We Can Do Better: The Overlooked Importance of Professional Journalism

Advertisement

The Web is a galaxy of information that is rapidly expanding. Blogs and online magazines are helping shape the future of this Information Age that we live in. Those of us who read, write and design blogs and online magazines possess extraordinary power and potential. How will we choose to use it?

If you use your website to publish news, events, opinions or interviews, you should familiarize yourself with the basics of journalism. These tools can help us develop and share information that is exciting, intelligent, and responsible. They can provide guidance and support as you pursue a career or hobby writing online.

Newsstand by Ruth Orkin1

This article is accompanied by examples of photojournalism, which is the practice of communicating news through photographs. The above photo of a 1940′s newsstand in New York City was taken by photojournalist Ruth Orkin

We, designers, go on all day about the usability of our WordPress layouts and the readability of our typography, but all of those things have been considered in vain if our writing is poorly spelled, riddled with inaccuracies, or based on second-hand assumptions that will leave our audience misled, confused, or worse. Even if you’re just casually writing about why you personally love/hate the iPad (for example), you can do so in a truthful way (truthful to your own opinions and truthful to the information you are discussing).

Whether or not you strive to produce writing that you consider journalism is not all that important. What is important is that no matter what writing genre you specialize in, you have a responsibility to your readers to publish high quality writing that is truthful, accurate, and readable. Oh, and this applies to your professional Twitter stream and Facebook updates, too. All of these elements have a reflection on you and your brand.

Trained professional journalists spend years studying the complex techniques and thorny philosophical values that define the trade of journalism, so don’t expect to receive a Master’s degree from Columbia by the end of this article. What this piece can serve as is a crash course designed to introduce concepts that will improve your writing, pique your interest, and instill a sense of respect for the fundamentals of a noble profession.

What is Journalism?

The most familiar function of journalism is ‘hard news’ reporting you’ll see on the front page of the New York Times or the Washington Post. But journalistic writing also extends to editorial writing, cultural reviews, interviews, and more.

According to The Elements of Journalism (written by Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel), “Journalism’s first obligation is to the truth.” Journalism is the pursuit of truth, accuracy and fairness in the telling of a story. Journalists serve and inform their audience by investigating and reporting on news, trends, issues, and events. Much like designers, journalists pride themselves on a duty provide their audience with useful, high-quality content.

What’s the difference between Journalism and Blogging?

CNN.com delivers journalism. Your cousin’s homemade Twilight fan fiction site, on the other hand, is a blog. However, somewhere in between lies a hotly debated grey area.

So can blogs be journalism? According to NYU journalism professor Jay Rosen2, “They can be, sometimes.”  How can you tell the difference? Depends on who you ask. Rosen himself is both journalist and blogger (he runs PressThink3, a weblog about journalism and the press). In his essay ‘Bloggers vs. Journalists is Over’4, Rosen decides that the sometimes indiscernible difference between these two forms of writing is less important than the implications of massive shifts of power in the media. Rosen acknowledges what Tom Curley (Chief Executive of the Associated Press) called “a huge shift in the ‘balance of power’ in our world, from the content providers to the content consumers.” What does that mean for those of us in a position to take advantage of our newfound power?

It means we should move forward with a spirit of responsibility and immense excitement. We live in a revolutionary time when just about anyone with access to a computer can make his or her writing available to an enormous international audience with the click of a button. As Web designers and online writers who are experienced with the Web, the potential of our medium is tremendous.

Journalistic Tools for Bloggers

Photo by Denis Darcazq5

This photo comes from a series chronicling Paris street dancers practicing dance styles including breakdancing and capoeira. This photo, by Denis Darcazq, was acknowledged by photojournalism foundation World Press Photo6 in 2007

Write Compelling Leads

A ‘lead’ is the first sentence of an article. The lead is your first and best chance to compel the reader to stick around and read more. A sentence that is humorous, provocative, or curious can be extremely engaging.

