Menu Search
Jump to the content X X
Smashing Conf San Francisco

We use ad-blockers as well, you know. We gotta keep those servers running though. Did you know that we publish useful books and run friendly conferences — crafted for pros like yourself? E.g. upcoming SmashingConf San Francisco, dedicated to smart front-end techniques and design patterns.

The Future Of The Internet

“In only a few short years, electronic computing systems have been invented and improved at a tremendous rate. But computers did not ‘just grow.’ They have evolved… They were born and they are being improved as a consequence of man’s ingenuity, his imagination… and his mathematics.” — 1958 IBM brochure

The Internet is a medium that is evolving at breakneck speed. It’s a wild organism of sweeping cultural change — one that leaves the carcasses of dead media forms1 in its sizeable wake. It’s transformative: it has transformed the vast globe into a ‘global village’ and it has drawn human communication away from print-based media and into a post-Gutenberg digital era2. Right now, its perils are equal to its potential. The debate over ‘net neutrality’ is at a fever pitch. There is a tug-of-war going on between an ‘open web’ and a more governed form of the web (like the Apple-approved apps on the iPad/iPhone) that has more security but less freedom.

IBM brochure3

An illustration of a computer from a 1958 IBM promotional brochure titled ‘World of Numbers’

So what’s the next step in its evolution, and what’s the big picture? What does the Internet mean as an extension of human communication, of the human mind? And forget tomorrow — where will the web be in fifty years, or a hundred? Will the Internet help make the world look like something out of Blade Runner or Minority Report? Let’s just pray it doesn’t have anything to do with The Matrix sequels, because those movies really sucked.

This article will offer in-depth analysis of a range of subjects — from realistic expectations stemming from current trends to some more imaginative speculations on the distant future.

Security Link

“Death of the Open Web”? Link

Those words have an ominous ring for those of us who have a deep appreciation of the Internet as well as high hopes for its future. The phrase comes from the title of a recent New York Times article4 that struck a nerve with some readers. The article paints a disquieting picture of the web as a “haphazardly planned” digital city where “malware and spam have turned living conditions in many quarters unsafe and unsanitary.”

There is a growing sentiment that the open web is a fundamentally dangerous place. Recent waves of hacked WordPress sites revealed exploited PHP vulnerabilities and affected dozens of well-known designers and bloggers like Chris Pearson5. The tools used by those with malicious intent evolve just as quickly as the rest of the web. It’s deeply saddening to hear that, according to Jonathan Zittrain, some web users have stooped so low as to set up ‘Captcha sweatshops’ where (very) low-paid people are employed to solve Captcha security technology for malicious purposes all day. This is the part where I weep for the inherent sadness of mankind.

“If we don’t do something about this,” says Jonathan Zittrain of the insecure web, “I see the end of much of the generative aspect of the technologies that we now take for granted.” Zittrain is a professor of Internet governance and regulation at Oxford University and the author of The Future of the Internet: and How to Stop It; watch his riveting Google Talk on these subjects.6

Wild Bill7

The Wild West: mainstream media’s favorite metaphor for today’s Internet

The result of the Internet’s vulnerability is a generation of Internet-centric products — like the iPad, the Tivo and the XBOX — that are not easily modified by anyone except their vendors and their approved partners. These products do not allow unapproved third-party code (such as the kind that could be used to install a virus) to run on them, and are therefore more reliable than some areas of the web. Increased security often means restricted or censored content — and even worse — limited freedoms that could impede the style of innovation that propels the evolution of the Internet, and therefore, our digital future.

The web of 2010 is a place where a 17 year-old high school student can have an idea for a website, program it in three days, and quickly turn it into a social networking craze used by millions (that student’s name is Andrey Ternovskiy and he invented Chatroulette8). That’s innovation in a nutshell. It’s a charming story and a compelling use of the web’s creative freedoms. If the security risks of the Internet kill the ‘open web’ and turn your average web experience into one that is governed by Apple or another proprietary company, the Andrey Ternovskiys of the world may never get their chance to innovate.

