positive outlook!
@steve: u could stand to learn something if you stop negating each and every comment that agrees with Speider’s article.