To learn more about captiving leads, you can’t beat the literary titans of fiction. One classic first sentence comes from Franz Kafka’s novella The Metamorphosis: “Gregor Samsa woke from uneasy dreams one morning to find himself changed into a giant bug.” Who wouldn’t want to know what happens next?

Use the Active Voice

The active voice is much more compelling than the passive voice.  To say ‘I am designing the website’ is a clearer and more powerful statement than ‘the website is being designed by me.’ According to The Elements of Style, “The habitual use of the active voice… makes for forcible writing. This is true not only in narrative concerned principally with action but in writing of any kind.”

Photo by Ruth Ortiz7

Twins are held up to watch Princess Margaret pass by in London on Armistice Day, 1951. Photo by Ruth Orkin

Write in Positive Terms

Describe things in terms of what they are instead of what they aren’t. Instead of saying that a painter ‘doesn’t use a lot of color,’ say that she ‘uses a limited palette.’

Spelling, Punctuation, and Grammar

It should go without saying, but it doesn’t: proper spelling and grammar are necessary if you want to be taken seriously. Writing that is descriptive, informative, and properly written speaks volumes about credibility and professionalism. It can be a baffling experience to visit a popular design blog and read a post that’s riddled with spelling errors and awkward, incomplete sentences.

Spell-check your documents, have a friend proofread them, and take the time to do it right. It’s understandable that bloggers who write in their second language might have some inaccuracies, but over time, those inaccuracies can degrade the quality of a brand.

For an invaluable resource on the subject, pick up The Elements of Style by William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White. The tips and tools you read in that book will reverberate inside your head for the rest of your writing career.

Verification

Journalism’s “essence is a discipline of verification” (The Elements of Journalism). “Rather than publishing another news outlet’s scoop, journalists have tended to require one of their reporters to call a source to confirm it first.”

Let’s say you’re writing about breaking technology news that you read about on another blogger’s site. Unless they’ve shared their sources, you probably don’t know where that blogger received their information (and it was likely to have been copied and pasted from yet another blog). If you want to make a commitment to accuracy, you can always take the extra two minutes to pick up the phone or write an email to the company releasing the product. Ask them to verify your facts, because otherwise you can’t be sure that they’re facts at all.

The Web can be a scandalous and salacious place. False rumors of a celebrity’s death will occasionally spread like wildfire on Twitter. These kinds of events can be distasteful and even disturbing. Now that we’re all casual news reporters through social media, it’s important to verify the things we hear before passing them along. Obviously, independent bloggers don’t have the same obligations that a newspaper reporter has, but it’s beneficial to stay aware of these issues.

Photo by Han Chuanhao/Xinhua/Landov8

Hikers walk along the wildly-colored Danxia Landform at a geopark in Zhangye, China. This photo is one of Life.com’s Photos of the Year9 for 2009. Photo by Han Chuanhao/Xinhua/Landov

Originality

Do your own work. Be unique. Generate fresh concepts that will engage your readers. Try not to imitate the work of others more than is necessary and never steal or plagiarize. Need images, ideas, or reference for your next project? Try the library instead of Google Images and Wikipedia (an especially perilous resource due to the questionable quality of much of its contents). You’ll be helping to make the Internet a richer and more diverse place instead of recycling or regurgitating. Sharing your reputable information sources will add credibility to your work.

Interviews

The interview is a popular feature on design blogs. Interviewing is an art of its own, and when it’s done right, it can be very fun and it can yield surprising results (who doesn’t love a valuable business insight or a shocking revelation?).

“A reporter who begins an interview without the proper preparation is like a student taking a final exam without studying” (News Reporting and Writing, The Missouri Group). Before your conversation with John Q. Celebrity, you need to do thorough research and you need to write good questions. Read everything you can find about your subject and his career. When he can’t recall the title of the sculpture he made in 1997 and you remind him that it was called ‘Pretentious Masterpiece,’ it shows that you’re on the ball.