Security Solutions Link

We champion innovation on the Internet and it’s going to require innovation to steer it in the right direction. Jonathan Zittrain says that he hopes we can come together on agreements for regulating the open web so that we don’t “feel that we have to lock down our technologies in order to save our future.”

According to Vint Cerf, vice president and Chief Internet Evangelist at Google, “I think we’re going to end up looking for international agreements – maybe even treaties of some kind – in which certain classes of behavior are uniformly considered inappropriate.”

Perhaps the future of the Internet involves social structures of web users who collaborate on solutions to online security issues. Perhaps companies like Google and Apple will team up with international governmental bodies to form an international online security council. Or maybe the innovative spirit of the web could mean that an independent, democratic group of digital security experts, designers, and programmers will form a grassroots-level organization that rises to prominence while fighting hackers, innovating on security technology, writing manifestos for online behavior, and setting an example through positive and supportive life online.

Many people are fighting to ensure your ability to have your voice heard online — so use that voice to participate in the debate, stay informed, and demand a positive future. Concerned netizens and Smashing readers: unite!

Freedom Link

Net Neutrality Link

Some believe that the fate of the Internet has been up for grabs ever since the federal government stopped enforcing ‘network neutrality’ rules in the mid-2000’s. In a nutshell, net neutrality means equality among the information that travels to your computer: everyone has the right to build a website that is just as public, affordable, and easily accessible as any other. However, some companies like phone and internet service providers are proposing ‘pay tiers’ (web service where you need to pay premium fees in order to allow visitors to access your site quickly). These tiers of web service could kill net neutrality by allowing those who can afford premium service (particularly large media companies who don’t like sharing their audience with your blog) greater access to consumers than the average web user.

The debate over net neutrality reached a boiling point when Google and Verizon announced a ‘joint policy proposal for an open Internet’9 on August 9th, 2010. Despite the proposal’s call for a “new, enforceable prohibition against discriminatory practices” amongst online content, many criticized it10, citing leniency and loopholes.

Net neutrality needs to be made law. If the Internet were to have a slow lane and a fast lane, your average web user could lose many of his or her freedoms and opportunities online, thereby shattering the core values that make the Internet so profoundly valuable to society. However, that’s just the tip of the iceberg for this thorny issue. To learn more, read the full proposal11 or watch the Bill Moyers episode ‘The Net @ Risk.’12

The World into the Web Link

Browser-based Everything Link

Google is developing a variety of applications and programs that exist entirely within the browser. Their PAC-MAN game13 was a preview of what’s to come because it allowed in-browser play of a simple, lightweight video game that required no downloads and relied on pure HTML, CSS, and Javascript. At the company’s 2010 I/O conference, Google laid out its plans to develop “rich multimedia applications that operate within the browser” (according to this New York Times report on the conference14). The company plans to sell in-browser web applications like photo editing software (imagine using a Photoshop equivalent entirely within the browser) that it will sell in a web applications store called the Chrome Web Store.15

If our programs and applications are about to be folded into the browser, what will exist within the browser in ten years? Currency? Education? Consciousness? Personally, I’m hopeful that my browser will be able to produce piping hot cheeseburgers sometime soon.

The Internet as a Collective Consciousness Link

The Internet is a medium, and philosopher Marshall McLuhan believed that all media are extensions of the human senses. The engine of our collective creative efforts is the force that’s causing the web to evolve more rapidly than any biological organism ever has.


Transcendence is one of the great themes of human culture. Image of seated Buddha statue: The Metropolitan Museum of Art17

The Internet is an extension of the collective human mind and it’s evolving into a medium of transcendence. By constructing a place where the collective human consciousness is both centralized in one location (on your computer) and globally accessible (for those with the means to reach or use a computer, that is), our human spirit is transcending the human body. Way back in 1964, McLuhan himself wondered, “might not our current translation of our entire lives into the spiritual form of information seem to make of the entire globe, and of the human family, a single consciousness?”