Write questions that will inspire unique answers. If you waste the entire interview asking banal questions that are easily available to the public (i.e. “Where did you go to college?”), you’re liable to walk away with an interview that’s going to put your audience to sleep. Worse yet, if your interview subject is someone who is interviewed several times a week, he or she might be irritated by the basic questions and the evidence that you didn’t do much research. Now you face the possibility of your interview subject growing cold, responding with disinterested answers, or cutting the interview short.

Once you’ve done great research and written compelling questions, you can relax and enter the interview with an inquisitive spirit. Buy a mini tape recorder and make sure you never begin an interview with dull batteries in it. Don’t be afraid to deviate from your well-researched questions if a more urgent question arises in your mind. Remember that you’re having a conversation with another human being — not just an article subject — and they want to engage with you. When the piece is completed and transcribed, the tone of your discussion will spring forth from your printed words.

Direct Quotations

Whether you’re transcribing your recorded interview or quoting an article, it is of utmost importance that every quote you write is entirely accurate. Changing a single word can change the entire meaning of a statement. In some situations, these kinds of mistakes can lead to anger, charges of libel, and even lawsuits.

A while back, a well-known Web designer expressed his displeasure over Twitter when someone re-tweeted one of his tweets, but changed part of his statement from “it’s disappointing” to “it’s pathetic.” The person on the other end of that exchange had altered the entire tone of that original tweet with the change of just one word. Pathetic is a much more severe word than disappointing, and the Web designer was irritated.

When you are writing a direct quote, make sure it is written verbatim. Verbatim means ‘in exactly the same words that were used originally.’ Punctuation can change the meaning of a statement, too.

Babe Ruth10

This Pulitzer Prize-winning photo portrays aging baseball great Babe Ruth receiving thunderous applause at Yankee Stadium in 1948. An image like this is a good example of why journalism legend Dan Rather once wrote, “It’s disheartening for anyone in my line of work to be reminded that sometimes one picture is, indeed, worth ten thousand words.”

Ethical Writing

In journalism, the philosophical and ethical boundaries of reporting are matters of great importance and pride.

So what does ethical writing mean for bloggers? Well, if you’re writing a simple ‘how to’ tutorial, ethics might not be involved at all. But what if your tutorial passively encourages readers to use a product that’s manufactured by a company whose business practices are disreputable or inhumane? Sometimes there are ethical implications where we least expect them.

Ethics are a matter of personal opinion. These matters are complex and open to interpretation. But few things are more important to you and your brand than your standards and principles.

Is it ethical to write paid ‘sponsored’ blog posts where you’re paid to write and publish a review of a product? It’s one thing to feature advertisements like Google AdWords in your sidebar, but when advertising merges with your content in the form of an entire post that you were paid to write, that’s a different story. Some sponsorship programs don’t ‘force’ bloggers to write favorable reviews, but oddly enough, you’ll be hard pressed to find a sponsored blog post that is harshly critical of its subject. That’s because if you’re being paid, you’re biased. That’s the bottom line.

Make your money from your ideas, designs, and creativity — not sponsored blog posts. No one wants to see a glorified advertisement tucked in amongst your real content. Besides, sponsored blog posts just look tacky.

In Conclusion

Bloggers, journalists, and designers can all work together to make the future of the Web an intelligent, enjoyable, and responsible place. This post has merely scratched the surface of what the study of journalism has to offer you, so don’t let your path of learning end here.

This new digital era has sent the practice of journalism into troubled waters. Those of us who have benefited from the shift of power from content consumers to content providers find ourselves in a unique position. We now have the opportunity to help foster the welfare of that great, guiding principle: the truth.

Your average blog or independent online publication is not beholden to the corporate or governmental interests that the subsidiaries of major media conglomerates (like Viacom or Disney) might be influenced by. For that reason, some of us may find ourselves in the position to publish truths that would otherwise go ignored. Of course, we’re often likely to adapt our viewpoints from those of corporate media publications — this happens every time you retweet a New York Times article or quote a CNN report in your blog post.

Hopefully, those viewpoints are usually honest and truthful. However, if we maintain a commitment to accuracy while doing some original thinking, writing, and reporting, we may be able to make valuable, independent contributions to the legacy of the truth that lies at the heart of journalism — and at the heart of our shared societal and cultural integrity.

Footnotes

  1. 1 http://www.smashingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/newsstand2.jpg
  2. 2 http://twitter.com/jayrosen_nyu
  3. 3 http://www.pressthink.org
  4. 4 http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2005/01/21/berk_essy.html
  5. 5 http://www.smashingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/paris.jpg
  6. 6 http://www.worldpressphoto.org/
  7. 7 http://www.smashingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/london.jpg
  8. 8 http://www.smashingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/red-sandstone1.jpg
  9. 9 http://www.life.com/image/first/in-gallery/37802/2009-photos-of-the-year
  10. 10 http://www.smashingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/babe.jpg

↑ Back to topShare on Twitter

Dan Redding creates websites and print design at his studio, Magnetic State. Follow Dan on Twitter.

Advertising
  1. 1

    Great article,…and Iove these photos!

    0
  2. 2

    Great brush-up. I’m a senior Interactive Media and Journalism double-major, and I think this is a great combination of both worlds.

    0
  3. 3

    Good article, but I would suggest that the title is a little misleading. Based on the headline (“the overlooked importance of professional journalism”), I expected this article to describe why professional journalism remains an important profession and discipline — indeed, I thought it would set professional journalism apart from amateur journalism. Instead, the article is primarily about how amateur journalists and bloggers can use some of the basic techniques of professionals. I’d advise a more accurate headline.

    Thanks for the article, though. It’s a good review of some basics.

    0
  4. 4

    In addition to the Elements of Style, I recommend William Zinsser’s On Writing Well. First published in 1976, this guide to writing nonfiction has stood the test of time and helped many journalists (and, now, bloggers) produce better articles. The 35th anniversary edition will be available in February. Buy it, study it. You will be a better writer because of it.

    0
    • 5

      This article contains almost every major point of The Elements of Style, which was definitely the most influential writing book I’ve read to date.

      Great job.

      0
  5. 6

    I nearly feel out of my chair laughing when you brought up “The Elements of Style.” It took me back to high school journalism classes and dreading my editor’s revisions of what I thought were “perfect” articles. Thanks for the nostalgia… as well as a nice review of the basic concepts! :D

    0
  6. 7

    The scary / sad part is, the amount of professional news outlets that allow such misspellings, grammatical errors, etc to slip through. I can not count the amount of errors I’ve read on nbc.com, fox.com etc.

    I’m not going to hold it against someone who is writing a tutorial, for the good of the community, if they have some grammatical errors. But for journalists that have editors upon editors to misspell video or whatever, is completely unforgivable. They went to school for this. A designer did not go to school for writing, they learned how to design.

    ** I do not claim to be a competent writer, hell a 4th grader writes better than I do

    2
  7. 8

    Thanks for this article. I always wanted to improve my writing style and I believe your guidance will help me.

    0
  8. 9

    I have about as much sympathy for the “journalists” who routinely show off their third-grade writing skills as I do for the president who whipped up the company logo using MacPaint. In either case, you have stupidly kissed off your credibility.

    If you want to write anything more public than a friendly email, follow the advice here and learn journalistic standards. In the meantime, hire a professional writer.

    0
  9. 10

    Now that we’re all casual news reporters through social media, it’s important to verify the things we hear before passing them along.

    If only this verification thing would catch on. It would be nice to see some more accurate articles reposted on FaceBook. Well I think I shall start the trend amongst my circle. Thank you for the excellent article!

    2
  10. 11

    This is a fantastic article!! Sites like RWW, TechCrunch, & Mashable should definitely read this!

    -3
    • 12

      So should most of today’s newspaper reporters, news anchors, publicists, web copy authors…. well just about every ‘journalist’ I’ve heard, read, or seen recently needs a brush-up on that little thing called VERIFICATION.

      I have come to expect the media in general to provide me with half-truths, unverified ‘facts’, and twisted misleading quotes that generally serve only the purpose of advancing a pre-determined agenda for whomever the author or reporter is.