With the advent of trends including social media, ‘lifecasting,’ and ‘mindcasting,’ the Internet is being used as a real-time portal for the human consciousness. Perhaps those trends will be inverted by some web users of the future: instead of bringing offline life to the web (as so-called ‘lifecasters’ do when they stream live video of their attendance at an offline event), some web users will live their entire public lives online. Imagine a pop star who conducts her entire career online: every interview, live performance, music video or album release conducted solely through a browser window or mobile screen. Or a media theorist who exploited the platform of the web while discussing the theoretical ramifications of those actions. It’d be a great gimmick.

The Web into the World Link

The ‘Web of Things’ Link

The ‘web of things’ or ‘Internet of things’ is a concept that will be a reality (at least in a rudimentary form) in the near future. The idea is that devices, appliances, and even your pets can all be tracked online. With Google Maps for iPhone, you can currently track your location on a digital map in relation to the streets and landmarks in your area. So it’s not hard to imagine a world where you can zoom in on your location and see detailed, 3D renderings of your surroundings: the cars on your block, the coffee machine in your kitchen, even Rover running around in your backyard! And it’s a good thing that you’re digitally tracking the location of poor Rover; he’s liable to hop the fence and make a run for it now that you’ve created a satellite computer out of everything you own (including his dog collar) by attaching a tracking device to it.

AT&T is betting big on the web of things. According to this Reuters article18, the phone service provider is investing in tracking devices that could be installed in cars, on dog collars, and on the pallets used to move large shipments of products. The dog collar, for example, “could send text messages or emails to the owner of a pet when it strays outside a certain area, or the device could allow continuous tracking of the pet.”

Combine the concept of the ‘web of things’ with Second Life-style 3D imaging and you can imagine a web-based duplicate world — a virtual world that corresponds to the real one. But what are the implications of a world where every physical item has a corresponding digital existence online? Can we track the physical effects of climate change in the web of things? Will there be a digital avatar for every pelican carcass in the vicinity of the oil spill that’s devastating the Gulf of Mexico? It’s a tragic shame to develop a virtual world if we let the natural one go to waste in the meantime.

Interactive Landscapes Link

It has been said that today’s science fiction is tomorrow’s reality. Unfortunately, most good science fiction stories are cautionary tales set in dystopian nightmares.

N Building19

QR codes on the façade of Japan’s N Building. Photo: Gizmodo20

Simon Mainwaring reports21 on the N building in Japan, where “the whole building facade has been transformed into a real time dialogue between smart phones and what’s going on inside the store.” The exterior of the building is layered with QR codes (an alternate form of bar code) that can deliver real-time information to your phone. In Stephen Spielberg’s film Minority Report (adapted from a short story by mad genius Philip K. Dick), Gap ads came alive to hawk khakis to Tom Cruise. Looks like we’re about one step away from this scenario.

Mr. Mainwaring imagines a future with “billboards that watch you shop and make targeted suggestions based on your age, location and past buying habits,” and “stores will effectively be turned inside out as dialogue and personalized interaction with customers begins outside the store.”

The technology is cool, but it sounds like a pretty annoying future if you ask me. Who wants to be accosted by a holographic salesperson? The web grants us a great opportunity to use our collective voices to speak out on topics that matter to us. Because there are no regulations yet for much of this technology, it may be up to concerned citizens to make themselves heard if Internet-based technology is used in intrusive or abrasive ways.

The ‘Innerweb’ Link

Cyborgs are among us already — humans whose physical abilities have been extended or altered by mechanical elements built into the body (people who live with pacemakers are one example). What will happen when the Internet becomes available on a device that is biologically installed in a human? What will the first internal user interfaces look like?

Here’s one speculation.

In the near future, we may be capable of installing the Internet directly into the user’s field of vision via a tiny computer chip implanted into the eye. Sound far-fetched? I doubt that it would sound far-fetched for Barbara Campbell, whose sight has been partially restored by a digital retinal implant (CNN reports on Barbara’s artificial retina22).