      Just because it’s on Wikipedia or the internet does not make it true.

      Bloggers can do no worse, and perhaps they can even do better.

      3
  11. 13

    Great work! Especially liked the Interviews part. Makes me wanna learn more about the great interviews. These kind of things can never be boring — they tell personal stories.

    -1
  12. 14

    I think this article is comical….on the difference between journalism and blogging….

    CNN.com delivers journalism.

    And then you define journalism as write in positive terms, ethical writing, originality, and verification……

    all things CNN.com fails miserably at.

    LOL

    2
  13. 15

    Does professional writing require professional readers?

    Many people think if content is not written at an elementary grade reading level then it is too taxing for readers. I think asking for what is essentially better, smarter writing is swimming against the tide of the typical, short and simplistic blog writing standards that all the ‘experts’ advise are necessary if you want readers. For example, around 300 words per post, insert a picture every two or three paragraphs, short sentences, no big words, etc.

    I’m hard pressed to believe that higher quality writing, or Professional Journalism standards, would sync up with the typical blog reader’s comprehension and attention span.

    Perhaps the most that “high quality writing” could ever hope to mean across blogosphere is for blog writers to continue to write with the assumption that readers have a third-grade level of reading comprehension — but strive to do it with better grammar, punctuation, and accuracy.

    1
    • 16

      Well said. I also find it difficult to place myself between trying to provide high level content to my readers or staying at their level (aged at around 16-25) on my Youth Site. People around me though, expect me to excel in my writing and enter the professional writing stage, which for my niche and my audience would make not much sense.

      1
      • 17

        Interesting challenge, Kevin.

        One of my high school teachers said, “Write with the intent that everybody is your audience and your writing will be as general and boring as your intent.” I never forgot that and I’ve found it to be true.

        You know your audience best and that should drive your writing style. Good luck!

        1
        • 18

          A fantastic quote and it really does make a lot of sense. It reminds me of another one; “The key to failure is trying to please everyone”. Don’t write to try and please everyone, find your audience and stick to them as much as possible.

          3
  14. 19

    “In journalism, the philosophical and ethical boundaries of reporting are matters of great importance and pride.”

    I read that 5 minutes ago, and I’ve only just stopped laughing. Journalism is inherently just a liberal propaganda machine.

    In fact, Dan gets it the wrong way round. It’s establishment journalists that should learn a sense of responsibility for “writing that is truthful, accurate, and readable” from internet writers.

    0
    • 20

      Hopefully most take your comment for what it is worth.

      Blogs as a whole are bare of fact-checking, full of bias and the majority, self-aggrandized Op/Ed pieces. To state that Journalism could learn responsibility from bloggers is laughable.

      0
      • 21

        “Blogs as a whole are bare of fact-checking, full of bias and the majority, self-aggrandized Op/Ed pieces.”

        You have read the New York Times in the last 70 years or so, right?!

        2
  15. 22

    A lot of professional journalists should read this article, especially the part “Journalism is the pursuit of truth, accuracy and fairness in the telling of a story.”

    If I recall correctly it was bloggers who exposed Dan Rather’s fraudulent reporting on George W. Bush’s National Guard service in 2004.

    4
  16. 23

    I’m looking forward to see this simple word “Truth” further than this site, but on the ‘lips’ to all the jurnalists. Amin.

    0
  17. 24

    enlightening article, thank you very much!

    -2
  18. 25

    Mark @ Alchemy United

    January 30, 2011 7:03 am

    Well stated Dan.

    I’d like to add that from the other side of the lens (i.e., as readers), we need to be conscious that not everything we read on the Internet is journalism, as hard as it might try to pretend to be.

    In fact, there’s quite a bit of journalism that isn’t even journalism any more. How many times have we heard a major media outlet quote an unvetted tweet or mention the blogosphere (as if it were the NY Times, Washington Post, etc.)? To manufacture their “news” they conveniently forget that in that massive pile of tweets there are bound to be 140 characters that are going to support (or not) just about any position on any subject. The fact is, most true and traditional sold its soul some time ago, eh?

    I agree, in theory all writers and publishers should be responsible. However, the practical reality is we as readers must be responsible for what we consume and how we interpret it. Skepticism is the new black, no?

    -1
  19. 26

    Thanks for this article. A background in journalism gives you a great edge in blogging, most definitely.

    0
  20. 27

    Wow, very thorough and thoughtful article on ways to improve the quality of writing on the web.

    I almost feel like the title could have been Journalistic Tools for Writing Web Content or something like that. While it’s focus might be journalism, I think the weight of the article is on worthy content & the tools you share to produce it.

    Definitely plan to share this on Twitter! Thanks! I also feel like my decade of teaching middle schoolers has helped my own writing skills.

    -1
  21. 28

    >> responsibility to your readers to publish high quality writing

    Cool, I pretty much came to the same conclusion earlier this year. Nice use of the journalism angle.

    -2
  22. 29

    its very useful article i enjoyed reading and useful for my work

    -2
  23. 30

    Some good points, though the issue is cloudy because the mainstream media outlets we think of as employers of ‘journalists’ do not remotely subscribe to the notion that: “Journalism is the pursuit of truth, accuracy and fairness in the telling of a story.”

    Journalism should adhere to that mantra, and it should be objective, but it’s certainly not here in the UK, and this is why it has a tainted reputation. Accuracy and fairness don’t often come into the picture. Or, as the old adage goes: “Never let the truth get in the way of a good story.”

    Here’s a list of successful libel cases brought against Express Newspapers in the past couple of years or so. This is just one newspaper, and these are the *known* cases of sufficient scale to result in legal action: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2011/jan/13/express-newspapers-medialaw

    The key thing that bloggers can take away from your article is the word ‘Verification’. That’s more often than not seen to be the difference between blogging and journalism, even though many mainstream journalists don’t bother to verify or fact check their own stories. It’s all about having good standards. Bloggers that verify are as good as, if not better, than the average journalist. Get to it!

    0
  24. 31

    Not a bad article. But a bit pretentious, too.

    Your syntax is appalling, and the prose is too chatty. This article could have been written in half the space…

    It’s one thing to know the rules of journalism, it’s another thing to know how to write. I’d say, about 15% of the population can write well, the rest have no idea.

    0
  25. 32

    Interesting stuff, and a debate that needs to keep happening. I ran a discussion with another UK-based journalist about what we meant by ‘journalism’ now and what the values associated with it were. It might be of interest. http://martincloake.wordpress.com/2010/06/14/voj10-what’s-the-value-of-journalism-a-debate/

    0
  26. 33

    Professional journalism is dead. I’m taken dead and has already turned to dust years ago. Everything on the news these days supports an agenda or some sort of political ideology. If you think there is ANY news channel that’s unbiased, than your a sheep.

    0
    • 34

      It’s quite ignorant and cynical to allow the application of these principles to destroy the principles themselves. The content of the news has nothing to do with the ideals which journalism SHOULD uphold, whether it does or not. Publishing any content can use and learn from these principles, especially online where anyone can post anything. It is what will separate the professional and respectable from the unprofessional.

      2
  27. 35

    My degree is actually a Bachelors of Journalism and that part of me cringes every time I see a blog that is just layered with rumors or even lies. We need to hold our favorite sites accountable for producing quality content with, at the very least, these basic guidelines in mind. Thank you for posting this.

    1
  28. 36

    Very interesting article. Journalism is the key nowadays!

    -2
  29. 37

    Thanks for your comments, everyone. It’s no secret that the subject of journalism in the digital era is a contentious one. However, I am surprised by the disdain and bitterness towards journalism that’s revealed in some of these comments. Just because we might object to the content/approach/bias of Publication X, does not devalue core journalism principles that have been in development for centuries. Journalism, after all, has been with us much longer than the Internet has. The profession of journalism is now evolving – albeit tumultuously – to adapt to online media, just like most other industries. Perhaps these hard feelings towards journalism are symptoms of that disruptive evolution. Or maybe people have always disagreed over how news stories are told.