Ms. Campbell was blind for many years until she had a small microchip surgically implanted in her eye. A rudimentary image of Ms.Campbell’s surroundings is transmitted to the device, which stimulates cells in her retina, in turn transmitting a signal to her brain. It’s a miracle that the development of a bionic eye has begun to help the blind see.

How else might doctors and scientists take advantage of the internal microchip? Perhaps the user’s vision will be augmented with an Internet-based interface with capabilities including geolocation or object identification. Imagine if technology like Google Goggles23 (a web-based application that identifies images from landmarks to book covers) was applied inside that interface. The act of seeing could not only be restored but augmented; a user might be capable of viewing a landscape while simultaneously identifying web-based information about it or even searching it for physical objects not visible to the naked eye. Apply the concept of augmented sight with the idea of the ‘web of things’ — an environment where physical objects have a corresponding presence on the web — and you can imagine a world where missing people are located, theft is dramatically reduced, the blind can see, and ‘seeing’ itself means something more than it used to.

If the web is an extension of our senses, it follows suit that the web may be capable of modifying those senses or even accelerating their evolution.

The Crown Jewels Link

“The next Bill Gates will be the deliverer of a highly technological solution to some of our climate change challenges.” — Lord Digby Jones of Birmingham

In preparation for this article, I considered a variety of wild ideas and fun speculations about the future. Could the Internet be used to solve the problem of climate change, generate tangible matter, or contact extraterrestrial life? Maybe those ideas sound like the stuff of imaginative fiction, but in a world where quantum teleportation has been achieved24 and researchers have created a living, synthetic cell25, it almost seems as if the concept of science fiction is being eradicated while real technology brings our wildest fantasies to life. Here is the result of my most daring (absurd?) speculation.

Time Travel Link

Eadweard Muybridge26

The functionality of the Internet relies on a linear series of events. Image: Eadweard Muybridge

I called on physics teacher Mark Stratil to answer my last burning question: could the Internet ever be capable of facilitating the development of time travel? Here’s Mark’s answer:

“The Internet is still based on computers, which make linear calculations. Right now, all computers are based on binary code, which is a series of yes and no questions. You can make something that’s incredibly complex with a series of yes and no questions, but it takes a certain amount of time. The Internet still has to go through those calculations and it still physically has to make one calculation that will lead to the next calculation that will lead to the next. So no matter how fast we can get our computers – they’re making billions of calculations, trillions of calculations per second – there’s still going to be some lag time. They’re still limited by time in that way. They still need some time to make that conversation or that calculation.

In that way, they’re kind of chained to time. Their whole existence is based on a linear sequence of things that happen. In order to create something else, something that goes outside of time, you would have to make it a non-linear system — something that that’s not based on a series of yes and no questions, because those have to be answered in a precise order. It would have to be some kind of system that was answering all the questions at once.

So Mark’s short answer to my fundamental question was basically that the Internet, in its current state, would not be capable of facilitating time travel. However, if the Internet was liberated from the linear structure of binary code and migrated onto an operating system that ‘answered all questions at once,’ then maybe it could have the potential to manipulate time or transcend the boundaries of time.

Sounds unlikely at this point, but one of the Internet’s greatest capabilities is the opportunity to share and develop ideas like these!

Conclusion Link

Responsible Evolution Link

Through technology, we hold the reins to our own evolution.

For the first time in history, it might be said that there are moral implications in the act of evolution. The Internet is an extension of our senses and our minds, and its progress is propelled by our own creative and intellectual efforts. The future of the Internet will be shaped by millions of choices and decisions by people from all walks of life. Designers and programmers like us have the advantage of technical skill and specialized knowledge. Given the increasing presence of the Internet in our lives, our choices can have deep reverberations in human society.