    0
    • 38

      Very good article, my only critique is that many of the “professional journalism” examples you site do not follow your claimed first order of journalism:

      “Journalism is the pursuit of truth, accuracy and fairness in the telling of a story.”

      Many traditional news organizations have forgone the pursuit of truth, and replaced it with timely stenography. The typists do not want to spend time verifying information, and the editors green-light anything that suits their bias.

      This is why there is a constantly shrinking audience for old media – why pay for rumors and fads when there are dozens of sites that have the same info for free. Any organization that has the intestinal fortitude to base their operation on solid journalism will be able to wipe the floor with the carcasses of their expired competitors.

      But it will take hard work.

      -1
  30. 39

    Wish they would all go away and it looks like they are. They were all white males that could not separate their racist views on the people of the world. Good riddance to them all

    -6
  31. 40

    Good comments though. That’s one big problem with “professional journalism” is that the “legitimate publishers” all have an agenda. Nobody cares anymore. People can think for themselves, I don’t need my news spooned out to me. There’s a place for both journalism and Blogs, it’s just that, Blogs have really taken the hegemony of the bigger publishers away. As much as I hate Blogs sometimes, this is a good thing. More power to the people.

    Man, the world is changing, and I don’t think they really know what’s hitting them.

    0
  32. 41

    Excellent post. The fundamental ethics and practices of journalism, whether written or photographic, should never be ignored. In this day and age of data access where information can be easily obtained, but unsubstantiated, integrity of research and a neutral objective voice is essential for most applications — unless it’s an opinion piece of course.

    1
  33. 42

    I loved this article! I am going to add this to my favorites and use it as a reference while writing. I am studying Communications currently and it was very enlightening to hear another person’s view on the transitions from print to electronic media and how we can preserve journalism. With online media popularity growing steadily, and traditional sources, such as newspapers, in rapid decline, I think it something that people really need to think about: the transition to OR convergence of paper media to online media.

    2
  34. 43

    I thoroughly enjoyed this article and have it bookmarked for reading again in the future. I’ve been wanting to start my own design/development blog for a while now. However, “words” are critical and hard to come by for me it seems. This was a much needed crash course to nudge me on – particularly the bit on interviewing.

    Thanks for writing it, Dan. Much appreciated.

    1
  35. 44

    “Of course, we’re often likely to adapt our viewpoints from those of corporate media publications — this happens every time you retweet a New York Times article or quote a CNN report in your blog post.”

    How do you retweet an article in a blog post? It can’t be done.

    -1
  36. 45

    In my experience it seams journalists & blogs alike, all have an personal agenda behind what they put into words. Even well written articles are swayed by the author’s internal wants & needs…

    -1
  37. 46

    Souvik Dutta Choudhury

    February 4, 2011 11:12 am

    The importance of active voice is still unrevealed to me. whenever a report is written Passive voice is insisted. Rest of it was absolutely breathtaking……………

    0
  38. 47

    sensiblochamaeleon

    February 8, 2011 12:24 pm

    1.] thanx for pointing out the aspect of truth.
    there are several laws and codici that oblige
    journalists to write the truth.

    Die Achtung vor der Wahrheit, die Wahrung der Menschenwürde und die wahrhaftige Unterrichtung der Öffentlichkeit sind oberste Gebote der Presse.

    (citing the official ‘pressekodex’ by german ‘presserat’)
    that would mean having to write what is most important (in times of SEO probably that doesn’t mean writing what gets you most site visitors or quotas ;) )

    2.] le jour(fr)~=the day AND weblog=~logbook=~ships logfile=~diary
    => a JOURnalist is a bLOGger is a microblogger is a vlogger
    etymologically, there is a very small difference or sometimes none at all ?