We’ll face small choices like what color to use for a button and larger choices like which platforms to endorse and which clients to support with our work. But the real questions form broad patterns behind every media trend and every mini technological revolution. Can we use technology to develop solutions to environmental problems — or will we abandon the natural world in favor of a digital one and the ‘web of things’? Have we fully considered what it means to merge biology and technology? And finally, do we really need a digital tracking device on our coffee machines?

What a thrilling time to be alive! Let’s proceed with great enthusiasm and a commitment to designing a future that is meaningful, peaceful, and staggeringly exciting.

Partial Bibliography Link

You may be interested in the following related posts:

Footnotes Link

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38

↑ Back to top Tweet itShare on Facebook


Dan Redding creates websites and print design at his studio, Magnetic State. Follow Dan on Twitter.

  1. 1

    I’ve never read something so distorted in my life. I’m upset i just wasted 5 minutes of my day on this…
    But, hopefully the author will take 5 minutes to read my comment, and then we will be even.

    False claim #1:
    proprietary products are safer than open source
    The truth : It is a poor assumption to say that there is a connection between proprietary software and security.

    Firefox = open source, and was wildly popular because it was very secure.
    Internet Explorer =Proprietary and incredibly buggy and historically has many security vulnerabilities .

    Friendly reminder, progress is driven by business and business models. And business is driven by offering quality to customers. And if consumers want secure products and secure internet experience, than thats what the great open source community will focus on ( and open source doesnt mean they dont make money, i.e. firefox was open source and free for consumers, but it still made incredible amount of money by making google its default search engine… that’s a winning model)

  2. 2

    Very well thought of Article and very informative. Thank you.

  3. 3

    Nicely put together article Dan. It must have spent a lot of time in the research phase for this one. Thanks for the great read. ^_^

  4. 4

    Nice article.
    Hope that the Internet will be accessible in the future :-)

  5. 5

    Rupnarayan Bhattacharya

    August 11, 2010 4:56 am

    Its really tough to say what will happen in future as new technologies are evolving everyday. We can only hope for the best.

  6. 6

    Have been watching Verizon & Google announcing their version of net neutrality this week. Thank you for giving an honest view on this subject. Its getting hard to decipher what a corporation like Google wants us to believe about “Net neutrality” and what reality is.

    • 7

      Thanks Josh. That complex subject could easily take up a post on its own. I basically just tried to summarize the issue so that readers might research further and make up their minds for themselves. Check out this scathing piece at Wired:

  7. 8

    The Internet is evolving. Technology is evolving. The world as we know it is evolving.

    William Bell
    Massive Dynamics

    • 9

      “Who will be man’s successor? To which the answer is: We are ourselves creating our own successors. Man will become to the machine what the horse and the dog are to the man; the conclusion being that machines are, or are becoming, animate.” -Samuel Butler, 1863 (four years after publication of Darwin’s ‘Origin of the Species’)

  8. 10

    These comments don’t encourage discussion, they’re comments for the sake of writing comments. Like this one. Long live the internet!

  9. 11

    I think the ‘open web’ vs ‘Apps’ thing is slightly misleading. For starters, 17 year olds were writing popular games on their proprietary home computers back in the early 80s, and some of them are writing iPhone and Android Apps now.

    Secondly, there seem to be a lot of people out there who object, in principle, to writing any software that consumes web services, but presents the data using non-web technologies. I think this is a bit of a mistake – it is viewing ‘the web’ as being synonymous with the browser and HTML – the presentation layer, when what is more important to innovation is having an underlying open data layer.

    The existence of Twitter client apps does not negate the Web in any way, unless companies actually start producing apps rather than sites. So far, I don’t see any sign of that.

    Basically, I think there is a lot of FUD coming from people who believe in the idea of a completely standardised computing environment, based on all software being delivered through the browser only. A lot of these people were advocating Java as achieving the same thing in the 90s. They see incompatibility as a problem to be solved, but the flipside of the same question has to be understanding why consumers choose particular systems.