    3.] i dunno why i wrote this comment, you are free to delete it if it is unimportant or if you don’t like it

    friendly greets

    0
  39. 48

    Great read! Learned a lot

    0
  40. 49

    Hi, nice article , first of all. You’re right that wirtting should be ethical, not just spamming etc. But on the other hand, nowadays there is a huge amount of copywriters who are paied nearly under the minimum wage just to spam web. I know people who are making hundreds of MFAs per month and they call texts in them as “valuable and useful”. I think that you can’t do anything with it and becuase the profit for employers is so high, journalism expecially on the internet is suffering terriblly and it will be worse, but once again, nice article.
    Jan Němec, Czech Republic

    0
  41. 50

    Ethics in blogging, as in journalism, is vital to long-term success. This article grazes the tip of the iceberg, but it is our responsibility as online communicators to look deeper into the issues, provide content based on quality and check our facts. It’s called accountability. Nice work, Smashing…

    1
  42. 51

    Thanks for the nice article Dan!

    A huge problem in professional journalism lies in the convergence to online media, because it’s much more difficult to charge readers for quality articles (=work). In addition to that, every reader can spread the content easily; so there are even less people who pay for a journalists work. It’s not surprising that the web is full of newspaper sites with typos and badly written texts. I don’t think they have been written by professional journalists, but by people who want to be professionals some day. They earn little or no money (e.g. trainees, interns), because they aren’t professionals and are not expected to produce high quality content. Remember though newspapers are companys, they can’t be expected to produce quality content for free. (As in design, nobody likes to do spec work and everybody wants to be paid for quality.)

    Another aspect that should be mentioned in the journalism-in-blogs-discussion is that newspapers are expected to choose information that is relevant to their readers. What that is may differ greatly, but I as the reader can find the paper that covers most of the information I seek. That means the paper acts as a filter – they decide what they publish on each page, at what length, etc. – and I am thankful that they do it, because they are the experts and I don’t want to search through a ton of crap to find my relevant information. There are some blogs that do that, too – but there are also a lot that don’t.

    0
  43. 52

    For more on the skills, methods, and importance of professional journalism, I urge people to view the full two seasons — available online, free of charge — of the terrific, and inspiring series, ‘Exposé: America’s Investigative Reports’ via .

    If we truly and fully recognize the importance of professional journalism, then moving forward would mean that bloggers would heed the journalism 101 advice given by Dan Redding in this article, **AND** we in the United States would fight like hell to secure permanent and stable public funding for professional media — print as well as broadcast.

    In the early years of this nation, the press was heavily subsidized, if I recall my history correctly. And in the U.K., few institutions are cherished like the BBC, despite the not-insignificant tax paid by households to support the BBC.

    Now it is time to support high-quality newspaper reporting and noncommercial broadcast journalism in the U.S. Nothing less than democracy itself is at stake. (Even our life on Earth could be at stake. For if anyone thinks that the present system of blogs, IndyMedia & YouTube, low-quality local TV news, Fox and MSNBC is adequate, then consider how — in just 5 years — the petroleum-products industry and ultra-rich capitalist ideologues persuaded millions of Americans to believe that the climate crisis should no longer be a top priority but is instead some sort of anti-capitalist hoax. Or consider how many people believe ridiculous conspiracies today, regarding Oama, 9/11, vaccinations, etc.)

    There is NO substitute for a professional media.

    Just take a look at that series, ‘Exposé: America’s Investigative Reports’ and ask yourselves how many bloggers have the funding and resources that the reporters in some of these episodes have at their disposal. In more than one case, a team of two reporters spent well over a year on a single investigation, while interviewing and traveling, accessing expensive archives, developing massive databases, etc, etc.

    (One team of reporters profiled in an episode spent a great deal of time investigating the WMD claims prior to America’s second war against Iraq. And in this team of reporters got it right — before the war began. Another pair of reporters spent over a year investigating and exposing high-level corruption and fraud involving federal tax dollars.)

    Again, there is NO substitute for a professional media. Knowing how to write a lead or how to write in an inverted pyramid is no substitute for the resources available to professional reporters.

    0

↑ Back to top