    What is also interesting is that mobile Apps suggest that users actually prefer having different Apps for Facebook, Twitter, etc over browsing to web apps – even if the ‘Apps’ are actually implemented in web technologies.

  10. 12

    It is very misleading to claim that closed environments (such as xbox or ipad) cannot be exploited. is the author of this article not familiar with the iphone jailbreak website that uses a PDF exploit to jail break an iphone without any other necessary tools?

    • 13

      I believe the scenario presented is not the current state of lock down success, but rather the intended goal and what might become of it in the future.

      • 14

        A locked down approach will never be secure as it relies on a closed-source environment.

  11. 15

    I found this article really interesting and “scary” at the same time… I’m really excited and looking forward to experiencing the internet as it evolves, but at the same time, I have major concerns over malicious practices on the web.

    The “Wild West” metaphor describes the internet (in it’s current state) perfectly – Perhaps there could be a “Most Wanted” site for Cyber-Criminals, offering bounty’s for their capture? – Or am I just getting too carried away?

    Anyway, thanks for writing this article. I really enjoyed reading it. But I must say, I have to disagree with your statement “Let’s just pray it doesn’t have anything to do with The Matrix sequels, because those movies really sucked.” – I loved those movies, despite Keanu Reeves appalling acting!

  12. 16

    Interesting article. Lots of things are happening and its fun to speculate what it all means. Came across this article a few years ago:

    FAQ about the meaning of Life

  13. 17

    Pretty awesome article… I particularly like the humor included throughout, which really helps in reading an article of this length.

    “Personally, I’m hopeful that my browser will be able to produce piping hot cheeseburgers sometime soon.” – LOL

    As far as time travel through a non-linear solution… this still wouldn’t really solve the problem with calculation duration, as well as, there are reasons why it is a linear structure… cause and effects are the utensils of a reactive web. The further abstract a solution is, the more intensive of calculations per task is required.

  14. 18

    What about the content of the web? I think the type of content and information is transitioning as well. People are beginning to see the impracticality of “Top X lists” and beginning to gravitate to more useful advice.

    That is why I started where I share practical tips on user experience design. If you’re interested feel free to check it out.

  15. 19

    Great article! I actually think the future of the internet lies in the fact that commerce has gotten that more easier and innovative for all of us. Just look at what companies like DubLi, FourSquare and Twitter are doing to lead the way for us!

  16. 20

    Not one word of mention towards ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement)

    This is by far one of the most pressing issues regarding our freedom on the internet today. Not 50 or 100 years. This is being set in motion now.

  17. 21

    Aaron Blakeley

    August 11, 2010 11:09 am

    The death of net neutrality is a sad proposition indeed.

  18. 22

    Very interesting, well written article.

    Though, as a designer, I would just like to see web get to the point where there is pure creativity without the burden/limitations of writing clean code like a professional coder must in so many languages. Just as in print they used to have manual type/image setters with that now being achieved easily on robust layout software with direct to plate printing, my hope is that the internet has achieves that type fluidity and more (like high speed laser printing).

    I know this thinking makes me seem silly to some. I also know this kind of talk makes true web programmers upset and perhaps a bit scared (just like the typesetters of yesteryear) with thoughts of quality control and job security. One must ask though will not website creation progress towards ease of use to the user? Inventions just like the camera, the computer, the telephone, even the automobile had need, in their first years, of specially trained technicians in order for them to run at all, now most anyone doesn’t need much training to run well if not exceptionally well. As a trained designer I do know that things of this nature are abused by laymen (like photography). But I do hope that site development will go from 3 days/months to within the hour with all (if not more) of the robust features we enjoy now.

    Here’s hoping…

  19. 23

    The word “privacy” doesn’t come up a single time in the article. I think you are missing that development completely. Observation, government control, bank oversight over personal finances, credit ratings… all that has happened already (the financial crisis was only possible thanks to the internet) – so where do you think will THAT go?

  20. 24

    And what about the Semantic Web? :)


↑ Back to top